| Quality | 0 | 0 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Starting Price | $6.00e-8 per prompt token | $1.05e-6 per prompt token |
| Capabilities | 5 decomposed | 13 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Generates contextually rich dialogue and character-driven narratives through fine-tuning on roleplay datasets and narrative corpora. The model uses a merged architecture combining Llama 2 13B base weights with specialized adapters trained on creative writing and character interaction patterns, enabling coherent multi-turn conversations with consistent persona maintenance and descriptive narrative flourishes without explicit prompt engineering.
Unique: Specialized merge of Llama 2 13B with roleplay-specific fine-tuning that prioritizes narrative richness and character consistency over general-purpose instruction-following, using curated creative writing datasets rather than generic instruction tuning
vs alternatives: Outperforms base Llama 2 and generic chat models on creative roleplay tasks due to specialized training, while remaining smaller and faster than 70B+ models, making it cost-effective for indie developers
Maintains coherent conversation state across multiple exchanges by processing full dialogue history within the context window, using transformer attention mechanisms to weight recent messages and character context more heavily. The model tracks implicit conversational state (character mood, relationship dynamics, narrative threads) without explicit state variables, relying on learned patterns from roleplay training data to infer and maintain consistency across turns.
Unique: Roleplay-specific fine-tuning enables implicit tracking of character relationships and emotional arcs across conversation turns without explicit state machines, learned from narrative datasets where character consistency is critical
vs alternatives: Better at maintaining character consistency across long conversations than base Llama 2 due to creative writing training, though less sophisticated than explicit memory systems like RAG or conversation summarization pipelines
Generates detailed, evocative descriptions and narrative prose by leveraging fine-tuning on creative writing corpora that emphasize sensory details, metaphor, and literary style. The model produces longer, more elaborate responses with environmental descriptions and action narration compared to instruction-tuned models, using learned patterns from fantasy, science fiction, and interactive fiction training data to construct multi-sentence narrative blocks.
Unique: Fine-tuned specifically on creative writing and roleplay datasets that prioritize rich, descriptive prose over concise instruction-following, producing naturally elaborate narratives without requiring verbose prompts
vs alternatives: Produces more literary and descriptive output than base Llama 2 or generic chat models, though less controllable than models with explicit style parameters or dedicated creative writing fine-tunes
Provides model inference through OpenRouter's HTTP API with support for streaming token-by-token responses, enabling real-time output display in client applications. Requests are routed through OpenRouter's infrastructure which handles model loading, batching, and response streaming via Server-Sent Events (SSE), allowing developers to display model output progressively without waiting for full completion.
Unique: Accessed exclusively through OpenRouter's managed API with streaming support, rather than direct model weights or local inference, providing abstraction over infrastructure while enabling real-time response delivery
vs alternatives: Simpler to integrate than self-hosted inference (no GPU required, no model management), and streaming capability provides better UX than batch API calls, though with higher latency and ongoing API costs
Executes user instructions with a bias toward creative, narrative-rich responses due to fine-tuning on roleplay and creative writing datasets. The model balances instruction adherence with creative elaboration, using learned patterns to expand simple requests into richer outputs while still following explicit directives. This differs from pure instruction-tuned models which prioritize conciseness and direct compliance.
Unique: Balances instruction adherence with creative elaboration through roleplay-specific fine-tuning, producing naturally richer responses than base models without requiring verbose prompts, while maintaining instruction compliance
vs alternatives: Better at creative instruction-following than base Llama 2, though less suitable for technical tasks than general-purpose instruction-tuned models like Mistral or Hermes
GLM-5.1 executes multi-step coding tasks over extended timeframes without requiring human intervention between steps, using an internal planning mechanism that decomposes complex objectives into sub-tasks and maintains execution state across sequential operations. Unlike minute-level interaction models that require prompting after each step, this capability enables the model to autonomously navigate decision trees, handle errors, and adapt strategy based on intermediate results without context resets.
Unique: Designed specifically for minute+ autonomous execution windows rather than single-turn interactions; maintains internal execution state and decision-making across extended task horizons without requiring external orchestration or re-prompting between steps
vs alternatives: Outperforms GPT-4 and Claude for long-horizon coding tasks because it's architected for continuous autonomous operation rather than stateless request-response cycles
GLM-5.1 generates and refactors code with awareness of the full codebase structure, dependencies, and patterns, using semantic understanding of how changes in one file propagate to others. The model analyzes import graphs, function signatures, and usage patterns across files to ensure generated code maintains consistency and doesn't introduce breaking changes, rather than treating each file in isolation.
Unique: Maintains semantic awareness of codebase structure and cross-file dependencies during generation, enabling it to make coordinated changes across multiple files rather than treating each file independently
vs alternatives: Produces more consistent multi-file refactorings than Copilot or Claude because it reasons about the entire codebase context simultaneously rather than file-by-file
Z.ai: GLM 5.1 scores higher at 24/100 vs MythoMax 13B at 21/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
GLM-5.1 diagnoses errors and bugs by analyzing error messages, stack traces, and code context to identify root causes and suggest fixes. The model correlates error symptoms with likely causes, explains why errors occur, and provides specific debugging steps or code fixes.
Unique: Diagnoses errors by correlating symptoms with root causes using semantic understanding of code and error patterns, providing explanations and fixes rather than just pattern matching
vs alternatives: More effective at diagnosing subtle bugs than search-based solutions because it reasons about code semantics and error causality
GLM-5.1 identifies performance bottlenecks in code and suggests optimizations with specific implementation guidance, analyzing algorithms, data structures, and resource usage to recommend improvements. The model understands performance implications of different approaches and can suggest algorithmic or architectural changes to improve efficiency.
Unique: Suggests optimizations based on algorithmic and architectural analysis rather than just code-level tweaks, understanding performance implications of different approaches
vs alternatives: Provides more meaningful performance guidance than generic LLMs because it understands algorithm complexity and can suggest structural improvements
GLM-5.1 analyzes code for security vulnerabilities including injection attacks, authentication/authorization issues, cryptographic weaknesses, and data exposure risks, providing specific remediation guidance. The model understands common vulnerability patterns and security best practices to identify risks and suggest secure implementations.
Unique: Identifies security vulnerabilities through semantic analysis of code patterns and provides remediation guidance based on security best practices, not just pattern matching against known CVEs
vs alternatives: More effective at finding context-specific security issues than SAST tools because it understands code intent and can suggest secure implementations
GLM-5.1 performs step-by-step reasoning about code behavior by internally simulating or tracing execution paths, allowing it to predict runtime behavior, identify bugs, and explain code logic without requiring actual execution. This capability uses chain-of-thought-like reasoning applied specifically to code semantics, tracking variable state, control flow, and function call sequences to reason about correctness.
Unique: Applies extended reasoning specifically to code semantics and execution paths, enabling it to predict runtime behavior and identify subtle bugs through symbolic execution simulation rather than pattern matching
vs alternatives: More effective at finding subtle logic bugs than GPT-4 because it explicitly traces execution state rather than relying on pattern recognition
GLM-5.1 maintains rich context across multiple conversation turns when working on code, remembering previous edits, design decisions, and constraints without requiring users to re-specify them. The model builds an internal model of the codebase state and user intent that persists across turns, enabling iterative refinement where each turn builds on previous work rather than starting fresh.
Unique: Maintains stateful context across turns specifically optimized for code collaboration, remembering design decisions and codebase state without explicit memory structures
vs alternatives: Provides better iterative code refinement than stateless models because it retains context about previous edits and design intent across turns
GLM-5.1 translates natural language specifications into code that preserves semantic intent, handling ambiguous or underspecified requirements by inferring reasonable implementations based on context and common patterns. The model uses semantic understanding of both natural language and code to bridge the gap between high-level intent and low-level implementation details.
Unique: Translates natural language to code with explicit semantic fidelity checking, inferring reasonable implementations for underspecified requirements rather than producing literal or incomplete code
vs alternatives: Handles ambiguous requirements better than Copilot because it uses semantic reasoning to infer intent rather than pattern matching against training data
+5 more capabilities