Supermaven ranks higher at 71/100 vs Kombai - The AI Agent Built for Frontend at 39/100. Capability-level comparison backed by match graph evidence from real search data.
| Feature | Kombai - The AI Agent Built for Frontend | Supermaven |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Extension | Extension |
| UnfragileRank | 39/100 | 71/100 |
| Adoption | 1 |
| 1 |
| Quality | 0 | 1 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Starting Price | — | $10/mo |
| Capabilities | 9 decomposed | 13 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Converts Figma design files, screenshots, or text descriptions into functional frontend code by extracting visual assets and layout information from Figma via MCP integration, then generating corresponding component code. Users can select specific DOM elements or screen snippets to provide pinpoint conversion instructions, enabling high-fidelity design-to-code workflows without manual asset extraction or layout specification.
Unique: Integrates Figma MCP connector for direct design asset extraction combined with DOM element targeting, allowing developers to select specific UI regions and generate code for just those elements rather than entire designs — a more granular approach than typical design-to-code tools that convert entire mockups at once.
vs alternatives: Offers tighter Figma integration via MCP than generic code-generation tools, with the ability to target specific DOM elements for surgical code generation rather than full-page conversion.
Generates new frontend components, features, or improvements by analyzing existing codebase patterns, component libraries, theme definitions, and architectural conventions. The agent builds a 'dev-like understanding' of the repository structure and automatically reuses existing components, styling patterns, and naming conventions across generated code, ensuring consistency with the project's established patterns without requiring explicit style guides.
Unique: Implements automatic pattern extraction and reuse by analyzing the full codebase context rather than relying on user-provided style guides or configuration files. The agent learns component conventions, theming approaches, and architectural patterns implicitly from existing code, enabling zero-configuration consistency across generated components.
vs alternatives: Outperforms generic code generators by automatically inferring and reusing project-specific patterns without requiring explicit configuration, reducing the need for manual post-generation refactoring to match codebase conventions.
Generates frontend code across diverse technology stacks (React, Vue, Svelte, Angular, etc.) with built-in knowledge of 400+ frontend libraries, frameworks, and dependencies. The agent includes embedded documentation and best practices for popular libraries, enabling it to generate idiomatic code that follows framework conventions and library APIs without requiring external documentation lookups or manual API reference checking.
Unique: Embeds comprehensive knowledge of 400+ frontend libraries with built-in best practices and API documentation rather than relying on external documentation or requiring users to specify library patterns. This enables single-prompt generation across different stacks without context switching or manual API lookups.
vs alternatives: Broader library coverage than generic code generators, with embedded best practices reducing the need for manual code review and refactoring to match library conventions and idiomatic patterns.
Executes frontend tests and tasks autonomously by controlling a browser instance, inspecting DOM elements, interacting with the application UI, and validating test results. The agent can navigate to local development servers, interact with components, capture screenshots, and execute test suites without manual intervention, enabling end-to-end testing workflows and validation of generated code.
Unique: Provides autonomous browser-based task execution integrated directly into the VS Code workflow, allowing the agent to validate generated code by actually running it in a browser environment rather than relying on static code analysis or manual testing.
vs alternatives: Enables validation of generated frontend code through actual browser execution rather than just code generation, reducing the gap between generated code and working implementations.
Refactors existing frontend code while preserving the project's architectural patterns, component structure, and styling conventions. The agent analyzes the codebase to understand existing patterns and applies refactoring transformations that maintain consistency with the project's established conventions, enabling large-scale refactoring without introducing architectural inconsistencies.
Unique: Refactoring is pattern-aware, analyzing the codebase to understand and preserve architectural conventions rather than applying generic refactoring rules. This enables large-scale refactoring while maintaining consistency with project-specific patterns.
vs alternatives: Outperforms generic refactoring tools by understanding project-specific patterns and ensuring refactored code maintains consistency with existing conventions, reducing post-refactoring cleanup and architectural drift.
Improves frontend user experience by analyzing existing components and suggesting or implementing enhancements to theme consistency, layout responsiveness, animations, and visual polish. The agent can modify styling, add animations, improve responsive design, and enhance visual hierarchy while maintaining consistency with the project's design system and existing patterns.
Unique: Provides autonomous UX enhancement by analyzing existing components and suggesting improvements to animations, layout, and theme consistency without requiring explicit design specifications or manual iteration.
vs alternatives: Enables non-designers to improve UX through autonomous suggestions and implementations, reducing the need for design review cycles and enabling rapid UX iteration.
Allows developers to define their project's technology stack in structured format, which the agent then automatically follows across all generated code and refactoring tasks. The extension maintains 'structured memory' of the tech stack configuration, ensuring that all generated code adheres to the specified frameworks, libraries, styling approaches, and architectural patterns without requiring per-task specification.
Unique: Implements persistent tech stack memory that automatically applies to all code generation and refactoring tasks, eliminating the need to specify framework, library, and architectural choices for each task. This is a form of structured context management specific to frontend development.
vs alternatives: Reduces cognitive load and ensures consistency by defining tech stack once and having it automatically applied across all tasks, versus generic code generators requiring per-task specification of frameworks and libraries.
Provides compatibility with multiple AI-augmented code editors (Cursor, Windsurf/Codeium, Claude Code, Codex) beyond native VS Code, enabling Kombai's frontend-specialized agent to work within developers' preferred AI-augmented IDE. The extension integrates with these editors' extension systems and AI capabilities, though the specific integration mechanism for non-VS Code platforms is undocumented.
Unique: Claims to provide a unified frontend-specialized agent across multiple AI-augmented editors rather than being locked to a single IDE, though the technical implementation for non-VS Code platforms is completely undocumented and unverified.
vs alternatives: Enables developers to use a frontend-specialized agent regardless of their preferred AI-augmented IDE, versus IDE-specific agents that lock users into particular editors.
+1 more capabilities
Generates single-line and multi-line code suggestions in real-time as developers type, using semantic indexing of the entire codebase to retrieve relevant type definitions, function signatures, and contextual patterns. The system maintains a 1M token context window (Pro/Team tiers) that enables suggestions informed by distant code definitions and cross-file dependencies, constructed via local codebase semantic search rather than simple token-based recency. Suggestions adapt to detected coding style on Pro/Team tiers through implicit pattern learning from recent edits.
Unique: 1M token context window with codebase-wide semantic indexing enables suggestions informed by distant code definitions and cross-file patterns, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that typically use fixed context windows (4K-32K tokens) or file-local context. Claimed 250ms latency suggests optimized retrieval pipeline, though indexing mechanism and performance at scale remain undisclosed.
vs alternatives: Larger context window than GitHub Copilot (8K-32K tokens) and faster latency than unnamed competitors (250ms vs 783ms claimed), enabling suggestions on large codebases with minimal typing delay; trade-off is cloud dependency and undisclosed free tier limitations.
Provides a separate chat interface supporting multiple LLM backends (GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, GPT-4, others) for conversational code assistance. Users attach files, reference recent edits, and trigger compiler diagnostic uploads; the system generates diffs and applies code changes directly to the editor. Model selection is per-conversation, and $5/month in credits (included in Pro/Team) covers external model API costs; overage pricing is undisclosed. Hotkey-driven workflow enables rapid context switching between inline completion and chat.
Unique: Multi-model chat interface with per-conversation model selection and integrated diff application, combined with compiler diagnostic auto-upload. Unlike Copilot Chat (single model per tier) or standalone ChatGPT, Supermaven Chat unifies multiple LLM backends in a single hotkey-driven workflow with direct editor integration for change application.
Supermaven scores higher at 71/100 vs Kombai - The AI Agent Built for Frontend at 39/100. Kombai - The AI Agent Built for Frontend leads on ecosystem, while Supermaven is stronger on adoption and quality.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
vs alternatives: Supports multiple LLM backends (GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet) in one interface with included credits, whereas GitHub Copilot Chat is single-model per tier and requires separate ChatGPT subscription for model switching; trade-off is credit limits and unknown overage pricing.
Supermaven Chat can automatically upload compiler diagnostic messages (errors, warnings) alongside code context to provide error-aware suggestions and fixes. The mechanism is described as 'automatically uploading your code together with compiler diagnostic messages,' but specific language/compiler support and the upload trigger mechanism are undisclosed. This feature is Chat-only and not available in inline completion.
Unique: Automatic compiler diagnostic upload in Chat for error-aware suggestions, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that require manual error context or have limited diagnostic integration. Supermaven's approach reduces friction but with undisclosed language/compiler support.
vs alternatives: Automatic diagnostic upload reduces manual context-gathering compared to manual copy-paste; trade-off is undisclosed language support and unclear upload trigger mechanism.
Supermaven offers a 30-day free trial of the Pro tier ($10/month), providing full access to 1M token context window, largest model, style adaptation, and $5/month chat credits. No credit card is required to start the trial (implied), and trial conversion to paid is automatic after 30 days unless cancelled. Trial terms and auto-renewal policy are not explicitly detailed.
Unique: 30-day free trial of Pro tier with full feature access (1M context, largest model, chat credits), versus competitors (Copilot 2-month free trial, Tabnine free tier only) with different trial lengths and feature access. Supermaven's approach is generous but with undisclosed auto-renewal terms.
vs alternatives: Full Pro feature access during trial compared to limited free tier; trade-off is undisclosed auto-renewal policy and potential unexpected charges if not cancelled.
Supermaven requires internet connectivity and server-side inference; no offline mode or local inference capability is mentioned or available. All code completion requests are sent to Supermaven's backend servers for processing, and responses are returned over the network. This creates a hard dependency on network connectivity and Supermaven's service availability; if the service is down or network is unavailable, code completion is not available.
Unique: Supermaven has no offline mode or local inference capability; all processing is server-side. GitHub Copilot also requires server-side inference, but Tabnine offers local inference options for some use cases. Supermaven's lack of offline capability is a significant limitation for developers with connectivity constraints.
vs alternatives: Supermaven's server-side-only approach is comparable to GitHub Copilot; Tabnine offers local inference options, making Tabnine more suitable for offline work. Supermaven's lack of offline capability is a weakness vs. Tabnine.
Analyzes recent code edits and inferred coding patterns to adapt inline suggestions to match team conventions, naming patterns, and structural preferences. The mechanism is implicit (not explicit fine-tuning) and operates only on Pro/Team tiers, suggesting pattern learning from editor activity rather than explicit configuration. Free tier uses a single base model without personalization.
Unique: Implicit style adaptation via editor activity analysis without explicit configuration, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that require manual style guides or explicit fine-tuning. Supermaven's approach is transparent to the user but also non-configurable and undisclosed in mechanism.
vs alternatives: Requires no manual style configuration compared to tools requiring explicit style guides; trade-off is lack of transparency and inability to control or export learned styles.
Delivers code suggestions to the editor inline as the developer types, with a claimed baseline latency of 250ms from keystroke to suggestion display. The system uses a cloud inference backend and local editor plugin to minimize round-trip time. Latency claim is positioned against an unnamed competitor (783ms), but methodology is undisclosed and no independent verification is provided.
Unique: Claimed 250ms latency via optimized cloud inference pipeline and editor plugin architecture, versus competitors with higher latency (783ms unnamed baseline). Actual differentiation is undisclosed; mechanism may involve request batching, model quantization, or edge caching, but specifics are not public.
vs alternatives: Faster than unnamed competitor (250ms vs 783ms claimed); trade-off is cloud dependency and unverified latency claim with no SLA or performance guarantee.
Provides native editor extensions for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs (IntelliJ IDEA, PyCharm, WebStorm, etc.), and Neovim, enabling inline suggestion rendering, hotkey-driven chat access, and compiler diagnostic integration directly within the editor. Each plugin variant is maintained separately and integrates with the editor's native autocomplete UI, keybinding system, and file context APIs.
Unique: Native plugins for three major editor ecosystems (VS Code, JetBrains, Neovim) with integrated chat and diff application, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that support broader editor ecosystems but with less deep integration in some cases. Supermaven's approach prioritizes depth over breadth.
vs alternatives: Deep integration with VS Code and JetBrains (native autocomplete UI, hotkey system) compared to web-based tools or lighter integrations; trade-off is limited editor support (no Sublime, Vim, Emacs) and undisclosed Neovim support details.
+5 more capabilities