| Ecosystem | 1 | 1 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 17 decomposed | 12 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Executes a closed-loop reasoning cycle that alternates between LLM inference and tool execution, using structured tool-calling APIs (OpenAI, Anthropic native function calling) to invoke observability and infrastructure tools. The loop maintains conversation state across iterations, processes tool outputs through transformers, and implements context window management to handle large observability datasets. Tool execution is gated by an approval/security model that validates tool calls before execution against configured RBAC policies.
Unique: Implements a production-grade agentic loop with native support for tool approval workflows and RBAC-gated execution, combined with context window management specifically designed for observability data. Uses factory pattern for LLM provider abstraction (holmes/core/llm.py) enabling multi-provider support without code changes, and tool output transformers to normalize heterogeneous data sources into consistent formats for LLM consumption.
vs alternatives: Differs from generic LLM frameworks (LangChain, LlamaIndex) by embedding SRE-specific concerns (alert investigation, runbook integration, observability platform connectors) directly into the agentic loop rather than requiring custom tool definitions, reducing integration friction for incident response use cases.
Aggregates real-time observability data from heterogeneous sources (Kubernetes API, Prometheus, Grafana, Loki, Tempo, DataDog, cloud provider APIs) through a pluggable toolset architecture. Each toolset encapsulates source-specific query logic, authentication, and data transformation. The system uses a factory-based loader (holmes/plugins/toolsets/__init__.py) to dynamically instantiate toolsets from configuration, and applies tool output transformers to normalize disparate data formats into a consistent schema for LLM processing.
Unique: Uses a declarative toolset loading system (holmes/plugins/toolsets/__init__.py) with factory pattern and tool output transformers to normalize heterogeneous observability data without requiring custom adapter code. Supports both built-in toolsets (Kubernetes, Prometheus, Grafana, Loki, Tempo, DataDog) and user-defined custom toolsets through a plugin interface, enabling extensibility without forking.
vs alternatives: Provides deeper observability platform integration than generic LLM agents (which typically support only REST API calls) by offering domain-specific toolsets with pre-built queries, authentication handling, and output normalization for Kubernetes, Prometheus, and cloud platforms.
Provides an interactive CLI interface (holmes/interactive.py) for conversational investigation with multi-turn dialogue support. The CLI maintains conversation history, supports tool execution with user approval workflows, displays investigation results with formatting, and integrates with the agentic loop for iterative investigation. Supports both interactive mode (human-in-the-loop) and batch mode (automated investigation) through the same codebase.
Unique: Implements an interactive CLI that integrates with the agentic loop, supporting multi-turn conversation with tool approval workflows and formatted result display. Shares the same investigation logic as automated workflows, enabling seamless switching between interactive and batch modes without code duplication.
vs alternatives: Provides tighter integration with the agentic loop than generic chatbot CLIs by supporting tool approval workflows, investigation context persistence across turns, and formatted display of observability data.
Exposes investigation capabilities through a REST API (server.py) with streaming support for long-running investigations. The API supports investigation triggering (alerts, issues, custom queries), result polling or streaming via Server-Sent Events (SSE), and webhook integration for alert/issue sources. Implements authentication, rate limiting, and request validation. Supports both synchronous (request-response) and asynchronous (streaming) investigation patterns.
Unique: Implements a REST API with streaming support (Server-Sent Events) for long-running investigations, enabling real-time result delivery without polling. Supports both synchronous and asynchronous investigation patterns, and integrates with webhook sources for alert/issue triggering, enabling seamless integration into existing incident response platforms.
vs alternatives: Provides tighter streaming integration than generic REST APIs by supporting Server-Sent Events for real-time investigation progress delivery, enabling responsive UIs and real-time incident response workflows.
Implements a tool approval and security model that gates tool execution based on RBAC policies and approval workflows. The system supports multiple approval modes: auto-approve (for safe tools), require-approval (for sensitive operations like pod deletion), and deny (for prohibited tools). Integrates with Kubernetes RBAC and custom authorization providers. Logs all tool executions for audit trails and supports dry-run mode for previewing tool effects without execution.
Unique: Implements a fine-grained tool approval model that supports multiple approval modes (auto-approve, require-approval, deny) and integrates with Kubernetes RBAC for policy enforcement. Supports dry-run mode for previewing tool effects and maintains audit logs for compliance, enabling secure agent deployment in enterprise environments.
vs alternatives: Provides tighter security integration than generic agent frameworks by embedding RBAC-aware tool approval and audit logging directly into the tool execution pipeline, enabling enterprise-grade security without external policy engines.
Implements scheduled investigation capabilities for proactive health checks and periodic analysis. The system supports cron-like scheduling (e.g., daily health checks on critical services), automatic investigation triggering based on conditions (e.g., investigate when error rate exceeds threshold), and result persistence to external systems (Jira, Slack, databases). Integrates with the agentic loop for investigation execution and supports custom investigation templates per schedule.
Unique: Implements scheduled investigation capabilities that integrate with external schedulers (Kubernetes CronJob, GitHub Actions) and support custom investigation templates per schedule. Supports both time-based scheduling (cron expressions) and condition-based triggering (metric thresholds), enabling flexible automation patterns.
vs alternatives: Provides tighter automation integration than generic scheduling tools by embedding investigation logic directly into the scheduled workflow, enabling end-to-end automation of health checks and trend analysis without external orchestration.
Provides a plugin system for developing custom toolsets that extend HolmesGPT with domain-specific tools. The system uses a base Toolset class and factory pattern (holmes/plugins/toolsets/__init__.py) to enable custom tool definitions without modifying core code. Custom toolsets can integrate with proprietary systems (internal APIs, custom databases, specialized monitoring tools) and are loaded dynamically from configuration. Includes documentation and examples for common integration patterns.
Unique: Implements a plugin system using factory pattern and base Toolset classes that enables custom toolset development without modifying core code. Supports dynamic toolset loading from configuration and includes examples for common integration patterns (REST APIs, databases, proprietary systems), enabling extensibility without forking.
vs alternatives: Provides tighter extensibility than generic agent frameworks by embedding toolset development patterns directly into the architecture, enabling rapid custom integration development without requiring deep framework knowledge.
Implements Model Context Protocol (MCP) server support, enabling HolmesGPT to be deployed as an MCP server and integrated with other MCP clients (Claude Desktop, other LLM applications). The MCP integration exposes HolmesGPT tools as MCP resources, enabling external LLM applications to invoke investigations without direct API calls. Supports both standalone MCP server deployment and embedded MCP server within HolmesGPT.
Unique: Implements MCP server support that exposes HolmesGPT tools as MCP resources, enabling integration with MCP-compatible LLM applications (Claude Desktop, custom clients). Supports both standalone and embedded MCP server deployment, enabling flexible integration patterns.
vs alternatives: Provides tighter MCP integration than generic agent frameworks by embedding MCP server support directly into HolmesGPT, enabling seamless integration with Claude Desktop and other MCP-compatible applications without external adapters.
+9 more capabilities
Crawls 11+ heterogeneous platforms (Zhihu, Weibo, Bilibili, Twitter, Reddit, HackerNews, etc.) and RSS feeds using platform-specific scrapers, normalizes disparate data schemas into a unified NewsItem model, and deduplicates content across sources using fuzzy title matching and URL canonicalization. The system maintains platform-specific metadata (rank, heat value, engagement metrics) while presenting a single normalized feed, enabling cross-platform trend detection that would be invisible within individual platform silos.
Unique: Implements platform-specific crawler modules with unified NewsItem schema and fuzzy deduplication across 11+ heterogeneous sources (Chinese + international), rather than relying on single-platform APIs or generic RSS parsing. Maintains platform-specific metadata (rank × 0.6 + frequency × 0.3 + platform hot value × 0.1) for weighted hotspot scoring.
vs alternatives: Covers more platforms (especially Chinese social media) with deeper metadata extraction than generic RSS aggregators, and provides unified deduplication across sources unlike single-platform monitoring tools.
Implements a multi-stage filtering pipeline that matches news items against user-defined keywords using regex patterns, required word lists, and excluded word lists. The system applies frequency-based scoring (keyword occurrence count) combined with platform hotspot weights to rank filtered results. Configuration is stored in frequency_words.txt with support for regex patterns, AND/OR/NOT boolean operators, and per-keyword weighting. Filtering occurs at collection time (reducing storage) and again at report generation time (enabling dynamic reconfiguration without re-crawling).
Unique: Combines regex pattern matching with frequency-based scoring and platform hotspot weighting (rank × 0.6 + frequency × 0.3 + platform hot value × 0.1) in a two-stage pipeline (collection-time and report-time filtering). Supports dynamic reconfiguration without re-crawling by applying filters at report generation.
TrendRadar scores higher at 58/100 vs holmesgpt at 38/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
vs alternatives: More flexible than simple keyword matching (supports regex and boolean logic) and more efficient than semantic filtering (no LLM overhead), making it suitable for real-time filtering at scale.
Detects newly emerged topics by comparing current crawl results against historical data stored in the system. Topics are marked as 🆕 (new) if they appear for the first time in the current crawl or if their hotspot rank increased significantly compared to previous crawls. The system tracks topic emergence velocity (how quickly a topic rises in rankings) and flags topics with unusual acceleration. New topic detection is performed at report generation time, enabling dynamic detection without re-crawling. The system maintains a historical hotspot index for comparison.
Unique: Detects new topics by comparing current hotspot rankings against historical data, marking topics with significant rank increases as 🆕. Tracks emergence velocity to distinguish breaking news from sustained trends.
vs alternatives: More efficient than semantic similarity detection (no LLM overhead) and more accurate than simple first-appearance detection (accounts for re-emerging topics), but requires historical baseline data.
Provides a web-based UI for editing TrendRadar configuration files (config.yaml, frequency_words.txt, timeline.yaml) with real-time validation and preview. The editor supports: (1) syntax highlighting for YAML and regex, (2) validation of keyword patterns (regex compilation check), (3) preview of filtered results based on current keyword configuration, (4) drag-and-drop channel configuration, (5) schedule preview (shows next 10 execution times). Changes are validated before saving, preventing configuration errors. The editor is optional; users can edit config files directly.
Unique: Provides web-based configuration editor with real-time validation, regex preview, and schedule visualization. Enables non-technical users to configure TrendRadar without editing YAML files.
vs alternatives: More user-friendly than manual YAML editing and provides validation feedback, but adds operational complexity compared to file-based configuration.
Integrates LiteLLM to provide vendor-agnostic AI analysis and summarization of filtered news items. Users configure their preferred LLM provider (OpenAI, Anthropic, Ollama, local models, etc.) once in config.yaml, and the system automatically routes analysis requests to that provider. The AI analysis capability includes: (1) automated summarization of long articles into key points, (2) sentiment analysis (positive/negative/neutral), (3) trend prediction based on historical patterns, and (4) custom analysis prompts. Analysis results are cached to avoid redundant API calls and can be pushed directly to notification channels.
Unique: Uses LiteLLM abstraction layer to support any LLM provider (OpenAI, Anthropic, Ollama, local models) with single configuration, enabling provider switching without code changes. Caches analysis results to reduce redundant API calls and costs.
vs alternatives: More flexible than hardcoded OpenAI integration (supports any LiteLLM provider) and cheaper than dedicated sentiment analysis APIs (can use local models), but slower than rule-based sentiment analysis.
Leverages LiteLLM to translate news content from source languages (primarily Chinese) to target languages (English, etc.) on-demand. The system detects source language automatically (via langdetect or similar), caches translations to avoid re-translating identical content, and batches translation requests to reduce API calls. Translations are stored alongside original content, enabling bilingual reports and multi-language notification delivery. Translation can be triggered at collection time (all news) or report time (only filtered news).
Unique: Implements provider-agnostic translation via LiteLLM with automatic language detection, content-based caching, and batch request optimization. Stores translations alongside originals for bilingual report generation.
vs alternatives: More flexible than dedicated translation APIs (supports any LiteLLM provider) and cheaper than commercial translation services when using local models, but slower than specialized translation APIs.
Implements a notification abstraction layer supporting 9+ delivery channels (WeChat, WeWork, Feishu, Telegram, Email, ntfy, Bark, Slack, etc.). Each channel has a provider-specific formatter that converts normalized news items into channel-appropriate messages (e.g., WeChat card format, Telegram markdown, email HTML). The system batches notifications atomically—all news items for a report are sent as a single batch to each channel, ensuring consistency and reducing API calls. Message formatting respects channel constraints (character limits, attachment limits, etc.) and supports templating for customization.
Unique: Implements atomic message batching across 9+ heterogeneous channels with provider-specific formatters and constraint-aware truncation. Single configuration enables simultaneous delivery to WeChat, WeWork, Feishu, Telegram, Email, ntfy, Bark, Slack, etc. without code changes.
vs alternatives: Supports more channels (especially Chinese platforms like WeWork, Feishu) than generic notification services, and batching reduces API calls and spam compared to per-item notifications.
Exposes TrendRadar's data and analysis capabilities as an MCP server, enabling AI agents and LLM applications to query trends, perform analysis, and generate insights through natural language. The MCP server implements tools for: (1) querying filtered news by keyword/date/platform, (2) retrieving trend statistics and hotspot rankings, (3) running custom analysis on news subsets, (4) generating reports in various formats. Clients (Claude, other LLM agents) can invoke these tools via MCP protocol, enabling conversational exploration of trends without direct database access. The server maintains state across multiple requests, allowing multi-turn conversations about trends.
Unique: Implements full MCP server exposing trend data and analysis tools to LLM agents, enabling conversational queries and multi-turn analysis workflows. Maintains state across requests and supports complex tool invocations (filtering, analysis, report generation).
vs alternatives: Enables conversational access to trends (vs. API-only access) and integrates with LLM agent workflows (vs. standalone tools), but adds operational complexity compared to simple REST APIs.
+4 more capabilities