| 0 |
| Quality | 0 | 0 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Starting Price | $1.70e-8 per prompt token | $6.00e-7 per prompt token |
| Capabilities | 7 decomposed | 12 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Generates coherent text responses using a 3B parameter transformer architecture optimized for inference efficiency on resource-constrained environments. The model employs standard causal language modeling with attention mechanisms fine-tuned to handle extended context windows, enabling multi-turn conversations and document-aware responses without requiring GPU acceleration for deployment.
Unique: Granite 4.0 Micro uses IBM's proprietary fine-tuning approach for extended context handling in a 3B parameter footprint, achieving better long-document coherence than typical distilled models of equivalent size through specialized attention pattern optimization and training data curation focused on technical and enterprise content.
vs alternatives: Smaller and more efficient than Llama 2 7B while maintaining comparable long-context performance through IBM's specialized training; lower inference cost than Mistral 7B with similar quality for enterprise use cases.
Maintains coherent dialogue across multiple exchanges by processing concatenated conversation history as context in each inference call. The model uses standard transformer attention to track speaker roles, intent shifts, and contextual references across turns, enabling stateless conversation management where the full history is resubmitted with each new user message.
Unique: Granite 4.0 Micro's fine-tuning includes explicit optimization for conversation turn-taking and role awareness, allowing it to maintain speaker identity and intent consistency across turns more reliably than base models, using specialized tokens and attention patterns for dialogue structure.
vs alternatives: More efficient at multi-turn conversation than GPT-3.5 for equivalent parameter count; requires less prompt engineering for role clarity due to dialogue-specific fine-tuning compared to generic 3B models.
Generates and analyzes code across multiple programming languages by leveraging transformer attention over tokenized source code, with fine-tuning on technical documentation and code repositories. The model can complete code snippets, explain code logic, and generate code from natural language descriptions, using standard causal language modeling without specialized AST parsing or syntax-aware tokenization.
Unique: Granite 4.0 Micro includes IBM's enterprise-focused code training data emphasizing Java, Python, and JavaScript with strong performance on business logic and API integration patterns; fine-tuned on IBM's internal codebase and open-source enterprise projects rather than generic GitHub data.
vs alternatives: Better code quality for enterprise patterns (Spring, Django, Node.js frameworks) than generic 3B models; lower latency and cost than Codex or GPT-4 for simple completions, though less capable for complex multi-file refactoring.
Executes user instructions by conditioning generation on system prompts that define behavior, tone, and task constraints. The model uses standard prompt engineering patterns where system instructions are prepended to user input, allowing dynamic role-playing, task specialization, and output format control through text-based configuration without model fine-tuning.
Unique: Granite 4.0 Micro's fine-tuning includes explicit instruction-following optimization using IBM's proprietary instruction dataset focused on enterprise and technical tasks, improving adherence to complex multi-step instructions compared to base models without specialized instruction tuning.
vs alternatives: More reliable instruction-following than generic 3B models due to enterprise-focused training; comparable to Llama 2 Instruct for instruction adherence but with lower inference cost and smaller model size.
Provides text generation through OpenRouter's REST API with support for streaming responses via server-sent events (SSE) or polling. Requests are formatted as JSON payloads containing model parameters (temperature, max_tokens, top_p) and conversation history, with responses streamed token-by-token or returned in full, enabling real-time user feedback and progressive output rendering.
Unique: Accessed exclusively through OpenRouter's unified API layer, which abstracts IBM's Granite model behind a standardized interface supporting provider switching, cost optimization, and fallback routing — enabling applications to swap models without code changes.
vs alternatives: Lower cost than direct cloud provider APIs (AWS Bedrock, Azure OpenAI) for equivalent inference; OpenRouter's provider abstraction enables cost-based routing and model switching without application refactoring, unlike direct API integration.
Modulates output randomness and diversity through temperature, top_p (nucleus sampling), and top_k parameters passed to the API. Lower temperatures (0.1-0.3) produce deterministic, focused outputs suitable for factual tasks; higher temperatures (0.7-1.0) increase creativity and diversity for generative tasks. The model applies these parameters during token sampling, affecting probability distribution over vocabulary without retraining.
Unique: OpenRouter exposes standard sampling parameters (temperature, top_p, top_k) with documented ranges and defaults optimized for Granite 4.0 Micro; no proprietary parameter tuning required, enabling straightforward integration with standard LLM parameter conventions.
vs alternatives: Standard parameter interface matches OpenAI and Anthropic APIs, enabling easy model switching; no proprietary tuning required compared to some specialized models with custom sampling strategies.
Constrains output length by specifying max_tokens parameter, which limits the number of tokens generated before stopping. The model stops generation when the token limit is reached, even if the response is incomplete, enabling cost control and predictable output sizes. Token counting is approximate (1 token ≈ 4 characters for English text) and handled server-side by OpenRouter.
Unique: OpenRouter's token limiting is applied server-side with transparent token counting; no client-side token estimation required, reducing implementation complexity compared to managing token counts locally.
vs alternatives: Simpler than client-side token counting and truncation; server-side enforcement ensures accurate limits without client-side token counting library dependencies.
GLM-5 processes extended code contexts (supporting multi-file projects and large codebases) while maintaining semantic understanding of system architecture through attention mechanisms optimized for code structure. The model uses specialized tokenization for programming languages and maintains coherence across thousands of tokens of code context, enabling generation of complex features that respect existing patterns and dependencies.
Unique: Engineered specifically for complex systems design with attention mechanisms tuned for code structure and architectural patterns, rather than generic language modeling — enables understanding of system-wide dependencies and design constraints across extended contexts
vs alternatives: Outperforms general-purpose models on large-scale programming tasks because it's optimized for architectural coherence and long-horizon code generation rather than treating code as generic text
GLM-5 supports extended reasoning chains for agentic workflows through structured prompt patterns that enable step-by-step decomposition of complex tasks. The model can maintain state across multiple turns, reason about tool outputs, and make decisions about next actions — designed for long-horizon agent loops where the model must plan, execute, observe, and adapt across dozens of steps.
Unique: Explicitly engineered for long-horizon agent workflows with architectural patterns optimized for extended reasoning chains, rather than single-turn tool calling — maintains coherence and decision quality across dozens of reasoning steps
vs alternatives: Better suited for multi-step agentic tasks than general-purpose models because reasoning and tool-use patterns are baked into the training, not bolted on via prompt engineering
Z.ai: GLM 5 scores higher at 24/100 vs IBM: Granite 4.0 Micro at 22/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
GLM-5 analyzes code for performance bottlenecks and suggests optimization strategies through understanding of algorithmic complexity, memory management, and system-level performance patterns. The model can identify inefficient algorithms, suggest data structure improvements, and recommend caching or parallelization strategies — enabling targeted performance improvements with understanding of trade-offs.
Unique: Understands algorithmic complexity and system-level performance patterns, enabling identification of fundamental bottlenecks and suggestion of targeted optimizations rather than micro-optimizations
vs alternatives: Identifies more fundamental performance issues than profiling tools because it understands algorithmic complexity and can suggest architectural improvements, not just code-level optimizations
GLM-5 generates comprehensive API specifications, including endpoint definitions, request/response schemas, error handling, and usage examples through understanding of API design best practices and REST/GraphQL patterns. The model can produce OpenAPI/Swagger specifications, generate API documentation, and suggest design improvements — enabling rapid API specification and documentation.
Unique: Generates comprehensive API specifications that follow REST/GraphQL best practices and include error handling, authentication, and usage examples — not just endpoint definitions
vs alternatives: Produces more complete and best-practice-aligned API specifications than simple code-to-spec tools because it understands API design patterns and includes comprehensive documentation
GLM-5 generates high-quality technical documentation, design documents, and architectural specifications through training on expert-level technical writing patterns. The model understands domain-specific terminology, maintains consistency across long documents, and can generate structured documentation (API specs, RFC-style documents, architecture decision records) with appropriate technical depth and precision.
Unique: Trained on expert-level technical documentation patterns and domain-specific terminology, enabling generation of publication-ready documentation with appropriate technical depth rather than generic summaries
vs alternatives: Produces more technically precise and domain-aware documentation than general-purpose models because it understands architectural patterns, trade-offs, and expert writing conventions specific to software engineering
GLM-5 breaks down complex, ambiguous problems into structured task hierarchies and implementation plans through chain-of-thought reasoning patterns. The model can identify dependencies, suggest phased approaches, and generate detailed step-by-step plans for tackling large engineering challenges — useful for translating high-level requirements into actionable development roadmaps.
Unique: Optimized for expert-level problem decomposition through training on complex system design patterns and architectural reasoning, enabling generation of sophisticated multi-phase plans rather than simple task lists
vs alternatives: Produces more sophisticated and architecturally-aware plans than general-purpose models because it understands system design patterns, dependency relationships, and phased implementation strategies
GLM-5 analyzes code for quality issues, architectural violations, and design improvements through patterns learned from expert code review practices. The model can identify performance bottlenecks, suggest refactoring opportunities, flag architectural inconsistencies, and provide detailed feedback on code quality — going beyond simple linting to understand design intent and system-wide implications.
Unique: Trained on expert code review patterns and architectural reasoning, enabling detection of design issues and architectural violations rather than just syntax and style problems
vs alternatives: Provides more sophisticated architectural and design feedback than linting tools because it understands system-wide implications and expert design patterns, not just local code quality
GLM-5 translates code between programming languages while preserving semantic meaning and adapting to language-specific idioms. The model understands language-specific patterns, libraries, and best practices, enabling translation that produces idiomatic code rather than mechanical line-by-line conversions — useful for migrating systems across language ecosystems or supporting polyglot architectures.
Unique: Produces idiomatic, language-specific code rather than mechanical translations because it understands language-specific patterns, libraries, and best practices learned from diverse codebases
vs alternatives: Generates more idiomatic and maintainable translations than simple pattern-matching tools because it understands semantic equivalence and language-specific idioms
+4 more capabilities