| 0 |
| 0 |
| Quality | 0 | 0 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Starting Price | $1.70e-8 per prompt token | $6.00e-7 per prompt token |
| Capabilities | 7 decomposed | 11 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Generates coherent text responses using a 3B parameter transformer architecture optimized for inference efficiency on resource-constrained environments. The model employs standard causal language modeling with attention mechanisms fine-tuned to handle extended context windows, enabling multi-turn conversations and document-aware responses without requiring GPU acceleration for deployment.
Unique: Granite 4.0 Micro uses IBM's proprietary fine-tuning approach for extended context handling in a 3B parameter footprint, achieving better long-document coherence than typical distilled models of equivalent size through specialized attention pattern optimization and training data curation focused on technical and enterprise content.
vs alternatives: Smaller and more efficient than Llama 2 7B while maintaining comparable long-context performance through IBM's specialized training; lower inference cost than Mistral 7B with similar quality for enterprise use cases.
Maintains coherent dialogue across multiple exchanges by processing concatenated conversation history as context in each inference call. The model uses standard transformer attention to track speaker roles, intent shifts, and contextual references across turns, enabling stateless conversation management where the full history is resubmitted with each new user message.
Unique: Granite 4.0 Micro's fine-tuning includes explicit optimization for conversation turn-taking and role awareness, allowing it to maintain speaker identity and intent consistency across turns more reliably than base models, using specialized tokens and attention patterns for dialogue structure.
vs alternatives: More efficient at multi-turn conversation than GPT-3.5 for equivalent parameter count; requires less prompt engineering for role clarity due to dialogue-specific fine-tuning compared to generic 3B models.
Generates and analyzes code across multiple programming languages by leveraging transformer attention over tokenized source code, with fine-tuning on technical documentation and code repositories. The model can complete code snippets, explain code logic, and generate code from natural language descriptions, using standard causal language modeling without specialized AST parsing or syntax-aware tokenization.
Unique: Granite 4.0 Micro includes IBM's enterprise-focused code training data emphasizing Java, Python, and JavaScript with strong performance on business logic and API integration patterns; fine-tuned on IBM's internal codebase and open-source enterprise projects rather than generic GitHub data.
vs alternatives: Better code quality for enterprise patterns (Spring, Django, Node.js frameworks) than generic 3B models; lower latency and cost than Codex or GPT-4 for simple completions, though less capable for complex multi-file refactoring.
Executes user instructions by conditioning generation on system prompts that define behavior, tone, and task constraints. The model uses standard prompt engineering patterns where system instructions are prepended to user input, allowing dynamic role-playing, task specialization, and output format control through text-based configuration without model fine-tuning.
Unique: Granite 4.0 Micro's fine-tuning includes explicit instruction-following optimization using IBM's proprietary instruction dataset focused on enterprise and technical tasks, improving adherence to complex multi-step instructions compared to base models without specialized instruction tuning.
vs alternatives: More reliable instruction-following than generic 3B models due to enterprise-focused training; comparable to Llama 2 Instruct for instruction adherence but with lower inference cost and smaller model size.
Provides text generation through OpenRouter's REST API with support for streaming responses via server-sent events (SSE) or polling. Requests are formatted as JSON payloads containing model parameters (temperature, max_tokens, top_p) and conversation history, with responses streamed token-by-token or returned in full, enabling real-time user feedback and progressive output rendering.
Unique: Accessed exclusively through OpenRouter's unified API layer, which abstracts IBM's Granite model behind a standardized interface supporting provider switching, cost optimization, and fallback routing — enabling applications to swap models without code changes.
vs alternatives: Lower cost than direct cloud provider APIs (AWS Bedrock, Azure OpenAI) for equivalent inference; OpenRouter's provider abstraction enables cost-based routing and model switching without application refactoring, unlike direct API integration.
Modulates output randomness and diversity through temperature, top_p (nucleus sampling), and top_k parameters passed to the API. Lower temperatures (0.1-0.3) produce deterministic, focused outputs suitable for factual tasks; higher temperatures (0.7-1.0) increase creativity and diversity for generative tasks. The model applies these parameters during token sampling, affecting probability distribution over vocabulary without retraining.
Unique: OpenRouter exposes standard sampling parameters (temperature, top_p, top_k) with documented ranges and defaults optimized for Granite 4.0 Micro; no proprietary parameter tuning required, enabling straightforward integration with standard LLM parameter conventions.
vs alternatives: Standard parameter interface matches OpenAI and Anthropic APIs, enabling easy model switching; no proprietary tuning required compared to some specialized models with custom sampling strategies.
Constrains output length by specifying max_tokens parameter, which limits the number of tokens generated before stopping. The model stops generation when the token limit is reached, even if the response is incomplete, enabling cost control and predictable output sizes. Token counting is approximate (1 token ≈ 4 characters for English text) and handled server-side by OpenRouter.
Unique: OpenRouter's token limiting is applied server-side with transparent token counting; no client-side token estimation required, reducing implementation complexity compared to managing token counts locally.
vs alternatives: Simpler than client-side token counting and truncation; server-side enforcement ensures accurate limits without client-side token counting library dependencies.
GLM-4.5 uses a Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architecture to dynamically route tokens through specialized expert networks based on input characteristics, enabling efficient processing of 128k-token contexts without proportional latency increases. The MoE design allows selective expert activation per token, reducing computational overhead while maintaining reasoning depth across extended conversations and multi-document analysis tasks typical of agent-based workflows.
Unique: Mixture-of-Experts routing specifically tuned for agent workloads rather than generic dense models; expert activation patterns are optimized for tool-use sequences and multi-step reasoning rather than general language tasks
vs alternatives: Outperforms dense models like GPT-4 Turbo on agent tasks within 128k context by routing computational budget to relevant experts, reducing latency and cost vs. models that process all tokens through identical layers
GLM-4.5 implements native function calling through a schema-based registry where tools are defined as JSON schemas with parameter constraints, type validation, and description metadata. The model learns to emit structured tool invocations that map directly to function signatures, enabling deterministic tool orchestration without post-processing or regex parsing. Integration with OpenRouter's API exposes this via standard function-calling parameters compatible with OpenAI's format.
Unique: Schema-based function calling is trained directly into the model weights rather than implemented as post-hoc decoding constraints, allowing the model to learn semantic relationships between tool purposes and input context during training
vs alternatives: More reliable than constraint-based function calling (e.g., Guidance, LMQL) because tool selection is learned rather than enforced, reducing parsing failures and enabling the model to reason about tool applicability
Z.ai: GLM 4.5 scores higher at 24/100 vs IBM: Granite 4.0 Micro at 22/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
GLM-4.5 can be used for batch inference through OpenRouter's API, enabling cost-optimized processing of large numbers of requests. Batch processing typically offers reduced pricing compared to real-time API calls and is suitable for non-urgent inference tasks. The model can process batches of prompts efficiently, with results returned after processing completes. This is valuable for agents running scheduled tasks or processing large datasets.
Unique: Batch processing is offered through OpenRouter's unified API rather than a separate batch service, enabling seamless switching between real-time and batch modes with the same client code
vs alternatives: More cost-effective than real-time API for high-volume inference; simpler than managing separate batch infrastructure because OpenRouter handles queuing and result delivery
GLM-4.5 maintains coherent conversation state across turns by encoding prior messages into a compressed representation that persists within the 128k context window. The model uses attention mechanisms to selectively retrieve relevant prior context, enabling agents to reference earlier decisions, tool results, and user preferences without explicit memory management. This is particularly effective for agent workflows where state accumulation (e.g., task progress, discovered facts) must inform subsequent actions.
Unique: Implicit memory management through attention-based context selection rather than explicit memory modules; the model learns which prior turns are relevant without separate retrieval or summarization steps
vs alternatives: More efficient than explicit memory systems (e.g., LangChain's ConversationBufferMemory) because attention is computed once during inference rather than requiring separate retrieval and summarization passes
GLM-4.5 generates code across 40+ programming languages by leveraging training data that includes diverse codebases and syntax patterns. The model understands language-specific idioms, library conventions, and structural patterns (e.g., async/await in JavaScript, type hints in Python, generics in Java) without explicit language-specific modules. Generation is context-aware, respecting indentation, existing code style, and project conventions when completing or extending code snippets.
Unique: Language-agnostic code generation trained on diverse codebases rather than language-specific fine-tuning; the model generalizes syntax patterns across languages, enabling reasonable code generation even for less common languages
vs alternatives: Broader language coverage than specialized models like Codex (which emphasizes Python/JavaScript) but lower quality on niche languages compared to language-specific models; better for polyglot teams than single-language specialists
GLM-4.5 is trained on extensive technical documentation, API references, and code examples, enabling it to understand and reason about complex technical concepts, library APIs, and system architectures. The model can parse API schemas (OpenAPI, GraphQL, Protocol Buffers), understand parameter constraints and type systems, and generate code that correctly uses APIs based on documentation. This is particularly valuable for agent workflows that must interact with external systems.
Unique: Semantic understanding of API schemas and documentation is learned from training data rather than implemented as a separate schema parser; the model reasons about API semantics holistically
vs alternatives: More flexible than code-generation-only models because it understands API semantics and can reason about correctness; better than generic LLMs for technical tasks because training includes extensive API documentation
GLM-4.5 can generate responses that explicitly show reasoning steps, enabling transparency into how conclusions were reached. When prompted with chain-of-thought patterns, the model generates intermediate reasoning steps before final answers, making it suitable for applications requiring explainability or verification. This is implemented through training on reasoning-annotated data and prompt patterns that encourage step-by-step decomposition.
Unique: Chain-of-thought reasoning is trained directly into the model rather than implemented as a decoding strategy; the model learns to generate reasoning steps as part of its core training objective
vs alternatives: More natural and coherent reasoning steps than prompt-injection approaches (e.g., appending 'think step by step') because reasoning is learned as a first-class capability
GLM-4.5 supports multiple languages (Chinese, English, and others) with training that enables cross-lingual reasoning — understanding concepts expressed in one language and reasoning about them in another. The model can translate, summarize, and reason across languages without language-specific degradation. This is particularly valuable for global applications and agents that must operate in multilingual environments.
Unique: Cross-lingual reasoning is learned from multilingual training data rather than implemented as separate language-specific models; the model develops a shared representation across languages
vs alternatives: More efficient than maintaining separate models per language because a single model handles all languages; better for cross-lingual reasoning than language-specific models because the shared representation enables concept transfer
+3 more capabilities