| Ecosystem | 1 | 1 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 15 decomposed | 12 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Indexes user documents (markdown, PDFs, web pages) into PostgreSQL with vector embeddings, enabling semantic search via cosine similarity matching. Uses a content processing pipeline that extracts, chunks, and embeds documents through configurable embedding models, then retrieves contextually relevant passages to augment chat responses. The search engine supports multiple content sources (local files, web URLs, Obsidian vaults) with unified indexing through database adapters.
Unique: Combines multi-source content indexing (local files, web URLs, Obsidian vaults) with PostgreSQL vector search and configurable embedding models, allowing users to maintain a unified searchable knowledge base across heterogeneous document sources without cloud dependency. Uses content processing pipeline with pluggable extractors and chunking strategies.
vs alternatives: Offers self-hosted semantic search with multi-source indexing and local embedding support, whereas Pinecone/Weaviate require cloud infrastructure and don't natively integrate with Obsidian/local file systems.
Routes chat requests through a provider-agnostic conversation pipeline that supports OpenAI (GPT), Anthropic (Claude), Google Gemini, and local LLMs (Llama, Qwen, Mistral via Ollama/LlamaCPP). The chat processor retrieves relevant context from the semantic search index, constructs a system prompt with retrieved passages, and streams responses back to clients. Implements conversation history management via Django ORM with per-user conversation threads and message persistence.
Unique: Implements provider-agnostic chat routing through a unified conversation processor that abstracts OpenAI, Anthropic, Google Gemini, and local LLM APIs, allowing seamless provider switching without application changes. Integrates semantic search context augmentation directly into the chat pipeline via system prompt injection with retrieved passages.
vs alternatives: Supports both cloud and local LLMs in a single system with automatic context augmentation from personal documents, whereas LangChain requires explicit chain composition and most chat UIs lock users into single providers.
Provides an Obsidian plugin that indexes the user's vault into Khoj's knowledge base and enables semantic search within Obsidian. The plugin watches for file changes and incrementally updates the index, supporting live synchronization of new notes. Implements bidirectional integration: users can search their vault from Khoj chat, and Khoj can suggest related notes from the vault. The plugin uses Obsidian's API for file access and the Khoj backend API for indexing and search.
Unique: Integrates Obsidian vaults directly into Khoj's knowledge base with live file watching and incremental indexing, enabling semantic search of vault notes from both Obsidian and Khoj interfaces. Uses Obsidian's native API for file access and change detection.
vs alternatives: Provides native Obsidian integration with live sync and bidirectional search, whereas most AI tools require manual vault exports or don't support Obsidian at all.
Provides an Emacs plugin that enables inline chat and search within Emacs buffers. Users can select text, ask Khoj questions about it, and receive responses inline. The plugin supports semantic search of indexed documents and integrates with Emacs' completion and buffer management systems. Implements streaming response rendering in Emacs buffers with syntax highlighting for code blocks.
Unique: Integrates Khoj chat and search directly into Emacs buffers with streaming response rendering and syntax highlighting, enabling AI interaction without leaving the editor. Uses Emacs' native buffer and completion APIs for seamless integration.
vs alternatives: Provides native Emacs integration with inline chat and streaming responses, whereas most AI tools are web-only or require external windows.
Provides Docker and Docker Compose configurations for self-hosted deployment of the full Khoj stack (backend, PostgreSQL, frontend). Includes environment-based configuration management through .env files and Django settings, supporting customization of LLM providers, embedding models, search engines, and other services. The deployment supports both development (docker-compose.yml) and production (prod.Dockerfile) configurations with Gunicorn WSGI server for production.
Unique: Provides complete Docker-based self-hosted deployment with environment-based configuration management supporting customization of LLM providers, embedding models, and external services. Includes both development and production configurations with Gunicorn WSGI server.
vs alternatives: Offers full self-hosted deployment with Docker support and environment-based configuration, whereas many AI tools are cloud-only or require complex manual setup.
Implements a content processing pipeline with pluggable extractors for different file types (PDF, markdown, HTML, plain text, Obsidian). Each extractor converts the source format to normalized text, which is then chunked and embedded. The pipeline supports custom extractors through a plugin interface, allowing users to add support for new file types. Chunking strategies are configurable (fixed size, semantic, sliding window) with metadata preservation (source, timestamp, section).
Unique: Implements content processing through pluggable extractors with configurable chunking strategies and metadata preservation, supporting multiple file types (PDF, markdown, HTML, Obsidian) through a unified pipeline. Allows custom extractors via plugin interface without modifying core.
vs alternatives: Provides pluggable content extraction with metadata preservation and configurable chunking, whereas most RAG systems use fixed extraction logic and don't support custom extractors.
Implements streaming response delivery through both HTTP Server-Sent Events (SSE) and WebSocket protocols, enabling real-time response rendering on clients. The streaming processor chunks LLM responses and sends them incrementally, reducing perceived latency and enabling progressive rendering. Supports streaming for chat responses, search results, and agent execution logs. Clients can subscribe to response streams and render content as it arrives.
Unique: Implements dual streaming protocols (SSE and WebSocket) with chunked response delivery and progressive rendering support, enabling real-time response visualization and agent execution log streaming. Integrates streaming directly into the chat and agent pipelines.
vs alternatives: Provides both SSE and WebSocket streaming with agent execution log support, whereas most chat APIs only support SSE and don't stream agent intermediate steps.
Implements an agent system that decomposes user requests into subtasks, selects appropriate tools (web search, code execution, image generation, MCP servers), and executes them in sequence with result aggregation. The agent uses the LLM to reason about tool selection via function-calling APIs (OpenAI, Anthropic native support) or prompt-based tool selection for other providers. Tool execution is sandboxed through subprocess isolation for code execution and API-based execution for external tools, with results fed back into the agent loop for iterative refinement.
Unique: Combines LLM-based agent reasoning with pluggable tool execution (web search, code execution, image generation, MCP servers) through a unified tool registry that abstracts provider-specific function-calling APIs. Uses subprocess isolation for code execution and supports both native function-calling (OpenAI, Anthropic) and prompt-based tool selection for other LLMs.
vs alternatives: Offers integrated agent execution with sandboxed code running and MCP server support in a single system, whereas LangChain agents require explicit chain composition and most frameworks don't natively support MCP or code sandboxing.
+7 more capabilities
Crawls 11+ heterogeneous platforms (Zhihu, Weibo, Bilibili, Twitter, Reddit, HackerNews, etc.) and RSS feeds using platform-specific scrapers, normalizes disparate data schemas into a unified NewsItem model, and deduplicates content across sources using fuzzy title matching and URL canonicalization. The system maintains platform-specific metadata (rank, heat value, engagement metrics) while presenting a single normalized feed, enabling cross-platform trend detection that would be invisible within individual platform silos.
Unique: Implements platform-specific crawler modules with unified NewsItem schema and fuzzy deduplication across 11+ heterogeneous sources (Chinese + international), rather than relying on single-platform APIs or generic RSS parsing. Maintains platform-specific metadata (rank × 0.6 + frequency × 0.3 + platform hot value × 0.1) for weighted hotspot scoring.
vs alternatives: Covers more platforms (especially Chinese social media) with deeper metadata extraction than generic RSS aggregators, and provides unified deduplication across sources unlike single-platform monitoring tools.
Implements a multi-stage filtering pipeline that matches news items against user-defined keywords using regex patterns, required word lists, and excluded word lists. The system applies frequency-based scoring (keyword occurrence count) combined with platform hotspot weights to rank filtered results. Configuration is stored in frequency_words.txt with support for regex patterns, AND/OR/NOT boolean operators, and per-keyword weighting. Filtering occurs at collection time (reducing storage) and again at report generation time (enabling dynamic reconfiguration without re-crawling).
Unique: Combines regex pattern matching with frequency-based scoring and platform hotspot weighting (rank × 0.6 + frequency × 0.3 + platform hot value × 0.1) in a two-stage pipeline (collection-time and report-time filtering). Supports dynamic reconfiguration without re-crawling by applying filters at report generation.
TrendRadar scores higher at 58/100 vs khoj at 41/100. khoj leads on quality, while TrendRadar is stronger on adoption and ecosystem.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
vs alternatives: More flexible than simple keyword matching (supports regex and boolean logic) and more efficient than semantic filtering (no LLM overhead), making it suitable for real-time filtering at scale.
Detects newly emerged topics by comparing current crawl results against historical data stored in the system. Topics are marked as 🆕 (new) if they appear for the first time in the current crawl or if their hotspot rank increased significantly compared to previous crawls. The system tracks topic emergence velocity (how quickly a topic rises in rankings) and flags topics with unusual acceleration. New topic detection is performed at report generation time, enabling dynamic detection without re-crawling. The system maintains a historical hotspot index for comparison.
Unique: Detects new topics by comparing current hotspot rankings against historical data, marking topics with significant rank increases as 🆕. Tracks emergence velocity to distinguish breaking news from sustained trends.
vs alternatives: More efficient than semantic similarity detection (no LLM overhead) and more accurate than simple first-appearance detection (accounts for re-emerging topics), but requires historical baseline data.
Provides a web-based UI for editing TrendRadar configuration files (config.yaml, frequency_words.txt, timeline.yaml) with real-time validation and preview. The editor supports: (1) syntax highlighting for YAML and regex, (2) validation of keyword patterns (regex compilation check), (3) preview of filtered results based on current keyword configuration, (4) drag-and-drop channel configuration, (5) schedule preview (shows next 10 execution times). Changes are validated before saving, preventing configuration errors. The editor is optional; users can edit config files directly.
Unique: Provides web-based configuration editor with real-time validation, regex preview, and schedule visualization. Enables non-technical users to configure TrendRadar without editing YAML files.
vs alternatives: More user-friendly than manual YAML editing and provides validation feedback, but adds operational complexity compared to file-based configuration.
Integrates LiteLLM to provide vendor-agnostic AI analysis and summarization of filtered news items. Users configure their preferred LLM provider (OpenAI, Anthropic, Ollama, local models, etc.) once in config.yaml, and the system automatically routes analysis requests to that provider. The AI analysis capability includes: (1) automated summarization of long articles into key points, (2) sentiment analysis (positive/negative/neutral), (3) trend prediction based on historical patterns, and (4) custom analysis prompts. Analysis results are cached to avoid redundant API calls and can be pushed directly to notification channels.
Unique: Uses LiteLLM abstraction layer to support any LLM provider (OpenAI, Anthropic, Ollama, local models) with single configuration, enabling provider switching without code changes. Caches analysis results to reduce redundant API calls and costs.
vs alternatives: More flexible than hardcoded OpenAI integration (supports any LiteLLM provider) and cheaper than dedicated sentiment analysis APIs (can use local models), but slower than rule-based sentiment analysis.
Leverages LiteLLM to translate news content from source languages (primarily Chinese) to target languages (English, etc.) on-demand. The system detects source language automatically (via langdetect or similar), caches translations to avoid re-translating identical content, and batches translation requests to reduce API calls. Translations are stored alongside original content, enabling bilingual reports and multi-language notification delivery. Translation can be triggered at collection time (all news) or report time (only filtered news).
Unique: Implements provider-agnostic translation via LiteLLM with automatic language detection, content-based caching, and batch request optimization. Stores translations alongside originals for bilingual report generation.
vs alternatives: More flexible than dedicated translation APIs (supports any LiteLLM provider) and cheaper than commercial translation services when using local models, but slower than specialized translation APIs.
Implements a notification abstraction layer supporting 9+ delivery channels (WeChat, WeWork, Feishu, Telegram, Email, ntfy, Bark, Slack, etc.). Each channel has a provider-specific formatter that converts normalized news items into channel-appropriate messages (e.g., WeChat card format, Telegram markdown, email HTML). The system batches notifications atomically—all news items for a report are sent as a single batch to each channel, ensuring consistency and reducing API calls. Message formatting respects channel constraints (character limits, attachment limits, etc.) and supports templating for customization.
Unique: Implements atomic message batching across 9+ heterogeneous channels with provider-specific formatters and constraint-aware truncation. Single configuration enables simultaneous delivery to WeChat, WeWork, Feishu, Telegram, Email, ntfy, Bark, Slack, etc. without code changes.
vs alternatives: Supports more channels (especially Chinese platforms like WeWork, Feishu) than generic notification services, and batching reduces API calls and spam compared to per-item notifications.
Exposes TrendRadar's data and analysis capabilities as an MCP server, enabling AI agents and LLM applications to query trends, perform analysis, and generate insights through natural language. The MCP server implements tools for: (1) querying filtered news by keyword/date/platform, (2) retrieving trend statistics and hotspot rankings, (3) running custom analysis on news subsets, (4) generating reports in various formats. Clients (Claude, other LLM agents) can invoke these tools via MCP protocol, enabling conversational exploration of trends without direct database access. The server maintains state across multiple requests, allowing multi-turn conversations about trends.
Unique: Implements full MCP server exposing trend data and analysis tools to LLM agents, enabling conversational queries and multi-turn analysis workflows. Maintains state across requests and supports complex tool invocations (filtering, analysis, report generation).
vs alternatives: Enables conversational access to trends (vs. API-only access) and integrates with LLM agent workflows (vs. standalone tools), but adds operational complexity compared to simple REST APIs.
+4 more capabilities