Z.ai: GLM 5 ranks higher at 24/100 vs DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B at 22/100. Capability-level comparison backed by match graph evidence from real search data.
| Feature | DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B | Z.ai: GLM 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Model | Model |
| UnfragileRank | 22/100 | 24/100 |
| Adoption |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| Quality | 0 | 0 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Starting Price | $7.00e-7 per prompt token | $6.00e-7 per prompt token |
| Capabilities | 7 decomposed | 12 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Generates coherent, contextually-aware text responses by leveraging knowledge distilled from DeepSeek R1's chain-of-thought reasoning into a 70B parameter Llama-3.3 base model. The distillation process transfers reasoning patterns and decision-making logic from the larger R1 model into a more efficient architecture, enabling structured problem-solving without explicit chain-of-thought token overhead. Accessed via OpenRouter's unified API endpoint with streaming and non-streaming modes.
Unique: Combines DeepSeek R1's advanced reasoning distillation with Llama-3.3-70B's proven instruction-following architecture, creating a hybrid that captures R1's reasoning patterns without full R1 inference latency. The distillation approach embeds reasoning logic directly into model weights rather than generating explicit chain-of-thought tokens, reducing output length while preserving reasoning quality.
vs alternatives: Offers better reasoning-to-latency ratio than full DeepSeek R1 and lower cost than R1 API access, while maintaining stronger reasoning than base Llama-3.3-70B through knowledge distillation from R1 training.
Maintains and processes multi-turn conversation history with role-based message sequencing (system, user, assistant) through OpenRouter's message API. The model tracks conversation state across requests, applying attention mechanisms to earlier turns while maintaining coherence and consistency. Supports dynamic context window management where older messages can be pruned or summarized based on token budget constraints.
Unique: Leverages Llama-3.3-70B's instruction-tuned architecture for robust role-based message handling, combined with R1 distillation to maintain reasoning consistency across turns. The model applies cross-turn attention patterns learned from R1 to better track logical dependencies between conversation steps.
vs alternatives: Maintains stronger reasoning coherence across multi-turn exchanges than base Llama-3.3 due to R1 distillation, while offering lower latency than full R1 for interactive conversational applications.
Executes complex, multi-part instructions with high fidelity through Llama-3.3-70B's instruction-tuning combined with R1's reasoning distillation. The model interprets detailed system prompts, follows formatting constraints (JSON, XML, markdown), and produces structured outputs that can be reliably parsed. Supports few-shot prompting patterns where examples guide output format without explicit schema validation.
Unique: Combines Llama-3.3-70B's strong instruction-following capabilities with R1's reasoning distillation to maintain format consistency even in complex multi-step extraction tasks. The distilled reasoning helps the model understand the semantic intent behind format constraints, not just pattern-match examples.
vs alternatives: Produces more reliable structured outputs than base Llama-3.3 due to R1 reasoning distillation improving format constraint understanding, while avoiding the latency of full R1 or the cost of function-calling APIs.
Generates code snippets, complete functions, and technical explanations by applying Llama-3.3-70B's code-training combined with R1's reasoning distillation for logic clarity. The model produces syntactically-correct code across multiple languages (Python, JavaScript, SQL, etc.) and explains implementation decisions with reasoning transparency. Supports context-aware code generation where previous code exchanges inform subsequent suggestions.
Unique: Distills R1's reasoning patterns into code generation, enabling the model to explain not just what code does but why specific implementation choices were made. This reasoning-aware approach produces code with better architectural decisions than pattern-matching alone, particularly for complex algorithms.
vs alternatives: Generates code with better reasoning transparency than base Llama-3.3 and lower latency than full R1, making it suitable for interactive code-generation workflows where explanation quality matters.
Synthesizes knowledge across domains (science, medicine, law, finance) by applying Llama-3.3-70B's broad training combined with R1's reasoning distillation for accuracy and logical coherence. The model produces detailed explanations that connect concepts, identify assumptions, and reason through implications. Supports multi-step explanations where each step builds on previous reasoning, creating transparent knowledge synthesis.
Unique: Embeds R1's reasoning distillation into domain knowledge synthesis, enabling the model to not just retrieve facts but reason through their implications and connections. This produces more coherent, logically-sound explanations than fact-retrieval alone, particularly for interdisciplinary questions.
vs alternatives: Provides reasoning-transparent domain explanations with lower latency than full R1, while offering stronger logical coherence than base Llama-3.3 due to R1 distillation.
Provides inference through OpenRouter's REST API with support for streaming responses (Server-Sent Events), token-level control (max_tokens, temperature, top_p), and usage tracking. The model processes requests asynchronously, returning partial responses via streaming for real-time UI updates or progressive output handling. Token budgeting is managed client-side through explicit parameters and response metadata.
Unique: OpenRouter's unified API abstraction provides consistent streaming and token-control interfaces across multiple model backends, allowing clients to swap models (including R1 Distill Llama) without code changes. The streaming implementation uses standard SSE protocol for broad client compatibility.
vs alternatives: Offers lower latency than direct DeepSeek API for distilled models while providing unified interface across multiple providers, reducing vendor lock-in compared to model-specific APIs.
Controls output randomness and diversity through temperature (0.0-2.0), top_p (nucleus sampling), and top_k parameters passed to the inference engine. Lower temperatures (0.0-0.5) produce deterministic, focused outputs; higher temperatures (1.0+) increase creativity and diversity. The model applies these parameters at token-generation time, affecting probability distributions over the vocabulary without post-processing.
Unique: Exposes fine-grained sampling control through OpenRouter's parameter API, allowing developers to tune output diversity without model retraining. The R1 distillation preserves reasoning coherence even at higher temperatures, preventing reasoning collapse that occurs in non-distilled models.
vs alternatives: Provides more stable high-temperature outputs than base Llama-3.3 due to R1 reasoning distillation, enabling creative tasks without sacrificing coherence.
GLM-5 processes extended code contexts (supporting multi-file projects and large codebases) while maintaining semantic understanding of system architecture through attention mechanisms optimized for code structure. The model uses specialized tokenization for programming languages and maintains coherence across thousands of tokens of code context, enabling generation of complex features that respect existing patterns and dependencies.
Unique: Engineered specifically for complex systems design with attention mechanisms tuned for code structure and architectural patterns, rather than generic language modeling — enables understanding of system-wide dependencies and design constraints across extended contexts
vs alternatives: Outperforms general-purpose models on large-scale programming tasks because it's optimized for architectural coherence and long-horizon code generation rather than treating code as generic text
GLM-5 supports extended reasoning chains for agentic workflows through structured prompt patterns that enable step-by-step decomposition of complex tasks. The model can maintain state across multiple turns, reason about tool outputs, and make decisions about next actions — designed for long-horizon agent loops where the model must plan, execute, observe, and adapt across dozens of steps.
Unique: Explicitly engineered for long-horizon agent workflows with architectural patterns optimized for extended reasoning chains, rather than single-turn tool calling — maintains coherence and decision quality across dozens of reasoning steps
vs alternatives: Better suited for multi-step agentic tasks than general-purpose models because reasoning and tool-use patterns are baked into the training, not bolted on via prompt engineering
Z.ai: GLM 5 scores higher at 24/100 vs DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B at 22/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
GLM-5 analyzes code for performance bottlenecks and suggests optimization strategies through understanding of algorithmic complexity, memory management, and system-level performance patterns. The model can identify inefficient algorithms, suggest data structure improvements, and recommend caching or parallelization strategies — enabling targeted performance improvements with understanding of trade-offs.
Unique: Understands algorithmic complexity and system-level performance patterns, enabling identification of fundamental bottlenecks and suggestion of targeted optimizations rather than micro-optimizations
vs alternatives: Identifies more fundamental performance issues than profiling tools because it understands algorithmic complexity and can suggest architectural improvements, not just code-level optimizations
GLM-5 generates comprehensive API specifications, including endpoint definitions, request/response schemas, error handling, and usage examples through understanding of API design best practices and REST/GraphQL patterns. The model can produce OpenAPI/Swagger specifications, generate API documentation, and suggest design improvements — enabling rapid API specification and documentation.
Unique: Generates comprehensive API specifications that follow REST/GraphQL best practices and include error handling, authentication, and usage examples — not just endpoint definitions
vs alternatives: Produces more complete and best-practice-aligned API specifications than simple code-to-spec tools because it understands API design patterns and includes comprehensive documentation
GLM-5 generates high-quality technical documentation, design documents, and architectural specifications through training on expert-level technical writing patterns. The model understands domain-specific terminology, maintains consistency across long documents, and can generate structured documentation (API specs, RFC-style documents, architecture decision records) with appropriate technical depth and precision.
Unique: Trained on expert-level technical documentation patterns and domain-specific terminology, enabling generation of publication-ready documentation with appropriate technical depth rather than generic summaries
vs alternatives: Produces more technically precise and domain-aware documentation than general-purpose models because it understands architectural patterns, trade-offs, and expert writing conventions specific to software engineering
GLM-5 breaks down complex, ambiguous problems into structured task hierarchies and implementation plans through chain-of-thought reasoning patterns. The model can identify dependencies, suggest phased approaches, and generate detailed step-by-step plans for tackling large engineering challenges — useful for translating high-level requirements into actionable development roadmaps.
Unique: Optimized for expert-level problem decomposition through training on complex system design patterns and architectural reasoning, enabling generation of sophisticated multi-phase plans rather than simple task lists
vs alternatives: Produces more sophisticated and architecturally-aware plans than general-purpose models because it understands system design patterns, dependency relationships, and phased implementation strategies
GLM-5 analyzes code for quality issues, architectural violations, and design improvements through patterns learned from expert code review practices. The model can identify performance bottlenecks, suggest refactoring opportunities, flag architectural inconsistencies, and provide detailed feedback on code quality — going beyond simple linting to understand design intent and system-wide implications.
Unique: Trained on expert code review patterns and architectural reasoning, enabling detection of design issues and architectural violations rather than just syntax and style problems
vs alternatives: Provides more sophisticated architectural and design feedback than linting tools because it understands system-wide implications and expert design patterns, not just local code quality
GLM-5 translates code between programming languages while preserving semantic meaning and adapting to language-specific idioms. The model understands language-specific patterns, libraries, and best practices, enabling translation that produces idiomatic code rather than mechanical line-by-line conversions — useful for migrating systems across language ecosystems or supporting polyglot architectures.
Unique: Produces idiomatic, language-specific code rather than mechanical translations because it understands language-specific patterns, libraries, and best practices learned from diverse codebases
vs alternatives: Generates more idiomatic and maintainable translations than simple pattern-matching tools because it understands semantic equivalence and language-specific idioms
+4 more capabilities