| Ecosystem |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 14 decomposed | 9 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Automatically extracts and structures contextual memories from unstructured user interactions using LLM-powered analysis. The system sends conversation context to configurable LLM providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini) via a factory pattern, which parse interactions and extract key facts, preferences, and relationships. Extracted memories are then normalized and stored in vector embeddings for semantic retrieval, enabling the system to learn and retain user context across sessions without manual annotation.
Unique: Uses a pluggable LLM factory pattern supporting OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, and Ollama with configurable prompts, enabling users to choose extraction quality vs. cost tradeoff. The extraction pipeline integrates directly with vector storage backends (Qdrant, Pinecone, Weaviate, FAISS) via a unified factory system, avoiding vendor lock-in.
vs alternatives: More flexible than Pinecone's memory layer because it supports any LLM provider and vector store, and more cost-effective than proprietary memory services by allowing local embedding models and open-source vector databases.
Provides unified vector storage abstraction supporting Qdrant, Pinecone, Weaviate, Azure Cognitive Search, Vertex AI Vector Search, and local FAISS via a factory-based provider pattern. Memories are stored as embeddings with metadata, enabling semantic similarity search across stored memories. The system handles embedding generation, vector indexing, and retrieval through a consistent API regardless of underlying storage backend, with configurable distance metrics and filtering.
Unique: Implements a factory-based provider pattern (VectorStoreFactory) supporting 7+ backends with unified configuration, allowing runtime backend switching without code changes. Integrates embedding generation directly into the storage layer, handling the full pipeline from text to indexed vectors.
vs alternatives: More portable than LangChain's vector store integrations because it's purpose-built for memory systems and includes built-in embedding orchestration; more flexible than single-vendor solutions like Pinecone because it supports local FAISS and open-source Qdrant.
Provides official client libraries for Python (MemoryClient, AsyncMemoryClient) and TypeScript (MemoryClient) with identical APIs, enabling developers to use the same memory operations across language ecosystems. Clients handle authentication, request serialization, error handling, and retry logic transparently. Both SDKs support local and remote memory backends, enabling seamless development-to-production transitions.
Unique: Provides officially maintained SDKs for Python and TypeScript with identical APIs, enabling code reuse patterns across language boundaries. Both SDKs support local and remote backends with transparent switching.
vs alternatives: More consistent than language-specific implementations because APIs are intentionally identical; more type-safe than REST clients because TypeScript and Python clients provide compile-time checking.
Provides Docker containerization and Kubernetes manifests for self-hosted deployments of the full Jean Memory stack (backend API, MCP server, frontend UI). Deployment includes environment-based configuration for memory backends, LLM providers, and authentication. Kubernetes support enables horizontal scaling, automatic failover, and resource management for production deployments.
Unique: Provides production-ready Docker images and Kubernetes manifests for complete Jean Memory stack, including backend, MCP server, and frontend. Supports environment-based configuration for easy customization across deployments.
vs alternatives: More complete than raw source code because it includes containerization and orchestration; more flexible than managed services because it enables on-premises deployment and full infrastructure control.
Automatically retrieves relevant memories from the vector store based on current conversation context and injects them into the LLM prompt before generating responses. The system performs semantic search on the query, ranks results by relevance, and formats memories as context blocks in the system prompt. This enables AI models to provide personalized, contextually-aware responses without explicit memory management by the application.
Unique: Implements automatic memory retrieval and injection into LLM prompts, enabling transparent personalization without explicit application logic. Uses semantic search to find relevant memories and ranks them by relevance to current context.
vs alternatives: More seamless than manual memory loading because it's automatic; more intelligent than simple history concatenation because it uses semantic search to find relevant context rather than just recent messages.
Identifies semantically similar or duplicate memories using vector similarity and LLM-powered comparison, then consolidates them into single authoritative memories. The system runs periodic deduplication jobs that cluster similar memories, merge metadata, and update relationships. This prevents memory bloat from repeated extraction of the same facts and improves retrieval efficiency.
Unique: Implements automatic deduplication using vector similarity and LLM-powered semantic comparison, consolidating duplicate memories without manual intervention. Maintains audit trail of merge operations for traceability.
vs alternatives: More intelligent than simple hash-based deduplication because it catches semantic duplicates; more efficient than manual curation because it runs automatically as a background job.
Provides AsyncMemoryClient for non-blocking memory operations and batch APIs for bulk memory creation, updates, and deletion. The system uses Python asyncio patterns to handle concurrent memory operations without blocking, enabling high-throughput scenarios. Batch endpoints accept arrays of memory objects and process them transactionally, reducing API overhead and enabling efficient bulk imports or synchronization across multiple AI agents.
Unique: Implements dual client interfaces (MemoryClient for sync, AsyncMemoryClient for async) with identical APIs, allowing developers to choose blocking or non-blocking patterns without code duplication. Batch endpoints are optimized for transactional consistency across multiple memory updates.
vs alternatives: More efficient than sequential API calls for bulk operations because batch endpoints reduce network round-trips; more developer-friendly than raw asyncio because it provides high-level async abstractions without requiring deep async knowledge.
Implements MemoryGraph class that models memories as nodes in a knowledge graph with edges representing relationships (e.g., 'user prefers X', 'X is related to Y'). The system uses LLM-powered reasoning to infer relationships between extracted memories and stores them as graph edges, enabling multi-hop reasoning and contextual memory retrieval. Graph traversal can retrieve not just direct memories but related context, improving response relevance by understanding memory relationships.
Unique: Combines vector-based semantic search with graph-based relationship reasoning, allowing both similarity-based and relationship-based memory retrieval. Uses LLM-powered inference to automatically discover relationships rather than requiring manual annotation.
vs alternatives: More intelligent than flat vector search because it understands memory relationships; more flexible than fixed ontology systems because relationships are inferred dynamically from LLM reasoning.
+6 more capabilities
Executes SQL queries against Supabase PostgreSQL instances through the Model Context Protocol, translating natural language or structured query requests into parameterized SQL statements. Uses MCP's tool-calling interface to expose database operations as callable functions with schema validation, enabling LLM agents to perform CRUD operations, joins, and aggregations with automatic connection pooling and credential management through Supabase client SDK.
Unique: Exposes Supabase PostgreSQL as MCP tools with automatic credential injection from Supabase client SDK, eliminating manual connection string management and enabling seamless LLM-to-database queries within Claude or compatible agents
vs alternatives: Tighter integration than generic SQL MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in authentication and connection pooling rather than requiring separate database credential configuration
Exposes Supabase Auth session state and user metadata through MCP tools, allowing agents to inspect current authentication context, retrieve user profiles, and trigger auth-related operations. Integrates with Supabase's JWT-based auth system to validate sessions and access user claims without re-authenticating, using the Supabase client's built-in session management.
Unique: Integrates Supabase's JWT-based auth system directly into MCP tool interface, allowing agents to inspect and act on auth state without managing separate credential stores or re-authentication flows
vs alternatives: More seamless than generic auth MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in session management and avoids redundant credential passing between agent and auth system
Invokes Supabase Edge Functions (serverless TypeScript/JavaScript functions) through MCP tools, passing parameters and receiving results with optional streaming support. Uses Supabase's edge function HTTP API to trigger functions with automatic authentication headers and response parsing, enabling agents to execute custom business logic without embedding it in the agent itself.
Supabase scores higher at 42/100 vs Jean Memory at 22/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Edge Functions as MCP tools with automatic authentication and response parsing, allowing agents to invoke custom serverless logic without managing HTTP clients or credential injection
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic HTTP MCP tools because it handles Supabase-specific authentication, error handling, and response formatting automatically
Subscribes to real-time changes on Supabase tables through MCP's event streaming interface, using Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY mechanism to push INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE events to agents. Maintains persistent WebSocket connections and filters events by table and row-level policies, enabling agents to react to database changes without polling.
Unique: Bridges Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY real-time system with MCP's tool interface, enabling agents to subscribe to database changes without managing WebSocket connections or event serialization
vs alternatives: More efficient than polling-based approaches because it uses Supabase's native real-time infrastructure rather than repeated database queries
Manages files in Supabase Storage buckets through MCP tools, supporting upload, download, list, and delete operations with automatic authentication and path-based access control. Uses Supabase's S3-compatible storage API with built-in support for public/private buckets and signed URLs for temporary access, enabling agents to handle file I/O without managing cloud storage credentials.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Storage's S3-compatible API as MCP tools with automatic authentication and signed URL generation, eliminating the need for agents to manage cloud storage credentials or generate temporary access tokens
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic S3 MCP tools because it leverages Supabase's built-in bucket policies and authentication rather than requiring separate AWS credentials
Performs semantic similarity searches on vector embeddings stored in Supabase PostgreSQL using pgvector extension, translating natural language queries into embedding vectors and executing cosine/L2 distance searches. Integrates with embedding providers (OpenAI, Cohere) or uses pre-computed embeddings, enabling agents to retrieve semantically similar documents or records without full-text search limitations.
Unique: Integrates pgvector directly into MCP tools with automatic embedding generation and distance calculation, enabling agents to perform semantic search without managing separate vector database infrastructure
vs alternatives: More efficient than external vector databases (Pinecone, Weaviate) for Supabase users because it colocates embeddings with relational data, reducing network latency and simplifying data synchronization
Exposes Supabase database schema information through MCP tools, allowing agents to discover table structures, column types, constraints, and relationships without manual schema documentation. Queries PostgreSQL information_schema and Supabase metadata tables to dynamically generate schema descriptions, enabling agents to construct valid queries and understand data relationships.
Unique: Queries Supabase's PostgreSQL information_schema directly through MCP tools, enabling agents to dynamically discover and adapt to database schemas without pre-configured schema definitions
vs alternatives: More flexible than static schema definitions because it reflects live database state, including recent migrations or schema changes
Enforces Supabase Row-Level Security policies within agent queries, ensuring that agents can only access rows permitted by RLS rules defined in the database. Evaluates policies based on authenticated user context (JWT claims, user ID) and applies WHERE clause filters automatically, preventing unauthorized data access at the database layer rather than application layer.
Unique: Delegates authorization enforcement to PostgreSQL RLS policies rather than implementing authorization in agent code, ensuring that data access rules are centralized and cannot be bypassed by agent logic
vs alternatives: More secure than application-level authorization because RLS is enforced at the database layer, preventing accidental data leaks even if agent code has bugs
+1 more capabilities