IP Author vs Relativity
Side-by-side comparison to help you choose.
| Feature | IP Author | Relativity |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Product | Product |
| UnfragileRank | 32/100 | 35/100 |
| Adoption | 0 | 0 |
| Quality | 1 | 1 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Capabilities | 13 decomposed | 13 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Searches patent databases and prior art references in real-time as the user drafts patent claims, surfacing relevant existing patents and publications that may impact novelty. Integrates search results directly into the writing workflow without requiring context switching.
Generates multiple structural variations of patent claims based on technical specifications and invention descriptions. Produces alternative claim phrasings and scope options to explore different protection strategies without manual rewriting.
Automatically classifies inventions into technical fields and filters prior art results by relevant classifications. Reduces noise in prior art searches by focusing on relevant technical domains.
Performs detailed comparison between claim language and prior art references, identifying specific overlaps and differences. Maps claim elements to prior art disclosures to assess novelty and non-obviousness.
Tracks time spent on patent drafting tasks and identifies workflow bottlenecks. Provides insights into which tasks consume the most attorney time and where AI assistance provides the greatest time savings.
Identifies and alerts the user to potential patentability issues and novelty conflicts as claims are being written, rather than waiting for post-submission review. Provides early warnings about claim language that may conflict with prior art.
Maintains and queries a comprehensive database of patents, publications, and prior art references. Provides structured search and retrieval of relevant prior art documents indexed by technical classification, keywords, and claim language.
Analyzes claim language to suggest modifications that broaden or narrow scope based on prior art constraints and prosecution strategy. Helps balance protection breadth against patentability risk.
+5 more capabilities
Automatically categorizes and codes documents based on learned patterns from human-reviewed samples, using machine learning to predict relevance, privilege, and responsiveness. Reduces manual review burden by identifying documents that match specified criteria without human intervention.
Ingests and processes massive volumes of documents in native formats while preserving metadata integrity and creating searchable indices. Handles format conversion, deduplication, and metadata extraction without data loss.
Provides tools for organizing and retrieving documents during depositions and trial, including document linking, timeline creation, and quick-search capabilities. Enables attorneys to rapidly locate supporting documents during proceedings.
Manages documents subject to regulatory requirements and compliance obligations, including retention policies, audit trails, and regulatory reporting. Tracks document lifecycle and ensures compliance with legal holds and preservation requirements.
Manages multi-reviewer document review workflows with task assignment, progress tracking, and quality control mechanisms. Supports parallel review by multiple team members with conflict resolution and consistency checking.
Enables rapid searching across massive document collections using full-text indexing, Boolean operators, and field-specific queries. Supports complex search syntax for precise document retrieval and filtering.
Relativity scores higher at 35/100 vs IP Author at 32/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Identifies and flags privileged communications (attorney-client, work product) and confidential information through pattern recognition and metadata analysis. Maintains comprehensive audit trails of all access to sensitive materials.
Implements role-based access controls with fine-grained permissions at document, workspace, and field levels. Allows administrators to restrict access based on user roles, case assignments, and security clearances.
+5 more capabilities