| 1 |
| Ecosystem | 1 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Starting Price | — | $25/mo |
| Capabilities | 13 decomposed | 15 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Performs sub-5ms vector similarity search over stored memories using ONNX-based local embeddings without external API calls. Implements a hybrid retrieval pipeline that combines dense vector search (via sqlite-vec) with optional ONNX-based re-ranking to surface contextually relevant memories from long-term storage. The system maintains embedding indices in SQLite or Cloudflare Vectorize, enabling instant semantic matching without cloud latency or token costs.
Unique: Uses ONNX-based local embeddings instead of cloud APIs (OpenAI, Cohere), eliminating per-query costs and latency; combines sqlite-vec for dense search with optional ONNX re-ranker for quality without external dependencies. Supports both local SQLite and remote Cloudflare Vectorize backends with transparent fallback.
vs alternatives: Faster and cheaper than Pinecone/Weaviate for single-agent deployments due to local ONNX inference; more flexible than Anthropic's native memory because it supports arbitrary knowledge graphs and multi-provider agent frameworks.
Maintains a typed, directed knowledge graph where memories are nodes and relationships (causes, fixes, contradicts, references, etc.) are edges with semantic meaning. The system stores relationships in a relational schema (likely using SQLAlchemy ORM based on architecture patterns) and supports graph traversal queries to infer indirect associations and build richer context. Relationships are typed to enable domain-aware reasoning (e.g., distinguishing causal links from contradictions).
Unique: Implements a typed knowledge graph within a relational database (SQLite/D1) rather than a dedicated graph database, enabling lightweight deployment without external infrastructure. Supports autonomous relationship inference based on semantic similarity and metadata, allowing agents to discover indirect connections without explicit programming.
vs alternatives: Simpler to deploy than Neo4j or ArangoDB because it uses standard SQL; more semantically rich than flat vector stores because relationships carry type information that enables domain-aware reasoning.
Provides command-line utilities for backing up memory to files, restoring from backups, and synchronizing memory between different storage backends or instances. Supports incremental backups to minimize storage overhead and includes validation checks to ensure data integrity during restore operations. Synchronization utilities enable replication of memory across multiple deployments (e.g., local to cloud, or between team members).
Unique: Provides integrated backup/restore and synchronization utilities that work across different storage backends (SQLite, Cloudflare), enabling seamless data portability. Supports incremental backups and validation checks to ensure data integrity during restore operations.
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than database-specific backup tools because it handles both local and cloud backends; more reliable than manual data export because it includes validation and integrity checks.
Encodes and decodes memory metadata (entity types, relationships, quality scores, access patterns) into a compact binary format for efficient storage and transmission. The system tracks quality metrics (access frequency, recency, consolidation status, confidence scores) and provides analytics to identify memory health issues (stale facts, low-confidence memories, orphaned relationships). Analytics can be queried to generate reports on memory quality and usage patterns.
Unique: Implements a compact binary codec for metadata that reduces storage overhead while maintaining queryability, enabling efficient storage of large memory corpora. Provides built-in quality analytics to identify memory health issues without external monitoring tools.
vs alternatives: More storage-efficient than JSON-based metadata because it uses binary encoding; more comprehensive than simple access logs because it tracks quality metrics and consolidation status.
Provides Docker containerization for easy deployment of the memory service in containerized environments (Kubernetes, Docker Compose, etc.) and system service installation scripts for running the service as a background daemon on Linux/macOS. Docker images include all dependencies (Python, ONNX, SQLite) and expose the REST API and MCP server ports. System service installation enables automatic startup on system boot and process supervision.
Unique: Provides both Docker containerization and system service installation, enabling deployment in both containerized and traditional server environments. Docker images are pre-configured with all dependencies, reducing setup complexity.
vs alternatives: More convenient than manual Python installation because Docker includes all dependencies; more flexible than cloud-only deployments because it supports both local and containerized environments.
Implements a background consolidation system inspired by biological memory consolidation that automatically clusters similar memories, compresses redundant information, and applies time-decay to less-relevant facts. The system runs asynchronously (likely via background tasks or scheduled jobs) to analyze memory access patterns, identify semantic clusters, and merge or archive memories to manage context window limits. Decay functions reduce the relevance scores of older memories, simulating natural forgetting while preserving important facts.
Unique: Applies biological memory consolidation principles (clustering, decay, compression) to AI memory management, running autonomously in the background without agent intervention. Uses semantic clustering (ONNX embeddings) to identify redundant memories and merge them, reducing storage and retrieval overhead.
vs alternatives: More sophisticated than simple TTL-based expiration because it preserves important facts while compressing redundancy; more automated than manual memory management because consolidation runs continuously without user intervention.
Exposes memory capabilities as a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server compatible with Claude Desktop, IDEs, and other MCP clients. Implements both native MCP (stdio-based) and Remote MCP via Streamable HTTP with mDNS discovery, enabling agents to access memory through standardized tool calls. The HTTP bridge allows remote clients to communicate with the MCP server over the network with OAuth 2.1 authentication, supporting multi-client scenarios without requiring local installation.
Unique: Implements both native MCP (stdio) and Remote MCP (HTTP) in a single service, with mDNS auto-discovery for local networks. Bridges the gap between desktop-only MCP servers and enterprise remote deployments by supporting OAuth 2.1 and Streamable HTTP without requiring a separate gateway.
vs alternatives: More flexible than Claude's built-in memory because it supports arbitrary knowledge graphs and multi-agent frameworks; more accessible than custom REST APIs because it uses the standardized MCP protocol that Claude Desktop understands natively.
Provides a FastAPI-based REST API for memory operations (store, retrieve, update, delete) with OAuth 2.1 PKCE and Dynamic Client Registration (DCR) for secure team collaboration. The API supports both local (development) and remote (production) deployments, with token-based authentication and optional role-based access control. Implements standard REST conventions with JSON payloads and HTTP status codes, making it compatible with any HTTP client (Python, JavaScript, Go, etc.).
Unique: Implements OAuth 2.1 with PKCE and Dynamic Client Registration (DCR) for secure team collaboration without manual credential management. Supports both local development (no auth) and remote production (full OAuth 2.1) with the same codebase, enabling seamless scaling from solo development to enterprise deployments.
vs alternatives: More secure than API key-based authentication because OAuth 2.1 supports token expiration and revocation; more flexible than Anthropic's native memory because it's accessible from any HTTP client and supports arbitrary authentication schemes.
+5 more capabilities
Automatically inspects tabular data sources (Google Sheets, Airtable, Excel, CSV, SQL databases) to extract column names, infer field types (text, number, date, checkbox, etc.), and create bidirectional data bindings between UI components and source columns. Uses declarative component-to-column mappings that persist schema changes in real-time, enabling components to automatically reflect upstream data structure modifications without manual rebinding.
Unique: Glide's approach combines automatic schema introspection with declarative component binding, eliminating manual field mapping that competitors like Airtable require. The bidirectional sync model means changes to source column structure automatically propagate to UI components without developer intervention, reducing maintenance overhead for non-technical users.
vs alternatives: Faster to initial app than Airtable (which requires manual field configuration) and more flexible than rigid form builders because it adapts to evolving data structures automatically.
Provides 40+ pre-built, data-aware UI components (forms, tables, calendars, charts, buttons, text inputs, dropdowns, file uploads, maps, etc.) that automatically render responsively across mobile and desktop viewports. Components use a declarative binding syntax to connect to spreadsheet columns, with built-in support for computed fields, conditional visibility, and user-specific data filtering. Layout engine uses CSS Grid/Flexbox under the hood to adapt component sizing and positioning based on screen size without requiring manual breakpoint configuration.
Unique: Glide's component library is tightly integrated with data binding — components are not generic UI elements but data-aware objects that automatically sync with spreadsheet columns. This eliminates the disconnect between UI and data that exists in traditional form builders, where developers must manually wire component values to data sources.
vs alternatives: Faster to build than Bubble (which requires manual component-to-data wiring) and more mobile-optimized than Airtable's grid-centric interface, which prioritizes desktop spreadsheet metaphors over mobile-first design.
Glide scores higher at 70/100 vs mcp-memory-service at 38/100. mcp-memory-service leads on ecosystem, while Glide is stronger on adoption and quality.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Enables multiple team members to edit apps simultaneously with role-based access control. Supports predefined roles (Owner, Editor, Viewer) with different permission levels: Owners can manage team members and publish apps, Editors can modify app design and data, Viewers can only view published apps. Team member limits vary by plan (2 free, 10 business, custom enterprise). Real-time collaboration on app design is not mentioned, suggesting changes may not be synchronized in real-time between editors.
Unique: Glide's team collaboration is built into the platform, meaning team members don't need separate accounts or complex permission configuration — they're invited via email and assigned roles directly in the app. This is more seamless than tools requiring external identity management.
vs alternatives: More integrated than Airtable (which requires separate workspace management) and simpler than GitHub-based collaboration (which requires version control knowledge), though less sophisticated than enterprise platforms with audit logging and approval workflows.
Provides pre-built app templates for common use cases (inventory management, CRM, project management, expense tracking, etc.) that users can clone and customize. Templates include sample data, pre-configured components, and example workflows, reducing time-to-first-app from hours to minutes. Templates are fully editable, allowing users to modify data sources, components, and workflows to match their specific needs. Template library is curated by Glide and updated regularly with new templates.
Unique: Glide's templates are fully functional apps with sample data and workflows, not just empty scaffolds. This allows users to immediately see how components work together and understand app structure before customizing, reducing the learning curve significantly.
vs alternatives: More complete than Airtable's templates (which are mostly empty bases) and more accessible than building from scratch, though less flexible than code-based frameworks where templates can be parameterized and generated programmatically.
Allows workflows to be triggered on a schedule (daily, weekly, monthly, or custom intervals) without manual intervention. Scheduled workflows execute at specified times and can perform batch operations (process pending records, send daily reports, sync data, etc.). Execution time is in UTC, and the exact scheduling mechanism (cron, quartz, custom) is undocumented. Failed scheduled tasks may or may not retry automatically (retry logic undocumented).
Unique: Glide's scheduled workflows are integrated with the workflow engine, meaning scheduled tasks can execute the same complex logic as event-triggered workflows (conditional logic, multi-step actions, API calls). This is more powerful than simple scheduled email tools because scheduled tasks can perform data transformations and cross-system synchronization.
vs alternatives: More integrated than Zapier's schedule trigger (which is limited to simple actions) and more accessible than cron jobs (which require server access and scripting knowledge), though less transparent about execution guarantees and failure handling than enterprise job schedulers.
Offers Glide Tables, a proprietary managed database alternative to external spreadsheets or databases, with automatic scaling and optimization for Glide apps. Glide Tables are stored in Glide's infrastructure and optimized for the data binding and query patterns used by Glide apps. Scaling limits are plan-dependent (25k-100k rows), with separate 'Big Tables' tier for larger datasets (exact scaling limits undocumented). Automatic backups and disaster recovery are mentioned but details are undocumented.
Unique: Glide Tables are optimized specifically for Glide's data binding and query patterns, meaning they're tightly integrated with the app builder and don't require separate database administration. This is more seamless than connecting external databases (which require schema design and optimization knowledge) but less flexible because data is locked into Glide's proprietary format.
vs alternatives: More managed than self-hosted databases (no administration required) and more integrated than external databases (no separate configuration), though less portable than standard databases because data cannot be easily exported or migrated.
Provides basic chart components (bar, line, pie, area charts) that visualize data from connected sources. Charts are configured visually by selecting data columns for axes, values, and grouping. Charts are responsive and adapt to mobile/tablet/desktop. Real-time updates are supported; charts refresh when underlying data changes. No custom chart types or advanced visualization options (3D, animations, etc.) are available.
Unique: Provides basic chart components with automatic real-time updates and responsive design, suitable for simple dashboards — most visual builders (Bubble, FlutterFlow) require chart plugins or custom code
vs alternatives: More integrated than Airtable's chart view because real-time updates are automatic; weaker than BI tools (Tableau, Looker) because no drill-down, filtering, or advanced visualization options
Allows users to query data using natural language (e.g., 'Show me all orders from last month with revenue > $5k') which is converted to structured database queries without SQL knowledge. Also includes AI-powered data extraction from unstructured text (emails, documents, images) to populate spreadsheet columns. Implementation details (LLM model, context window, fine-tuning approach) are undocumented, but the feature appears to use prompt-based query generation with fallback to manual query building if AI fails.
Unique: Glide's natural language query feature bridges the gap between spreadsheet users (who think in English) and database queries (which require SQL). Rather than teaching users SQL, it translates natural language to structured queries, lowering the barrier to data exploration. The data extraction capability extends this to unstructured sources, automating data entry from emails and documents.
vs alternatives: More accessible than Airtable's formula language or traditional SQL, and more integrated than bolt-on AI query tools because it's built directly into the data layer rather than as a separate search interface.
+7 more capabilities