| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Starting Price | — | $25/mo |
| Capabilities | 6 decomposed | 15 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Exposes ESLint's linting engine as an MCP server, allowing remote clients (Claude, other LLM agents, or tools) to invoke ESLint rule checking and code analysis over the MCP protocol. The server wraps ESLint's core linting API and translates rule violations into structured MCP resource/tool responses, enabling stateless, request-response linting without direct filesystem access from the client.
Unique: Bridges ESLint (a mature, widely-adopted linting tool) into the MCP ecosystem, enabling AI agents and remote tools to invoke linting without direct filesystem access or subprocess spawning. Uses MCP's resource/tool abstraction to expose ESLint's linting API as a standardized remote service.
vs alternatives: Provides centralized, MCP-native linting for AI agents (vs. agents spawning ESLint subprocesses or calling ESLint via REST APIs), with full access to ESLint's rule ecosystem and configuration system.
Exposes ESLint rule definitions, descriptions, and documentation links as MCP resources or tools, allowing clients to query rule metadata without parsing ESLint's internal rule registry. The server introspects the loaded ESLint ruleset and surfaces rule names, descriptions, categories, and documentation URLs for use in AI-assisted code review or rule recommendation workflows.
Unique: Exposes ESLint's internal rule registry as queryable MCP resources, allowing clients to introspect rule definitions without parsing ESLint source code or documentation. Integrates with ESLint 9.x's flat config system to surface rule metadata dynamically.
vs alternatives: Provides programmatic access to rule metadata via MCP (vs. hardcoding rule descriptions or scraping ESLint docs), ensuring metadata stays in sync with the actual ESLint version running in the server.
Invokes ESLint's built-in auto-fix mechanism to automatically correct code violations where rules provide fix implementations. The server applies fixes to code strings or files, returns the corrected code, and optionally provides structured fix suggestions (before/after diffs, rule applied, confidence level) for client-side review or approval workflows.
Unique: Wraps ESLint's fix API in an MCP-accessible interface, allowing remote clients to request and apply fixes without spawning ESLint processes. Integrates with ESLint 9.x's rule fix system and provides structured fix metadata for client-side approval workflows.
vs alternatives: Enables AI agents to apply ESLint fixes as part of a larger workflow (vs. agents manually rewriting code or calling ESLint CLI), with full access to ESLint's fix implementations and the ability to preview fixes before applying them.
Accepts multiple code files or file paths in a single MCP request and returns aggregated linting results across all files. The server batches ESLint invocations, deduplicates configuration loading, and returns structured results grouped by file, enabling efficient bulk code analysis for large codebases or multi-file refactoring workflows.
Unique: Batches ESLint invocations to analyze multiple files in a single MCP request, reducing overhead vs. individual file requests. Aggregates results with file-level grouping and summary statistics for efficient bulk analysis.
vs alternatives: More efficient than making separate MCP requests per file (reduces network round-trips and server startup overhead), while providing structured aggregation suitable for dashboards or bulk refactoring workflows.
Automatically discovers and loads ESLint configuration files (.eslintrc.js, eslint.config.js, or package.json eslintConfig) from the server's working directory and validates the configuration for syntax errors or invalid rule options. The server exposes the loaded configuration as MCP resources, allowing clients to query which rules are enabled, their severity levels, and any configuration errors.
Unique: Exposes ESLint's configuration discovery and validation as MCP resources, allowing clients to introspect the active rule set without parsing config files manually. Integrates with ESLint 9.x's flat config system and legacy config support.
vs alternatives: Provides programmatic access to ESLint configuration via MCP (vs. clients parsing config files themselves or calling ESLint CLI with --print-config), ensuring config state is consistent with the server's linting behavior.
Supports linting of multiple languages (JavaScript, TypeScript, JSX, TSX) by leveraging ESLint's parser and plugin system. The server loads configured parsers (e.g., @typescript-eslint/parser) and plugins (e.g., @typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin) from the server environment, enabling language-specific rule checking and type-aware linting for TypeScript code.
Unique: Leverages ESLint 9.x's flat config system and plugin architecture to support multiple languages and type-aware linting. Integrates with @typescript-eslint and other language-specific plugins without requiring client-side parser installation.
vs alternatives: Provides type-aware linting for TypeScript via MCP (vs. clients running separate TypeScript linters or ESLint CLI with complex config), with full access to the @typescript-eslint rule ecosystem.
Automatically inspects tabular data sources (Google Sheets, Airtable, Excel, CSV, SQL databases) to extract column names, infer field types (text, number, date, checkbox, etc.), and create bidirectional data bindings between UI components and source columns. Uses declarative component-to-column mappings that persist schema changes in real-time, enabling components to automatically reflect upstream data structure modifications without manual rebinding.
Unique: Glide's approach combines automatic schema introspection with declarative component binding, eliminating manual field mapping that competitors like Airtable require. The bidirectional sync model means changes to source column structure automatically propagate to UI components without developer intervention, reducing maintenance overhead for non-technical users.
vs alternatives: Faster to initial app than Airtable (which requires manual field configuration) and more flexible than rigid form builders because it adapts to evolving data structures automatically.
Provides 40+ pre-built, data-aware UI components (forms, tables, calendars, charts, buttons, text inputs, dropdowns, file uploads, maps, etc.) that automatically render responsively across mobile and desktop viewports. Components use a declarative binding syntax to connect to spreadsheet columns, with built-in support for computed fields, conditional visibility, and user-specific data filtering. Layout engine uses CSS Grid/Flexbox under the hood to adapt component sizing and positioning based on screen size without requiring manual breakpoint configuration.
Unique: Glide's component library is tightly integrated with data binding — components are not generic UI elements but data-aware objects that automatically sync with spreadsheet columns. This eliminates the disconnect between UI and data that exists in traditional form builders, where developers must manually wire component values to data sources.
vs alternatives: Faster to build than Bubble (which requires manual component-to-data wiring) and more mobile-optimized than Airtable's grid-centric interface, which prioritizes desktop spreadsheet metaphors over mobile-first design.
Glide scores higher at 69/100 vs @eslint/mcp at 39/100. @eslint/mcp leads on ecosystem, while Glide is stronger on adoption and quality.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Enables multiple team members to edit apps simultaneously with role-based access control. Supports predefined roles (Owner, Editor, Viewer) with different permission levels: Owners can manage team members and publish apps, Editors can modify app design and data, Viewers can only view published apps. Team member limits vary by plan (2 free, 10 business, custom enterprise). Real-time collaboration on app design is not mentioned, suggesting changes may not be synchronized in real-time between editors.
Unique: Glide's team collaboration is built into the platform, meaning team members don't need separate accounts or complex permission configuration — they're invited via email and assigned roles directly in the app. This is more seamless than tools requiring external identity management.
vs alternatives: More integrated than Airtable (which requires separate workspace management) and simpler than GitHub-based collaboration (which requires version control knowledge), though less sophisticated than enterprise platforms with audit logging and approval workflows.
Provides pre-built app templates for common use cases (inventory management, CRM, project management, expense tracking, etc.) that users can clone and customize. Templates include sample data, pre-configured components, and example workflows, reducing time-to-first-app from hours to minutes. Templates are fully editable, allowing users to modify data sources, components, and workflows to match their specific needs. Template library is curated by Glide and updated regularly with new templates.
Unique: Glide's templates are fully functional apps with sample data and workflows, not just empty scaffolds. This allows users to immediately see how components work together and understand app structure before customizing, reducing the learning curve significantly.
vs alternatives: More complete than Airtable's templates (which are mostly empty bases) and more accessible than building from scratch, though less flexible than code-based frameworks where templates can be parameterized and generated programmatically.
Allows workflows to be triggered on a schedule (daily, weekly, monthly, or custom intervals) without manual intervention. Scheduled workflows execute at specified times and can perform batch operations (process pending records, send daily reports, sync data, etc.). Execution time is in UTC, and the exact scheduling mechanism (cron, quartz, custom) is undocumented. Failed scheduled tasks may or may not retry automatically (retry logic undocumented).
Unique: Glide's scheduled workflows are integrated with the workflow engine, meaning scheduled tasks can execute the same complex logic as event-triggered workflows (conditional logic, multi-step actions, API calls). This is more powerful than simple scheduled email tools because scheduled tasks can perform data transformations and cross-system synchronization.
vs alternatives: More integrated than Zapier's schedule trigger (which is limited to simple actions) and more accessible than cron jobs (which require server access and scripting knowledge), though less transparent about execution guarantees and failure handling than enterprise job schedulers.
Offers Glide Tables, a proprietary managed database alternative to external spreadsheets or databases, with automatic scaling and optimization for Glide apps. Glide Tables are stored in Glide's infrastructure and optimized for the data binding and query patterns used by Glide apps. Scaling limits are plan-dependent (25k-100k rows), with separate 'Big Tables' tier for larger datasets (exact scaling limits undocumented). Automatic backups and disaster recovery are mentioned but details are undocumented.
Unique: Glide Tables are optimized specifically for Glide's data binding and query patterns, meaning they're tightly integrated with the app builder and don't require separate database administration. This is more seamless than connecting external databases (which require schema design and optimization knowledge) but less flexible because data is locked into Glide's proprietary format.
vs alternatives: More managed than self-hosted databases (no administration required) and more integrated than external databases (no separate configuration), though less portable than standard databases because data cannot be easily exported or migrated.
Provides basic chart components (bar, line, pie, area charts) that visualize data from connected sources. Charts are configured visually by selecting data columns for axes, values, and grouping. Charts are responsive and adapt to mobile/tablet/desktop. Real-time updates are supported; charts refresh when underlying data changes. No custom chart types or advanced visualization options (3D, animations, etc.) are available.
Unique: Provides basic chart components with automatic real-time updates and responsive design, suitable for simple dashboards — most visual builders (Bubble, FlutterFlow) require chart plugins or custom code
vs alternatives: More integrated than Airtable's chart view because real-time updates are automatic; weaker than BI tools (Tableau, Looker) because no drill-down, filtering, or advanced visualization options
Allows users to query data using natural language (e.g., 'Show me all orders from last month with revenue > $5k') which is converted to structured database queries without SQL knowledge. Also includes AI-powered data extraction from unstructured text (emails, documents, images) to populate spreadsheet columns. Implementation details (LLM model, context window, fine-tuning approach) are undocumented, but the feature appears to use prompt-based query generation with fallback to manual query building if AI fails.
Unique: Glide's natural language query feature bridges the gap between spreadsheet users (who think in English) and database queries (which require SQL). Rather than teaching users SQL, it translates natural language to structured queries, lowering the barrier to data exploration. The data extraction capability extends this to unstructured sources, automating data entry from emails and documents.
vs alternatives: More accessible than Airtable's formula language or traditional SQL, and more integrated than bolt-on AI query tools because it's built directly into the data layer rather than as a separate search interface.
+7 more capabilities