| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 6 decomposed | 12 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Generates contextually appropriate musical extensions that match the harmonic, rhythmic, and tonal characteristics of uploaded compositions. Uses neural sequence models trained on music theory principles to predict and synthesize the next musical phrases while maintaining consistency with the original material's key, tempo, and instrumentation patterns. The system analyzes input audio/MIDI to extract style embeddings and applies them as constraints during generation.
Unique: Implements style-aware continuation by extracting harmonic and rhythmic embeddings from input material and using them as conditioning signals during neural generation, rather than treating each generation as independent. This enables coherent multi-phrase extensions that maintain tonal consistency without explicit parameter tuning.
vs alternatives: Faster iteration than hiring session musicians or collaborators, and free access removes financial barriers compared to subscription-based composition plugins like LANDR or Amper Music, though with less granular control than professional DAW-integrated tools.
Automatically detects or accepts explicit tempo and key signature from input compositions, then uses this metadata to constrain neural generation to harmonically valid progressions within the detected key. The system applies music theory rules (chord voicing, voice leading, functional harmony) as soft constraints during decoding to ensure generated extensions don't introduce jarring key changes or rhythmic discontinuities.
Unique: Embeds music theory constraints (functional harmony, voice leading rules, key-relative chord progressions) as soft penalties in the neural decoding process rather than post-processing generated sequences, enabling real-time constraint satisfaction during generation rather than filtering invalid outputs afterward.
vs alternatives: More musically coherent than generic sequence models that ignore harmonic context, and faster than manual music theory rule-checking, though less flexible than DAW tools that allow explicit chord specification and progression editing.
Generates multiple distinct musical continuations from a single input composition in a single session, allowing users to compare variations side-by-side and select the most musically suitable option. Each variation is independently sampled from the neural model with different random seeds, producing stylistically consistent but melodically and harmonically diverse alternatives that maintain the original's core characteristics.
Unique: Implements parallel variation generation by sampling multiple independent trajectories from the same neural model with different random seeds, then presents them in a unified comparison interface rather than requiring sequential regeneration. This enables rapid exploration of the model's output distribution without architectural changes.
vs alternatives: Faster creative exploration than manual composition or sequential AI generation, and more efficient than hiring multiple session musicians to propose different arrangements, though less controllable than DAW tools with explicit parameter tweaking.
Provides free access to music generation capabilities without financial barriers, watermarks, or credit requirements on generated output. The free tier removes friction from experimentation, allowing users to iterate rapidly and test the tool's suitability for their workflow without subscription commitment or licensing concerns. Generated audio can be downloaded and used immediately without additional processing or attribution requirements.
Unique: Removes all financial and technical barriers to initial experimentation by offering watermark-free generation on the free tier, unlike competitors (Amper, LANDR) that watermark free outputs or require subscriptions. This design choice prioritizes user acquisition and workflow integration over immediate monetization.
vs alternatives: Lower barrier to entry than subscription-based competitors like Amper Music or LANDR, and no watermarking unlike many free AI music tools, making it more suitable for rapid prototyping and creative exploration without financial commitment.
Processes uploaded compositions and generates continuations with sub-minute latency, enabling rapid iteration cycles where users can upload, generate, listen, and refine within a single creative session. The system uses optimized neural inference (likely quantization, batching, or model distillation) to keep processing time under 60 seconds per generation, allowing multiple variations to be explored without breaking creative flow.
Unique: Achieves sub-60-second generation latency through optimized neural inference (likely model quantization, knowledge distillation, or inference-time optimization) rather than relying on larger, slower models. This enables real-time creative iteration without sacrificing immediate playback feedback.
vs alternatives: Faster iteration than offline DAW plugins or cloud services with longer processing times, enabling creative flow maintenance that slower tools interrupt. Trade-off is likely reduced output quality compared to slower, larger models.
Accepts both audio files and MIDI files as input, and outputs generated continuations in both formats. This enables integration with external DAWs and music production workflows by allowing users to import generated MIDI into their existing tools for further editing, or to work with audio-only sources without MIDI availability. The system likely uses audio-to-MIDI transcription (onset detection, pitch estimation, note quantization) to extract symbolic representations from audio inputs.
Unique: Implements bidirectional format conversion by using audio-to-MIDI transcription (likely onset detection and pitch estimation) to extract symbolic representations from audio, enabling MIDI output from audio inputs. This allows seamless integration with DAW workflows without requiring users to manually transcribe or re-record.
vs alternatives: More flexible than audio-only or MIDI-only tools, enabling integration with diverse production workflows. Transcription quality is likely lower than manual MIDI entry or professional transcription services, but sufficient for rapid prototyping.
Transcribes audio in 98 languages to text in the original language using a Transformer sequence-to-sequence architecture trained on 680,000 hours of diverse internet audio. The system uses mel spectrogram feature extraction via FFmpeg integration, processes audio through an AudioEncoder that generates embeddings, then applies an autoregressive TextDecoder with task-specific tokens to produce language-native transcriptions. Language-specific models (e.g., tiny.en, base.en) optimize for English-only workloads with reduced parameter count.
Unique: Unified multitasking Transformer model replaces traditional multi-stage speech pipelines (VAD → language detection → ASR → post-processing) with single forward pass; trained on 680K hours of internet audio providing robustness to background noise, accents, and technical speech unlike studio-trained competitors
vs alternatives: Outperforms Google Cloud Speech-to-Text and Azure Speech Services on non-English languages and noisy audio due to diverse training data; open-source allows local deployment without API latency or privacy concerns
Translates non-English speech directly to English text in a single forward pass using the same Transformer architecture as transcription, but with a translation task token prepended to the decoder input. The model learns to skip intermediate transcription and generate English output directly from audio embeddings, avoiding cascading errors from intermediate transcription steps. Supports 98 source languages translating to English only.
Unique: Direct audio-to-English translation without intermediate transcription step — the decoder learns to skip source language text generation and output English directly, reducing error propagation and latency compared to cascade approaches (transcribe → translate)
vs alternatives: Faster and more accurate than Google Translate + Google Speech-to-Text pipeline because it avoids intermediate transcription errors; open-source allows offline deployment unlike cloud translation APIs
Whisper Large v3 scores higher at 59/100 vs ExtendMusic.AI at 43/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Normalizes variable-length audio to exactly 30 seconds via `whisper.pad_or_trim()`: audio shorter than 30 seconds is padded with silence (zeros) to reach 30 seconds, audio longer than 30 seconds is trimmed to first 30 seconds. This ensures consistent input shape (80×3000 mel spectrogram) for the model, avoiding shape mismatches and enabling batch processing. Padding strategy is simple zero-padding rather than sophisticated techniques like repetition or interpolation.
Unique: Simple zero-padding strategy is computationally efficient and deterministic, but acoustically naive — alternative approaches (silence detection, repetition) not implemented in base library
vs alternatives: Simpler than librosa-based preprocessing with sophisticated padding; deterministic behavior aids reproducibility; zero-padding is fast but may introduce artifacts vs more sophisticated techniques
Returns transcription results as structured JSON objects containing: transcribed text, language code, duration, segments (with timing and text), and optional confidence metrics. The `model.transcribe()` API returns a dictionary with keys like 'text' (full transcript), 'language' (detected language), 'segments' (list of segment objects with start/end times and text). This structured format enables downstream processing (subtitle generation, database storage, API responses) without string parsing.
Unique: Structured output format is built into high-level API rather than requiring manual parsing — segments include timing and text, enabling direct use for subtitle generation or timeline-based applications
vs alternatives: More structured than raw text output; less detailed than forced alignment tools that provide phoneme-level information; JSON format is language-agnostic and integrates easily with web APIs
Detects the spoken language in audio by processing mel spectrograms through the AudioEncoder and using a language classification head that outputs probability distributions over 98 supported languages. The model leverages 680K hours of multilingual training data to recognize language characteristics from acoustic features alone, without requiring transcription. Language detection occurs as a preliminary step in the transcription pipeline and can be called independently via the language detection task token.
Unique: Language detection is integrated into the same Transformer model as transcription/translation via task tokens, allowing shared AudioEncoder computation and single model load — not a separate classifier, reducing memory footprint and inference overhead
vs alternatives: More accurate than acoustic-only language identification (e.g., librosa-based approaches) because it leverages semantic understanding from 680K hours of training; faster than transcription-based detection (identify language from first few words) because it uses acoustic features directly
Provides six model variants (tiny 39M, base 74M, small 244M, medium 769M, large 1550M, turbo 809M) with different parameter counts, VRAM requirements (1-10GB), and inference speeds (10x-1x relative to large). Each size trades accuracy for speed — tiny runs ~10x faster but with ~5-10% lower WER (word error rate), while large provides best accuracy at 10GB VRAM cost. Turbo variant (809M params) optimizes large-v3 for 8x speedup with minimal accuracy loss but lacks translation support.
Unique: Discrete model size family with published speed/accuracy/VRAM tradeoff matrix allows developers to make informed selection based on deployment constraints; turbo variant represents architectural optimization (knowledge distillation or pruning) achieving 8x speedup with <5% accuracy loss, distinct from simply using smaller base model
vs alternatives: More transparent tradeoff options than Whisper API (single model) or competitors like Deepgram (proprietary size selection); open-source allows local benchmarking on own hardware rather than relying on vendor performance claims
Automatically segments audio longer than 30 seconds into overlapping windows, processes each window independently through the transcription pipeline, and merges results with overlap handling to produce seamless full-length transcripts. The system uses `whisper.pad_or_trim()` to normalize each segment to exactly 30 seconds (padding with silence if needed), then applies the decoder to each segment and concatenates outputs while managing word-level boundaries and timestamp continuity across segment edges.
Unique: Sliding window approach with automatic overlap and boundary handling is built into high-level `model.transcribe()` API — developers don't manually implement segmentation, unlike lower-level APIs that require explicit window management
vs alternatives: Simpler than building custom segmentation logic; more robust than naive concatenation because it handles word-level boundary issues; faster than streaming approaches because it processes segments in parallel on GPU
Generates precise word-level timestamps (start and end times in milliseconds) for each word in the transcript by leveraging the decoder's attention weights and token alignment information. The system maps output tokens back to audio frames using the attention mechanism, then converts frame indices to millisecond timestamps based on the mel spectrogram hop length (20ms per frame). Timestamps are returned as part of the structured output alongside transcribed text.
Unique: Word-level timestamps are derived from attention weight alignment rather than separate timestamp prediction head — leverages existing decoder computation without additional model parameters, but introduces ±100-200ms uncertainty from frame quantization
vs alternatives: More granular than segment-level timestamps (which only mark 30-second boundaries); less accurate than forced alignment tools (e.g., Montreal Forced Aligner) but requires no phonetic lexicon or manual annotation
+4 more capabilities