| 1 |
| Ecosystem | 1 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Starting Price | — | $10/mo |
| Capabilities | 12 decomposed | 13 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Devon abstracts multiple LLM providers (OpenAI GPT-4/4o, Anthropic Claude, Groq, Ollama, Llama3) behind a unified ConversationalAgent interface, enabling developers to swap providers via configuration without code changes. The backend routes requests through a provider-agnostic layer that handles API key management, model selection, and response normalization across different API schemas and response formats.
Unique: Implements provider abstraction at the ConversationalAgent level with Git-backed session state, allowing model swaps mid-session without losing conversation context or checkpoint history
vs alternatives: More flexible than Copilot (single provider) and more integrated than LangChain (includes full agent loop, not just LLM abstraction)
Devon uses Git as a first-class versioning system for coding sessions, creating atomic commits at each agent action step and allowing developers to revert to any previous state. The GitVersioning component wraps Git operations to track file changes, create named checkpoints, and enable timeline-based navigation through the agent's work history without losing intermediate states.
Unique: Treats each agent action as an atomic Git commit with structured metadata, enabling fine-grained undo/redo and timeline visualization without custom state serialization
vs alternatives: More granular than traditional Git workflows (commits per action, not per user decision) and safer than in-memory undo stacks because state is persisted to disk
Devon's file editing tools (via editorblock.py) support editing multiple files in a single agent action, with awareness of code structure (functions, classes, imports). The tools can insert code at specific locations (e.g., 'add this function after the existing one'), replace blocks, or append to files, reducing the need for full-file rewrites and preserving formatting.
Unique: Supports block-level edits (insert, replace, append) with location awareness, enabling the agent to make surgical changes without full-file rewrites
vs alternatives: More precise than full-file replacement and more flexible than line-based diffs
Devon's shell tool executes arbitrary shell commands (tests, builds, linting) in the project directory and captures stdout/stderr for the agent to analyze. The tool enforces timeouts, handles non-zero exit codes, and returns structured results (exit code, output, errors) that the agent can use to decide next steps.
Unique: Captures both stdout and stderr separately, enabling the agent to distinguish between normal output and errors, and enforces timeouts to prevent hanging on long-running commands
vs alternatives: More structured than raw shell access (returns exit code + output) and safer than unrestricted command execution (timeouts prevent hangs)
Devon implements a Tool base class that agents use to safely execute file edits, shell commands, and user interactions through a controlled registry. Each tool validates inputs, enforces constraints (e.g., file path boundaries), and returns structured results that feed back into the LLM context. The architecture separates tool definition from execution, allowing new tools to be added without modifying the agent loop.
Unique: Implements a declarative Tool registry where each tool defines its own input schema and execution logic, enabling the agent to self-discover available actions and validate inputs before execution
vs alternatives: More structured than shell-only agents (validates tool inputs) and more extensible than hardcoded action sets (new tools inherit from base class)
The ConversationalAgent processes natural language queries by maintaining a conversation history, injecting relevant codebase context (file contents, structure), and generating tool calls or responses. It uses the LLM to reason about which files to examine, what tools to invoke, and how to explain its actions back to the developer, creating a multi-turn dialogue where context accumulates across messages.
Unique: Maintains bidirectional context flow: the agent reads codebase state to inform decisions, and writes changes back through tools, with all actions tracked in Git for auditability
vs alternatives: More conversational than Copilot (supports multi-turn dialogue) and more autonomous than GitHub Copilot (executes changes, not just suggestions)
Devon's Electron UI spawns a local Python backend server and provides a graphical interface with Monaco editor for code viewing/editing, a chat panel for AI interaction, a timeline view of Git checkpoints, and configuration panels for model selection. The UI communicates with the backend via HTTP/WebSocket, enabling real-time updates of agent progress and file changes.
Unique: Integrates Monaco editor with a live Git timeline view, allowing developers to see code changes and their Git history in parallel without switching windows
vs alternatives: More feature-rich than VS Code extension (includes timeline, chat, and settings in one window) but heavier than terminal UI
Devon's terminal interface (devon-tui) provides a lightweight text-based UI built with React/Ink, offering a chat panel, shell command execution, and direct integration with the user's terminal environment. It communicates with the same Python backend as the Electron UI, enabling developers to use Devon without leaving their terminal or installing Electron.
Unique: Implements a React/Ink-based TUI that shares the same backend as Electron, enabling feature parity between GUI and CLI without duplicating agent logic
vs alternatives: Lighter than Electron UI and more interactive than pure CLI tools; enables terminal-native workflows while maintaining the same agent capabilities
+4 more capabilities
Generates single-line and multi-line code suggestions in real-time as developers type, using semantic indexing of the entire codebase to retrieve relevant type definitions, function signatures, and contextual patterns. The system maintains a 1M token context window (Pro/Team tiers) that enables suggestions informed by distant code definitions and cross-file dependencies, constructed via local codebase semantic search rather than simple token-based recency. Suggestions adapt to detected coding style on Pro/Team tiers through implicit pattern learning from recent edits.
Unique: 1M token context window with codebase-wide semantic indexing enables suggestions informed by distant code definitions and cross-file patterns, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that typically use fixed context windows (4K-32K tokens) or file-local context. Claimed 250ms latency suggests optimized retrieval pipeline, though indexing mechanism and performance at scale remain undisclosed.
vs alternatives: Larger context window than GitHub Copilot (8K-32K tokens) and faster latency than unnamed competitors (250ms vs 783ms claimed), enabling suggestions on large codebases with minimal typing delay; trade-off is cloud dependency and undisclosed free tier limitations.
Provides a separate chat interface supporting multiple LLM backends (GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, GPT-4, others) for conversational code assistance. Users attach files, reference recent edits, and trigger compiler diagnostic uploads; the system generates diffs and applies code changes directly to the editor. Model selection is per-conversation, and $5/month in credits (included in Pro/Team) covers external model API costs; overage pricing is undisclosed. Hotkey-driven workflow enables rapid context switching between inline completion and chat.
Unique: Multi-model chat interface with per-conversation model selection and integrated diff application, combined with compiler diagnostic auto-upload. Unlike Copilot Chat (single model per tier) or standalone ChatGPT, Supermaven Chat unifies multiple LLM backends in a single hotkey-driven workflow with direct editor integration for change application.
Supermaven scores higher at 71/100 vs Devon at 38/100. Devon leads on ecosystem, while Supermaven is stronger on adoption and quality.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
vs alternatives: Supports multiple LLM backends (GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet) in one interface with included credits, whereas GitHub Copilot Chat is single-model per tier and requires separate ChatGPT subscription for model switching; trade-off is credit limits and unknown overage pricing.
Supermaven Chat can automatically upload compiler diagnostic messages (errors, warnings) alongside code context to provide error-aware suggestions and fixes. The mechanism is described as 'automatically uploading your code together with compiler diagnostic messages,' but specific language/compiler support and the upload trigger mechanism are undisclosed. This feature is Chat-only and not available in inline completion.
Unique: Automatic compiler diagnostic upload in Chat for error-aware suggestions, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that require manual error context or have limited diagnostic integration. Supermaven's approach reduces friction but with undisclosed language/compiler support.
vs alternatives: Automatic diagnostic upload reduces manual context-gathering compared to manual copy-paste; trade-off is undisclosed language support and unclear upload trigger mechanism.
Supermaven offers a 30-day free trial of the Pro tier ($10/month), providing full access to 1M token context window, largest model, style adaptation, and $5/month chat credits. No credit card is required to start the trial (implied), and trial conversion to paid is automatic after 30 days unless cancelled. Trial terms and auto-renewal policy are not explicitly detailed.
Unique: 30-day free trial of Pro tier with full feature access (1M context, largest model, chat credits), versus competitors (Copilot 2-month free trial, Tabnine free tier only) with different trial lengths and feature access. Supermaven's approach is generous but with undisclosed auto-renewal terms.
vs alternatives: Full Pro feature access during trial compared to limited free tier; trade-off is undisclosed auto-renewal policy and potential unexpected charges if not cancelled.
Supermaven requires internet connectivity and server-side inference; no offline mode or local inference capability is mentioned or available. All code completion requests are sent to Supermaven's backend servers for processing, and responses are returned over the network. This creates a hard dependency on network connectivity and Supermaven's service availability; if the service is down or network is unavailable, code completion is not available.
Unique: Supermaven has no offline mode or local inference capability; all processing is server-side. GitHub Copilot also requires server-side inference, but Tabnine offers local inference options for some use cases. Supermaven's lack of offline capability is a significant limitation for developers with connectivity constraints.
vs alternatives: Supermaven's server-side-only approach is comparable to GitHub Copilot; Tabnine offers local inference options, making Tabnine more suitable for offline work. Supermaven's lack of offline capability is a weakness vs. Tabnine.
Analyzes recent code edits and inferred coding patterns to adapt inline suggestions to match team conventions, naming patterns, and structural preferences. The mechanism is implicit (not explicit fine-tuning) and operates only on Pro/Team tiers, suggesting pattern learning from editor activity rather than explicit configuration. Free tier uses a single base model without personalization.
Unique: Implicit style adaptation via editor activity analysis without explicit configuration, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that require manual style guides or explicit fine-tuning. Supermaven's approach is transparent to the user but also non-configurable and undisclosed in mechanism.
vs alternatives: Requires no manual style configuration compared to tools requiring explicit style guides; trade-off is lack of transparency and inability to control or export learned styles.
Delivers code suggestions to the editor inline as the developer types, with a claimed baseline latency of 250ms from keystroke to suggestion display. The system uses a cloud inference backend and local editor plugin to minimize round-trip time. Latency claim is positioned against an unnamed competitor (783ms), but methodology is undisclosed and no independent verification is provided.
Unique: Claimed 250ms latency via optimized cloud inference pipeline and editor plugin architecture, versus competitors with higher latency (783ms unnamed baseline). Actual differentiation is undisclosed; mechanism may involve request batching, model quantization, or edge caching, but specifics are not public.
vs alternatives: Faster than unnamed competitor (250ms vs 783ms claimed); trade-off is cloud dependency and unverified latency claim with no SLA or performance guarantee.
Provides native editor extensions for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs (IntelliJ IDEA, PyCharm, WebStorm, etc.), and Neovim, enabling inline suggestion rendering, hotkey-driven chat access, and compiler diagnostic integration directly within the editor. Each plugin variant is maintained separately and integrates with the editor's native autocomplete UI, keybinding system, and file context APIs.
Unique: Native plugins for three major editor ecosystems (VS Code, JetBrains, Neovim) with integrated chat and diff application, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that support broader editor ecosystems but with less deep integration in some cases. Supermaven's approach prioritizes depth over breadth.
vs alternatives: Deep integration with VS Code and JetBrains (native autocomplete UI, hotkey system) compared to web-based tools or lighter integrations; trade-off is limited editor support (no Sublime, Vim, Emacs) and undisclosed Neovim support details.
+5 more capabilities