| Ecosystem |
| 1 |
| 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Paid |
| Capabilities | 12 decomposed | 5 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Automatically locates and parses session logs from Claude Code, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Codex, and other AI coding tools by scanning platform-specific directories (~/.claude, ~/.config, etc.). Implements a provider plugin system with standardized parsers that convert heterogeneous log formats into a unified ParsedTurn and Session object model, enabling downstream analysis across multiple tools without manual configuration.
Unique: Implements a provider plugin architecture that decouples provider-specific parsing logic from the core analysis engine, allowing new providers to be added via standardized interfaces (discoverAllSessions, parseSessionFile) without modifying core code. Uses LiteLLM's pricing database as the canonical source for model cost data across 100+ models.
vs alternatives: Supports 5+ AI coding tools natively with a pluggable architecture, whereas most token trackers are single-tool specific or require API proxies that add latency and privacy concerns.
Analyzes parsed session turns and classifies them into TaskCategory buckets (coding, testing, terminal usage, debugging, etc.) using heuristic rules based on turn content, tool invocations, and file types. Implements a classifyTurn function that examines API calls, file modifications, and context patterns to assign semantic meaning to raw token consumption, enabling cost breakdown by activity type rather than just by model.
Unique: Uses multi-signal heuristic classification (file types, tool invocations, context patterns) rather than simple keyword matching, enabling semantic understanding of turn purpose. Tracks one-shot success rate per task category to identify which activity types benefit most from AI assistance.
vs alternatives: Provides task-level cost visibility that generic token counters cannot offer, allowing developers to optimize by activity type rather than just by model or project.
Provides CLI commands (codeburn status, codeburn report) that generate detailed reports on session discovery status, parsing errors, and data quality metrics. Implements metadata inspection capabilities that allow developers to examine individual session files, view parsing errors, and understand data completeness. Generates status summaries showing how many sessions were discovered, parsed successfully, and skipped due to errors.
Unique: Provides transparent visibility into the data ingestion pipeline, showing exactly which sessions were discovered, parsed, and skipped with detailed error messages. Enables developers to audit data quality before relying on cost calculations.
vs alternatives: Offers detailed status and error reporting that helps developers understand data completeness, whereas black-box tools that silently skip sessions make it difficult to detect data quality issues.
Implements a plugin-based architecture that allows new AI coding providers to be added without modifying core CodeBurn code. Each provider plugin implements standardized interfaces (discoverAllSessions, parseSessionFile) that return normalized ParsedTurn and Session objects. Plugins are loaded dynamically at runtime and can be distributed as npm packages, enabling community contributions and custom provider support.
Unique: Defines a minimal, standardized plugin interface (discoverAllSessions, parseSessionFile) that decouples provider-specific logic from the core analysis engine, enabling community contributions without core code changes. Plugins are loaded dynamically at runtime.
vs alternatives: Enables extensibility without forking or modifying core code, whereas monolithic tools that hardcode provider support require core maintainers to add each new provider.
Calculates USD costs for each turn by multiplying token counts (input + output) by model-specific pricing rates sourced from LiteLLM's pricing database, which covers 100+ models across OpenAI, Anthropic, and other providers. Implements a calculateCost function that handles variable pricing tiers, currency conversion, and subscription plan adjustments (e.g., Claude Pro discounts), ensuring accurate financial visibility without requiring API calls to pricing services.
Unique: Integrates LiteLLM's comprehensive pricing database as a built-in data source rather than requiring external API calls, enabling offline cost calculation and eliminating latency. Handles subscription plan adjustments (Claude Pro discounts) and multi-currency support natively.
vs alternatives: Provides accurate, offline cost calculation across 100+ models without API dependencies, whereas most token trackers either hardcode pricing or require cloud lookups that add latency and privacy exposure.
Renders a terminal-based interactive dashboard (TUI) using a framework like Ink or Blessed that displays aggregated token usage, costs, and efficiency metrics across multiple time periods (Today, 7 Days, 30 Days, All Time). Implements keyboard-driven navigation, filtering by project/model/task category, and drill-down capabilities that allow developers to explore cost patterns without leaving the terminal. Updates metrics in real-time as new session data is discovered.
Unique: Implements a keyboard-driven TUI dashboard that runs entirely in the terminal without external dependencies, enabling cost monitoring in headless environments and SSH sessions. Provides drill-down navigation from aggregate metrics to individual turns without context switching.
vs alternatives: Offers a native terminal experience for developers who live in the CLI, whereas web-based dashboards require browser context switching and are inaccessible in SSH/headless environments.
Aggregates parsed session turns into daily buckets and higher-level time periods (7 Days, 30 Days, All Time) using an aggregateProjectsIntoDays function that groups by date, project, and model. Implements a caching layer that stores aggregated results to avoid recomputing statistics on every dashboard load, with cache invalidation triggered by new session data discovery. Supports efficient querying of cost trends across arbitrary time windows.
Unique: Implements a two-level aggregation strategy (daily buckets + period summaries) with intelligent cache invalidation that rebuilds only affected time periods when new sessions are discovered, avoiding full recomputation. Uses immutable daily aggregates as the foundation for all higher-level queries.
vs alternatives: Provides fast metric queries even with large datasets by pre-aggregating and caching, whereas naive approaches that recalculate from raw turns on every query become slow with 1000+ turns.
Scans session history to identify inefficient token usage patterns such as redundant file reads, bloated context windows, unused MCP tool invocations, and low one-shot success rates. Implements an optimization engine (codeburn optimize) that analyzes turn sequences, detects repeated operations on the same files, and generates actionable recommendations to reduce token waste. Uses heuristic rules and statistical analysis to flag anomalies in token consumption.
Unique: Analyzes turn sequences and file access patterns to detect structural inefficiencies (e.g., reading the same file 5 times in a single session) rather than just flagging high token counts. Tracks one-shot success rate as a proxy for efficiency and correlates it with context size and tool usage.
vs alternatives: Provides actionable optimization recommendations based on actual usage patterns, whereas generic cost-cutting advice (e.g., 'use smaller models') ignores the specific inefficiencies in a developer's workflow.
+4 more capabilities
ChatGPT utilizes a transformer-based architecture to generate responses based on the context of the conversation. It employs attention mechanisms to weigh the importance of different parts of the input text, allowing it to maintain context over multiple turns of dialogue. This enables it to provide coherent and contextually relevant responses that evolve as the conversation progresses.
Unique: ChatGPT's use of fine-tuning on conversational datasets allows it to better understand nuances in dialogue compared to other models that may not be specifically trained for conversation.
vs alternatives: More contextually aware than many rule-based chatbots, as it leverages deep learning for understanding and generating human-like dialogue.
ChatGPT employs a multi-layered neural network that analyzes user input to identify intent dynamically. It uses embeddings to represent user queries and matches them against a vast array of learned intents, enabling it to adapt responses based on the user's needs in real-time. This capability allows for more personalized and relevant interactions.
Unique: The model's ability to leverage contextual embeddings for intent recognition sets it apart from simpler keyword-based systems, allowing for a more nuanced understanding of user queries.
vs alternatives: More effective than traditional keyword matching systems, as it understands context and intent rather than relying solely on predefined keywords.
ChatGPT manages multi-turn dialogues by maintaining a conversation history that informs its responses. It uses a sliding window approach to keep track of recent exchanges, ensuring that the context remains relevant and coherent. This allows it to handle complex interactions where user queries may refer back to previous statements.
codeburn scores higher at 43/100 vs ChatGPT at 43/100. codeburn also has a free tier, making it more accessible.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Unique: The implementation of a dynamic context management system allows ChatGPT to effectively manage and reference prior interactions, unlike simpler models that may reset context after each response.
vs alternatives: Superior to basic chatbots that lack memory, as it can recall and reference previous messages to maintain a coherent conversation.
ChatGPT can summarize lengthy texts by analyzing the content and extracting key points while maintaining the original context. It utilizes attention mechanisms to focus on the most relevant parts of the text, allowing it to generate concise summaries that capture essential information without losing meaning.
Unique: ChatGPT's summarization capability is enhanced by its ability to maintain context through attention mechanisms, which allows it to produce more coherent and relevant summaries compared to simpler models.
vs alternatives: More effective than traditional summarization tools that rely on extractive methods, as it can generate summaries that are both concise and contextually accurate.
ChatGPT can modify its tone and style based on user preferences or contextual cues. It analyzes the input text to determine the desired tone and adjusts its responses accordingly, whether the user prefers formal, casual, or technical language. This capability enhances user engagement by tailoring interactions to individual preferences.
Unique: The ability to adapt tone and style dynamically based on user input distinguishes ChatGPT from static response systems that lack this level of personalization.
vs alternatives: More responsive than traditional chatbots that provide fixed responses, as it can tailor its language style to match user preferences.