| 0 |
| 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 9 decomposed | 12 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Continuously scans and identifies technology adoption patterns across target companies by analyzing web signals, DNS records, and application fingerprints. Uses pattern-matching algorithms to detect installed software, frameworks, and infrastructure components, then tracks changes over time to alert users to tech stack shifts. The system maintains a live database of tech signatures and correlates them with company metadata to surface adoption trends.
Unique: Combines web fingerprinting with continuous monitoring to surface tech adoption changes in real-time, rather than static snapshots. Integrates funding activity signals alongside tech stack data to correlate investment with infrastructure changes.
vs alternatives: Faster tech stack updates than BuiltWith or Crunchbase because it monitors web signals continuously rather than batch-processing, and correlates tech adoption with funding events that traditional tools miss.
Applies machine learning models to rank and prioritize sales prospects based on multiple signals including tech stack fit, company funding stage, growth indicators, and historical conversion patterns. The system learns from user engagement (which leads convert, which are ignored) to refine scoring weights over time. Scoring logic combines rule-based filters (e.g., 'Series A+ funding') with learned patterns to surface high-probability opportunities.
Unique: Combines tech stack affinity scoring with funding and growth signals in a unified model, rather than treating them as separate filters. Learns from user engagement patterns (which leads are contacted, which convert) to continuously refine weights.
vs alternatives: More dynamic than static lead lists from traditional sales intelligence tools because it adapts scoring based on your team's actual conversion patterns, not industry benchmarks.
Monitors public funding announcements, SEC filings, and investment databases to detect when target companies raise capital. Automatically extracts funding round details (amount, stage, investors, date) and correlates them with tech stack changes to identify companies in growth mode. Generates alerts via email or webhook when tracked companies announce funding, enabling sales teams to reach out during high-intent windows.
Unique: Correlates funding announcements with concurrent tech stack changes to identify companies in active growth/scaling mode, rather than just surfacing funding events in isolation. Enables webhook-based automation for outreach triggers.
vs alternatives: Faster funding alerts than Crunchbase or PitchBook because it aggregates multiple data sources and pushes alerts via webhook, enabling real-time sales automation rather than manual list reviews.
Enables side-by-side analysis of technology choices across multiple companies, showing which tools are adopted by competitors, market leaders, or similar-sized firms. Generates aggregated statistics (e.g., '73% of Series B SaaS companies use AWS') to contextualize individual company tech decisions. Uses clustering algorithms to group companies by tech stack similarity and identify market trends.
Unique: Aggregates tech stack data across cohorts to surface market-level trends and adoption patterns, rather than just showing individual company choices. Uses clustering to identify companies with similar tech profiles for competitive positioning.
vs alternatives: Provides market-level tech adoption statistics that BuiltWith or similar tools don't expose, enabling data-driven positioning narratives rather than anecdotal competitive claims.
Generates qualified prospect lists by combining multiple filter criteria: companies using specific technologies, funding stage, company size, geography, and industry. Applies AI-driven ranking to order results by sales readiness. Supports saved searches and scheduled list refreshes to maintain up-to-date prospect pipelines. Exports results in multiple formats (CSV, JSON, CRM-ready) for downstream sales tools.
Unique: Combines tech stack, funding, and company metadata filters in a single query interface, then applies AI-driven ranking to order results by sales readiness. Supports scheduled refreshes to maintain evergreen prospect lists.
vs alternatives: More flexible filtering than static lead lists because it enables custom combinations of tech stack + funding + company attributes, and refreshes automatically rather than requiring manual re-runs.
Provides bidirectional data synchronization with popular CRM platforms (Salesforce, HubSpot, Pipedrive, etc.) to push prospect data, tech stack insights, and funding alerts directly into sales workflows. Supports field mapping to align Fork data with CRM schemas. Enables two-way sync so that CRM engagement data (calls, emails, meetings) flows back to Fork for lead scoring refinement.
Unique: Enables bidirectional sync so that CRM engagement data (calls, emails, meetings) flows back to Fork for lead scoring refinement, creating a feedback loop. Supports field mapping to align Fork data with custom CRM schemas.
vs alternatives: More integrated than manual CSV exports because it maintains live sync and enables CRM engagement data to feed back into Fork's scoring models, creating a closed-loop system.
Generates personalized sales outreach messages (emails, LinkedIn messages) based on company tech stack, funding activity, and company profile. Uses templates and AI-driven personalization to reference specific technologies, recent funding rounds, or company milestones in outreach copy. Supports A/B testing of message variants to optimize response rates.
Unique: Personalizes outreach copy by referencing specific company data (tech stack, funding round, company milestones) rather than generic templates. Supports A/B testing to optimize message variants based on response rates.
vs alternatives: More contextually relevant than generic sales templates because it incorporates real-time company data (funding, tech changes) into message generation, and enables data-driven optimization through A/B testing.
Provides tools to define and validate Ideal Customer Profile (ICP) criteria by analyzing historical wins and losses. Allows users to specify ICP attributes (company size, funding stage, industry, tech stack) and validates these criteria against historical conversion data to measure fit accuracy. Suggests refinements to ICP definition based on patterns in won vs. lost deals.
Unique: Validates ICP criteria against historical conversion data to measure predictive accuracy, rather than relying on intuition or industry benchmarks. Suggests refinements based on patterns in won vs. lost deals.
vs alternatives: More data-driven than manual ICP definition because it analyzes your actual conversion patterns rather than relying on industry best practices or sales intuition.
+1 more capabilities
Store and automatically index high-dimensional vector embeddings in a managed, scalable database without manual infrastructure provisioning. The system handles index optimization and partitioning transparently.
Query stored vectors to find semantically similar items by computing distance metrics between query embeddings and indexed vectors. Returns ranked results based on relevance in sub-100ms latency.
Serve as the retrieval component in Retrieval-Augmented Generation pipelines, providing relevant context documents to language models for grounded responses.
Provide a generous free tier (1 pod, 100K vectors) enabling teams to build and test real applications before committing to paid plans.
Execute searches using both dense vector embeddings and sparse keyword-based vectors simultaneously, combining results to improve relevance by capturing both semantic and lexical similarity.
Filter vector search results based on metadata attributes (tags, categories, timestamps, custom fields) before or during similarity search, enabling faceted and conditional retrieval.
Insert, update, or replace multiple vectors and their metadata in a single batch operation, optimizing throughput for bulk data ingestion without individual API calls.
Pinecone scores higher at 71/100 vs Fork at 43/100. Fork leads on ecosystem, while Pinecone is stronger on adoption and quality.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Partition vector data within a single index using namespaces, enabling logical separation of data (by user, tenant, or dataset) without creating separate indexes.
+4 more capabilities