| Ecosystem | 1 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Starting Price | — | $10/mo |
| Capabilities | 12 decomposed | 13 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Orchestrates coding agents (Claude, Gemini, Copilot) from a CLI interface by establishing a command-line control plane that routes agent instructions to remote execution environments. Uses a client-server architecture where the CLI acts as a control interface, serializing agent tasks and receiving structured execution results back, enabling developers to trigger multi-step coding workflows without leaving the terminal.
Unique: Provides unified CLI interface for orchestrating heterogeneous coding agents (Claude, Gemini, Copilot) through a single command abstraction, rather than requiring separate integrations per provider. Uses a provider-agnostic task serialization format that maps to each agent's native API.
vs alternatives: Enables agent orchestration from CLI without web UI context-switching, whereas most agent platforms (Claude Code, GitHub Copilot) require IDE or browser interaction
Provides a mobile-optimized interface (iOS/Android) for controlling remote coding agents, allowing developers to trigger agent tasks, monitor execution, and retrieve results from their phone. Implements a lightweight mobile client that communicates with the orchestration backend via REST or WebSocket APIs, with optimized UI for touch interaction and low-bandwidth scenarios.
Unique: Extends agent orchestration to mobile platforms with touch-optimized UI and push notification support, whereas most agent platforms (Claude Code, Copilot) are desktop/IDE-only. Uses WebSocket for real-time task status streaming to minimize polling overhead on mobile networks.
vs alternatives: Enables agent task management from mobile without requiring full IDE, whereas GitHub Copilot and Claude Code require desktop IDE integration
Schedules agent tasks for execution at specified times or on recurring schedules, and batches multiple tasks for efficient execution. Implements a task queue with scheduling support (cron-like syntax), batch processing to reduce API calls, and execution monitoring.
Unique: Provides integrated task scheduling and batch execution for agent workflows, enabling cost optimization through off-peak scheduling and efficient batch processing. Uses a persistent task queue for reliability.
vs alternatives: Enables scheduled and batched agent execution without external job schedulers, whereas direct agent APIs require custom scheduling infrastructure
Orchestrates multi-agent workflows where multiple agents collaborate on a task, passing results between agents and coordinating execution. Implements agent communication patterns (sequential, parallel, branching) and result aggregation for complex tasks requiring multiple agents.
Unique: Implements multi-agent orchestration with support for sequential, parallel, and branching workflows, enabling agents to collaborate on complex tasks. Provides result aggregation and inter-agent communication patterns.
vs alternatives: Enables multi-agent collaboration workflows, whereas single-agent APIs (Claude, Gemini) require external orchestration for agent-to-agent communication
Abstracts over multiple coding agent providers (Claude, Gemini, Copilot, OpenCode) through a unified task interface, allowing users to switch providers or run tasks against multiple agents without changing client code. Implements a provider adapter pattern where each agent's API (function calling, streaming, response format) is normalized into a common task execution model with capability negotiation.
Unique: Provides unified abstraction over heterogeneous agent APIs (Claude's tool_use, Gemini's function calling, Copilot's native integration) through a common task serialization format and capability negotiation protocol. Enables provider-agnostic orchestration logic.
vs alternatives: Decouples orchestration logic from specific agent providers, whereas direct agent SDKs (Claude SDK, Gemini SDK) lock you into a single provider's API design
Streams agent execution results in real-time using Server-Sent Events (SSE) or WebSocket, allowing clients to receive partial results, intermediate steps, and progress updates as the agent executes rather than waiting for completion. Implements a streaming response handler that buffers and forwards agent output chunks to connected clients with minimal latency.
Unique: Implements streaming response handling for agent execution with real-time progress feedback, whereas most agent orchestration tools (GitHub Copilot, Claude Code) show results only after completion. Uses SSE/WebSocket to minimize latency between agent output and client display.
vs alternatives: Provides immediate visual feedback on agent progress, improving perceived responsiveness compared to polling-based status checks
Automatically injects local codebase context (file structure, relevant code snippets, dependencies) into agent prompts before execution, enabling agents to generate code that's aware of existing patterns, APIs, and project structure. Implements a context extraction pipeline that parses the local codebase, identifies relevant files based on task description, and formats them for inclusion in the agent's input context window.
Unique: Implements intelligent codebase context extraction and injection for agents using AST-based file relevance scoring, rather than naive full-codebase inclusion. Selects only relevant files based on semantic similarity to task description, reducing context bloat.
vs alternatives: Enables agents to generate code aware of project patterns and existing APIs, whereas generic agent APIs (Claude, Gemini) have no built-in codebase awareness without manual context engineering
Maintains a persistent log of all agent task executions with full input/output history, execution metadata (duration, provider, cost), and audit trails for compliance. Stores task records in a queryable database with support for filtering, searching, and replaying past executions, enabling debugging and accountability.
Unique: Provides built-in audit logging and task history for agent executions with cost tracking and compliance metadata, whereas most agent platforms (Claude Code, Copilot) offer minimal execution history. Enables querying and replaying past tasks for debugging.
vs alternatives: Enables compliance and cost tracking for agent usage, whereas direct agent APIs provide no built-in audit trail or usage analytics
+4 more capabilities
Generates single-line and multi-line code suggestions in real-time as developers type, using semantic indexing of the entire codebase to retrieve relevant type definitions, function signatures, and contextual patterns. The system maintains a 1M token context window (Pro/Team tiers) that enables suggestions informed by distant code definitions and cross-file dependencies, constructed via local codebase semantic search rather than simple token-based recency. Suggestions adapt to detected coding style on Pro/Team tiers through implicit pattern learning from recent edits.
Unique: 1M token context window with codebase-wide semantic indexing enables suggestions informed by distant code definitions and cross-file patterns, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that typically use fixed context windows (4K-32K tokens) or file-local context. Claimed 250ms latency suggests optimized retrieval pipeline, though indexing mechanism and performance at scale remain undisclosed.
vs alternatives: Larger context window than GitHub Copilot (8K-32K tokens) and faster latency than unnamed competitors (250ms vs 783ms claimed), enabling suggestions on large codebases with minimal typing delay; trade-off is cloud dependency and undisclosed free tier limitations.
Provides a separate chat interface supporting multiple LLM backends (GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, GPT-4, others) for conversational code assistance. Users attach files, reference recent edits, and trigger compiler diagnostic uploads; the system generates diffs and applies code changes directly to the editor. Model selection is per-conversation, and $5/month in credits (included in Pro/Team) covers external model API costs; overage pricing is undisclosed. Hotkey-driven workflow enables rapid context switching between inline completion and chat.
Unique: Multi-model chat interface with per-conversation model selection and integrated diff application, combined with compiler diagnostic auto-upload. Unlike Copilot Chat (single model per tier) or standalone ChatGPT, Supermaven Chat unifies multiple LLM backends in a single hotkey-driven workflow with direct editor integration for change application.
Supermaven scores higher at 71/100 vs paseo at 39/100. paseo leads on ecosystem, while Supermaven is stronger on adoption and quality.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
vs alternatives: Supports multiple LLM backends (GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet) in one interface with included credits, whereas GitHub Copilot Chat is single-model per tier and requires separate ChatGPT subscription for model switching; trade-off is credit limits and unknown overage pricing.
Supermaven Chat can automatically upload compiler diagnostic messages (errors, warnings) alongside code context to provide error-aware suggestions and fixes. The mechanism is described as 'automatically uploading your code together with compiler diagnostic messages,' but specific language/compiler support and the upload trigger mechanism are undisclosed. This feature is Chat-only and not available in inline completion.
Unique: Automatic compiler diagnostic upload in Chat for error-aware suggestions, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that require manual error context or have limited diagnostic integration. Supermaven's approach reduces friction but with undisclosed language/compiler support.
vs alternatives: Automatic diagnostic upload reduces manual context-gathering compared to manual copy-paste; trade-off is undisclosed language support and unclear upload trigger mechanism.
Supermaven offers a 30-day free trial of the Pro tier ($10/month), providing full access to 1M token context window, largest model, style adaptation, and $5/month chat credits. No credit card is required to start the trial (implied), and trial conversion to paid is automatic after 30 days unless cancelled. Trial terms and auto-renewal policy are not explicitly detailed.
Unique: 30-day free trial of Pro tier with full feature access (1M context, largest model, chat credits), versus competitors (Copilot 2-month free trial, Tabnine free tier only) with different trial lengths and feature access. Supermaven's approach is generous but with undisclosed auto-renewal terms.
vs alternatives: Full Pro feature access during trial compared to limited free tier; trade-off is undisclosed auto-renewal policy and potential unexpected charges if not cancelled.
Supermaven requires internet connectivity and server-side inference; no offline mode or local inference capability is mentioned or available. All code completion requests are sent to Supermaven's backend servers for processing, and responses are returned over the network. This creates a hard dependency on network connectivity and Supermaven's service availability; if the service is down or network is unavailable, code completion is not available.
Unique: Supermaven has no offline mode or local inference capability; all processing is server-side. GitHub Copilot also requires server-side inference, but Tabnine offers local inference options for some use cases. Supermaven's lack of offline capability is a significant limitation for developers with connectivity constraints.
vs alternatives: Supermaven's server-side-only approach is comparable to GitHub Copilot; Tabnine offers local inference options, making Tabnine more suitable for offline work. Supermaven's lack of offline capability is a weakness vs. Tabnine.
Analyzes recent code edits and inferred coding patterns to adapt inline suggestions to match team conventions, naming patterns, and structural preferences. The mechanism is implicit (not explicit fine-tuning) and operates only on Pro/Team tiers, suggesting pattern learning from editor activity rather than explicit configuration. Free tier uses a single base model without personalization.
Unique: Implicit style adaptation via editor activity analysis without explicit configuration, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that require manual style guides or explicit fine-tuning. Supermaven's approach is transparent to the user but also non-configurable and undisclosed in mechanism.
vs alternatives: Requires no manual style configuration compared to tools requiring explicit style guides; trade-off is lack of transparency and inability to control or export learned styles.
Delivers code suggestions to the editor inline as the developer types, with a claimed baseline latency of 250ms from keystroke to suggestion display. The system uses a cloud inference backend and local editor plugin to minimize round-trip time. Latency claim is positioned against an unnamed competitor (783ms), but methodology is undisclosed and no independent verification is provided.
Unique: Claimed 250ms latency via optimized cloud inference pipeline and editor plugin architecture, versus competitors with higher latency (783ms unnamed baseline). Actual differentiation is undisclosed; mechanism may involve request batching, model quantization, or edge caching, but specifics are not public.
vs alternatives: Faster than unnamed competitor (250ms vs 783ms claimed); trade-off is cloud dependency and unverified latency claim with no SLA or performance guarantee.
Provides native editor extensions for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs (IntelliJ IDEA, PyCharm, WebStorm, etc.), and Neovim, enabling inline suggestion rendering, hotkey-driven chat access, and compiler diagnostic integration directly within the editor. Each plugin variant is maintained separately and integrates with the editor's native autocomplete UI, keybinding system, and file context APIs.
Unique: Native plugins for three major editor ecosystems (VS Code, JetBrains, Neovim) with integrated chat and diff application, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that support broader editor ecosystems but with less deep integration in some cases. Supermaven's approach prioritizes depth over breadth.
vs alternatives: Deep integration with VS Code and JetBrains (native autocomplete UI, hotkey system) compared to web-based tools or lighter integrations; trade-off is limited editor support (no Sublime, Vim, Emacs) and undisclosed Neovim support details.
+5 more capabilities