| Ecosystem |
| 1 |
| 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Paid |
| Capabilities | 14 decomposed | 13 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
FastGPT provides a drag-and-drop workflow editor that compiles visual node graphs into a directed acyclic graph (DAG) executed server-side with streaming support. The system resolves variable dependencies across nodes, supports branching logic, pause-resume semantics for interactive workflows, and child workflow composition. Each node type (AI, HTTP, dataset query, etc.) has a standardized execution interface that handles both synchronous and asynchronous operations with real-time streaming of intermediate results back to the client.
Unique: Implements a full-stack visual workflow system with server-side DAG execution, variable resolution engine, and streaming response propagation — not just a client-side canvas. Supports interactive pause-resume workflows and child workflow composition, enabling complex multi-tenant AI applications without custom backend code.
vs alternatives: Faster to prototype than Zapier/Make for AI-specific workflows because nodes are purpose-built for LLM integration (streaming, token counting, model selection) rather than generic HTTP connectors.
FastGPT abstracts LLM provider APIs (OpenAI, Anthropic, Qwen, DeepSeek, Ollama, etc.) behind a unified request interface that handles model selection, streaming response aggregation, token counting, and cost tracking. The system normalizes chat message formats across providers, manages API key rotation, implements retry logic with exponential backoff, and streams partial responses to clients in real-time. Token usage is tracked per request and aggregated for billing/analytics.
Unique: Implements a provider abstraction layer with unified streaming, token accounting, and cost tracking across 8+ LLM providers — not just a simple API wrapper. Handles provider-specific quirks (message format differences, token counting methods, streaming chunk boundaries) transparently.
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than LiteLLM because it includes built-in token accounting, cost tracking, and workflow-level integration rather than just API normalization.
FastGPT provides Docker images and Kubernetes manifests (Helm charts) for containerized deployment, with comprehensive environment variable configuration for all components (backend, frontend, vector DB, etc.). The system includes health checks, resource limits, and scaling policies. Deployment documentation covers single-container setups, multi-replica production deployments, and cloud-specific configurations (AWS, GCP, Azure). Environment variables control feature flags, database connections, and LLM provider credentials.
Unique: Provides production-ready Docker images and Helm charts with comprehensive environment configuration and scaling policies — not just basic Dockerfiles. Includes health checks, resource limits, and multi-replica deployment support.
vs alternatives: More production-ready than basic Docker setup because it includes Helm charts, health checks, and scaling policies; more flexible than managed platforms because it supports self-hosted Kubernetes deployments.
FastGPT includes an observability SDK that collects structured logs, traces, and metrics from all components (workflows, LLM calls, database operations, etc.). The system integrates with popular observability platforms (Datadog, New Relic, Prometheus) via standard protocols (OpenTelemetry). Logs include request IDs for tracing across services, structured fields for filtering/searching, and configurable log levels. Metrics cover latency, error rates, token usage, and cost tracking.
Unique: Implements comprehensive observability with structured logging, metrics, and tracing integrated into the platform — not just basic logging. Supports multiple observability platforms via OpenTelemetry and includes cost tracking for LLM usage.
vs alternatives: More integrated than adding observability libraries to code because it's built into the platform; more comprehensive than basic logging because it includes metrics, tracing, and cost tracking.
FastGPT provides a testing framework that allows users to create test cases for workflows, run them against different model configurations, and track metrics like accuracy, latency, and cost. The system supports batch testing with result comparison, A/B testing between workflow versions, and metric aggregation across test runs. Test results are stored with full execution logs for debugging. The framework integrates with the workflow editor for easy test creation and execution.
Unique: Provides integrated testing and evaluation framework with metric tracking and A/B testing support — not just manual testing. Integrates with workflow editor for easy test creation and execution.
vs alternatives: More integrated than external testing tools because it's built into the platform; more comprehensive than basic test runners because it includes metric tracking and A/B testing.
FastGPT supports publishing workflows as reusable plugins that can be shared with other users or teams via a built-in marketplace. Plugins can be simple workflows or complex tools with custom UI. The system handles plugin versioning, dependency management, and installation. Users can browse available plugins, install them with one click, and customize them for their use case. Plugin authors can monetize their work via the marketplace.
Unique: Provides a built-in marketplace for sharing and discovering workflows as plugins with versioning and monetization support — not just export/import. Enables community-driven ecosystem of reusable workflows.
vs alternatives: More integrated than external plugin systems because it's built into the platform; more discoverable than GitHub-based sharing because plugins are searchable in the marketplace.
FastGPT implements a multi-stage retrieval pipeline that converts documents into embeddings, stores them in vector databases, and retrieves relevant chunks via semantic similarity search combined with BM25 keyword matching. The system supports hierarchical dataset organization, configurable chunk size and overlap, multiple embedding models, and re-ranking of results before passing to LLMs. Retrieved context is automatically injected into chat prompts with source attribution and confidence scores.
Unique: Combines semantic search with BM25 keyword matching and optional re-ranking in a single retrieval pipeline, with automatic chunk management and hierarchical dataset organization. Integrates directly into workflow nodes for seamless context injection into LLM prompts.
vs alternatives: More integrated than standalone RAG libraries (LangChain, LlamaIndex) because retrieval is a first-class workflow node with built-in chunk management, re-ranking, and source attribution rather than a library you compose yourself.
FastGPT provides a data pipeline that ingests documents in multiple formats (PDF, DOCX, TXT, Markdown, JSON, CSV), automatically chunks them with configurable size/overlap, generates embeddings, and stores chunks in vector databases with metadata. The system supports incremental updates (add/delete chunks without re-processing entire dataset), batch processing with progress tracking, and automatic format detection. Chunks are versioned and linked to source documents for traceability.
Unique: Implements end-to-end data pipeline with automatic format detection, configurable chunking, incremental updates, and version tracking — not just a simple file upload handler. Integrates with multiple vector databases and embedding providers without requiring custom code.
vs alternatives: More user-friendly than raw vector DB SDKs because it handles format conversion, chunking strategy, and metadata management automatically; faster than manual preprocessing because batch operations are optimized for throughput.
+6 more capabilities
LangChain provides a Chain abstraction that sequences LLM calls, prompt templates, and tool invocations into directed acyclic graphs (DAGs). Chains support sequential execution (SequentialChain), conditional branching (RouterChain), and parallel execution patterns. The framework uses a Runnable interface that standardizes input/output contracts across all chain components, enabling composition via pipe operators and method chaining. This allows developers to build complex multi-step workflows without managing state manually.
Unique: Uses a unified Runnable interface across all components (LLMs, tools, retrievers, parsers) enabling composability via pipe operators, unlike frameworks that require separate orchestration layers for different component types. Supports both sync and async execution with identical code paths.
vs alternatives: More flexible than simple prompt chaining (like OpenAI's function calling alone) because it abstracts orchestration logic, making chains reusable and testable; simpler than full workflow engines (Airflow, Prefect) because it's optimized for LLM-specific patterns rather than general data pipelines.
LangChain's PromptTemplate class provides structured prompt engineering with variable placeholders, automatic validation, and support for few-shot learning patterns. Templates use Jinja2-style syntax for variable substitution and support dynamic example selection via ExampleSelector. The framework includes specialized templates (ChatPromptTemplate for multi-turn conversations, FewShotPromptTemplate for in-context learning) that handle formatting differences across LLM types. This enables prompt reusability, version control, and systematic experimentation without string concatenation.
Unique: Provides first-class abstractions for few-shot learning (FewShotPromptTemplate) with pluggable ExampleSelector strategies, enabling dynamic example selection based on input similarity without requiring developers to implement selection logic. Separates system prompts, conversation history, and user input in ChatPromptTemplate, making multi-turn conversations composable.
FastGPT scores higher at 42/100 vs LangChain at 41/100. FastGPT also has a free tier, making it more accessible.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
vs alternatives: More structured than manual string formatting because it validates variable names and supports semantic example selection; more specialized than generic templating engines (Jinja2) because it understands LLM-specific patterns like chat message roles and few-shot formatting.
LangChain abstracts function calling across LLM providers by converting Python functions or Pydantic models into provider-specific schemas (OpenAI function_call, Anthropic tool_use, etc.). The framework automatically generates schemas, handles argument parsing, and routes calls to the correct provider. Developers define functions once and LangChain handles provider-specific formatting. This enables tool use without learning each provider's function calling API.
Unique: Automatically converts Python functions and Pydantic models into provider-specific function calling schemas (OpenAI, Anthropic, Cohere, etc.) and handles parsing and routing transparently. Developers define tools once and LangChain handles provider-specific formatting and execution.
vs alternatives: More portable than using provider SDKs directly because function definitions are provider-agnostic; more automated than manual schema management because schemas are generated from function signatures.
LangChain supports streaming LLM output at token granularity, enabling real-time user feedback as tokens are generated. The framework provides streaming iterators and async generators that yield tokens as they arrive from the LLM. Streaming is integrated into chains and agents, so developers can stream output from complex workflows without special handling. This enables responsive user experiences where output appears in real-time rather than waiting for full completion.
Unique: Integrates streaming at the framework level so chains and agents can stream output transparently without special handling. Provides both sync and async streaming iterators and handles provider-specific streaming formats uniformly.
vs alternatives: More integrated than provider-specific streaming APIs because streaming works across chains and agents; more responsive than buffering full output because tokens appear in real-time.
LangChain provides async/await support throughout the framework, enabling concurrent execution of LLM calls, chains, and agents. All major components (LLMs, chains, retrievers, agents) have async variants (e.g., arun() alongside run()). The framework uses asyncio for Python and native async/await for Node.js. This enables high-concurrency applications that can handle multiple requests simultaneously without blocking. Async execution is transparent; developers write the same code as sync but use async/await syntax.
Unique: Provides async/await support throughout the framework with parallel async implementations of all major components. Enables transparent concurrent execution without requiring developers to manage thread pools or explicit parallelization.
vs alternatives: More integrated than manual async management because async is built into the framework; more scalable than sync-only implementations because it enables handling multiple concurrent requests.
LangChain abstracts LLM APIs behind a common BaseLanguageModel interface, supporting OpenAI, Anthropic, Cohere, Hugging Face, Ollama, and 20+ other providers. The abstraction handles provider-specific details: token counting, streaming, function calling schemas, and cost tracking. Developers write LLM-agnostic code and swap providers via configuration. The framework includes built-in retry logic, rate limiting, and fallback chains for reliability. This enables portability and cost optimization without rewriting application logic.
Unique: Implements a unified BaseLanguageModel interface that abstracts away provider differences in token counting, streaming protocols, and function calling schemas. Includes built-in retry policies, rate limiting, and cost tracking at the framework level rather than requiring developers to implement these separately for each provider.
vs alternatives: More portable than using provider SDKs directly because swapping providers requires only configuration changes; more comprehensive than simple wrapper libraries because it handles streaming, retries, and cost tracking uniformly across 20+ providers.
LangChain provides a Retriever abstraction that enables RAG by connecting LLMs to external knowledge sources. The framework supports multiple retrieval strategies: vector similarity search (via VectorStore), BM25 keyword search, hybrid search, and custom retrievers. Documents are chunked, embedded, and stored in vector databases (Pinecone, Weaviate, Chroma, FAISS, etc.). The RetrievalQA chain automatically retrieves relevant documents and passes them as context to the LLM. This enables LLMs to answer questions grounded in custom data without fine-tuning.
Unique: Provides a unified Retriever interface that abstracts different retrieval strategies (vector, keyword, hybrid, custom) and integrates seamlessly with LLM chains via RetrievalQA. Includes built-in document loaders for 50+ formats (PDF, HTML, Markdown, code files) and automatic chunking strategies, reducing boilerplate for document ingestion.
vs alternatives: More integrated than building RAG from scratch because document loading, chunking, embedding, and retrieval are unified in one framework; more flexible than specialized RAG platforms (Pinecone, Weaviate) because it supports multiple vector stores and custom retrieval logic.
LangChain's Agent abstraction enables autonomous task execution by combining LLMs with tools (functions, APIs, retrievers). The agent uses an action-observation loop: the LLM decides which tool to call based on the task, executes the tool, observes the result, and repeats until the task is complete. Agents support multiple reasoning strategies: ReAct (reasoning + acting), chain-of-thought, and tool-use patterns. The framework handles tool schema generation, argument parsing, and error recovery. This enables building autonomous systems that can decompose complex tasks without explicit step-by-step instructions.
Unique: Implements a generalized Agent interface that supports multiple reasoning strategies (ReAct, chain-of-thought, tool-use) and automatically handles tool schema generation, argument parsing, and error recovery. The action-observation loop is abstracted, allowing developers to focus on defining tools rather than implementing agent logic.
vs alternatives: More flexible than simple function calling (OpenAI's tool_choice) because it implements multi-step reasoning and tool sequencing; more accessible than building agents from scratch because it handles schema generation, parsing, and error recovery automatically.
+5 more capabilities