| 0 |
| 0 |
| Quality | 0 | 0 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Starting Price | $2.00e-7 per prompt token | $1.05e-6 per prompt token |
| Capabilities | 9 decomposed | 13 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
DeepSeek V3 processes multi-turn conversations using a 685B-parameter mixture-of-experts (MoE) architecture where only a subset of expert modules activate per token, enabling efficient inference while maintaining reasoning depth. The model routes input tokens through sparse expert selection gates, allowing it to allocate computational resources dynamically based on query complexity and context length. This approach balances response quality with inference latency across diverse conversation types.
Unique: 685B MoE architecture with dynamic expert routing enables sparse activation patterns — only relevant expert modules fire per token, reducing per-token compute vs dense models while maintaining reasoning capability through selective expert ensemble
vs alternatives: More parameter-efficient than dense 685B models (GPT-4, Claude 3.5) while maintaining comparable reasoning depth through MoE sparse routing; lower inference cost than dense equivalents with competitive latency
DeepSeek V3 generates code across multiple programming languages by leveraging its large parameter count and MoE architecture to maintain semantic understanding of code structure, dependencies, and domain-specific patterns. The model processes code context (existing files, imports, function signatures) and generates syntactically correct, contextually appropriate code completions or full implementations. It handles both imperative code generation and architectural reasoning about code organization.
Unique: MoE architecture allows selective activation of code-specific expert modules, enabling efficient handling of diverse language syntax and paradigms without full model re-evaluation; 685B parameters provide deep semantic understanding of code patterns across 40+ languages
vs alternatives: Larger parameter count than Copilot (35B) enables better architectural reasoning; API-based approach avoids IDE lock-in but trades real-time latency for flexibility and cost efficiency
DeepSeek V3 extracts structured information from unstructured text by processing natural language input and generating output conforming to specified schemas (JSON, XML, or custom formats). The model understands schema constraints and generates valid structured data without requiring fine-tuning, using prompt engineering and in-context learning to enforce format compliance. This enables reliable data extraction pipelines without custom parsing logic.
Unique: Large parameter count (685B) enables implicit understanding of complex schema constraints without explicit schema parsing; MoE routing allows selective activation of data-formatting expert modules, improving consistency for structured outputs
vs alternatives: More reliable schema compliance than smaller models (Llama 2, Mistral) due to larger capacity; faster and cheaper than fine-tuned extraction models while maintaining comparable accuracy for common schemas
DeepSeek V3 supports function calling by accepting tool/function definitions in prompts and generating structured function calls with arguments that conform to provided schemas. The model understands function signatures, parameter types, and constraints, then decides when to invoke tools and generates properly formatted invocations. This enables agentic workflows where the model acts as a decision-maker, selecting and calling external tools based on user intent.
Unique: Large parameter capacity enables understanding of complex tool semantics and multi-step reasoning about tool sequences; MoE architecture allows selective activation of tool-reasoning experts, improving decision quality without full model overhead
vs alternatives: More flexible than OpenAI's function calling (supports arbitrary schemas) but requires more explicit prompt engineering; better reasoning about tool selection than smaller models due to parameter count
DeepSeek V3 processes extended context windows (typically 64K-128K tokens) enabling analysis of long documents, codebases, or conversation histories without summarization. The model maintains semantic coherence across long sequences through attention mechanisms optimized for sparse expert routing, allowing it to reason about relationships between distant parts of the input. This supports use cases requiring holistic understanding of large documents or multi-file codebases.
Unique: MoE architecture with sparse routing enables efficient processing of long contexts — only relevant expert modules activate per position, reducing memory overhead vs dense models; 685B parameters provide semantic depth for complex document reasoning
vs alternatives: Comparable context window to Claude 3.5 (200K) but with lower inference cost through MoE sparsity; better latency than dense models on long contexts due to selective expert activation
DeepSeek V3 processes input in multiple languages (Chinese, English, and others) and maintains semantic understanding across language boundaries, enabling translation, cross-language reasoning, and multilingual conversation. The model leverages its large parameter count to encode language-specific patterns and cross-lingual semantics, allowing it to reason about concepts that may be expressed differently across languages. This supports both direct translation and semantic-preserving paraphrasing.
Unique: Large parameter count (685B) enables rich cross-lingual embeddings and semantic mapping between languages; MoE architecture allows selective activation of language-specific expert modules, improving efficiency for multilingual processing
vs alternatives: Better semantic preservation than rule-based translation systems; more cost-efficient than maintaining separate models per language due to MoE sparsity
DeepSeek V3 follows complex, multi-part instructions by decomposing tasks into subtasks, reasoning about dependencies, and executing steps in logical order. The model understands implicit task structure, identifies missing information, and asks clarifying questions when needed. This enables reliable automation of complex workflows where instruction clarity and step-by-step reasoning are critical.
Unique: Large parameter capacity enables implicit understanding of task structure and dependencies without explicit specification; MoE routing allows selective activation of reasoning experts for different task types
vs alternatives: More reliable instruction-following than smaller models due to parameter count; better task decomposition than rule-based systems through learned reasoning patterns
DeepSeek V3 generates original creative content (stories, articles, marketing copy) while adapting to specified styles, tones, and formats. The model understands narrative structure, character development, and rhetorical techniques, enabling generation of coherent, engaging content across genres. It supports style transfer where existing content can be rewritten in different voices or formats.
Unique: Large parameter count enables nuanced understanding of style, tone, and narrative structure; MoE architecture allows selective activation of creative reasoning experts, improving stylistic consistency
vs alternatives: Better narrative coherence than smaller models; more cost-efficient than hiring professional copywriters while maintaining reasonable quality for non-critical content
+1 more capabilities
GLM-5.1 executes multi-step coding tasks over extended timeframes without requiring human intervention between steps, using an internal planning mechanism that decomposes complex objectives into sub-tasks and maintains execution state across sequential operations. Unlike minute-level interaction models that require prompting after each step, this capability enables the model to autonomously navigate decision trees, handle errors, and adapt strategy based on intermediate results without context resets.
Unique: Designed specifically for minute+ autonomous execution windows rather than single-turn interactions; maintains internal execution state and decision-making across extended task horizons without requiring external orchestration or re-prompting between steps
vs alternatives: Outperforms GPT-4 and Claude for long-horizon coding tasks because it's architected for continuous autonomous operation rather than stateless request-response cycles
GLM-5.1 generates and refactors code with awareness of the full codebase structure, dependencies, and patterns, using semantic understanding of how changes in one file propagate to others. The model analyzes import graphs, function signatures, and usage patterns across files to ensure generated code maintains consistency and doesn't introduce breaking changes, rather than treating each file in isolation.
Unique: Maintains semantic awareness of codebase structure and cross-file dependencies during generation, enabling it to make coordinated changes across multiple files rather than treating each file independently
vs alternatives: Produces more consistent multi-file refactorings than Copilot or Claude because it reasons about the entire codebase context simultaneously rather than file-by-file
Z.ai: GLM 5.1 scores higher at 24/100 vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3 0324 at 23/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
GLM-5.1 diagnoses errors and bugs by analyzing error messages, stack traces, and code context to identify root causes and suggest fixes. The model correlates error symptoms with likely causes, explains why errors occur, and provides specific debugging steps or code fixes.
Unique: Diagnoses errors by correlating symptoms with root causes using semantic understanding of code and error patterns, providing explanations and fixes rather than just pattern matching
vs alternatives: More effective at diagnosing subtle bugs than search-based solutions because it reasons about code semantics and error causality
GLM-5.1 identifies performance bottlenecks in code and suggests optimizations with specific implementation guidance, analyzing algorithms, data structures, and resource usage to recommend improvements. The model understands performance implications of different approaches and can suggest algorithmic or architectural changes to improve efficiency.
Unique: Suggests optimizations based on algorithmic and architectural analysis rather than just code-level tweaks, understanding performance implications of different approaches
vs alternatives: Provides more meaningful performance guidance than generic LLMs because it understands algorithm complexity and can suggest structural improvements
GLM-5.1 analyzes code for security vulnerabilities including injection attacks, authentication/authorization issues, cryptographic weaknesses, and data exposure risks, providing specific remediation guidance. The model understands common vulnerability patterns and security best practices to identify risks and suggest secure implementations.
Unique: Identifies security vulnerabilities through semantic analysis of code patterns and provides remediation guidance based on security best practices, not just pattern matching against known CVEs
vs alternatives: More effective at finding context-specific security issues than SAST tools because it understands code intent and can suggest secure implementations
GLM-5.1 performs step-by-step reasoning about code behavior by internally simulating or tracing execution paths, allowing it to predict runtime behavior, identify bugs, and explain code logic without requiring actual execution. This capability uses chain-of-thought-like reasoning applied specifically to code semantics, tracking variable state, control flow, and function call sequences to reason about correctness.
Unique: Applies extended reasoning specifically to code semantics and execution paths, enabling it to predict runtime behavior and identify subtle bugs through symbolic execution simulation rather than pattern matching
vs alternatives: More effective at finding subtle logic bugs than GPT-4 because it explicitly traces execution state rather than relying on pattern recognition
GLM-5.1 maintains rich context across multiple conversation turns when working on code, remembering previous edits, design decisions, and constraints without requiring users to re-specify them. The model builds an internal model of the codebase state and user intent that persists across turns, enabling iterative refinement where each turn builds on previous work rather than starting fresh.
Unique: Maintains stateful context across turns specifically optimized for code collaboration, remembering design decisions and codebase state without explicit memory structures
vs alternatives: Provides better iterative code refinement than stateless models because it retains context about previous edits and design intent across turns
GLM-5.1 translates natural language specifications into code that preserves semantic intent, handling ambiguous or underspecified requirements by inferring reasonable implementations based on context and common patterns. The model uses semantic understanding of both natural language and code to bridge the gap between high-level intent and low-level implementation details.
Unique: Translates natural language to code with explicit semantic fidelity checking, inferring reasonable implementations for underspecified requirements rather than producing literal or incomplete code
vs alternatives: Handles ambiguous requirements better than Copilot because it uses semantic reasoning to infer intent rather than pattern matching against training data
+5 more capabilities