| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 6 decomposed | 9 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Converts HuggingFace model repositories to GGUF (GGML Universal Format) with automatic quantization support. The system orchestrates the llama.cpp conversion pipeline, accepting model identifiers and outputting quantized binary artifacts suitable for CPU inference. It abstracts away the complexity of format conversion, weight quantization strategies (Q4, Q5, Q8), and metadata preservation across the transformation.
Unique: Provides a zero-setup web interface to the llama.cpp conversion toolchain, eliminating the need for local environment setup, CUDA dependencies, or manual command-line invocation. Leverages HuggingFace Spaces infrastructure to handle large model downloads and CPU-intensive conversion without user hardware requirements.
vs alternatives: Simpler than manual llama.cpp CLI workflows and more accessible than local conversion scripts, but slower than GPU-accelerated quantization tools like AutoGPTQ due to CPU-only Spaces compute.
Integrates with HuggingFace Hub API to discover, validate, and extract metadata from model repositories. The system resolves model identifiers, fetches model cards, configuration files, and weight information to determine compatibility with GGUF conversion. It validates architecture support (checking for llama, mistral, phi, etc.) and extracts quantization-relevant metadata like parameter count and weight precision.
Unique: Directly queries HuggingFace Hub API to validate model compatibility in real-time, rather than maintaining a static whitelist. Dynamically determines quantization recommendations based on actual model metadata, enabling support for newly-released models without code updates.
vs alternatives: More up-to-date than hardcoded model lists, but less reliable than local model inspection for edge-case architectures or heavily-modified model variants.
Orchestrates a multi-step conversion pipeline through a Gradio-based web interface, managing state transitions from model selection → validation → quantization parameter selection → conversion execution → artifact download. The system handles asynchronous job submission, progress tracking, and error handling across the conversion lifecycle. It abstracts away subprocess management, temporary file handling, and cleanup operations.
Unique: Uses Gradio framework to abstract away backend complexity, providing a declarative UI definition that maps directly to Python functions. Leverages HuggingFace Spaces infrastructure for automatic deployment, scaling, and authentication without containerization overhead.
vs alternatives: More user-friendly than CLI tools but less flexible than programmatic APIs; faster to deploy than custom FastAPI services but slower to iterate on UI changes.
Provides a curated set of quantization strategies (Q4_0, Q4_1, Q5_0, Q5_1, Q8_0) with automatic recommendations based on model size and use case. The system maps model parameter counts to optimal quantization levels, balancing inference speed, memory footprint, and quality loss. It exposes quantization options through a dropdown UI, with descriptions of trade-offs for each level.
Unique: Provides human-readable descriptions of quantization trade-offs (e.g., 'Q4: 4x smaller, slight quality loss') rather than technical specifications, making quantization accessible to non-experts. Recommendations are deterministic based on model size, enabling reproducible optimization workflows.
vs alternatives: More approachable than raw llama.cpp documentation but less sophisticated than AutoGPTQ's learned quantization strategies or GPTQ's per-layer optimization.
Manages the lifecycle of converted GGUF artifacts on the Spaces filesystem, including temporary storage during conversion, cleanup after download, and expiration handling. The system writes converted models to a temporary directory, serves them via HTTP for browser download, and implements garbage collection to prevent disk exhaustion. It handles large file downloads (2-50GB) through streaming and resumable transfer protocols.
Unique: Leverages HuggingFace Spaces ephemeral filesystem to automatically clean up artifacts without explicit user action, reducing operational overhead. Uses Gradio's built-in file serving to handle large downloads without custom HTTP server implementation.
vs alternatives: Simpler than managing persistent S3 buckets or artifact registries but less reliable for long-term storage or team collaboration.
Captures and reports errors from the llama.cpp conversion pipeline, including validation failures (unsupported architectures), runtime errors (OOM, timeout), and API failures (HuggingFace Hub unavailable). The system translates low-level subprocess errors into user-friendly messages and provides diagnostic information for troubleshooting. It implements retry logic for transient failures (network timeouts) and graceful degradation for unsupported models.
Unique: Translates subprocess-level errors into domain-specific messages (e.g., 'Model architecture not supported by llama.cpp' instead of 'segmentation fault'), reducing user confusion. Provides actionable next steps (e.g., 'Try a smaller model' or 'Check your API token') rather than raw error codes.
vs alternatives: More user-friendly than raw llama.cpp error output but less comprehensive than enterprise error tracking systems with historical analysis and ML-based root cause detection.
Executes SQL queries against Supabase PostgreSQL instances through the Model Context Protocol, translating natural language or structured query requests into parameterized SQL statements. Uses MCP's tool-calling interface to expose database operations as callable functions with schema validation, enabling LLM agents to perform CRUD operations, joins, and aggregations with automatic connection pooling and credential management through Supabase client SDK.
Unique: Exposes Supabase PostgreSQL as MCP tools with automatic credential injection from Supabase client SDK, eliminating manual connection string management and enabling seamless LLM-to-database queries within Claude or compatible agents
vs alternatives: Tighter integration than generic SQL MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in authentication and connection pooling rather than requiring separate database credential configuration
Exposes Supabase Auth session state and user metadata through MCP tools, allowing agents to inspect current authentication context, retrieve user profiles, and trigger auth-related operations. Integrates with Supabase's JWT-based auth system to validate sessions and access user claims without re-authenticating, using the Supabase client's built-in session management.
Unique: Integrates Supabase's JWT-based auth system directly into MCP tool interface, allowing agents to inspect and act on auth state without managing separate credential stores or re-authentication flows
vs alternatives: More seamless than generic auth MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in session management and avoids redundant credential passing between agent and auth system
Invokes Supabase Edge Functions (serverless TypeScript/JavaScript functions) through MCP tools, passing parameters and receiving results with optional streaming support. Uses Supabase's edge function HTTP API to trigger functions with automatic authentication headers and response parsing, enabling agents to execute custom business logic without embedding it in the agent itself.
Supabase scores higher at 42/100 vs gguf-my-repo at 20/100. gguf-my-repo leads on ecosystem, while Supabase is stronger on quality.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Edge Functions as MCP tools with automatic authentication and response parsing, allowing agents to invoke custom serverless logic without managing HTTP clients or credential injection
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic HTTP MCP tools because it handles Supabase-specific authentication, error handling, and response formatting automatically
Subscribes to real-time changes on Supabase tables through MCP's event streaming interface, using Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY mechanism to push INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE events to agents. Maintains persistent WebSocket connections and filters events by table and row-level policies, enabling agents to react to database changes without polling.
Unique: Bridges Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY real-time system with MCP's tool interface, enabling agents to subscribe to database changes without managing WebSocket connections or event serialization
vs alternatives: More efficient than polling-based approaches because it uses Supabase's native real-time infrastructure rather than repeated database queries
Manages files in Supabase Storage buckets through MCP tools, supporting upload, download, list, and delete operations with automatic authentication and path-based access control. Uses Supabase's S3-compatible storage API with built-in support for public/private buckets and signed URLs for temporary access, enabling agents to handle file I/O without managing cloud storage credentials.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Storage's S3-compatible API as MCP tools with automatic authentication and signed URL generation, eliminating the need for agents to manage cloud storage credentials or generate temporary access tokens
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic S3 MCP tools because it leverages Supabase's built-in bucket policies and authentication rather than requiring separate AWS credentials
Performs semantic similarity searches on vector embeddings stored in Supabase PostgreSQL using pgvector extension, translating natural language queries into embedding vectors and executing cosine/L2 distance searches. Integrates with embedding providers (OpenAI, Cohere) or uses pre-computed embeddings, enabling agents to retrieve semantically similar documents or records without full-text search limitations.
Unique: Integrates pgvector directly into MCP tools with automatic embedding generation and distance calculation, enabling agents to perform semantic search without managing separate vector database infrastructure
vs alternatives: More efficient than external vector databases (Pinecone, Weaviate) for Supabase users because it colocates embeddings with relational data, reducing network latency and simplifying data synchronization
Exposes Supabase database schema information through MCP tools, allowing agents to discover table structures, column types, constraints, and relationships without manual schema documentation. Queries PostgreSQL information_schema and Supabase metadata tables to dynamically generate schema descriptions, enabling agents to construct valid queries and understand data relationships.
Unique: Queries Supabase's PostgreSQL information_schema directly through MCP tools, enabling agents to dynamically discover and adapt to database schemas without pre-configured schema definitions
vs alternatives: More flexible than static schema definitions because it reflects live database state, including recent migrations or schema changes
Enforces Supabase Row-Level Security policies within agent queries, ensuring that agents can only access rows permitted by RLS rules defined in the database. Evaluates policies based on authenticated user context (JWT claims, user ID) and applies WHERE clause filters automatically, preventing unauthorized data access at the database layer rather than application layer.
Unique: Delegates authorization enforcement to PostgreSQL RLS policies rather than implementing authorization in agent code, ensuring that data access rules are centralized and cannot be bypassed by agent logic
vs alternatives: More secure than application-level authorization because RLS is enforced at the database layer, preventing accidental data leaks even if agent code has bugs
+1 more capabilities