Codellm: Use Ollama and OpenAI to write code vs GitHub Copilot
Side-by-side comparison to help you choose.
| Feature | Codellm: Use Ollama and OpenAI to write code | GitHub Copilot |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Extension | Repository |
| UnfragileRank | 37/100 | 27/100 |
| Adoption | 0 | 0 |
| Quality |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 12 decomposed | 12 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Generates code via configurable backend selection between local OLLAMA models (offline-capable) and cloud OpenAI models (GPT-3/GPT-4/ChatGPT), with temperature and token limits adjustable per query. The extension maintains a unified prompt interface that routes to either backend without requiring code changes, enabling developers to switch between offline and cloud inference within VS Code preferences. Context is passed as selected code blocks or free-form queries through the sidebar input box.
Unique: Implements true dual-backend architecture allowing seamless switching between local OLLAMA and cloud OpenAI without extension reload, with configurable inference parameters (temperature, tokens) exposed in VS Code preferences rather than hardcoded defaults
vs alternatives: Offers offline-first capability with OLLAMA fallback that GitHub Copilot lacks, while maintaining OpenAI parity for teams preferring cloud models, without requiring separate tool installations
Analyzes selected code blocks and generates natural-language explanations by sending the selection to the configured LLM backend (local OLLAMA or OpenAI). The explanation capability is triggered via right-click context menu or command palette (`Codellm: Explain selection`) and returns formatted text in the editor panel. The extension preserves code context by passing only the selected block, avoiding full-file overhead while maintaining semantic accuracy.
Unique: Implements selection-scoped explanation that avoids full-file context bloat by passing only highlighted code to LLM, reducing token usage and latency compared to tools that send entire files for single-block explanations
vs alternatives: Faster and cheaper than Copilot's explanation feature for large files because it respects selection boundaries rather than inferring context from surrounding code
Integrates code-specific LLM commands (Explain, Refactor, Find Problems, Optimize) into VS Code's right-click context menu. When a code block is selected, right-clicking displays menu options for each command, triggering the corresponding LLM action on the selection. This integration eliminates command-palette navigation for frequent tasks and provides a discoverable interface for code-specific operations.
Unique: Integrates code-specific commands directly into VS Code's native right-click context menu, providing discoverable access without command-palette navigation
vs alternatives: More discoverable than Copilot's keyboard-only shortcuts because menu items are visible on right-click, though less efficient for power users who prefer keyboard workflows
Offers the extension as freemium software with free access to OpenAI's free-tier models (ChatGPT, code-davinci-002) and local OLLAMA models. Paid OpenAI models (GPT-3, GPT-4, text-davinci-003) require an OpenAI API key and incur usage costs. The extension does not charge for its own usage; costs are determined by the underlying LLM provider (OpenAI or OLLAMA). This pricing model enables developers to start using the extension without upfront costs.
Unique: Offers freemium extension with support for free OpenAI tier models and self-hosted OLLAMA, enabling zero-cost entry point for developers unwilling to pay for Copilot or other commercial tools
vs alternatives: Lower barrier to entry than GitHub Copilot (paid subscription) or Tabnine (freemium with limited features), though free OpenAI models have lower quality than Copilot's GPT-4 backend
Generates refactoring suggestions for selected code by routing the selection through a customizable prompt template to the configured LLM backend. The `Codellm: Refactor selection` command applies user-defined prompt customization (configurable via VS Code preferences) to guide the LLM toward specific refactoring goals (e.g., performance, readability, design patterns). Suggestions are returned as text in the editor panel and can be manually applied or copied into the editor.
Unique: Exposes custom prompt template configuration in VS Code preferences, allowing developers to define refactoring goals (e.g., 'convert to functional style', 'apply SOLID principles') without forking the extension or using separate tools
vs alternatives: More flexible than Copilot's fixed refactoring suggestions because users can inject domain-specific or team-specific refactoring rules via prompt customization
Scans selected code blocks for potential bugs, anti-patterns, and code smells by submitting the selection to the configured LLM backend with a problem-detection prompt. The `Codellm: Find problems` command returns a list of identified issues with explanations in the editor panel. The extension does not modify code; it only reports findings for manual review. Problem detection leverages the LLM's training data on common vulnerabilities and code issues.
Unique: Implements LLM-based problem detection without requiring external linters or static analysis tools, enabling developers to catch issues using the same backend (OLLAMA or OpenAI) configured for code generation
vs alternatives: Complements traditional linters by detecting semantic and architectural issues that regex-based tools miss, though with lower precision than specialized static analyzers
Generates performance and efficiency optimization suggestions for selected code by routing the selection through a performance-focused prompt to the LLM backend. The `Codellm: Optimize selection` command applies customizable optimization prompts (configurable via VS Code preferences) to guide the LLM toward specific optimization goals (e.g., algorithmic complexity, memory usage, I/O efficiency). Suggestions are returned as text and can be manually reviewed and applied.
Unique: Separates optimization prompting from general refactoring via dedicated `Optimize selection` command, allowing users to define performance-specific goals (e.g., 'minimize memory allocations', 'reduce time complexity') independently from code style preferences
vs alternatives: More targeted than general refactoring tools because it focuses exclusively on performance metrics, though without profiler integration it lacks the precision of specialized performance analysis tools
Maintains a local conversation history of all queries and LLM responses within the extension, accessible via the sidebar panel. The extension supports pinning important conversations, saving history as JSON for export/import, and retrieving past context for follow-up queries. Conversation state is stored locally (storage location unknown) and persists across VS Code sessions. The sidebar displays conversation history with pin/save controls, enabling developers to reference past interactions without re-querying the LLM.
Unique: Implements local-first conversation persistence with pin/save functionality in the sidebar, avoiding cloud dependency for history storage while enabling selective export for team sharing
vs alternatives: Simpler than ChatGPT's conversation management because it operates within the IDE context, though without cloud sync it lacks multi-device access that web-based tools provide
+4 more capabilities
Generates code suggestions as developers type by leveraging OpenAI Codex, a large language model trained on public code repositories. The system integrates directly into editor processes (VS Code, JetBrains, Neovim) via language server protocol extensions, streaming partial completions to the editor buffer with latency-optimized inference. Suggestions are ranked by relevance scoring and filtered based on cursor context, file syntax, and surrounding code patterns.
Unique: Integrates Codex inference directly into editor processes via LSP extensions with streaming partial completions, rather than polling or batch processing. Ranks suggestions using relevance scoring based on file syntax, surrounding context, and cursor position—not just raw model output.
vs alternatives: Faster suggestion latency than Tabnine or IntelliCode for common patterns because Codex was trained on 54M public GitHub repositories, providing broader coverage than alternatives trained on smaller corpora.
Generates complete functions, classes, and multi-file code structures by analyzing docstrings, type hints, and surrounding code context. The system uses Codex to synthesize implementations that match inferred intent from comments and signatures, with support for generating test cases, boilerplate, and entire modules. Context is gathered from the active file, open tabs, and recent edits to maintain consistency with existing code style and patterns.
Unique: Synthesizes multi-file code structures by analyzing docstrings, type hints, and surrounding context to infer developer intent, then generates implementations that match inferred patterns—not just single-line completions. Uses open editor tabs and recent edits to maintain style consistency across generated code.
vs alternatives: Generates more semantically coherent multi-file structures than Tabnine because Codex was trained on complete GitHub repositories with full context, enabling cross-file pattern matching and dependency inference.
Codellm: Use Ollama and OpenAI to write code scores higher at 37/100 vs GitHub Copilot at 27/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Analyzes pull requests and diffs to identify code quality issues, potential bugs, security vulnerabilities, and style inconsistencies. The system reviews changed code against project patterns and best practices, providing inline comments and suggestions for improvement. Analysis includes performance implications, maintainability concerns, and architectural alignment with existing codebase.
Unique: Analyzes pull request diffs against project patterns and best practices, providing inline suggestions with architectural and performance implications—not just style checking or syntax validation.
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than traditional linters because it understands semantic patterns and architectural concerns, enabling suggestions for design improvements and maintainability enhancements.
Generates comprehensive documentation from source code by analyzing function signatures, docstrings, type hints, and code structure. The system produces documentation in multiple formats (Markdown, HTML, Javadoc, Sphinx) and can generate API documentation, README files, and architecture guides. Documentation is contextualized by language conventions and project structure, with support for customizable templates and styles.
Unique: Generates comprehensive documentation in multiple formats by analyzing code structure, docstrings, and type hints, producing contextualized documentation for different audiences—not just extracting comments.
vs alternatives: More flexible than static documentation generators because it understands code semantics and can generate narrative documentation alongside API references, enabling comprehensive documentation from code alone.
Analyzes selected code blocks and generates natural language explanations, docstrings, and inline comments using Codex. The system reverse-engineers intent from code structure, variable names, and control flow, then produces human-readable descriptions in multiple formats (docstrings, markdown, inline comments). Explanations are contextualized by file type, language conventions, and surrounding code patterns.
Unique: Reverse-engineers intent from code structure and generates contextual explanations in multiple formats (docstrings, comments, markdown) by analyzing variable names, control flow, and language-specific conventions—not just summarizing syntax.
vs alternatives: Produces more accurate explanations than generic LLM summarization because Codex was trained specifically on code repositories, enabling it to recognize common patterns, idioms, and domain-specific constructs.
Analyzes code blocks and suggests refactoring opportunities, performance optimizations, and style improvements by comparing against patterns learned from millions of GitHub repositories. The system identifies anti-patterns, suggests idiomatic alternatives, and recommends structural changes (e.g., extracting methods, simplifying conditionals). Suggestions are ranked by impact and complexity, with explanations of why changes improve code quality.
Unique: Suggests refactoring and optimization opportunities by pattern-matching against 54M GitHub repositories, identifying anti-patterns and recommending idiomatic alternatives with ranked impact assessment—not just style corrections.
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than traditional linters because it understands semantic patterns and architectural improvements, not just syntax violations, enabling suggestions for structural refactoring and performance optimization.
Generates unit tests, integration tests, and test fixtures by analyzing function signatures, docstrings, and existing test patterns in the codebase. The system synthesizes test cases that cover common scenarios, edge cases, and error conditions, using Codex to infer expected behavior from code structure. Generated tests follow project-specific testing conventions (e.g., Jest, pytest, JUnit) and can be customized with test data or mocking strategies.
Unique: Generates test cases by analyzing function signatures, docstrings, and existing test patterns in the codebase, synthesizing tests that cover common scenarios and edge cases while matching project-specific testing conventions—not just template-based test scaffolding.
vs alternatives: Produces more contextually appropriate tests than generic test generators because it learns testing patterns from the actual project codebase, enabling tests that match existing conventions and infrastructure.
Converts natural language descriptions or pseudocode into executable code by interpreting intent from plain English comments or prompts. The system uses Codex to synthesize code that matches the described behavior, with support for multiple programming languages and frameworks. Context from the active file and project structure informs the translation, ensuring generated code integrates with existing patterns and dependencies.
Unique: Translates natural language descriptions into executable code by inferring intent from plain English comments and synthesizing implementations that integrate with project context and existing patterns—not just template-based code generation.
vs alternatives: More flexible than API documentation or code templates because Codex can interpret arbitrary natural language descriptions and generate custom implementations, enabling developers to express intent in their own words.
+4 more capabilities