Supermaven ranks higher at 71/100 vs Lingma - Alibaba Cloud AI Coding Assistant at 46/100. Capability-level comparison backed by match graph evidence from real search data.
| Feature | Lingma - Alibaba Cloud AI Coding Assistant | Supermaven |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Extension | Extension |
| UnfragileRank | 46/100 | 71/100 |
| Adoption | 1 |
| 1 |
| Quality | 0 | 1 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Starting Price | — | $10/mo |
| Capabilities | 13 decomposed | 13 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Generates single-line and multi-line code suggestions as developers type, leveraging both current file context and cross-file project awareness to predict the next logical code segment. The system analyzes syntactic patterns and semantic relationships within the codebase to produce contextually relevant completions that respect existing code style and project conventions.
Unique: Explicitly advertises cross-file context awareness for code completion, suggesting architectural integration with project-wide AST or semantic analysis rather than single-file token prediction; Alibaba's training on 'vast repository of high-quality open-source code' implies specialized handling of common patterns across diverse codebases
vs alternatives: Differentiates from GitHub Copilot by emphasizing project environment awareness and multi-file context, though specific architectural advantages (e.g., indexing strategy, context window size) are undocumented
Generates complete function implementations from partial signatures, docstrings, or type hints by analyzing the surrounding code context and project patterns. The system infers intent from function names, parameter types, and return type annotations, then synthesizes a full implementation that aligns with the codebase's architectural patterns and coding style.
Unique: Explicitly separates function-level generation as a distinct capability from line-level completion, suggesting a multi-stage generation pipeline that may use different model configurations or prompting strategies for function-scope vs. token-scope predictions
vs alternatives: Offers function-level generation as a first-class feature alongside inline completion, whereas Copilot primarily focuses on line-level prediction; unclear whether this represents architectural depth or marketing differentiation
Integrates Alibaba Cloud authentication directly into the IDE extension, allowing developers to authenticate using Aliyun or Alibaba Cloud accounts without leaving the editor. The system manages credentials securely and handles token refresh automatically, supporting both individual developer accounts and enterprise RAM user credentials for team deployments.
Unique: Integrates Alibaba Cloud authentication natively into the IDE extension, supporting both individual accounts and enterprise RAM credentials; suggests secure credential storage and automatic token refresh mechanisms, though implementation details are undocumented
vs alternatives: Offers native IDE authentication vs. Copilot's GitHub-based authentication; supports enterprise RAM credentials for team deployments, providing organizational identity management advantages
Provides a dedicated, isolated deployment option for enterprises that require custom domain configuration, private network deployment, or air-gapped environments. The system allows organizations to host Lingma on their own infrastructure or Alibaba Cloud dedicated resources, with full control over data residency, network access, and service configuration.
Unique: Offers dedicated enterprise deployment as a distinct offering, suggesting architectural support for multi-tenancy, custom domain routing, and isolated infrastructure; however, deployment mechanisms and configuration options are completely undocumented
vs alternatives: Differentiates from Copilot by offering dedicated enterprise deployment with custom domain and data residency options; however, without documented deployment mechanisms or pricing, practical value for enterprises is unclear
Enables team collaboration by sharing code context, generation history, and AI suggestions across team members working on the same project. The system maintains shared project context and allows team members to build on each other's AI-assisted work, reducing duplication and ensuring consistency across the codebase.
Unique: Advertises 'seamless collaboration' as a capability, suggesting architectural support for shared context and team-aware code generation; however, no technical details are provided on how collaboration is implemented or synchronized
vs alternatives: unknown — insufficient data on collaboration mechanisms, real-time vs. asynchronous synchronization, or how this compares to other team-based coding tools
Automatically generates unit test cases for functions or classes by analyzing the implementation logic, parameter types, and return values to create test scenarios covering common cases, edge cases, and error conditions. The system infers test intent from the code under test and generates assertions that validate expected behavior.
Unique: Positions test generation as a distinct capability separate from code completion, suggesting a specialized model or prompt engineering approach for test scenario identification and assertion generation
vs alternatives: Offers dedicated test generation vs. Copilot's general-purpose completion; however, without documented test framework support or coverage metrics, competitive advantage is unclear
Provides an interactive chat interface within the IDE where developers can ask questions about code problems, debugging issues, runtime errors, and general development topics. The system accesses a knowledge base combining technical documentation, product manuals, and general development knowledge to provide contextual answers that reference the developer's current code and project environment.
Unique: Integrates a knowledge base combining technical documentation, product manuals, and general development knowledge into the IDE chat interface, suggesting a hybrid RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) approach that blends Alibaba's curated knowledge with LLM-based reasoning
vs alternatives: Differentiates from Copilot Chat by emphasizing knowledge base integration and documentation access; however, the specific knowledge sources and retrieval mechanisms are undocumented
Enables simultaneous modification across multiple files in response to a single user request, allowing developers to specify requirements or refactoring goals and have the AI apply coordinated changes across the codebase. The system understands project structure and dependencies to ensure changes are consistent and maintain code integrity across file boundaries.
Unique: Explicitly advertises multi-file editing as a distinct mode separate from inline completion, suggesting architectural support for dependency graph analysis and cross-file impact assessment; implies a more sophisticated code understanding system than single-file completion
vs alternatives: Offers coordinated multi-file editing as a first-class feature, whereas Copilot primarily operates on single files; however, the lack of documented validation or rollback mechanisms suggests this is a higher-risk capability requiring manual review
+5 more capabilities
Generates single-line and multi-line code suggestions in real-time as developers type, using semantic indexing of the entire codebase to retrieve relevant type definitions, function signatures, and contextual patterns. The system maintains a 1M token context window (Pro/Team tiers) that enables suggestions informed by distant code definitions and cross-file dependencies, constructed via local codebase semantic search rather than simple token-based recency. Suggestions adapt to detected coding style on Pro/Team tiers through implicit pattern learning from recent edits.
Unique: 1M token context window with codebase-wide semantic indexing enables suggestions informed by distant code definitions and cross-file patterns, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that typically use fixed context windows (4K-32K tokens) or file-local context. Claimed 250ms latency suggests optimized retrieval pipeline, though indexing mechanism and performance at scale remain undisclosed.
vs alternatives: Larger context window than GitHub Copilot (8K-32K tokens) and faster latency than unnamed competitors (250ms vs 783ms claimed), enabling suggestions on large codebases with minimal typing delay; trade-off is cloud dependency and undisclosed free tier limitations.
Provides a separate chat interface supporting multiple LLM backends (GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, GPT-4, others) for conversational code assistance. Users attach files, reference recent edits, and trigger compiler diagnostic uploads; the system generates diffs and applies code changes directly to the editor. Model selection is per-conversation, and $5/month in credits (included in Pro/Team) covers external model API costs; overage pricing is undisclosed. Hotkey-driven workflow enables rapid context switching between inline completion and chat.
Unique: Multi-model chat interface with per-conversation model selection and integrated diff application, combined with compiler diagnostic auto-upload. Unlike Copilot Chat (single model per tier) or standalone ChatGPT, Supermaven Chat unifies multiple LLM backends in a single hotkey-driven workflow with direct editor integration for change application.
Supermaven scores higher at 71/100 vs Lingma - Alibaba Cloud AI Coding Assistant at 46/100. Lingma - Alibaba Cloud AI Coding Assistant leads on adoption and ecosystem, while Supermaven is stronger on quality.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
vs alternatives: Supports multiple LLM backends (GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet) in one interface with included credits, whereas GitHub Copilot Chat is single-model per tier and requires separate ChatGPT subscription for model switching; trade-off is credit limits and unknown overage pricing.
Supermaven Chat can automatically upload compiler diagnostic messages (errors, warnings) alongside code context to provide error-aware suggestions and fixes. The mechanism is described as 'automatically uploading your code together with compiler diagnostic messages,' but specific language/compiler support and the upload trigger mechanism are undisclosed. This feature is Chat-only and not available in inline completion.
Unique: Automatic compiler diagnostic upload in Chat for error-aware suggestions, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that require manual error context or have limited diagnostic integration. Supermaven's approach reduces friction but with undisclosed language/compiler support.
vs alternatives: Automatic diagnostic upload reduces manual context-gathering compared to manual copy-paste; trade-off is undisclosed language support and unclear upload trigger mechanism.
Supermaven offers a 30-day free trial of the Pro tier ($10/month), providing full access to 1M token context window, largest model, style adaptation, and $5/month chat credits. No credit card is required to start the trial (implied), and trial conversion to paid is automatic after 30 days unless cancelled. Trial terms and auto-renewal policy are not explicitly detailed.
Unique: 30-day free trial of Pro tier with full feature access (1M context, largest model, chat credits), versus competitors (Copilot 2-month free trial, Tabnine free tier only) with different trial lengths and feature access. Supermaven's approach is generous but with undisclosed auto-renewal terms.
vs alternatives: Full Pro feature access during trial compared to limited free tier; trade-off is undisclosed auto-renewal policy and potential unexpected charges if not cancelled.
Supermaven requires internet connectivity and server-side inference; no offline mode or local inference capability is mentioned or available. All code completion requests are sent to Supermaven's backend servers for processing, and responses are returned over the network. This creates a hard dependency on network connectivity and Supermaven's service availability; if the service is down or network is unavailable, code completion is not available.
Unique: Supermaven has no offline mode or local inference capability; all processing is server-side. GitHub Copilot also requires server-side inference, but Tabnine offers local inference options for some use cases. Supermaven's lack of offline capability is a significant limitation for developers with connectivity constraints.
vs alternatives: Supermaven's server-side-only approach is comparable to GitHub Copilot; Tabnine offers local inference options, making Tabnine more suitable for offline work. Supermaven's lack of offline capability is a weakness vs. Tabnine.
Analyzes recent code edits and inferred coding patterns to adapt inline suggestions to match team conventions, naming patterns, and structural preferences. The mechanism is implicit (not explicit fine-tuning) and operates only on Pro/Team tiers, suggesting pattern learning from editor activity rather than explicit configuration. Free tier uses a single base model without personalization.
Unique: Implicit style adaptation via editor activity analysis without explicit configuration, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that require manual style guides or explicit fine-tuning. Supermaven's approach is transparent to the user but also non-configurable and undisclosed in mechanism.
vs alternatives: Requires no manual style configuration compared to tools requiring explicit style guides; trade-off is lack of transparency and inability to control or export learned styles.
Delivers code suggestions to the editor inline as the developer types, with a claimed baseline latency of 250ms from keystroke to suggestion display. The system uses a cloud inference backend and local editor plugin to minimize round-trip time. Latency claim is positioned against an unnamed competitor (783ms), but methodology is undisclosed and no independent verification is provided.
Unique: Claimed 250ms latency via optimized cloud inference pipeline and editor plugin architecture, versus competitors with higher latency (783ms unnamed baseline). Actual differentiation is undisclosed; mechanism may involve request batching, model quantization, or edge caching, but specifics are not public.
vs alternatives: Faster than unnamed competitor (250ms vs 783ms claimed); trade-off is cloud dependency and unverified latency claim with no SLA or performance guarantee.
Provides native editor extensions for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs (IntelliJ IDEA, PyCharm, WebStorm, etc.), and Neovim, enabling inline suggestion rendering, hotkey-driven chat access, and compiler diagnostic integration directly within the editor. Each plugin variant is maintained separately and integrates with the editor's native autocomplete UI, keybinding system, and file context APIs.
Unique: Native plugins for three major editor ecosystems (VS Code, JetBrains, Neovim) with integrated chat and diff application, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that support broader editor ecosystems but with less deep integration in some cases. Supermaven's approach prioritizes depth over breadth.
vs alternatives: Deep integration with VS Code and JetBrains (native autocomplete UI, hotkey system) compared to web-based tools or lighter integrations; trade-off is limited editor support (no Sublime, Vim, Emacs) and undisclosed Neovim support details.
+5 more capabilities