| 0 |
| 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Paid | Free |
| Capabilities | 5 decomposed | 9 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Automates the planning, scheduling, and optimization of Twitter/X content calendars by analyzing audience engagement patterns, optimal posting times, and content performance metrics. The system likely integrates with X API v2 to fetch historical performance data, applies heuristic-based or ML-driven scheduling algorithms to determine ideal post times, and queues content for publication across multiple accounts or team members.
Unique: unknown — insufficient data on whether this uses proprietary engagement prediction models, integrates with X's native scheduling APIs, or applies founder-specific heuristics (e.g., optimizing for founder visibility vs. viral reach)
vs alternatives: unknown — cannot differentiate vs. Buffer, Later, or native X scheduling without visibility into prediction accuracy, team collaboration features, or founder-specific optimizations
Enables centralized management of multiple X/Twitter accounts from a single dashboard, allowing founders to coordinate posting across personal, company, and product accounts. Likely implements account switching via OAuth 2.0 token management, unified content calendar views, and cross-account analytics aggregation to track brand presence holistically.
Unique: unknown — unclear whether this uses native X API multi-account features, implements custom OAuth token orchestration, or provides founder-specific workflows (e.g., auto-tagging company account in personal posts)
vs alternatives: unknown — cannot assess vs. Hootsuite or Sprout Social without knowing whether it offers founder-specific features like personal brand amplification or startup-focused analytics
Analyzes historical tweet performance (impressions, engagement rate, reply sentiment) and recommends content topics, formats, and posting strategies tailored to a founder's audience. Likely uses collaborative filtering or content-based recommendation algorithms trained on the user's own tweet history plus aggregated founder/startup community data to suggest high-performing content patterns.
Unique: unknown — unclear whether recommendations use founder-specific training data (e.g., startup community tweets), proprietary engagement prediction models, or simple heuristic-based rules (e.g., 'threads get 3x engagement')
vs alternatives: unknown — cannot compare to Lately or Phrasee without knowing whether this uses LLM-based content generation, founder-specific training data, or purely statistical pattern matching
Identifies other founders, investors, and collaborators on X based on shared interests, industries, or engagement patterns, and suggests collaboration opportunities. Likely uses graph analysis on follower networks, semantic analysis of tweet content, and heuristic matching to surface relevant connections and potential partnership opportunities.
Unique: unknown — unclear whether this uses proprietary founder classification models, integrates with external databases (Crunchbase, LinkedIn), or relies purely on X API data and semantic analysis
vs alternatives: unknown — cannot assess vs. Founder Institute or AngelList without knowing whether it provides real-time discovery, automated outreach, or founder-specific matching criteria
Assists in structuring and optimizing multi-tweet threads by providing formatting suggestions, engagement hooks, and narrative flow analysis. Likely uses NLP to analyze thread coherence, suggest hook-worthy opening lines, and recommend optimal thread length based on historical performance data and audience attention patterns.
Unique: unknown — unclear whether this uses LLM-based analysis, rule-based heuristics, or founder-specific training data to optimize threads
vs alternatives: unknown — cannot compare to Typefully or Thread Reader without knowing whether it provides real-time suggestions during composition or post-hoc analysis only
Executes SQL queries against Supabase PostgreSQL instances through the Model Context Protocol, translating natural language or structured query requests into parameterized SQL statements. Uses MCP's tool-calling interface to expose database operations as callable functions with schema validation, enabling LLM agents to perform CRUD operations, joins, and aggregations with automatic connection pooling and credential management through Supabase client SDK.
Unique: Exposes Supabase PostgreSQL as MCP tools with automatic credential injection from Supabase client SDK, eliminating manual connection string management and enabling seamless LLM-to-database queries within Claude or compatible agents
vs alternatives: Tighter integration than generic SQL MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in authentication and connection pooling rather than requiring separate database credential configuration
Exposes Supabase Auth session state and user metadata through MCP tools, allowing agents to inspect current authentication context, retrieve user profiles, and trigger auth-related operations. Integrates with Supabase's JWT-based auth system to validate sessions and access user claims without re-authenticating, using the Supabase client's built-in session management.
Unique: Integrates Supabase's JWT-based auth system directly into MCP tool interface, allowing agents to inspect and act on auth state without managing separate credential stores or re-authentication flows
vs alternatives: More seamless than generic auth MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in session management and avoids redundant credential passing between agent and auth system
Invokes Supabase Edge Functions (serverless TypeScript/JavaScript functions) through MCP tools, passing parameters and receiving results with optional streaming support. Uses Supabase's edge function HTTP API to trigger functions with automatic authentication headers and response parsing, enabling agents to execute custom business logic without embedding it in the agent itself.
Supabase scores higher at 42/100 vs Founder's X at 18/100. Supabase also has a free tier, making it more accessible.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Edge Functions as MCP tools with automatic authentication and response parsing, allowing agents to invoke custom serverless logic without managing HTTP clients or credential injection
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic HTTP MCP tools because it handles Supabase-specific authentication, error handling, and response formatting automatically
Subscribes to real-time changes on Supabase tables through MCP's event streaming interface, using Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY mechanism to push INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE events to agents. Maintains persistent WebSocket connections and filters events by table and row-level policies, enabling agents to react to database changes without polling.
Unique: Bridges Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY real-time system with MCP's tool interface, enabling agents to subscribe to database changes without managing WebSocket connections or event serialization
vs alternatives: More efficient than polling-based approaches because it uses Supabase's native real-time infrastructure rather than repeated database queries
Manages files in Supabase Storage buckets through MCP tools, supporting upload, download, list, and delete operations with automatic authentication and path-based access control. Uses Supabase's S3-compatible storage API with built-in support for public/private buckets and signed URLs for temporary access, enabling agents to handle file I/O without managing cloud storage credentials.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Storage's S3-compatible API as MCP tools with automatic authentication and signed URL generation, eliminating the need for agents to manage cloud storage credentials or generate temporary access tokens
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic S3 MCP tools because it leverages Supabase's built-in bucket policies and authentication rather than requiring separate AWS credentials
Performs semantic similarity searches on vector embeddings stored in Supabase PostgreSQL using pgvector extension, translating natural language queries into embedding vectors and executing cosine/L2 distance searches. Integrates with embedding providers (OpenAI, Cohere) or uses pre-computed embeddings, enabling agents to retrieve semantically similar documents or records without full-text search limitations.
Unique: Integrates pgvector directly into MCP tools with automatic embedding generation and distance calculation, enabling agents to perform semantic search without managing separate vector database infrastructure
vs alternatives: More efficient than external vector databases (Pinecone, Weaviate) for Supabase users because it colocates embeddings with relational data, reducing network latency and simplifying data synchronization
Exposes Supabase database schema information through MCP tools, allowing agents to discover table structures, column types, constraints, and relationships without manual schema documentation. Queries PostgreSQL information_schema and Supabase metadata tables to dynamically generate schema descriptions, enabling agents to construct valid queries and understand data relationships.
Unique: Queries Supabase's PostgreSQL information_schema directly through MCP tools, enabling agents to dynamically discover and adapt to database schemas without pre-configured schema definitions
vs alternatives: More flexible than static schema definitions because it reflects live database state, including recent migrations or schema changes
Enforces Supabase Row-Level Security policies within agent queries, ensuring that agents can only access rows permitted by RLS rules defined in the database. Evaluates policies based on authenticated user context (JWT claims, user ID) and applies WHERE clause filters automatically, preventing unauthorized data access at the database layer rather than application layer.
Unique: Delegates authorization enforcement to PostgreSQL RLS policies rather than implementing authorization in agent code, ensuring that data access rules are centralized and cannot be bypassed by agent logic
vs alternatives: More secure than application-level authorization because RLS is enforced at the database layer, preventing accidental data leaks even if agent code has bugs
+1 more capabilities