| 0 |
| 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 9 decomposed | 3 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Captures text selections and highlights from web articles through a browser extension that injects DOM event listeners into the page context. When users select text, the extension intercepts the selection event, extracts the highlighted content along with metadata (URL, timestamp, article title), and stores it in a local/cloud database with visual annotation markers persisted in the browser's extension storage. The implementation uses MutationObserver patterns to track DOM changes and maintain highlight positions across page reloads.
Unique: Uses browser extension context injection to capture highlights at the DOM level with automatic metadata extraction (URL, title, author) rather than requiring manual entry or relying on page-specific APIs. Persists visual annotations directly in the browser's extension storage with position-aware rendering.
vs alternatives: More lightweight and privacy-preserving than cloud-first highlighters like Notion Web Clipper because it stores highlights locally first and only syncs to cloud on user action, reducing data transmission and latency.
Extends highlight capture to YouTube videos by detecting video player context and mapping text selections to specific timestamps. The extension injects a custom UI overlay into the YouTube player, captures the current playback time when a highlight is made, and stores highlights as structured objects containing video ID, timestamp range, selected text, and context. Uses YouTube's iframe API to track playback state and enables seeking to highlight timestamps directly from the knowledge library.
Unique: Implements video-aware highlighting by hooking into YouTube's iframe player API to capture and store playback timestamps alongside text selections, enabling direct seek-to-highlight functionality. Uses video ID + timestamp as a composite key for highlight retrieval and sharing.
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic note-taking apps because it understands video player state natively and enables one-click seeking to highlighted moments, whereas generic tools require manual timestamp entry or external video player integration.
Processes collections of highlights through an LLM API (likely OpenAI or similar) to generate abstractive summaries, key takeaways, and thematic clustering. The extension batches highlights by source (article, video, or topic tag) and sends them to a backend service that calls an LLM with a prompt template optimized for summarization. Results are cached and stored alongside the original highlights, with options to regenerate summaries with different prompt parameters or LLM models.
Unique: Integrates LLM summarization directly into the highlight workflow by batching highlights by source and sending them to an LLM API with optimized prompts. Caches summaries to avoid redundant API calls and allows users to regenerate with different parameters without re-highlighting.
vs alternatives: More efficient than manually copying highlights into ChatGPT because it automates batching, caching, and maintains the relationship between highlights and summaries within the knowledge library. Reduces context-switching and API costs through intelligent batching.
Implements a social layer where users can publish their highlights to a community feed, discover highlights from other curators on the same articles or topics, and follow curators with similar interests. The backend maintains a public database of highlights indexed by article URL, video ID, and topic tags, with a recommendation algorithm that surfaces highlights based on user's reading history and followed curators. Highlights can be marked as public or private, and users can see aggregated highlight statistics (e.g., 'highlighted by 47 other users').
Unique: Builds a social graph of curators and highlights by indexing public highlights by source URL and topic, enabling discovery of what other users found important in the same content. Uses follower relationships and reading history to power a lightweight recommendation engine.
vs alternatives: Differentiates from purely personal knowledge tools like Obsidian by adding a social discovery layer that surfaces curated highlights from domain experts and peers, creating a crowdsourced knowledge curation network rather than isolated personal libraries.
Provides a hierarchical tagging and folder-based organization system for highlights, allowing users to create custom tags, nested collections, and color-coded categories. Tags are stored as metadata on each highlight object and indexed for full-text search. The UI allows bulk tagging, tag suggestions based on highlight content and existing tags, and dynamic filtering by multiple tags with AND/OR logic. Tags can be synced across devices through the cloud account.
Unique: Implements a lightweight tagging system with color-coding and bulk operations, indexed for fast filtering. Uses tag metadata to enable multi-tag filtering with AND/OR logic, allowing complex queries without requiring a full query language.
vs alternatives: Simpler and faster than folder-based organization systems because tags are non-exclusive (one highlight can have multiple tags) and enable cross-cutting categorization, whereas folders force hierarchical decisions that don't scale across multiple organizational dimensions.
Synchronizes highlights across multiple devices (desktop, mobile, tablet) through a cloud backend that stores highlights in a user's account. When a highlight is created on one device, it is uploaded to the cloud backend and automatically downloaded to other devices where the Glasp extension is installed. Sync uses differential updates (only changed highlights are synced) to minimize bandwidth. Offline mode allows local highlight creation that is queued and synced when connectivity is restored.
Unique: Implements differential sync with offline queueing, allowing highlights created offline to be persisted locally and synced to the cloud when connectivity is restored. Uses last-write-wins conflict resolution to avoid complex merge logic.
vs alternatives: More seamless than manual export/import workflows because sync is automatic and bidirectional, but less sophisticated than operational transformation (OT) or CRDT-based systems because it doesn't handle simultaneous edits from multiple devices without conflicts.
Exports highlights in multiple formats (JSON, CSV, Markdown, HTML) and integrates with external tools like Notion, Obsidian, and Roam Research through API connectors or manual export. The export process batches highlights by source or tag, formats them according to the target tool's schema, and uploads them via API or generates a downloadable file. Markdown export includes source links and timestamps for easy import into note-taking apps.
Unique: Supports multiple export formats and direct API integrations with popular note-taking tools, allowing highlights to be exported as structured data (JSON, CSV) or formatted for specific tools (Markdown for Obsidian, Notion API for Notion). Preserves source metadata and timestamps across all formats.
vs alternatives: More flexible than single-format exporters because it supports multiple output formats and direct API integrations, enabling highlights to flow into existing workflows without manual reformatting. Reduces lock-in by making highlights portable across tools.
Indexes all highlight text and metadata (source, tags, author) in a full-text search engine (likely Elasticsearch or similar) and provides a search interface that returns matching highlights with relevance ranking. Search supports boolean operators (AND, OR, NOT), phrase matching, and filtering by tag, source, or date range. Search results are ranked by relevance and recency, with highlighting of matching terms in the result preview.
Unique: Implements full-text search with relevance ranking and metadata filtering, indexing highlight text and source metadata to enable fast retrieval across large libraries. Uses a search backend (likely Elasticsearch) to support boolean operators and phrase matching in paid tiers.
vs alternatives: More powerful than browser-based search (Ctrl+F) because it searches across all highlights and sources, not just the current page. More accessible than building a custom search index because search is built-in and requires no configuration.
+1 more capabilities
Utilizes a combination of static analysis and machine learning models to provide context-aware code completions in VS Code. It analyzes the current codebase and user input to suggest relevant completions, leveraging a local model that minimizes latency and maximizes accuracy. This approach allows it to offer suggestions that are more aligned with the specific coding patterns and libraries used in the project.
Unique: Integrates a local machine learning model that adapts to the user's coding style and project context, reducing reliance on cloud-based solutions.
vs alternatives: More responsive than cloud-based solutions like GitHub Copilot due to local processing of context.
Provides an interactive chat interface within VS Code that allows developers to ask questions and receive code-related answers in real-time. This capability is powered by an integrated language model that understands programming queries and can generate relevant code snippets or explanations based on the context of the current project. The chat interface is designed to be seamless, allowing for quick interactions without disrupting the coding flow.
Unique: Combines code context awareness with a chat interface, allowing for more relevant and focused responses compared to standalone chatbots.
vs alternatives: Offers a more integrated experience than external chat tools by staying within the coding environment.
Analyzes the entire codebase to provide insights and recommendations tailored to the specific project. This feature uses static analysis and pattern recognition to identify common coding issues, suggest improvements, and highlight best practices relevant to the libraries and frameworks in use. The insights are presented in a user-friendly format within the IDE, enabling developers to quickly act on them.
Glasp scores higher at 54/100 vs Continue at 19/100. Glasp leads on adoption and quality, while Continue is stronger on ecosystem.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Unique: Utilizes a comprehensive analysis engine that combines static analysis with project context to deliver tailored insights, unlike generic linting tools.
vs alternatives: More contextually aware than traditional linters, providing insights based on the entire project rather than isolated files.