LlamaIndex ranks higher at 40/100 vs @cr4yfish/entity-db-fixed at 25/100. Capability-level comparison backed by match graph evidence from real search data.
| Feature | @cr4yfish/entity-db-fixed | LlamaIndex |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Framework | Framework |
| UnfragileRank | 25/100 | 40/100 |
| Adoption | 0 | 0 |
| Quality | 0 |
| 0 |
| Ecosystem | 1 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Paid |
| Capabilities | 6 decomposed | 14 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Generates dense vector embeddings directly in the browser using Transformers.js, eliminating the need for external embedding APIs. The system downloads pre-trained transformer models (e.g., all-MiniLM-L6-v2) to the client and runs inference locally, converting text into high-dimensional vectors suitable for semantic search and similarity matching without exposing data to remote servers.
Unique: Integrates Transformers.js directly into an IndexedDB-backed vector store, enabling end-to-end client-side embeddings without requiring a separate embedding service or API calls. The architecture caches model weights in IndexedDB to avoid re-downloading on subsequent sessions.
vs alternatives: Provides true offline embedding capability with zero data transmission, unlike Pinecone or Weaviate which require cloud infrastructure, and simpler than self-hosting Ollama or LM Studio while maintaining privacy guarantees.
Stores embeddings and associated metadata in the browser's IndexedDB, providing a structured, queryable vector database that persists across browser sessions. The system manages object stores for entities, embeddings, and metadata with automatic indexing on vector similarity and entity IDs, enabling efficient retrieval without server-side persistence.
Unique: Wraps IndexedDB with a vector-aware schema that automatically indexes embeddings and provides similarity-based querying, bridging the gap between traditional key-value IndexedDB and specialized vector databases. Uses object stores with compound indexes for efficient entity + embedding lookups.
vs alternatives: Lighter-weight than running a full vector database like Milvus or Qdrant in the browser, and requires no backend infrastructure unlike cloud-based solutions, though with lower query performance and storage limits.
Implements vector similarity search by computing cosine distance or other distance metrics between a query embedding and all stored embeddings in IndexedDB, returning ranked results sorted by similarity score. The search operates entirely client-side without external APIs, using efficient distance computation optimized for browser JavaScript execution.
Unique: Performs similarity search entirely within IndexedDB queries without requiring a separate search engine, using JavaScript distance computation optimized for browser execution. Integrates tightly with the embedding generation pipeline to ensure consistent vector spaces.
vs alternatives: Simpler integration than Elasticsearch or Milvus for small-scale use cases, and maintains privacy by avoiding external search services, though with worse scaling characteristics than specialized vector databases with approximate nearest neighbor indexing.
Organizes stored data around entities (documents, records, etc.) with associated metadata (title, source, timestamp, custom fields) and their corresponding embeddings, using a normalized schema where entities are linked to embeddings via foreign keys in IndexedDB. This structure enables efficient retrieval of both vector and non-vector attributes in a single query.
Unique: Structures IndexedDB around entities as first-class objects with embedded metadata, rather than treating embeddings as isolated vectors. This design enables retrieval of full entity context (text, metadata, embedding) in coordinated queries, supporting document-centric RAG workflows.
vs alternatives: More flexible than vector-only databases for applications requiring rich metadata, and simpler than relational databases with vector extensions, though without the query optimization and consistency guarantees of dedicated solutions.
Processes multiple documents or entities in a single operation, generating embeddings for all items and storing them in IndexedDB with their metadata. The system handles the full pipeline from raw text to persisted vectors, managing model initialization, batch inference, and database writes as a coordinated workflow.
Unique: Coordinates the full embedding-to-storage pipeline for multiple documents in a single operation, handling model initialization, batch inference, and IndexedDB writes as an atomic workflow. Optimizes for initial knowledge base population rather than incremental updates.
vs alternatives: Simpler than building custom ingestion pipelines with separate embedding and storage steps, though less flexible than specialized ETL tools like Airbyte or custom Python scripts for complex data transformations.
Automatically downloads and caches transformer models on first use, storing model weights in IndexedDB or browser cache to avoid re-downloading on subsequent sessions. The system implements lazy initialization where models are loaded only when embeddings are first requested, reducing initial page load time while ensuring models are available when needed.
Unique: Integrates model caching directly into the vector database layer, automatically persisting downloaded models in IndexedDB alongside embeddings. This design eliminates the need for separate model management infrastructure while keeping the API simple.
vs alternatives: More integrated than manual model management with Transformers.js, and avoids repeated downloads unlike stateless embedding APIs, though without the sophisticated caching and versioning of production ML serving systems like TensorFlow Serving.
Automatically loads and parses documents from diverse sources (PDFs, Word docs, HTML, Markdown, code files, databases) into a unified in-memory representation using format-specific loaders and node-based document abstractions. Each document is decomposed into Document objects containing metadata, content, and relationships, enabling downstream processing without format-specific handling in application code.
Unique: Provides a unified loader abstraction (BaseReader interface) that normalizes 100+ data source connectors into a single Document/Node API, eliminating format-specific branching logic in application code. Loaders are composable and chainable, allowing sequential transformations (e.g., load → split → extract metadata → embed).
vs alternatives: Broader out-of-the-box loader coverage than LangChain's document loaders and more structured node-based decomposition than raw text splitting, reducing boilerplate for multi-source RAG pipelines.
Splits documents into semantically coherent chunks using multiple strategies (character-based, token-aware, recursive, semantic) with configurable overlap and chunk size. Preserves document hierarchy and metadata through a node tree structure, enabling retrieval systems to maintain context relationships and enable hierarchical re-ranking or parent-document retrieval patterns.
Unique: Implements a node-tree abstraction that preserves document hierarchy and enables parent-document retrieval patterns. Supports multiple splitting strategies (recursive, semantic, code-aware) with pluggable custom splitters, and automatically propagates metadata through the node tree.
vs alternatives: More sophisticated than LangChain's text splitters because it preserves hierarchical relationships and supports semantic splitting; better for complex document structures than simple character-based splitting.
LlamaIndex scores higher at 40/100 vs @cr4yfish/entity-db-fixed at 25/100. @cr4yfish/entity-db-fixed leads on adoption and ecosystem, while LlamaIndex is stronger on quality. However, @cr4yfish/entity-db-fixed offers a free tier which may be better for getting started.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Processes documents containing mixed content (text, images, tables, code) by extracting and understanding each modality separately, then synthesizing information across modalities. Uses vision models for image understanding, specialized parsers for tables and code, and integrates results into a unified document representation for retrieval and generation.
Unique: Integrates vision models, table parsers, and code extractors into a unified multi-modal document processing pipeline that synthesizes information across modalities. Preserves modality-specific structure (table schemas, code formatting) while enabling cross-modal retrieval and generation.
vs alternatives: More comprehensive multi-modal support than text-only RAG; built-in vision integration reduces boilerplate for document understanding compared to manual vision API calls.
Enables streaming of LLM responses token-by-token and real-time retrieval updates, allowing applications to display partial results as they become available. Supports streaming from retrieval (progressive document discovery) and generation (token-by-token output) with backpressure handling and cancellation support for responsive user experiences.
Unique: Provides first-class streaming support for both retrieval and generation with automatic backpressure handling and cancellation. Enables progressive result display without custom async/streaming code in application layer.
vs alternatives: More integrated streaming support than manual LLM API streaming; built-in retrieval streaming and backpressure handling reduce complexity compared to custom streaming implementations.
Tracks API costs for LLM calls, embeddings, and other operations with per-query and per-session cost attribution. Provides cost optimization recommendations (e.g., batch processing, model selection, caching) and enables cost-aware query planning to balance quality and expense. Integrates with multiple LLM providers to normalize cost tracking across models.
Unique: Provides automatic cost tracking across multiple LLM providers with per-query attribution and cost optimization recommendations. Integrates with query execution to enable cost-aware planning without manual cost calculation.
vs alternatives: More integrated cost tracking than manual API billing review; built-in optimization recommendations reduce guesswork for cost reduction.
Enables building custom RAG pipelines by composing modular components (retrievers, synthesizers, agents, tools) through a declarative or programmatic API. Supports complex workflows with branching, loops, and conditional logic, with automatic dependency resolution and execution optimization. Pipelines are reusable, testable, and can be deployed as APIs or batch jobs.
Unique: Provides a flexible pipeline composition API supporting both declarative and programmatic definitions, with automatic dependency resolution and execution optimization. Enables complex workflows with branching and conditional logic without custom orchestration code.
vs alternatives: More flexible pipeline composition than fixed RAG architectures; better workflow support than manual component chaining.
Generates embeddings for documents/nodes using pluggable embedding providers (OpenAI, Hugging Face, local models) and stores them in a unified vector store interface that abstracts over multiple backends (Pinecone, Weaviate, Milvus, FAISS, Chroma, etc.). The abstraction layer enables switching vector stores without changing application code, and handles batching, retry logic, and metadata indexing.
Unique: Provides a unified VectorStore interface that abstracts 10+ vector database backends, enabling zero-code switching between providers. Handles embedding batching, retry logic, and metadata propagation automatically. Supports both cloud and local embedding models through a pluggable EmbedModel interface.
vs alternatives: Broader vector store coverage and more seamless provider switching than LangChain's vectorstore integrations; better abstraction consistency across backends than using raw vector store SDKs directly.
Retrieves semantically similar documents from vector stores using embedding-based similarity search, with optional re-ranking, filtering, and fusion strategies (hybrid search combining dense and sparse retrieval). Supports multiple retrieval modes (similarity, MMR, fusion) and enables custom retrieval logic through a pluggable Retriever interface that can combine multiple strategies.
Unique: Implements a pluggable Retriever abstraction supporting multiple retrieval strategies (similarity, MMR, fusion, custom) that can be composed and chained. Built-in support for re-ranking via LLM or cross-encoder, and hybrid search combining dense and sparse retrieval without custom integration code.
vs alternatives: More flexible retrieval composition than LangChain's retrievers; built-in re-ranking and fusion strategies reduce boilerplate for advanced retrieval pipelines.
+6 more capabilities