Supermaven ranks higher at 71/100 vs GitHub Copilot modernization - upgrade for Java at 41/100. Capability-level comparison backed by match graph evidence from real search data.
| Feature | GitHub Copilot modernization - upgrade for Java | Supermaven |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Extension | Extension |
| UnfragileRank | 41/100 | 71/100 |
| Adoption |
| 1 |
| 1 |
| Quality | 0 | 1 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Starting Price | — | $10/mo |
| Capabilities | 10 decomposed | 13 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Scans the entire Java project structure, parses build configuration (Maven/Gradle), and inventories all direct and transitive dependencies. Generates a customizable upgrade plan that identifies outdated libraries, framework versions, and Java language features, presenting recommendations in a VS Code UI panel that developers can review, edit, and approve before execution. Uses AST-level analysis to understand dependency usage patterns across the codebase.
Unique: Integrates GitHub Copilot's LLM reasoning with OpenRewrite's structural code analysis to generate context-aware upgrade plans that account for actual usage patterns in the codebase, not just version availability. Plans are editable within VS Code before execution, allowing developers to override AI recommendations.
vs alternatives: Differs from static dependency checkers (like Dependabot) by using LLM-driven reasoning to understand upgrade impact and generate customized plans, while remaining faster than manual code review by automating the analysis phase.
Executes code transformations against the Java project using OpenRewrite, an open-source framework that applies composable, recipe-based code modifications. Transformations are applied at the AST level, ensuring structural correctness (not regex-based). The extension runs transformations in a controlled manner, validates syntax, and automatically resolves build issues by re-running Maven/Gradle builds and fixing compilation errors.
Unique: Combines OpenRewrite's AST-based transformation engine with GitHub Copilot's LLM to automatically resolve build errors post-transformation. When compilation fails, the extension uses Copilot to suggest fixes rather than requiring manual debugging, creating a closed-loop automation pipeline.
vs alternatives: More reliable than IDE refactoring tools (like IntelliJ IDEA's built-in refactors) because OpenRewrite operates on a normalized AST representation, and more comprehensive than manual find-and-replace because it understands Java semantics and applies transformations consistently across the entire codebase.
After code transformation completes, scans all dependencies and transitive libraries for known Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs) using a vulnerability database. Identifies vulnerable versions, cross-references with available patches, and uses GitHub Copilot's 'Agent Mode' to automatically apply fixes by updating dependency versions or applying security patches. Detects code inconsistencies introduced by upgrades and suggests corrections.
Unique: Integrates CVE scanning with LLM-driven automated remediation via Copilot Agent Mode, allowing the system to not only identify vulnerabilities but also apply fixes autonomously. Includes code inconsistency detection to catch side effects of upgrades, a feature absent from standalone CVE scanners.
vs alternatives: More proactive than Dependabot (which only alerts) because it automatically applies patches; more comprehensive than manual security audits because it scans transitive dependencies and applies fixes in seconds rather than hours.
Generates new unit test cases using GitHub Copilot to increase test coverage for code modified during the upgrade process. Analyzes which methods and classes were changed, understands their new signatures and behavior, and generates test cases that validate the upgraded code. Tests are generated separately from the upgrade process, allowing developers to review and integrate them independently. Uses LLM-based code understanding to infer test scenarios from method signatures and documentation.
Unique: Generates tests specifically for code changed during the upgrade process, using LLM understanding of API changes and method behavior. Tests are generated as separate artifacts, allowing developers to review and selectively integrate them rather than auto-applying them to the codebase.
vs alternatives: More targeted than generic test generation tools because it focuses on upgraded code; more intelligent than coverage-driven tools (like JaCoCo) because it understands method semantics and generates meaningful assertions, not just line-coverage-maximizing tests.
Generates a detailed summary report after the upgrade process completes, documenting all file changes, updated dependencies with version deltas, test results, and remaining issues. Tracks commits and logs changes in a working branch, providing a complete audit trail. Summary includes metrics like number of files modified, dependencies upgraded, CVEs resolved, and test coverage delta. Enables developers to review the entire upgrade impact before merging to main branch.
Unique: Generates human-readable summaries using LLM-based natural language generation, not just structured data dumps. Integrates with Git to create an immutable audit trail in the working branch, enabling teams to review the entire upgrade history and rollback if needed.
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than Maven dependency reports because it includes code changes, test results, and security findings; more actionable than raw Git diffs because it synthesizes changes into a narrative summary with metrics and remaining issues highlighted.
Presents the generated upgrade plan in a VS Code UI panel where developers can review, edit, and customize recommendations before execution. Allows selective enabling/disabling of specific upgrades, version pinning, and dependency exclusions. Changes to the plan are validated in real-time (e.g., checking for version conflicts) and reflected in the execution preview. Developers can add notes or justifications for customizations, which are preserved in the audit trail.
Unique: Provides interactive, in-editor customization of AI-generated plans rather than requiring developers to accept or reject the plan wholesale. Real-time validation ensures customizations don't introduce conflicts, and audit notes create accountability for deviations from recommendations.
vs alternatives: More flexible than fully automated tools (like Dependabot) because developers retain control; more efficient than manual planning because the LLM generates the baseline and developers only override exceptions.
Analyzes Java source code to identify opportunities for using newer language features (e.g., lambda expressions, records, sealed classes, pattern matching) available in the target Java version. Generates recommendations for code patterns that can be simplified or improved using modern syntax. Uses AST analysis to understand code structure and LLM reasoning to suggest idiomatic Java patterns. Recommendations are presented alongside upgrade plans and can be applied selectively.
Unique: Combines AST-level code analysis with LLM-driven pattern recognition to identify modernization opportunities that go beyond simple API migrations. Understands idiomatic Java patterns and suggests improvements that improve both readability and performance.
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than IDE inspections (like IntelliJ IDEA's built-in inspections) because it understands the full upgrade context and can suggest cross-cutting refactorings; more intelligent than regex-based tools because it understands Java semantics.
Validates that upgraded dependencies are compatible with the project's build system (Maven or Gradle) and Java version. Checks for plugin version compatibility, enforces dependency constraint rules, and detects conflicts between transitive dependencies. Runs the build system to validate that the project compiles and tests pass after upgrades. Automatically suggests build configuration changes (e.g., updating plugin versions) if needed to resolve incompatibilities.
Unique: Integrates build system execution into the upgrade workflow, not just dependency analysis. Automatically suggests build configuration changes (e.g., plugin version updates) to resolve incompatibilities, creating a closed-loop validation pipeline.
vs alternatives: More thorough than dependency checkers (like Maven Dependency Plugin) because it actually runs the build and tests; more automated than manual validation because it suggests fixes rather than just reporting errors.
+2 more capabilities
Generates single-line and multi-line code suggestions in real-time as developers type, using semantic indexing of the entire codebase to retrieve relevant type definitions, function signatures, and contextual patterns. The system maintains a 1M token context window (Pro/Team tiers) that enables suggestions informed by distant code definitions and cross-file dependencies, constructed via local codebase semantic search rather than simple token-based recency. Suggestions adapt to detected coding style on Pro/Team tiers through implicit pattern learning from recent edits.
Unique: 1M token context window with codebase-wide semantic indexing enables suggestions informed by distant code definitions and cross-file patterns, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that typically use fixed context windows (4K-32K tokens) or file-local context. Claimed 250ms latency suggests optimized retrieval pipeline, though indexing mechanism and performance at scale remain undisclosed.
vs alternatives: Larger context window than GitHub Copilot (8K-32K tokens) and faster latency than unnamed competitors (250ms vs 783ms claimed), enabling suggestions on large codebases with minimal typing delay; trade-off is cloud dependency and undisclosed free tier limitations.
Provides a separate chat interface supporting multiple LLM backends (GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, GPT-4, others) for conversational code assistance. Users attach files, reference recent edits, and trigger compiler diagnostic uploads; the system generates diffs and applies code changes directly to the editor. Model selection is per-conversation, and $5/month in credits (included in Pro/Team) covers external model API costs; overage pricing is undisclosed. Hotkey-driven workflow enables rapid context switching between inline completion and chat.
Unique: Multi-model chat interface with per-conversation model selection and integrated diff application, combined with compiler diagnostic auto-upload. Unlike Copilot Chat (single model per tier) or standalone ChatGPT, Supermaven Chat unifies multiple LLM backends in a single hotkey-driven workflow with direct editor integration for change application.
Supermaven scores higher at 71/100 vs GitHub Copilot modernization - upgrade for Java at 41/100. GitHub Copilot modernization - upgrade for Java leads on adoption and ecosystem, while Supermaven is stronger on quality.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
vs alternatives: Supports multiple LLM backends (GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet) in one interface with included credits, whereas GitHub Copilot Chat is single-model per tier and requires separate ChatGPT subscription for model switching; trade-off is credit limits and unknown overage pricing.
Supermaven Chat can automatically upload compiler diagnostic messages (errors, warnings) alongside code context to provide error-aware suggestions and fixes. The mechanism is described as 'automatically uploading your code together with compiler diagnostic messages,' but specific language/compiler support and the upload trigger mechanism are undisclosed. This feature is Chat-only and not available in inline completion.
Unique: Automatic compiler diagnostic upload in Chat for error-aware suggestions, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that require manual error context or have limited diagnostic integration. Supermaven's approach reduces friction but with undisclosed language/compiler support.
vs alternatives: Automatic diagnostic upload reduces manual context-gathering compared to manual copy-paste; trade-off is undisclosed language support and unclear upload trigger mechanism.
Supermaven offers a 30-day free trial of the Pro tier ($10/month), providing full access to 1M token context window, largest model, style adaptation, and $5/month chat credits. No credit card is required to start the trial (implied), and trial conversion to paid is automatic after 30 days unless cancelled. Trial terms and auto-renewal policy are not explicitly detailed.
Unique: 30-day free trial of Pro tier with full feature access (1M context, largest model, chat credits), versus competitors (Copilot 2-month free trial, Tabnine free tier only) with different trial lengths and feature access. Supermaven's approach is generous but with undisclosed auto-renewal terms.
vs alternatives: Full Pro feature access during trial compared to limited free tier; trade-off is undisclosed auto-renewal policy and potential unexpected charges if not cancelled.
Supermaven requires internet connectivity and server-side inference; no offline mode or local inference capability is mentioned or available. All code completion requests are sent to Supermaven's backend servers for processing, and responses are returned over the network. This creates a hard dependency on network connectivity and Supermaven's service availability; if the service is down or network is unavailable, code completion is not available.
Unique: Supermaven has no offline mode or local inference capability; all processing is server-side. GitHub Copilot also requires server-side inference, but Tabnine offers local inference options for some use cases. Supermaven's lack of offline capability is a significant limitation for developers with connectivity constraints.
vs alternatives: Supermaven's server-side-only approach is comparable to GitHub Copilot; Tabnine offers local inference options, making Tabnine more suitable for offline work. Supermaven's lack of offline capability is a weakness vs. Tabnine.
Analyzes recent code edits and inferred coding patterns to adapt inline suggestions to match team conventions, naming patterns, and structural preferences. The mechanism is implicit (not explicit fine-tuning) and operates only on Pro/Team tiers, suggesting pattern learning from editor activity rather than explicit configuration. Free tier uses a single base model without personalization.
Unique: Implicit style adaptation via editor activity analysis without explicit configuration, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that require manual style guides or explicit fine-tuning. Supermaven's approach is transparent to the user but also non-configurable and undisclosed in mechanism.
vs alternatives: Requires no manual style configuration compared to tools requiring explicit style guides; trade-off is lack of transparency and inability to control or export learned styles.
Delivers code suggestions to the editor inline as the developer types, with a claimed baseline latency of 250ms from keystroke to suggestion display. The system uses a cloud inference backend and local editor plugin to minimize round-trip time. Latency claim is positioned against an unnamed competitor (783ms), but methodology is undisclosed and no independent verification is provided.
Unique: Claimed 250ms latency via optimized cloud inference pipeline and editor plugin architecture, versus competitors with higher latency (783ms unnamed baseline). Actual differentiation is undisclosed; mechanism may involve request batching, model quantization, or edge caching, but specifics are not public.
vs alternatives: Faster than unnamed competitor (250ms vs 783ms claimed); trade-off is cloud dependency and unverified latency claim with no SLA or performance guarantee.
Provides native editor extensions for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs (IntelliJ IDEA, PyCharm, WebStorm, etc.), and Neovim, enabling inline suggestion rendering, hotkey-driven chat access, and compiler diagnostic integration directly within the editor. Each plugin variant is maintained separately and integrates with the editor's native autocomplete UI, keybinding system, and file context APIs.
Unique: Native plugins for three major editor ecosystems (VS Code, JetBrains, Neovim) with integrated chat and diff application, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that support broader editor ecosystems but with less deep integration in some cases. Supermaven's approach prioritizes depth over breadth.
vs alternatives: Deep integration with VS Code and JetBrains (native autocomplete UI, hotkey system) compared to web-based tools or lighter integrations; trade-off is limited editor support (no Sublime, Vim, Emacs) and undisclosed Neovim support details.
+5 more capabilities