| 0 |
| 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 9 decomposed | 14 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Displays live SEO performance data (search volume, keyword difficulty, CPC, competition metrics) directly on the Chrome New Tab page by integrating with third-party SEO data APIs (likely SemRush, Ahrefs, or Moz APIs). The extension fetches and caches metrics on tab load, presenting aggregated keyword and domain-level insights without requiring users to navigate away from their browsing context. Architecture relies on background service workers to poll API endpoints and store results in Chrome's local storage for instant rendering.
Unique: Embeds SEO metrics directly into the Chrome New Tab page (a high-frequency user touchpoint) rather than requiring users to open a separate dashboard, reducing context switching friction. Uses background service worker architecture to pre-fetch and cache API data, enabling near-instant metric display on tab open.
vs alternatives: Faster than opening SEMrush or Ahrefs dashboards for quick metric checks, but less comprehensive than dedicated platforms for deep analysis or historical tracking.
Monitors competitor domains and keywords by querying SEO APIs for ranking positions, traffic estimates, and backlink changes, then displays a summary widget on the New Tab page. The extension likely stores a user-configured list of competitor domains in Chrome's sync storage and periodically fetches updated metrics via background workers. Changes are highlighted or flagged (e.g., 'competitor X gained 50 new backlinks') to surface actionable intelligence without requiring manual checks.
Unique: Integrates competitor monitoring into the New Tab page as a passive, always-visible widget rather than requiring users to actively check a separate tool. Uses background polling with change detection logic to surface only significant deltas, reducing notification fatigue.
vs alternatives: More accessible than Semrush or Ahrefs competitor modules for quick checks, but lacks the depth of analysis and custom alert rules available in dedicated platforms.
Provides instant keyword search volume, trend data, and related keyword suggestions by querying SEO APIs (e.g., Google Trends API, SemRush API, or Moz API) based on user input or context from the current tab. The extension parses page content or accepts manual keyword input, then returns structured data including monthly search volume, year-over-year trends, and semantically related keywords. Results are cached locally to reduce API calls for repeated queries.
Unique: Embeds keyword research into the New Tab page with local caching of results, enabling sub-second lookups for repeated queries. Likely uses a lightweight keyword extraction algorithm to auto-populate search fields from current tab content, reducing manual input friction.
vs alternatives: Faster than opening Ubersuggest or Ahrefs for single-keyword checks, but lacks the bulk research and advanced filtering capabilities of dedicated keyword research tools.
Monitors and displays current search engine ranking positions for user-configured target keywords, fetching data from SEO APIs that track SERP positions across Google, Bing, or other search engines. The extension stores a list of tracked keywords and periodically queries ranking APIs to detect position changes, displaying current rank, URL position, and position delta (improvement/decline) on the New Tab widget. Architecture uses background workers to schedule periodic checks and Chrome storage to persist keyword lists across sessions.
Unique: Integrates SERP position tracking into the New Tab page as a persistent, always-visible metric rather than requiring users to check a separate rank tracking tool. Uses background scheduling to fetch updates asynchronously, ensuring data freshness without blocking the UI.
vs alternatives: More convenient than logging into Ahrefs or SEMrush for daily rank checks, but less detailed than dedicated rank tracking platforms which offer historical trends, local rank variants, and competitor rank comparisons.
Automatically analyzes the content of the currently active browser tab (via DOM parsing and text extraction) to identify primary keywords, entities, and semantic themes, then pre-populates the extension's search/analysis fields with these extracted keywords. The extension likely uses NLP techniques (keyword frequency analysis, TF-IDF, or lightweight NER) to surface the most relevant terms without requiring manual input. This reduces friction for users who want to analyze the page they're currently viewing.
Unique: Automatically extracts keywords from the current tab context without user input, using lightweight NLP (likely TF-IDF or frequency-based ranking) to surface relevant terms. This contextual awareness reduces friction compared to manual keyword entry in traditional SEO tools.
vs alternatives: More convenient than manually entering keywords into SEMrush or Ahrefs, but less accurate than dedicated content analysis tools that use advanced NLP models for semantic understanding.
Allows users to configure which SEO metrics, widgets, and data cards appear on their New Tab page, including reordering, resizing, and toggling visibility of individual components. The extension stores user preferences in Chrome's sync storage, enabling cross-device persistence. The dashboard likely uses a grid-based or card-based layout system (e.g., CSS Grid or a lightweight layout library) to render widgets responsively and allow drag-and-drop customization.
Unique: Provides drag-and-drop dashboard customization directly on the New Tab page, with Chrome sync persistence for cross-device consistency. Uses a lightweight layout system to avoid performance overhead while maintaining responsive design.
vs alternatives: More personalized than static SEO dashboards, but less flexible than full dashboard builders like Databox or Klipboard which allow custom metric selection and advanced visualization options.
Orchestrates connections to multiple third-party SEO data APIs (SemRush, Ahrefs, Moz, Google Trends, etc.) through a unified abstraction layer, handling authentication, rate limiting, and response caching. The extension implements a background service worker that manages API calls, stores results in Chrome's local storage with TTL-based expiration, and serves cached data to UI components. This architecture decouples the UI from API latency and reduces redundant API calls for the same data.
Unique: Implements a unified API abstraction layer that handles authentication, rate limiting, and intelligent caching across multiple SEO data providers, reducing latency and API quota waste. Uses background service workers to manage API calls asynchronously without blocking the UI.
vs alternatives: More efficient than making direct API calls from the UI, but adds complexity and potential security risk compared to server-side API aggregation (which would require a backend service).
Provides a prominent search input field on the New Tab page that accepts keywords or domain URLs and instantly returns SEO metrics without page navigation. The search bar uses autocomplete suggestions (likely based on user history or popular keywords) and submits queries to the API integration layer, displaying results in a modal or inline card. The implementation likely uses debouncing and request deduplication to avoid excessive API calls during typing.
Unique: Provides a prominent, always-visible search interface on the New Tab page with debounced API calls and autocomplete suggestions, enabling sub-second metric lookups for frequently-searched terms. Uses request deduplication to avoid redundant API calls for the same query.
vs alternatives: Faster than opening SEMrush or Ahrefs for single lookups, but lacks the advanced filtering and bulk research capabilities of dedicated tools.
+1 more capabilities
Users describe content or workflow tasks in natural language to the WRITER Agent, which interprets intent and executes end-to-end task completion without intermediate prompting. The system maps user descriptions to pre-built or custom playbooks, retrieves relevant context from the Knowledge Graph, applies personality profiles for brand consistency, and orchestrates multi-step execution across integrated tools. This differs from traditional chatbots by claiming autonomous task completion rather than conversational assistance.
Unique: Writer positions task delegation as autonomous agent execution rather than prompt-based generation, combining playbook templates with Knowledge Graph context and personality profiles to enforce brand consistency at execution time. The system claims to handle 'start to finish' task completion without intermediate user refinement, differentiating from traditional LLM interfaces that require iterative prompting.
vs alternatives: Unlike ChatGPT or Claude (conversational, iterative refinement required) or Zapier (rule-based automation without LLM reasoning), Writer combines LLM-powered task interpretation with pre-configured playbooks and brand enforcement, enabling non-technical users to delegate complex workflows with minimal prompt engineering.
Writer provides a library of 100+ prebuilt playbooks (Starter) or unlimited custom playbooks (Enterprise) that encode multi-step workflows as reusable templates. Playbooks are executed on-demand or on a schedule (up to 3 routines in Starter, unlimited in Enterprise), with Enterprise tier supporting chained workflows that sequence multiple playbooks with conditional logic. The system stores playbooks in a proprietary format with no documented export capability, creating vendor lock-in but enabling tight integration with Knowledge Graph and personality profiles.
Unique: Writer encodes workflows as proprietary playbook templates that integrate tightly with Knowledge Graph context and personality profiles, enabling brand-consistent automation without manual prompt engineering. The playbook library (100+ prebuilt in Starter) provides immediate value, while Enterprise chaining enables multi-step orchestration with conditional logic—differentiating from generic workflow tools like Zapier that lack LLM-powered task interpretation.
Writer scores higher at 56/100 vs EVOLV at 42/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
vs alternatives: Compared to Zapier (rule-based, no LLM reasoning) or Make (visual workflow builder, generic), Writer's playbooks are LLM-aware and brand-aware, automatically applying company context and voice guidelines to each step. Compared to custom LLM agents (requires coding), Writer's no-code playbook builder enables non-technical users to create complex workflows in minutes.
Writer enables sharing of playbooks and agents across teams within an organization (Enterprise tier only). Starter tier limits playbook sharing to single team. The system stores playbooks in a proprietary format and provides a library interface for discovering and reusing shared templates. Cross-team sharing enables standardization of workflows and reduces duplication of effort, but requires Enterprise subscription.
Unique: Writer enables cross-team playbook sharing as a built-in feature (Enterprise only), allowing organizations to standardize workflows and reduce duplication without requiring custom development or manual coordination. The shared playbook library provides discovery and reuse, with automatic application of Knowledge Graph context and personality profiles—differentiating from generic workflow tools that lack built-in team collaboration.
vs alternatives: Compared to Zapier (limited team collaboration features), Writer's playbook sharing is built-in and integrated with governance controls. Compared to custom playbook repositories (require manual management), Writer's library provides discovery and automatic context application. Compared to single-team automation (Starter tier), Enterprise cross-team sharing enables organizational-scale standardization.
Writer provides approval workflows that enforce review and sign-off on generated content before publication or delivery (Enterprise tier only). The system integrates with role-based access control, enabling admins to define approval requirements by content type, team, or workflow. Approval workflow configuration, enforcement mechanisms, and notification systems are largely undisclosed.
Unique: Writer integrates approval workflows directly into the content generation pipeline, enabling organizations to enforce review and sign-off without manual coordination or external tools. Approval workflows are integrated with role-based access control and personality profiles, enabling fine-grained control over content publication—differentiating from generic workflow tools that lack built-in approval mechanisms.
vs alternatives: Compared to ChatGPT or Claude (no approval workflows), Writer provides built-in approval enforcement. Compared to manual email-based approvals (error-prone, slow), Writer's workflows are automated and auditable. Compared to traditional content management systems (separate from generation), Writer's approval workflows are integrated with the generation pipeline, enabling seamless content creation and review.
Writer provides audit trails for all system activities (agent creation, playbook execution, content generation, approvals) with user, action, timestamp, and resource details. Enterprise tier includes advanced auditability and compliance reporting features. Audit logs are stored in the system and accessible via admin interface. Specific audit scope, retention policies, and reporting capabilities are largely undisclosed.
Unique: Writer provides built-in audit logging for all system activities, enabling organizations to track and demonstrate compliance without implementing separate audit systems. Audit logs are integrated with role-based access control and approval workflows, providing comprehensive activity tracking—differentiating from generic workflow tools that lack built-in audit capabilities.
vs alternatives: Compared to ChatGPT or Claude (no audit logging), Writer provides comprehensive activity tracking. Compared to manual audit logs (error-prone, incomplete), Writer's automated logging is comprehensive and tamper-resistant. Compared to external audit systems (separate from generation), Writer's audit logging is built-in and integrated with the generation pipeline.
Offers a 14-day free trial of the Starter plan with no credit card required, enabling teams to evaluate Writer's core capabilities (WRITER Agent, basic playbooks, limited Knowledge Graph, basic connectors) before committing to paid plans. The trial provides full access to Starter-tier features with standard user and resource limits (5 users, 5 playbooks, 3 scheduled routines).
Unique: Provides a 14-day free trial with no credit card requirement, lowering barrier to entry for team evaluation. The trial includes full Starter plan features (WRITER Agent, playbooks, Knowledge Graph, connectors) rather than a limited feature set.
vs alternatives: Differs from competitors requiring credit card for trials by removing friction from initial evaluation. Differs from freemium models by providing a time-limited trial of paid features rather than permanent free tier.
Writer encodes brand guidelines, tone, style, and voice as reusable 'personality profiles' that are applied to all generated content at execution time. Starter tier supports one team-level profile; Enterprise supports departmental profiles for fine-grained voice control. The system injects personality profile instructions into the LLM context during content generation, ensuring consistent brand voice across all outputs without requiring manual editing or style guide enforcement.
Unique: Writer's personality profiles encode brand voice as reusable templates applied at generation time, rather than requiring manual editing or post-processing. This approach enables consistent voice across all content without human intervention, and supports departmental customization (Enterprise) for multi-team organizations—differentiating from generic LLM interfaces that require explicit prompting for each content piece.
vs alternatives: Unlike ChatGPT (requires manual style enforcement per prompt) or Jasper (limited to predefined tone templates), Writer's personality profiles are custom-encoded and applied automatically to all generated content. Compared to traditional brand guidelines (manual enforcement), Writer's approach is scalable and consistent, eliminating human error in voice application.
Writer maintains a Knowledge Graph that stores company-specific context, standards, tools, and data, which is automatically retrieved and injected into the LLM context during content generation and task execution. Starter tier provides limited Knowledge Graph access; Enterprise tier offers unrestricted connectors for ingesting data from multiple sources. The system retrieves relevant context based on task description, playbook requirements, and user permissions, enabling generated content to reference company-specific information without manual context provision.
Unique: Writer's Knowledge Graph integrates company context directly into the content generation pipeline, automatically retrieving and injecting relevant information based on task requirements. This approach enables context-aware generation without manual context provision, and supports multi-source data ingestion (Enterprise) for comprehensive organizational knowledge—differentiating from generic LLMs that lack built-in enterprise knowledge integration.
vs alternatives: Compared to ChatGPT (requires manual context provision in each prompt) or Copilot (limited to codebase context), Writer's Knowledge Graph automatically surfaces company-specific information during generation. Compared to traditional RAG systems (requires custom implementation), Writer's Knowledge Graph is pre-integrated with the generation pipeline and personality profiles, enabling seamless context-aware content creation.
+6 more capabilities