Supabase ranks higher at 42/100 vs Hyperion Blockchain Server at 30/100. Capability-level comparison backed by match graph evidence from real search data.
| Feature | Hyperion Blockchain Server | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Type | MCP Server | MCP Server |
| UnfragileRank | 30/100 | 42/100 |
| Adoption | 0 | 0 |
| Quality | 0 |
| 0 |
| Ecosystem | 1 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 5 decomposed | 9 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
This capability allows users to manage multiple blockchain wallets through a standardized Model Context Protocol (MCP) interface, which abstracts the complexity of wallet interactions. It utilizes a modular architecture that enables easy integration with various wallet providers, ensuring seamless transactions and balance queries. The implementation leverages event-driven programming to provide real-time updates on wallet states, making it distinct from traditional wallet management systems.
Unique: Utilizes a modular MCP architecture that allows for easy integration with various wallet providers, unlike rigid wallet management systems.
vs alternatives: More flexible than traditional wallet management tools, allowing for easy integration with multiple wallet providers.
This capability enables users to send transactions to the Hyperion blockchain while incorporating robust error handling mechanisms. It employs a retry logic pattern that automatically attempts to resend transactions in case of failures, along with detailed logging for troubleshooting. The design ensures that users receive immediate feedback on transaction status, which is a step beyond basic transaction sending functionalities.
Unique: Incorporates advanced error handling and retry logic, ensuring higher reliability compared to standard transaction sending methods.
vs alternatives: More reliable than basic transaction senders due to built-in error handling and logging features.
This capability allows users to query blockchain data efficiently through a structured API that abstracts the underlying complexities of the Hyperion blockchain. It employs a caching mechanism to speed up repeated queries and uses a flexible query language that can handle various data retrieval scenarios. This design choice ensures that users can access data quickly without overwhelming the blockchain with redundant requests.
Unique: Utilizes a caching mechanism to improve query performance, making it faster than traditional querying methods that hit the blockchain directly.
vs alternatives: Faster than direct blockchain queries due to caching, which reduces load and improves response times.
This capability facilitates seamless interaction with smart contracts deployed on the Hyperion blockchain. It employs a standardized interface that abstracts the complexities of contract calls, allowing users to invoke functions and retrieve results easily. The implementation includes a built-in verification layer to ensure that contract interactions are secure and valid, which is a significant enhancement over basic contract interaction tools.
Unique: Includes a verification layer for secure contract interactions, which is not commonly found in other smart contract tools.
vs alternatives: More secure than standard smart contract interaction tools due to built-in verification mechanisms.
This capability allows users to subscribe to specific events on the Hyperion blockchain, enabling real-time notifications for changes such as new transactions or contract updates. It uses a publish-subscribe architecture that efficiently manages event listeners, ensuring that users receive timely updates without polling the blockchain constantly. This approach minimizes resource usage and enhances responsiveness compared to traditional event monitoring methods.
Unique: Employs a publish-subscribe architecture for efficient event management, reducing resource consumption compared to traditional polling methods.
vs alternatives: More efficient than traditional event monitoring due to reduced resource usage and immediate notifications.
Executes SQL queries against Supabase PostgreSQL instances through the Model Context Protocol, translating natural language or structured query requests into parameterized SQL statements. Uses MCP's tool-calling interface to expose database operations as callable functions with schema validation, enabling LLM agents to perform CRUD operations, joins, and aggregations with automatic connection pooling and credential management through Supabase client SDK.
Unique: Exposes Supabase PostgreSQL as MCP tools with automatic credential injection from Supabase client SDK, eliminating manual connection string management and enabling seamless LLM-to-database queries within Claude or compatible agents
vs alternatives: Tighter integration than generic SQL MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in authentication and connection pooling rather than requiring separate database credential configuration
Exposes Supabase Auth session state and user metadata through MCP tools, allowing agents to inspect current authentication context, retrieve user profiles, and trigger auth-related operations. Integrates with Supabase's JWT-based auth system to validate sessions and access user claims without re-authenticating, using the Supabase client's built-in session management.
Unique: Integrates Supabase's JWT-based auth system directly into MCP tool interface, allowing agents to inspect and act on auth state without managing separate credential stores or re-authentication flows
vs alternatives: More seamless than generic auth MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in session management and avoids redundant credential passing between agent and auth system
Invokes Supabase Edge Functions (serverless TypeScript/JavaScript functions) through MCP tools, passing parameters and receiving results with optional streaming support. Uses Supabase's edge function HTTP API to trigger functions with automatic authentication headers and response parsing, enabling agents to execute custom business logic without embedding it in the agent itself.
Supabase scores higher at 42/100 vs Hyperion Blockchain Server at 30/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Edge Functions as MCP tools with automatic authentication and response parsing, allowing agents to invoke custom serverless logic without managing HTTP clients or credential injection
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic HTTP MCP tools because it handles Supabase-specific authentication, error handling, and response formatting automatically
Subscribes to real-time changes on Supabase tables through MCP's event streaming interface, using Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY mechanism to push INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE events to agents. Maintains persistent WebSocket connections and filters events by table and row-level policies, enabling agents to react to database changes without polling.
Unique: Bridges Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY real-time system with MCP's tool interface, enabling agents to subscribe to database changes without managing WebSocket connections or event serialization
vs alternatives: More efficient than polling-based approaches because it uses Supabase's native real-time infrastructure rather than repeated database queries
Manages files in Supabase Storage buckets through MCP tools, supporting upload, download, list, and delete operations with automatic authentication and path-based access control. Uses Supabase's S3-compatible storage API with built-in support for public/private buckets and signed URLs for temporary access, enabling agents to handle file I/O without managing cloud storage credentials.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Storage's S3-compatible API as MCP tools with automatic authentication and signed URL generation, eliminating the need for agents to manage cloud storage credentials or generate temporary access tokens
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic S3 MCP tools because it leverages Supabase's built-in bucket policies and authentication rather than requiring separate AWS credentials
Performs semantic similarity searches on vector embeddings stored in Supabase PostgreSQL using pgvector extension, translating natural language queries into embedding vectors and executing cosine/L2 distance searches. Integrates with embedding providers (OpenAI, Cohere) or uses pre-computed embeddings, enabling agents to retrieve semantically similar documents or records without full-text search limitations.
Unique: Integrates pgvector directly into MCP tools with automatic embedding generation and distance calculation, enabling agents to perform semantic search without managing separate vector database infrastructure
vs alternatives: More efficient than external vector databases (Pinecone, Weaviate) for Supabase users because it colocates embeddings with relational data, reducing network latency and simplifying data synchronization
Exposes Supabase database schema information through MCP tools, allowing agents to discover table structures, column types, constraints, and relationships without manual schema documentation. Queries PostgreSQL information_schema and Supabase metadata tables to dynamically generate schema descriptions, enabling agents to construct valid queries and understand data relationships.
Unique: Queries Supabase's PostgreSQL information_schema directly through MCP tools, enabling agents to dynamically discover and adapt to database schemas without pre-configured schema definitions
vs alternatives: More flexible than static schema definitions because it reflects live database state, including recent migrations or schema changes
Enforces Supabase Row-Level Security policies within agent queries, ensuring that agents can only access rows permitted by RLS rules defined in the database. Evaluates policies based on authenticated user context (JWT claims, user ID) and applies WHERE clause filters automatically, preventing unauthorized data access at the database layer rather than application layer.
Unique: Delegates authorization enforcement to PostgreSQL RLS policies rather than implementing authorization in agent code, ensuring that data access rules are centralized and cannot be bypassed by agent logic
vs alternatives: More secure than application-level authorization because RLS is enforced at the database layer, preventing accidental data leaks even if agent code has bugs
+1 more capabilities