Health Scanner vs Abridge
Side-by-side comparison to help you choose.
| Feature | Health Scanner | Abridge |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Web App | Product |
| UnfragileRank | 27/100 | 29/100 |
| Adoption | 0 | 0 |
| Quality | 1 | 0 |
| Ecosystem | 0 |
| 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Paid |
| Capabilities | 13 decomposed | 10 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Accepts medical records in DICOM, PDF, image, and printed document formats via web upload or phone camera, automatically extracting structured health data (test results, prescriptions, diagnoses) using a combination of proprietary image neural networks for visual content and OCR-based text extraction. The system normalizes heterogeneous input formats into a unified internal representation for downstream AI analysis, handling variable image quality from phone photos to professional medical prints.
Unique: Combines proprietary image neural networks with OCR and DICOM parsing to handle heterogeneous medical record formats (professional imaging, PDFs, phone photos, prints) in a single unified pipeline, normalizing outputs for AI analysis — most competitors require standardized digital formats or manual data entry
vs alternatives: Broader input format support than most health AI tools (accepts phone photos and prints, not just digital records), reducing friction for users in regions with limited digital healthcare infrastructure
Provides conversational Q&A interface over uploaded medical records using GPT-3.5, GPT-4, and Google Gemini as interchangeable backend models, with free tier restricted to GPT-3.5/Gemini and paid tier unlocking GPT-4 access. The system retrieves relevant sections from stored medical records in response to user queries, though the exact retrieval mechanism (RAG, semantic search, or keyword matching) is undocumented. Supports 40 languages for query input and response generation.
Unique: Implements model abstraction layer allowing users to switch between GPT-3.5, GPT-4, and Gemini backends with pricing-based access control (free tier limited to weaker models), with 40-language support for both input and output — most health AI tools lock users into single-model ecosystems
vs alternatives: Broader language support (40 languages) than most medical AI tools (typically English-only or 5-10 languages), making it more accessible to non-English-speaking populations in underserved regions
Implements pricing-based access control to AI models, with free tier restricted to GPT-3.5 and Google Gemini, while paid tier unlocks GPT-4 access. Users can select which model to use for analysis (if multiple are available in their tier), with model choice affecting response quality and potentially latency. The pricing structure and tier definitions are not publicly documented.
Unique: Implements transparent model abstraction layer with pricing-based access control, allowing users to understand which model they're using and upgrade for better performance — most health AI tools hide model selection and lock users into single-model ecosystems
vs alternatives: Explicit model selection with tiered access enables cost-conscious users to start free while offering upgrade path for higher-quality analysis, compared to competitors with fixed model choices
Supports analysis of NHS app screenshots and UK-specific medical record formats, enabling British users to upload records directly from the NHS digital health platform. The system recognizes NHS-specific data structures and can extract information from NHS app screenshots without requiring manual transcription.
Unique: Implements NHS app screenshot recognition and extraction, enabling UK patients to directly upload NHS digital records without manual transcription — most health AI tools don't support NHS-specific formats or screenshot extraction
vs alternatives: Direct NHS app integration reduces friction for UK users by eliminating manual data entry from NHS digital health platform
Announced but not yet live feature providing AI-based psychiatric consultation and mental health analysis. The system will analyze mental health symptoms and provide preliminary psychiatric guidance, though implementation details, model architecture, and launch timeline are undocumented. Feature status is 'coming soon' with no ETA.
Unique: Announced feature for AI-based psychiatric consultation, extending health analysis beyond physical medicine to mental health — most health AI tools focus on physical health analysis only
vs alternatives: Planned psychiatric AI would differentiate from physical-health-only competitors, but feature is not yet live and carries vaporware risk
Analyzes uploaded medical records and user queries to identify potential drug-drug interactions, contraindications, and medication safety concerns by cross-referencing extracted medication lists against an undocumented drug interaction database. The system integrates with the chatbot interface, allowing users to ask about specific medication combinations or receive proactive warnings based on their prescription history.
Unique: Integrates medication extraction from multiformat medical records with real-time interaction checking via LLM-mediated chatbot, allowing conversational queries about drug combinations rather than requiring structured input — most drug interaction tools require manual medication entry or API integration
vs alternatives: Automatically extracts medications from uploaded records rather than requiring manual entry, reducing friction for users with complex medication histories
Analyzes extracted blood test values from medical records using LLM-based interpretation, providing context-aware explanations of test results (normal/abnormal ranges, clinical significance, potential causes of abnormalities). The system compares values against reference ranges and generates natural language summaries of findings, supporting multi-test analysis when multiple lab reports are uploaded.
Unique: Combines automated extraction of lab values from multiformat records with LLM-based contextual interpretation, generating natural language summaries of clinical significance — most lab analysis tools either require manual value entry or provide only reference range comparisons without clinical context
vs alternatives: Provides clinical interpretation beyond simple reference range comparison, explaining what abnormal values might indicate and their potential significance
Offers optional human expert review of uploaded medical records and AI analysis, with a licensed medical team generating detailed reports that synthesize AI findings with professional clinical judgment. The exact workflow (manual review, AI-assisted review, or hybrid) is undocumented, as are SLAs, pricing, and which medical specialties are available. Reports are generated asynchronously with unknown turnaround time.
Unique: Implements human-in-the-loop workflow where licensed medical experts review and synthesize AI analysis of medical records, generating credible reports for medical-legal use — most health AI tools provide AI-only analysis without professional verification pathway
vs alternatives: Adds professional medical credibility through expert review, enabling reports suitable for insurance, employment, or legal purposes where AI-only analysis would lack authority
+5 more capabilities
Captures and transcribes patient-clinician conversations in real-time during clinical encounters. Converts spoken dialogue into text format while preserving medical terminology and context.
Automatically generates structured clinical notes from conversation transcripts using medical AI. Produces documentation that follows clinical standards and includes relevant sections like assessment, plan, and history of present illness.
Directly integrates with Epic electronic health record system to automatically populate generated clinical notes into patient records. Eliminates manual data entry and ensures documentation flows seamlessly into existing workflows.
Ensures all patient conversations, transcripts, and generated documentation are processed and stored in compliance with HIPAA regulations. Implements security protocols for protected health information throughout the documentation workflow.
Processes patient-clinician conversations in multiple languages and generates documentation in the appropriate language. Enables healthcare delivery across diverse patient populations with different primary languages.
Accurately identifies and standardizes medical terminology, abbreviations, and clinical concepts from conversations. Ensures documentation uses correct medical language and coding-ready terminology.
Abridge scores higher at 29/100 vs Health Scanner at 27/100. Health Scanner leads on quality, while Abridge is stronger on ecosystem. However, Health Scanner offers a free tier which may be better for getting started.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Measures and tracks time savings achieved through automated documentation generation. Provides analytics on clinician time freed up from administrative tasks and documentation burden reduction.
Provides implementation support, training, and workflow optimization to help clinicians integrate Abridge into their existing documentation processes. Ensures smooth adoption and maximum effectiveness.
+2 more capabilities