| 0 |
| 1 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Starting Price | — | $10/mo |
| Capabilities | 7 decomposed | 13 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Generates up-to-one-line code predictions that appear as non-intrusive grey-text inline suggestions to the right of the cursor as the user types. The completion engine analyzes the current file context (cursor position, surrounding code tokens, language syntax) and triggers automatically without explicit user action. Predictions are rendered inline rather than in a popup menu, minimizing visual disruption while maintaining discoverability through standard Tab/ESC acceptance keybindings.
Unique: Integrates with VS Code's IntelliSense ranking system to coordinate suggestion acceptance — first Tab accepts IntelliSense token, second Tab accepts remaining inline completion — creating a unified suggestion workflow rather than competing suggestion sources. Uses grey-text inline rendering instead of popup menus, reducing visual clutter while maintaining automatic trigger behavior.
vs alternatives: Less intrusive than GitHub Copilot's popup-based suggestions and more integrated with VS Code's native IntelliSense than standalone completion extensions, but limited to single-line predictions vs. multi-line block generation in Copilot.
Provides granular configuration to enable or disable inline completion predictions on a per-language basis (Python, JavaScript, TypeScript) while preserving other IntelliCode features like IntelliSense ranking. Configuration is stored in VS Code Settings and discoverable via extension-specific settings search. Allows developers to use AI completions selectively — e.g., enable for Python but disable for TypeScript — without uninstalling the extension or affecting IntelliSense functionality.
Unique: Decouples completion predictions from IntelliSense ranking — developers can disable completions for a language while retaining AI-ranked IntelliSense suggestions, a capability most completion extensions do not offer separately. Settings are discoverable via VS Code's extension-specific settings search rather than requiring manual JSON editing.
vs alternatives: More granular than Copilot's global on/off toggle, allowing language-specific control; simpler than custom configuration files required by some LSP-based completion tools.
Processes source code entirely on the developer's machine without transmitting code content to external servers. The extension explicitly guarantees that 'Your code does not leave your machine and is not used to train our model,' implying a pre-trained model architecture that performs inference locally or via a privacy-preserving remote endpoint that does not log or retain code. This design choice prioritizes data security for enterprises and developers working with proprietary or sensitive codebases.
Unique: Explicitly commits to local code processing and non-use of code for model training, differentiating from GitHub Copilot and other cloud-based completion services that train on user code. Uses a pre-trained model architecture rather than fine-tuning on user submissions, a design choice that prioritizes privacy over personalization.
vs alternatives: Stronger privacy guarantees than Copilot (which trains on code) and Tabnine (which offers optional local mode but defaults to cloud); comparable to Codeium's privacy-first approach but with Microsoft's enterprise backing and integration into VS Code's native ecosystem.
Coordinates inline completion predictions with VS Code's native IntelliSense popup menu to prevent suggestion conflicts and enable sequential acceptance. When IntelliSense is open, the first Tab keypress accepts the token selected in the IntelliSense list, and the second Tab keypress accepts the remaining inline completion. This coordination pattern ensures that inline completions augment rather than compete with IntelliSense, creating a unified suggestion workflow that respects the user's existing IntelliSense muscle memory.
Unique: Implements a two-stage Tab acceptance pattern that coordinates with IntelliSense state rather than replacing or shadowing IntelliSense suggestions. This requires reading IntelliSense state from VS Code's extension API and implementing custom keybinding logic, a level of editor integration that most standalone completion extensions do not attempt.
vs alternatives: More integrated with VS Code's native suggestion system than Copilot (which uses separate keybindings and UI) or Tabnine (which overlays suggestions rather than coordinating with IntelliSense); reduces cognitive load for users already familiar with IntelliSense workflows.
Generates and displays code predictions automatically as the user types, without requiring explicit trigger actions (e.g., Ctrl+Space or menu navigation). The prediction engine monitors keystroke events and cursor position changes, analyzes the current code context in real-time, and renders suggestions inline when confidence thresholds are met. This automatic trigger pattern minimizes friction in the coding workflow by eliminating the need for users to consciously request completions.
Unique: Implements continuous keystroke monitoring and real-time context analysis to trigger predictions without explicit user action, requiring integration with VS Code's editor event system and efficient incremental parsing. Most completion extensions use explicit trigger keybindings (Ctrl+Space) or require IntelliSense to be open; automatic trigger requires more aggressive event handling and context caching.
vs alternatives: More seamless than on-demand completion tools (Copilot, Tabnine) that require explicit trigger actions; comparable to GitHub Copilot's automatic trigger but with local processing and privacy guarantees instead of cloud-based inference.
Provides AI-driven code completion predictions optimized for three specific programming languages: Python, JavaScript, and TypeScript. The underlying model(s) are pre-trained on code in these languages and tuned to understand language-specific syntax, idioms, and common patterns. Inference is performed per-language with language detection based on file extension or explicit language mode in VS Code, enabling language-appropriate suggestions that respect each language's conventions and standard libraries.
Unique: Implements language-specific model inference rather than a single unified model, allowing optimization for each language's syntax and idioms. This requires separate model training, deployment, and inference pipelines per language, a more complex architecture than single-model approaches but enabling better language-specific quality.
vs alternatives: More focused on supported languages than Copilot (which supports 10+ languages but with variable quality); comparable to Tabnine's language-specific models but with Microsoft's research backing and integration into VS Code's native ecosystem.
Collects usage telemetry and analytics data about IntelliCode Completions usage patterns (e.g., suggestion acceptance rates, language distribution, feature usage) and transmits this metadata to Microsoft servers. Telemetry collection respects VS Code's global `telemetry.enableTelemetry` setting, allowing users to disable all telemetry collection across VS Code and its extensions via a single configuration option. Specific telemetry fields and data retention policies are not documented.
Unique: Integrates with VS Code's global telemetry setting rather than implementing extension-specific telemetry controls, reducing configuration complexity but limiting granular control. This design choice prioritizes simplicity over transparency, as users cannot selectively disable IntelliCode telemetry while keeping other VS Code telemetry enabled.
vs alternatives: Simpler than Copilot's separate telemetry settings but less transparent than some open-source completion tools that document exact telemetry fields; comparable to Tabnine's telemetry approach but with less granular control options.
Generates single-line and multi-line code suggestions in real-time as developers type, using semantic indexing of the entire codebase to retrieve relevant type definitions, function signatures, and contextual patterns. The system maintains a 1M token context window (Pro/Team tiers) that enables suggestions informed by distant code definitions and cross-file dependencies, constructed via local codebase semantic search rather than simple token-based recency. Suggestions adapt to detected coding style on Pro/Team tiers through implicit pattern learning from recent edits.
Unique: 1M token context window with codebase-wide semantic indexing enables suggestions informed by distant code definitions and cross-file patterns, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that typically use fixed context windows (4K-32K tokens) or file-local context. Claimed 250ms latency suggests optimized retrieval pipeline, though indexing mechanism and performance at scale remain undisclosed.
vs alternatives: Larger context window than GitHub Copilot (8K-32K tokens) and faster latency than unnamed competitors (250ms vs 783ms claimed), enabling suggestions on large codebases with minimal typing delay; trade-off is cloud dependency and undisclosed free tier limitations.
Provides a separate chat interface supporting multiple LLM backends (GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, GPT-4, others) for conversational code assistance. Users attach files, reference recent edits, and trigger compiler diagnostic uploads; the system generates diffs and applies code changes directly to the editor. Model selection is per-conversation, and $5/month in credits (included in Pro/Team) covers external model API costs; overage pricing is undisclosed. Hotkey-driven workflow enables rapid context switching between inline completion and chat.
Unique: Multi-model chat interface with per-conversation model selection and integrated diff application, combined with compiler diagnostic auto-upload. Unlike Copilot Chat (single model per tier) or standalone ChatGPT, Supermaven Chat unifies multiple LLM backends in a single hotkey-driven workflow with direct editor integration for change application.
Supermaven scores higher at 71/100 vs IntelliCode Completions at 39/100. IntelliCode Completions leads on adoption and ecosystem, while Supermaven is stronger on quality.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
vs alternatives: Supports multiple LLM backends (GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet) in one interface with included credits, whereas GitHub Copilot Chat is single-model per tier and requires separate ChatGPT subscription for model switching; trade-off is credit limits and unknown overage pricing.
Supermaven Chat can automatically upload compiler diagnostic messages (errors, warnings) alongside code context to provide error-aware suggestions and fixes. The mechanism is described as 'automatically uploading your code together with compiler diagnostic messages,' but specific language/compiler support and the upload trigger mechanism are undisclosed. This feature is Chat-only and not available in inline completion.
Unique: Automatic compiler diagnostic upload in Chat for error-aware suggestions, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that require manual error context or have limited diagnostic integration. Supermaven's approach reduces friction but with undisclosed language/compiler support.
vs alternatives: Automatic diagnostic upload reduces manual context-gathering compared to manual copy-paste; trade-off is undisclosed language support and unclear upload trigger mechanism.
Supermaven offers a 30-day free trial of the Pro tier ($10/month), providing full access to 1M token context window, largest model, style adaptation, and $5/month chat credits. No credit card is required to start the trial (implied), and trial conversion to paid is automatic after 30 days unless cancelled. Trial terms and auto-renewal policy are not explicitly detailed.
Unique: 30-day free trial of Pro tier with full feature access (1M context, largest model, chat credits), versus competitors (Copilot 2-month free trial, Tabnine free tier only) with different trial lengths and feature access. Supermaven's approach is generous but with undisclosed auto-renewal terms.
vs alternatives: Full Pro feature access during trial compared to limited free tier; trade-off is undisclosed auto-renewal policy and potential unexpected charges if not cancelled.
Supermaven requires internet connectivity and server-side inference; no offline mode or local inference capability is mentioned or available. All code completion requests are sent to Supermaven's backend servers for processing, and responses are returned over the network. This creates a hard dependency on network connectivity and Supermaven's service availability; if the service is down or network is unavailable, code completion is not available.
Unique: Supermaven has no offline mode or local inference capability; all processing is server-side. GitHub Copilot also requires server-side inference, but Tabnine offers local inference options for some use cases. Supermaven's lack of offline capability is a significant limitation for developers with connectivity constraints.
vs alternatives: Supermaven's server-side-only approach is comparable to GitHub Copilot; Tabnine offers local inference options, making Tabnine more suitable for offline work. Supermaven's lack of offline capability is a weakness vs. Tabnine.
Analyzes recent code edits and inferred coding patterns to adapt inline suggestions to match team conventions, naming patterns, and structural preferences. The mechanism is implicit (not explicit fine-tuning) and operates only on Pro/Team tiers, suggesting pattern learning from editor activity rather than explicit configuration. Free tier uses a single base model without personalization.
Unique: Implicit style adaptation via editor activity analysis without explicit configuration, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that require manual style guides or explicit fine-tuning. Supermaven's approach is transparent to the user but also non-configurable and undisclosed in mechanism.
vs alternatives: Requires no manual style configuration compared to tools requiring explicit style guides; trade-off is lack of transparency and inability to control or export learned styles.
Delivers code suggestions to the editor inline as the developer types, with a claimed baseline latency of 250ms from keystroke to suggestion display. The system uses a cloud inference backend and local editor plugin to minimize round-trip time. Latency claim is positioned against an unnamed competitor (783ms), but methodology is undisclosed and no independent verification is provided.
Unique: Claimed 250ms latency via optimized cloud inference pipeline and editor plugin architecture, versus competitors with higher latency (783ms unnamed baseline). Actual differentiation is undisclosed; mechanism may involve request batching, model quantization, or edge caching, but specifics are not public.
vs alternatives: Faster than unnamed competitor (250ms vs 783ms claimed); trade-off is cloud dependency and unverified latency claim with no SLA or performance guarantee.
Provides native editor extensions for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs (IntelliJ IDEA, PyCharm, WebStorm, etc.), and Neovim, enabling inline suggestion rendering, hotkey-driven chat access, and compiler diagnostic integration directly within the editor. Each plugin variant is maintained separately and integrates with the editor's native autocomplete UI, keybinding system, and file context APIs.
Unique: Native plugins for three major editor ecosystems (VS Code, JetBrains, Neovim) with integrated chat and diff application, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that support broader editor ecosystems but with less deep integration in some cases. Supermaven's approach prioritizes depth over breadth.
vs alternatives: Deep integration with VS Code and JetBrains (native autocomplete UI, hotkey system) compared to web-based tools or lighter integrations; trade-off is limited editor support (no Sublime, Vim, Emacs) and undisclosed Neovim support details.
+5 more capabilities