| 0 |
| 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Paid |
| Capabilities | 7 decomposed | 14 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Automatically captures audio streams from Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Google Meet via native platform integrations or browser-based recording, then applies speech-to-text processing (likely using cloud-based ASR engines like Google Speech-to-Text or Whisper) to generate full meeting transcripts. The system handles variable audio quality and multi-speaker scenarios by normalizing input before transcription, enabling downstream processing of meeting content without manual recording setup.
Unique: Integrates natively with three major meeting platforms (Zoom, Teams, Google Meet) via platform-specific APIs rather than generic screen recording, reducing setup friction and enabling structured metadata extraction (speaker names, timestamps) that generic audio capture cannot provide
vs alternatives: Simpler setup than Otter.ai or Fireflies.io because it works across platforms without requiring separate integrations per tool, though it may sacrifice some accuracy depth compared to specialized transcription-first competitors
Processes full meeting transcripts through a large language model (likely GPT-4 or similar) with a specialized prompt engineering pipeline that extracts summaries, key decisions, and action items in a single inference pass. The system likely uses few-shot prompting or fine-tuning to understand meeting context (project names, participant roles, business domain) and avoid generic verbose summaries, producing structured outputs that distinguish between decisions, action items, and discussion points.
Unique: Uses context-aware prompt engineering to extract structured decisions and action items in a single LLM pass rather than running separate extraction pipelines, reducing latency and cost while maintaining semantic understanding of meeting outcomes
vs alternatives: Produces more contextually relevant summaries than Otter.ai's generic templates because it likely uses domain-specific prompt tuning, though it lacks Fireflies.io's deeper integration with project management tools for automatic action item assignment
Provides APIs and webhook endpoints to export meeting summaries, transcripts, and action items to external tools (Slack, email, project management platforms) via standardized formats (JSON, CSV, or platform-specific APIs). The system likely implements a webhook-based push model for real-time distribution and a pull API for on-demand retrieval, with support for custom field mapping to adapt Feta's output schema to downstream tool requirements.
Unique: Implements webhook-based push distribution for real-time meeting data delivery to multiple destinations simultaneously, rather than requiring users to manually pull data from a dashboard, reducing friction for teams with distributed tool stacks
vs alternatives: More flexible than Fireflies.io's pre-built integrations because it supports custom webhooks, but less comprehensive than Otter.ai's native integrations with major enterprise tools like Salesforce and HubSpot
Automatically identifies and labels speakers in meeting transcripts using a combination of audio fingerprinting (voice biometrics) and meeting metadata (participant list from platform APIs). The system likely maintains a speaker profile database keyed by voice characteristics and meeting context, enabling consistent speaker attribution across multiple meetings and reducing manual speaker labeling overhead. Role inference (e.g., 'client', 'team member', 'manager') may be derived from meeting metadata or historical patterns.
Unique: Combines voice biometric fingerprinting with meeting platform metadata to achieve speaker attribution without requiring manual labeling, whereas competitors like Otter.ai rely on speaker diarization alone (which is less accurate with many speakers)
vs alternatives: More accurate speaker attribution than generic diarization because it leverages platform-provided participant lists, but less robust than Fireflies.io if the meeting platform doesn't provide reliable participant metadata
Indexes all meeting transcripts and summaries using vector embeddings (likely OpenAI embeddings or similar) to enable semantic search across the meeting library. Users can query with natural language (e.g., 'What did we decide about pricing?') and the system returns relevant meeting segments ranked by semantic similarity, rather than keyword matching. The system likely maintains a vector database (Pinecone, Weaviate, or similar) indexed by meeting date, participant, and topic for efficient retrieval.
Unique: Uses vector embeddings for semantic search across meeting transcripts rather than keyword-based search, enabling natural language queries that understand intent (e.g., 'What did we decide about pricing?' matches discussions about 'cost' or 'budget' without exact keyword match)
vs alternatives: More intuitive search experience than Otter.ai's keyword-based search, though it requires more infrastructure (vector database) and may have higher latency for large meeting libraries compared to simple full-text search
Aggregates meeting data (duration, participant count, talk time distribution, action item completion rate) into a dashboard that provides team-level and individual-level insights. The system likely computes metrics asynchronously (daily or weekly aggregation jobs) and caches results in a time-series database for fast dashboard rendering. Insights may include trends (e.g., 'meeting duration increasing over time') and anomalies (e.g., 'participant X rarely speaks in meetings').
Unique: Provides team-level meeting analytics (duration trends, participation patterns, action item completion) as a built-in dashboard rather than requiring external analytics tools, enabling managers to optimize meeting culture without leaving Feta
vs alternatives: More comprehensive analytics than Otter.ai's basic meeting list, though less sophisticated than specialized meeting analytics tools like Hyperise or Looker Studio integrations
Implements a freemium model where users can capture and summarize a limited number of meetings per month (likely 5-10) without payment, with automatic tier upgrades triggered by usage thresholds. The system tracks usage metrics (meetings captured, API calls, storage) and presents upgrade prompts when users approach limits, enabling low-friction onboarding and conversion to paid tiers. Pricing tiers likely correspond to meeting volume (e.g., 'Starter: 10 meetings/month', 'Pro: 50 meetings/month').
Unique: Offers no-credit-card freemium access with automatic tier progression based on usage, reducing friction for team evaluation compared to competitors requiring upfront payment or credit card for trial access
vs alternatives: Lower barrier to entry than Fireflies.io (which requires credit card for trial) and Otter.ai (which has limited free tier), though pricing transparency is worse than both competitors
Automatically loads and parses documents from diverse sources (PDFs, Word docs, HTML, Markdown, code files, databases) into a unified in-memory representation using format-specific loaders and node-based document abstractions. Each document is decomposed into Document objects containing metadata, content, and relationships, enabling downstream processing without format-specific handling in application code.
Unique: Provides a unified loader abstraction (BaseReader interface) that normalizes 100+ data source connectors into a single Document/Node API, eliminating format-specific branching logic in application code. Loaders are composable and chainable, allowing sequential transformations (e.g., load → split → extract metadata → embed).
vs alternatives: Broader out-of-the-box loader coverage than LangChain's document loaders and more structured node-based decomposition than raw text splitting, reducing boilerplate for multi-source RAG pipelines.
Splits documents into semantically coherent chunks using multiple strategies (character-based, token-aware, recursive, semantic) with configurable overlap and chunk size. Preserves document hierarchy and metadata through a node tree structure, enabling retrieval systems to maintain context relationships and enable hierarchical re-ranking or parent-document retrieval patterns.
Unique: Implements a node-tree abstraction that preserves document hierarchy and enables parent-document retrieval patterns. Supports multiple splitting strategies (recursive, semantic, code-aware) with pluggable custom splitters, and automatically propagates metadata through the node tree.
vs alternatives: More sophisticated than LangChain's text splitters because it preserves hierarchical relationships and supports semantic splitting; better for complex document structures than simple character-based splitting.
Feta scores higher at 43/100 vs LlamaIndex at 40/100. Feta also has a free tier, making it more accessible.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Processes documents containing mixed content (text, images, tables, code) by extracting and understanding each modality separately, then synthesizing information across modalities. Uses vision models for image understanding, specialized parsers for tables and code, and integrates results into a unified document representation for retrieval and generation.
Unique: Integrates vision models, table parsers, and code extractors into a unified multi-modal document processing pipeline that synthesizes information across modalities. Preserves modality-specific structure (table schemas, code formatting) while enabling cross-modal retrieval and generation.
vs alternatives: More comprehensive multi-modal support than text-only RAG; built-in vision integration reduces boilerplate for document understanding compared to manual vision API calls.
Enables streaming of LLM responses token-by-token and real-time retrieval updates, allowing applications to display partial results as they become available. Supports streaming from retrieval (progressive document discovery) and generation (token-by-token output) with backpressure handling and cancellation support for responsive user experiences.
Unique: Provides first-class streaming support for both retrieval and generation with automatic backpressure handling and cancellation. Enables progressive result display without custom async/streaming code in application layer.
vs alternatives: More integrated streaming support than manual LLM API streaming; built-in retrieval streaming and backpressure handling reduce complexity compared to custom streaming implementations.
Tracks API costs for LLM calls, embeddings, and other operations with per-query and per-session cost attribution. Provides cost optimization recommendations (e.g., batch processing, model selection, caching) and enables cost-aware query planning to balance quality and expense. Integrates with multiple LLM providers to normalize cost tracking across models.
Unique: Provides automatic cost tracking across multiple LLM providers with per-query attribution and cost optimization recommendations. Integrates with query execution to enable cost-aware planning without manual cost calculation.
vs alternatives: More integrated cost tracking than manual API billing review; built-in optimization recommendations reduce guesswork for cost reduction.
Enables building custom RAG pipelines by composing modular components (retrievers, synthesizers, agents, tools) through a declarative or programmatic API. Supports complex workflows with branching, loops, and conditional logic, with automatic dependency resolution and execution optimization. Pipelines are reusable, testable, and can be deployed as APIs or batch jobs.
Unique: Provides a flexible pipeline composition API supporting both declarative and programmatic definitions, with automatic dependency resolution and execution optimization. Enables complex workflows with branching and conditional logic without custom orchestration code.
vs alternatives: More flexible pipeline composition than fixed RAG architectures; better workflow support than manual component chaining.
Generates embeddings for documents/nodes using pluggable embedding providers (OpenAI, Hugging Face, local models) and stores them in a unified vector store interface that abstracts over multiple backends (Pinecone, Weaviate, Milvus, FAISS, Chroma, etc.). The abstraction layer enables switching vector stores without changing application code, and handles batching, retry logic, and metadata indexing.
Unique: Provides a unified VectorStore interface that abstracts 10+ vector database backends, enabling zero-code switching between providers. Handles embedding batching, retry logic, and metadata propagation automatically. Supports both cloud and local embedding models through a pluggable EmbedModel interface.
vs alternatives: Broader vector store coverage and more seamless provider switching than LangChain's vectorstore integrations; better abstraction consistency across backends than using raw vector store SDKs directly.
Retrieves semantically similar documents from vector stores using embedding-based similarity search, with optional re-ranking, filtering, and fusion strategies (hybrid search combining dense and sparse retrieval). Supports multiple retrieval modes (similarity, MMR, fusion) and enables custom retrieval logic through a pluggable Retriever interface that can combine multiple strategies.
Unique: Implements a pluggable Retriever abstraction supporting multiple retrieval strategies (similarity, MMR, fusion, custom) that can be composed and chained. Built-in support for re-ranking via LLM or cross-encoder, and hybrid search combining dense and sparse retrieval without custom integration code.
vs alternatives: More flexible retrieval composition than LangChain's retrievers; built-in re-ranking and fusion strategies reduce boilerplate for advanced retrieval pipelines.
+6 more capabilities