Supabase ranks higher at 42/100 vs Fábio Zé Domingues - co-founder of Code Autopilot at 18/100. Capability-level comparison backed by match graph evidence from real search data.
| Feature | Fábio Zé Domingues - co-founder of Code Autopilot | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Product | MCP Server |
| UnfragileRank | 18/100 | 42/100 |
| Adoption | 0 | 0 |
| Quality | 0 | 0 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Paid | Free |
| Capabilities | 5 decomposed | 9 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Generates, refactors, and automates code workflows by analyzing developer intent through natural language prompts and converting them into executable code modifications. The system likely uses LLM-based code understanding combined with AST analysis to maintain structural integrity across multi-file changes, enabling developers to express high-level intent (e.g., 'add authentication to this endpoint') and receive production-ready code changes with minimal manual intervention.
Unique: unknown — insufficient data on Code Autopilot's specific architectural approach (AST-based vs token-based, codebase indexing strategy, multi-file coordination mechanism)
vs alternatives: unknown — insufficient data to compare against GitHub Copilot, Codeium, or other code automation tools
Maintains awareness of project structure, dependencies, and code patterns by indexing and analyzing the full codebase to provide contextually relevant suggestions and modifications. This likely involves semantic understanding of imports, function signatures, and architectural patterns to ensure generated code integrates seamlessly with existing code without breaking changes or introducing inconsistencies.
Unique: unknown — insufficient data on indexing strategy (vector embeddings vs AST-based vs hybrid), update frequency, and scope of architectural pattern recognition
vs alternatives: unknown — insufficient data to compare context management depth against Copilot Enterprise or other codebase-aware tools
Chains multiple code generation and modification steps into automated workflows, allowing developers to define complex, multi-stage transformations that execute sequentially with state preservation between steps. This enables scenarios like 'add feature → generate tests → update documentation → create migration scripts' as a single atomic operation, with rollback capabilities if any step fails.
Unique: unknown — insufficient data on workflow definition language, state persistence mechanism, error handling strategy, and rollback capabilities
vs alternatives: unknown — insufficient data to compare against GitHub Actions, Make.com, or other workflow automation platforms
Provides inline code suggestions, real-time validation, and interactive code modification directly within development environments through language server protocol (LSP) or editor-specific APIs. This enables developers to see suggestions as they type, accept/reject changes with keyboard shortcuts, and maintain full control over code modifications without context switching to external tools.
Unique: unknown — insufficient data on LSP implementation, latency optimization strategy, and editor-specific integration patterns
vs alternatives: unknown — insufficient data to compare against Copilot's editor integration, Codeium's latency, or other IDE plugins
Interprets developer intent expressed in natural language and translates it into precise code modifications by combining LLM-based understanding with structured code analysis. The system parses intent descriptions (e.g., 'add error handling to the login function') and maps them to specific code locations, transformations, and validation rules, ensuring generated changes align with the developer's actual goal rather than literal interpretation.
Unique: unknown — insufficient data on intent parsing architecture (prompt engineering vs fine-tuned models), disambiguation strategy, and confidence scoring mechanism
vs alternatives: unknown — insufficient data to compare intent parsing accuracy against GitHub Copilot's prompt understanding or other NL-to-code systems
Executes SQL queries against Supabase PostgreSQL instances through the Model Context Protocol, translating natural language or structured query requests into parameterized SQL statements. Uses MCP's tool-calling interface to expose database operations as callable functions with schema validation, enabling LLM agents to perform CRUD operations, joins, and aggregations with automatic connection pooling and credential management through Supabase client SDK.
Unique: Exposes Supabase PostgreSQL as MCP tools with automatic credential injection from Supabase client SDK, eliminating manual connection string management and enabling seamless LLM-to-database queries within Claude or compatible agents
vs alternatives: Tighter integration than generic SQL MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in authentication and connection pooling rather than requiring separate database credential configuration
Exposes Supabase Auth session state and user metadata through MCP tools, allowing agents to inspect current authentication context, retrieve user profiles, and trigger auth-related operations. Integrates with Supabase's JWT-based auth system to validate sessions and access user claims without re-authenticating, using the Supabase client's built-in session management.
Unique: Integrates Supabase's JWT-based auth system directly into MCP tool interface, allowing agents to inspect and act on auth state without managing separate credential stores or re-authentication flows
vs alternatives: More seamless than generic auth MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in session management and avoids redundant credential passing between agent and auth system
Invokes Supabase Edge Functions (serverless TypeScript/JavaScript functions) through MCP tools, passing parameters and receiving results with optional streaming support. Uses Supabase's edge function HTTP API to trigger functions with automatic authentication headers and response parsing, enabling agents to execute custom business logic without embedding it in the agent itself.
Supabase scores higher at 42/100 vs Fábio Zé Domingues - co-founder of Code Autopilot at 18/100. Supabase also has a free tier, making it more accessible.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Edge Functions as MCP tools with automatic authentication and response parsing, allowing agents to invoke custom serverless logic without managing HTTP clients or credential injection
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic HTTP MCP tools because it handles Supabase-specific authentication, error handling, and response formatting automatically
Subscribes to real-time changes on Supabase tables through MCP's event streaming interface, using Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY mechanism to push INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE events to agents. Maintains persistent WebSocket connections and filters events by table and row-level policies, enabling agents to react to database changes without polling.
Unique: Bridges Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY real-time system with MCP's tool interface, enabling agents to subscribe to database changes without managing WebSocket connections or event serialization
vs alternatives: More efficient than polling-based approaches because it uses Supabase's native real-time infrastructure rather than repeated database queries
Manages files in Supabase Storage buckets through MCP tools, supporting upload, download, list, and delete operations with automatic authentication and path-based access control. Uses Supabase's S3-compatible storage API with built-in support for public/private buckets and signed URLs for temporary access, enabling agents to handle file I/O without managing cloud storage credentials.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Storage's S3-compatible API as MCP tools with automatic authentication and signed URL generation, eliminating the need for agents to manage cloud storage credentials or generate temporary access tokens
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic S3 MCP tools because it leverages Supabase's built-in bucket policies and authentication rather than requiring separate AWS credentials
Performs semantic similarity searches on vector embeddings stored in Supabase PostgreSQL using pgvector extension, translating natural language queries into embedding vectors and executing cosine/L2 distance searches. Integrates with embedding providers (OpenAI, Cohere) or uses pre-computed embeddings, enabling agents to retrieve semantically similar documents or records without full-text search limitations.
Unique: Integrates pgvector directly into MCP tools with automatic embedding generation and distance calculation, enabling agents to perform semantic search without managing separate vector database infrastructure
vs alternatives: More efficient than external vector databases (Pinecone, Weaviate) for Supabase users because it colocates embeddings with relational data, reducing network latency and simplifying data synchronization
Exposes Supabase database schema information through MCP tools, allowing agents to discover table structures, column types, constraints, and relationships without manual schema documentation. Queries PostgreSQL information_schema and Supabase metadata tables to dynamically generate schema descriptions, enabling agents to construct valid queries and understand data relationships.
Unique: Queries Supabase's PostgreSQL information_schema directly through MCP tools, enabling agents to dynamically discover and adapt to database schemas without pre-configured schema definitions
vs alternatives: More flexible than static schema definitions because it reflects live database state, including recent migrations or schema changes
Enforces Supabase Row-Level Security policies within agent queries, ensuring that agents can only access rows permitted by RLS rules defined in the database. Evaluates policies based on authenticated user context (JWT claims, user ID) and applies WHERE clause filters automatically, preventing unauthorized data access at the database layer rather than application layer.
Unique: Delegates authorization enforcement to PostgreSQL RLS policies rather than implementing authorization in agent code, ensuring that data access rules are centralized and cannot be bypassed by agent logic
vs alternatives: More secure than application-level authorization because RLS is enforced at the database layer, preventing accidental data leaks even if agent code has bugs
+1 more capabilities