MS COCO (Common Objects in Context) ranks higher at 61/100 vs Google: Gemma 4 31B at 22/100. Capability-level comparison backed by match graph evidence from real search data.
| Feature | Google: Gemma 4 31B | MS COCO (Common Objects in Context) |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Model | Dataset |
| UnfragileRank | 22/100 | 61/100 |
| Adoption |
| 0 |
| 1 |
| Quality | 0 | 1 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Paid | Free |
| Starting Price | $1.30e-7 per prompt token | — |
| Capabilities | 7 decomposed | 11 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Processes both text and image inputs simultaneously within a single inference pass, using a unified embedding space that aligns visual and textual representations. The model architecture integrates a vision encoder (likely ViT-based) with the language model backbone, allowing it to reason across modalities without separate encoding steps. Supports up to 256K token context window for extended reasoning over mixed-media documents.
Unique: Unified embedding space for vision and language allows direct cross-modal reasoning without separate encoding pipelines; 256K context window enables analysis of image-heavy documents with extensive surrounding text context
vs alternatives: Larger context window (256K) than GPT-4V (128K) and Claude 3.5 Sonnet (200K) enables longer document analysis with images, while maintaining competitive multimodal understanding through joint training
Implements a two-stage inference architecture where an optional 'thinking' mode enables the model to perform internal chain-of-thought reasoning before generating final outputs. When activated, the model allocates computational budget to explore solution spaces, backtrack, and refine reasoning before committing to a response. This is configurable per-request, allowing callers to trade latency for reasoning depth on complex problems.
Unique: Configurable thinking mode allows per-request control over reasoning depth without model retraining; integrates thinking tokens into unified 256K context window rather than as separate allocation
vs alternatives: More flexible than Claude 3.5 Sonnet's extended thinking (which is always-on for certain tasks) because it's configurable per-request, and cheaper than o1 because reasoning is optional rather than mandatory
Implements OpenAI-compatible function calling interface where the model can request execution of external tools by generating structured function calls based on a provided schema registry. The model learns to map natural language intents to function signatures, parameter types, and argument values during training. Supports multiple concurrent function calls per response and integrates with standard tool-use patterns (function name, arguments object, return value handling).
Unique: Native function calling baked into model training (not a post-hoc wrapper) enables more reliable tool selection and parameter binding compared to prompt-based tool use; OpenAI-compatible schema format ensures ecosystem compatibility
vs alternatives: More reliable than prompt-based tool calling because function signatures are enforced at the model level, and more flexible than Claude's tool_use block format because it supports concurrent multi-tool calls in a single response
A 30.7 billion parameter dense transformer model optimized for efficient inference on commodity hardware and cloud accelerators. The 256K token context window is achieved through efficient attention mechanisms (likely grouped query attention or similar) that reduce memory overhead while maintaining full context awareness. The dense architecture (no mixture-of-experts) ensures predictable latency and memory usage without routing overhead.
Unique: 31B dense architecture with 256K context achieves a sweet spot between model capability and inference efficiency; no mixture-of-experts routing overhead ensures predictable latency and cost
vs alternatives: Smaller than Llama 3.1 70B (faster, cheaper) but larger than Llama 3.1 8B (more capable); 256K context matches or exceeds most open-source models while maintaining faster inference than 70B+ alternatives
The 'IT' (Instruction-Tuned) variant is fine-tuned on instruction-following datasets and RLHF (reinforcement learning from human feedback) to produce helpful, harmless, and honest responses. The model learns to refuse harmful requests, acknowledge uncertainty, and provide structured outputs when appropriate. Safety training is integrated into the model weights rather than applied as a post-hoc filter, enabling more nuanced safety decisions.
Unique: Safety alignment integrated into model weights via RLHF rather than applied as external filter; enables nuanced refusal decisions that preserve conversation flow while preventing harmful outputs
vs alternatives: More nuanced than rule-based content filters (fewer false positives) but less configurable than Claude's constitution-based approach; comparable to GPT-4's safety training but with more transparent refusal patterns
Supports efficient batch processing of multiple requests with different input lengths through dynamic padding and attention masking. The model can process heterogeneous batch sizes (e.g., 5 short queries and 3 long documents in the same batch) without padding all inputs to the longest sequence length. This is achieved through efficient attention implementations that skip padding tokens and optimize memory layout.
Unique: Dynamic padding and attention masking enable efficient batching of variable-length inputs without padding waste; reduces per-token inference cost by 30-50% compared to sequential processing
vs alternatives: More efficient than sequential inference for high-volume workloads; comparable to other dense models but with better variable-length handling than mixture-of-experts models that require fixed batch shapes
The model can be constrained to generate outputs matching a provided JSON schema, ensuring structured data extraction without post-processing. This is implemented through constrained decoding where the model's token generation is restricted to valid continuations that maintain schema compliance. The model learns during training to map natural language to structured outputs, and inference-time constraints prevent invalid JSON or schema violations.
Unique: Constrained decoding at inference time ensures 100% schema compliance without post-processing; integrated into model training so the model learns to generate valid JSON naturally rather than as a constraint
vs alternatives: More reliable than post-hoc JSON parsing (no invalid JSON generation) and faster than Claude's tool_use blocks for simple structured output; comparable to GPT-4's JSON mode but with better schema flexibility
Provides 2.5 million manually-annotated object instances across 330,000 images with dual segmentation encoding: polygon coordinates for precise boundary definition and RLE (run-length encoding) for efficient storage and computation. Each instance includes bounding box coordinates in [x, y, width, height] format, category label from 80 object classes, and instance-level unique identifiers enabling per-object tracking and evaluation. Annotations are structured in JSON format with hierarchical organization linking images to annotations to categories, supporting both dense object scenes and sparse single-object images.
Unique: Dual segmentation encoding (polygon + RLE) in single dataset enables both precise boundary analysis and efficient computational workflows; 2.5M instances across 330K images provides scale unmatched by contemporaneous datasets (ImageNet had ~1.2M images, PASCAL VOC had ~11K images)
vs alternatives: Larger and more densely annotated than PASCAL VOC (11K images, ~6 objects/image) and more task-diverse than ImageNet (classification-only); RLE encoding enables 10-100x faster mask loading than polygon-only formats
Provides keypoint annotations for all people in images using a standardized 17-joint skeleton model (head, shoulders, elbows, wrists, hips, knees, ankles) with (x, y, visibility) tuples per joint. Visibility flag indicates whether keypoint is annotated (1), occluded (0), or outside image bounds (0). Keypoints are linked to parent person instances via instance ID, enabling pose estimation evaluation at both individual and crowd-level scales. Annotations follow COCO Keypoints task specification with consistent coordinate system across all 330K images.
Unique: Standardized 17-joint skeleton with explicit visibility flags enables robust evaluation of pose estimation under occlusion; linked to instance segmentation masks allows joint-level accuracy analysis within person bounding boxes
MS COCO (Common Objects in Context) scores higher at 61/100 vs Google: Gemma 4 31B at 22/100. MS COCO (Common Objects in Context) also has a free tier, making it more accessible.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than OpenPose dataset (no visibility flags) and larger scale than Human3.6M (3.6M frames vs 330K images); visibility annotations enable explicit occlusion handling unlike MPII (which lacks visibility metadata)
COCO ecosystem includes community-created extensions (COCO-Stuff, COCO DensePose, COCO Panoptic) that extend base dataset with additional annotations while maintaining compatibility with COCO API and evaluation infrastructure. Extensions follow COCO format and evaluation standards, enabling seamless integration into existing pipelines. Community contributions are vetted and published as official COCO variants, ensuring quality and standardization. Variant creation process is documented, enabling researchers to create custom extensions.
Unique: Standardized extension process enables community contributions while maintaining compatibility; official variants (Stuff, DensePose, Panoptic) are vetted and published, ensuring quality and discoverability
vs alternatives: More extensible than fixed datasets; community variants enable specialized use cases without forking; standardized format prevents fragmentation unlike ad-hoc dataset variants
Provides 1.65 million image-caption pairs (5 captions × 330K images) with natural language descriptions written by human annotators. Each caption is a free-form English sentence describing objects, actions, and scene context without enforced length limits or structured templates. Captions are stored in JSON format linked to image IDs, enabling training of vision-language models for image captioning, visual question answering, and cross-modal retrieval. Multiple captions per image capture linguistic diversity and alternative descriptions of the same visual content.
Unique: 5 captions per image (vs 1 in most datasets) captures linguistic diversity and enables robust evaluation of caption generation variability; 1.65M caption-image pairs provide scale for training large vision-language models
vs alternatives: 5x more captions per image than Flickr30K (1 caption/image) enabling better linguistic diversity modeling; larger scale than Visual Genome (108K images) while maintaining natural language quality vs automated alt-text
Extends base 80 object categories with 91 additional 'stuff' categories (background materials, textures, regions like sky, grass, wall) enabling dense semantic segmentation of entire images. Stuff categories are annotated as pixel-level masks without instance boundaries — all sky pixels are labeled 'sky' regardless of continuity. COCO-Stuff combines instance segmentation (80 objects) with semantic segmentation (171 total categories including stuff), stored as single-channel PNG masks where pixel value encodes category ID. Enables panoptic segmentation evaluation combining instance and stuff predictions.
Unique: 171-category taxonomy combining 80 instance objects + 91 stuff categories enables panoptic segmentation in single dataset; pixel-level masks for stuff enable dense scene understanding without instance boundaries
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than ADE20K (150 categories) and larger scale than Cityscapes (5K images); unified instance+stuff annotation enables panoptic evaluation unlike separate semantic/instance datasets
Combines instance segmentation (80 object categories with boundaries) and semantic segmentation (171 stuff categories without boundaries) into single panoptic prediction task. Evaluation uses Panoptic Quality (PQ) metric decomposed into Segmentation Quality (SQ — IoU of matched predictions) and Recognition Quality (RQ — detection rate). Panoptic masks encode both category ID and instance ID, enabling evaluation of both 'what' (category) and 'which' (instance identity) predictions. Standardized evaluation protocol with server-side metric computation ensures consistent benchmarking across submissions.
Unique: Panoptic Quality metric with explicit SQ/RQ decomposition enables fine-grained analysis of segmentation vs recognition errors; unified instance+stuff evaluation in single task forces models to handle both prediction types efficiently
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than separate instance/semantic benchmarks; PQ metric better captures real-world scene understanding than independent metrics; standardized evaluation prevents metric gaming unlike custom evaluation scripts
Provides dense 2D-to-3D correspondence maps for human bodies, mapping each pixel in a person instance to a 3D human body model surface. Annotations include UV coordinates (parameterization of 3D body surface) and body part indices enabling pixel-level body surface understanding. DensePose enables training of models that predict where each image pixel corresponds to on a canonical 3D human body, useful for pose transfer, virtual try-on, and detailed human understanding. Available from 2020 dataset version onwards, extends keypoint annotations with dense surface coverage.
Unique: Dense 2D-to-3D surface correspondence enables pixel-level body understanding beyond skeleton keypoints; UV parameterization allows transfer of appearance and shape across different people and poses
vs alternatives: More detailed than keypoint-only annotations (17 joints vs millions of surface points); enables pose transfer unlike keypoint datasets; larger scale than DensePose-specific datasets
Provides standardized evaluation metrics for each task (Average Precision for detection, IoU for segmentation, OKS for keypoints, BLEU/METEOR/CIDEr for captions, PQ for panoptic) computed server-side on held-out test set. Leaderboard system accepts structured JSON result submissions in COCO format, validates format, computes metrics, and ranks submissions by primary metric. Evaluation infrastructure ensures consistent benchmarking across all submissions and prevents metric gaming through standardized computation. Metrics are task-specific: AP/AP50/AP75 for detection, mIoU for segmentation, OKS for keypoints, CIDEr for captions.
Unique: Server-side metric computation prevents metric gaming and ensures consistency; task-specific metrics (AP, OKS, CIDEr, PQ) are standardized across all submissions enabling fair comparison; public leaderboard provides transparency and reproducibility
vs alternatives: More rigorous than self-reported metrics (prevents cherry-picking); standardized evaluation prevents metric implementation variations unlike custom evaluation scripts; public leaderboard enables community comparison unlike proprietary benchmarks
+3 more capabilities