| Ecosystem | 1 | 1 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 14 decomposed | 12 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
FastGPT provides a drag-and-drop workflow editor that compiles visual node graphs into a directed acyclic graph (DAG) executed server-side with streaming support. The system resolves variable dependencies across nodes, supports branching logic, pause-resume semantics for interactive workflows, and child workflow composition. Each node type (AI, HTTP, dataset query, etc.) has a standardized execution interface that handles both synchronous and asynchronous operations with real-time streaming of intermediate results back to the client.
Unique: Implements a full-stack visual workflow system with server-side DAG execution, variable resolution engine, and streaming response propagation — not just a client-side canvas. Supports interactive pause-resume workflows and child workflow composition, enabling complex multi-tenant AI applications without custom backend code.
vs alternatives: Faster to prototype than Zapier/Make for AI-specific workflows because nodes are purpose-built for LLM integration (streaming, token counting, model selection) rather than generic HTTP connectors.
FastGPT abstracts LLM provider APIs (OpenAI, Anthropic, Qwen, DeepSeek, Ollama, etc.) behind a unified request interface that handles model selection, streaming response aggregation, token counting, and cost tracking. The system normalizes chat message formats across providers, manages API key rotation, implements retry logic with exponential backoff, and streams partial responses to clients in real-time. Token usage is tracked per request and aggregated for billing/analytics.
Unique: Implements a provider abstraction layer with unified streaming, token accounting, and cost tracking across 8+ LLM providers — not just a simple API wrapper. Handles provider-specific quirks (message format differences, token counting methods, streaming chunk boundaries) transparently.
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than LiteLLM because it includes built-in token accounting, cost tracking, and workflow-level integration rather than just API normalization.
FastGPT provides Docker images and Kubernetes manifests (Helm charts) for containerized deployment, with comprehensive environment variable configuration for all components (backend, frontend, vector DB, etc.). The system includes health checks, resource limits, and scaling policies. Deployment documentation covers single-container setups, multi-replica production deployments, and cloud-specific configurations (AWS, GCP, Azure). Environment variables control feature flags, database connections, and LLM provider credentials.
Unique: Provides production-ready Docker images and Helm charts with comprehensive environment configuration and scaling policies — not just basic Dockerfiles. Includes health checks, resource limits, and multi-replica deployment support.
vs alternatives: More production-ready than basic Docker setup because it includes Helm charts, health checks, and scaling policies; more flexible than managed platforms because it supports self-hosted Kubernetes deployments.
FastGPT includes an observability SDK that collects structured logs, traces, and metrics from all components (workflows, LLM calls, database operations, etc.). The system integrates with popular observability platforms (Datadog, New Relic, Prometheus) via standard protocols (OpenTelemetry). Logs include request IDs for tracing across services, structured fields for filtering/searching, and configurable log levels. Metrics cover latency, error rates, token usage, and cost tracking.
Unique: Implements comprehensive observability with structured logging, metrics, and tracing integrated into the platform — not just basic logging. Supports multiple observability platforms via OpenTelemetry and includes cost tracking for LLM usage.
vs alternatives: More integrated than adding observability libraries to code because it's built into the platform; more comprehensive than basic logging because it includes metrics, tracing, and cost tracking.
FastGPT provides a testing framework that allows users to create test cases for workflows, run them against different model configurations, and track metrics like accuracy, latency, and cost. The system supports batch testing with result comparison, A/B testing between workflow versions, and metric aggregation across test runs. Test results are stored with full execution logs for debugging. The framework integrates with the workflow editor for easy test creation and execution.
Unique: Provides integrated testing and evaluation framework with metric tracking and A/B testing support — not just manual testing. Integrates with workflow editor for easy test creation and execution.
vs alternatives: More integrated than external testing tools because it's built into the platform; more comprehensive than basic test runners because it includes metric tracking and A/B testing.
FastGPT supports publishing workflows as reusable plugins that can be shared with other users or teams via a built-in marketplace. Plugins can be simple workflows or complex tools with custom UI. The system handles plugin versioning, dependency management, and installation. Users can browse available plugins, install them with one click, and customize them for their use case. Plugin authors can monetize their work via the marketplace.
Unique: Provides a built-in marketplace for sharing and discovering workflows as plugins with versioning and monetization support — not just export/import. Enables community-driven ecosystem of reusable workflows.
vs alternatives: More integrated than external plugin systems because it's built into the platform; more discoverable than GitHub-based sharing because plugins are searchable in the marketplace.
FastGPT implements a multi-stage retrieval pipeline that converts documents into embeddings, stores them in vector databases, and retrieves relevant chunks via semantic similarity search combined with BM25 keyword matching. The system supports hierarchical dataset organization, configurable chunk size and overlap, multiple embedding models, and re-ranking of results before passing to LLMs. Retrieved context is automatically injected into chat prompts with source attribution and confidence scores.
Unique: Combines semantic search with BM25 keyword matching and optional re-ranking in a single retrieval pipeline, with automatic chunk management and hierarchical dataset organization. Integrates directly into workflow nodes for seamless context injection into LLM prompts.
vs alternatives: More integrated than standalone RAG libraries (LangChain, LlamaIndex) because retrieval is a first-class workflow node with built-in chunk management, re-ranking, and source attribution rather than a library you compose yourself.
FastGPT provides a data pipeline that ingests documents in multiple formats (PDF, DOCX, TXT, Markdown, JSON, CSV), automatically chunks them with configurable size/overlap, generates embeddings, and stores chunks in vector databases with metadata. The system supports incremental updates (add/delete chunks without re-processing entire dataset), batch processing with progress tracking, and automatic format detection. Chunks are versioned and linked to source documents for traceability.
Unique: Implements end-to-end data pipeline with automatic format detection, configurable chunking, incremental updates, and version tracking — not just a simple file upload handler. Integrates with multiple vector databases and embedding providers without requiring custom code.
vs alternatives: More user-friendly than raw vector DB SDKs because it handles format conversion, chunking strategy, and metadata management automatically; faster than manual preprocessing because batch operations are optimized for throughput.
+6 more capabilities
Crawls 11+ heterogeneous platforms (Zhihu, Weibo, Bilibili, Twitter, Reddit, HackerNews, etc.) and RSS feeds using platform-specific scrapers, normalizes disparate data schemas into a unified NewsItem model, and deduplicates content across sources using fuzzy title matching and URL canonicalization. The system maintains platform-specific metadata (rank, heat value, engagement metrics) while presenting a single normalized feed, enabling cross-platform trend detection that would be invisible within individual platform silos.
Unique: Implements platform-specific crawler modules with unified NewsItem schema and fuzzy deduplication across 11+ heterogeneous sources (Chinese + international), rather than relying on single-platform APIs or generic RSS parsing. Maintains platform-specific metadata (rank × 0.6 + frequency × 0.3 + platform hot value × 0.1) for weighted hotspot scoring.
vs alternatives: Covers more platforms (especially Chinese social media) with deeper metadata extraction than generic RSS aggregators, and provides unified deduplication across sources unlike single-platform monitoring tools.
Implements a multi-stage filtering pipeline that matches news items against user-defined keywords using regex patterns, required word lists, and excluded word lists. The system applies frequency-based scoring (keyword occurrence count) combined with platform hotspot weights to rank filtered results. Configuration is stored in frequency_words.txt with support for regex patterns, AND/OR/NOT boolean operators, and per-keyword weighting. Filtering occurs at collection time (reducing storage) and again at report generation time (enabling dynamic reconfiguration without re-crawling).
Unique: Combines regex pattern matching with frequency-based scoring and platform hotspot weighting (rank × 0.6 + frequency × 0.3 + platform hot value × 0.1) in a two-stage pipeline (collection-time and report-time filtering). Supports dynamic reconfiguration without re-crawling by applying filters at report generation.
TrendRadar scores higher at 58/100 vs FastGPT at 42/100. FastGPT leads on quality, while TrendRadar is stronger on adoption and ecosystem.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
vs alternatives: More flexible than simple keyword matching (supports regex and boolean logic) and more efficient than semantic filtering (no LLM overhead), making it suitable for real-time filtering at scale.
Detects newly emerged topics by comparing current crawl results against historical data stored in the system. Topics are marked as 🆕 (new) if they appear for the first time in the current crawl or if their hotspot rank increased significantly compared to previous crawls. The system tracks topic emergence velocity (how quickly a topic rises in rankings) and flags topics with unusual acceleration. New topic detection is performed at report generation time, enabling dynamic detection without re-crawling. The system maintains a historical hotspot index for comparison.
Unique: Detects new topics by comparing current hotspot rankings against historical data, marking topics with significant rank increases as 🆕. Tracks emergence velocity to distinguish breaking news from sustained trends.
vs alternatives: More efficient than semantic similarity detection (no LLM overhead) and more accurate than simple first-appearance detection (accounts for re-emerging topics), but requires historical baseline data.
Provides a web-based UI for editing TrendRadar configuration files (config.yaml, frequency_words.txt, timeline.yaml) with real-time validation and preview. The editor supports: (1) syntax highlighting for YAML and regex, (2) validation of keyword patterns (regex compilation check), (3) preview of filtered results based on current keyword configuration, (4) drag-and-drop channel configuration, (5) schedule preview (shows next 10 execution times). Changes are validated before saving, preventing configuration errors. The editor is optional; users can edit config files directly.
Unique: Provides web-based configuration editor with real-time validation, regex preview, and schedule visualization. Enables non-technical users to configure TrendRadar without editing YAML files.
vs alternatives: More user-friendly than manual YAML editing and provides validation feedback, but adds operational complexity compared to file-based configuration.
Integrates LiteLLM to provide vendor-agnostic AI analysis and summarization of filtered news items. Users configure their preferred LLM provider (OpenAI, Anthropic, Ollama, local models, etc.) once in config.yaml, and the system automatically routes analysis requests to that provider. The AI analysis capability includes: (1) automated summarization of long articles into key points, (2) sentiment analysis (positive/negative/neutral), (3) trend prediction based on historical patterns, and (4) custom analysis prompts. Analysis results are cached to avoid redundant API calls and can be pushed directly to notification channels.
Unique: Uses LiteLLM abstraction layer to support any LLM provider (OpenAI, Anthropic, Ollama, local models) with single configuration, enabling provider switching without code changes. Caches analysis results to reduce redundant API calls and costs.
vs alternatives: More flexible than hardcoded OpenAI integration (supports any LiteLLM provider) and cheaper than dedicated sentiment analysis APIs (can use local models), but slower than rule-based sentiment analysis.
Leverages LiteLLM to translate news content from source languages (primarily Chinese) to target languages (English, etc.) on-demand. The system detects source language automatically (via langdetect or similar), caches translations to avoid re-translating identical content, and batches translation requests to reduce API calls. Translations are stored alongside original content, enabling bilingual reports and multi-language notification delivery. Translation can be triggered at collection time (all news) or report time (only filtered news).
Unique: Implements provider-agnostic translation via LiteLLM with automatic language detection, content-based caching, and batch request optimization. Stores translations alongside originals for bilingual report generation.
vs alternatives: More flexible than dedicated translation APIs (supports any LiteLLM provider) and cheaper than commercial translation services when using local models, but slower than specialized translation APIs.
Implements a notification abstraction layer supporting 9+ delivery channels (WeChat, WeWork, Feishu, Telegram, Email, ntfy, Bark, Slack, etc.). Each channel has a provider-specific formatter that converts normalized news items into channel-appropriate messages (e.g., WeChat card format, Telegram markdown, email HTML). The system batches notifications atomically—all news items for a report are sent as a single batch to each channel, ensuring consistency and reducing API calls. Message formatting respects channel constraints (character limits, attachment limits, etc.) and supports templating for customization.
Unique: Implements atomic message batching across 9+ heterogeneous channels with provider-specific formatters and constraint-aware truncation. Single configuration enables simultaneous delivery to WeChat, WeWork, Feishu, Telegram, Email, ntfy, Bark, Slack, etc. without code changes.
vs alternatives: Supports more channels (especially Chinese platforms like WeWork, Feishu) than generic notification services, and batching reduces API calls and spam compared to per-item notifications.
Exposes TrendRadar's data and analysis capabilities as an MCP server, enabling AI agents and LLM applications to query trends, perform analysis, and generate insights through natural language. The MCP server implements tools for: (1) querying filtered news by keyword/date/platform, (2) retrieving trend statistics and hotspot rankings, (3) running custom analysis on news subsets, (4) generating reports in various formats. Clients (Claude, other LLM agents) can invoke these tools via MCP protocol, enabling conversational exploration of trends without direct database access. The server maintains state across multiple requests, allowing multi-turn conversations about trends.
Unique: Implements full MCP server exposing trend data and analysis tools to LLM agents, enabling conversational queries and multi-turn analysis workflows. Maintains state across requests and supports complex tool invocations (filtering, analysis, report generation).
vs alternatives: Enables conversational access to trends (vs. API-only access) and integrates with LLM agent workflows (vs. standalone tools), but adds operational complexity compared to simple REST APIs.
+4 more capabilities