Supermaven ranks higher at 71/100 vs CodeCursor (Cursor for VS Code) at 39/100. Capability-level comparison backed by match graph evidence from real search data.
| Feature | CodeCursor (Cursor for VS Code) | Supermaven |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Extension | Extension |
| UnfragileRank | 39/100 | 71/100 |
| Adoption | 1 | 1 |
| Quality | 0 | 1 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Starting Price | — | $10/mo |
| Capabilities | 11 decomposed | 13 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Converts natural language prompts into executable code by routing requests through Cursor's server infrastructure to OpenAI GPT models, streaming generated code back to VS Code as a live text diff with accept/reject controls. The extension intercepts the generation stream and renders it incrementally in an inline notification panel, allowing users to preview changes before applying them to the document.
Unique: Implements streaming code generation with live diff rendering in VS Code's notification UI, allowing real-time preview of generated code before acceptance. Uses Cursor's server as intermediary rather than direct OpenAI API calls, enabling model selection and custom API key support while maintaining Cursor's infrastructure benefits.
vs alternatives: Faster visual feedback than GitHub Copilot's inline suggestions because it streams complete code blocks as diffs rather than token-by-token completions, and integrates tighter with VS Code's native diff UI for explicit accept/reject workflows.
Opens a persistent chat panel in VS Code's sidebar that maintains conversation context about the currently open document or selected code. Messages are routed through Cursor's server to GPT models, enabling developers to ask questions about code semantics, request explanations, or discuss implementation details without leaving the editor. The chat maintains multi-turn conversation history within a session.
Unique: Implements a persistent sidebar chat panel that maintains conversation state within a VS Code session, automatically scoping context to the active document or selection. Unlike Cursor's main app, this extension integrates chat as a lightweight sidebar widget rather than a full-screen interface, enabling rapid context-switching between coding and explanation.
vs alternatives: More integrated into the editing workflow than ChatGPT web interface because it maintains document context automatically and keeps conversation visible while coding, but less powerful than Cursor's native app because it lacks project-wide codebase awareness.
Automatically scopes all code generation and explanation requests to the currently open document, using the full file content as implicit context for prompts. The extension does not require users to manually specify file context — it's automatically included in every request. This enables context-aware generation without explicit context management, though it limits awareness to single-file scope.
Unique: Implements automatic document context inclusion without explicit user specification, reducing cognitive load for context management. The implicit scope is transparent to users but limits awareness to single-file boundaries.
vs alternatives: More convenient than manual context specification because it's automatic, but less powerful than Cursor's native app which has project-wide codebase awareness for cross-file understanding.
Generates entire project directory structures and boilerplate code from natural language descriptions by routing requests to GPT models via Cursor's server. The extension creates files and folders in the current workspace, with warnings if the workspace is non-empty to prevent accidental overwrites. This feature is marked experimental and may have undefined behavior with concurrent generation requests.
Unique: Implements multi-file project generation as an experimental feature with workspace-level awareness, detecting non-empty directories and warning users before generation. Unlike single-file code generation, this capability operates at the filesystem level, creating directory structures and multiple files in a single operation.
vs alternatives: Faster than manual project setup with create-react-app or similar tools because it generates custom project structures from natural language, but less reliable than established scaffolding tools because it's experimental and lacks rollback capabilities.
Allows users to override the default Cursor server backend by providing custom OpenAI API keys in extension settings, enabling model selection and cost control. The extension routes all requests through the provided API key instead of Cursor's infrastructure, though the connection still flows through Cursor's server as an intermediary rather than direct client-to-OpenAI communication. Configuration is stored in VS Code's extension settings.
Unique: Implements custom API key configuration at the extension level, allowing users to substitute their own OpenAI credentials while maintaining Cursor's server infrastructure as an intermediary. This hybrid approach enables model selection and cost control without requiring a full Cursor account, but trades direct API access for Cursor's managed infrastructure.
vs alternatives: More flexible than Cursor's default account-based authentication because it supports custom API keys and model selection, but less direct than using OpenAI API clients directly because requests still route through Cursor's server, adding latency and potential points of failure.
Enables users to select code snippets in the editor before triggering generation, automatically using the selection as context for code generation prompts. When code is generated, the selected text is replaced with the generated output in a single atomic operation, with the change shown as a diff in the notification panel before acceptance. This allows targeted code modification without affecting surrounding code.
Unique: Implements context-aware code replacement by automatically using editor selections as implicit context for generation prompts, eliminating the need to manually include code in prompts. The replacement is shown as a diff before acceptance, providing visual confirmation of changes.
vs alternatives: More precise than Copilot's inline suggestions for refactoring because it operates on explicit selections rather than cursor position, and shows full diffs before acceptance rather than token-by-token completions.
Displays real-time progress indicators in VS Code's status bar during code generation and project scaffolding operations, allowing users to cancel in-progress requests by clicking the status bar item. The status bar shows operation type (generating code, creating project) and provides a clickable interface to abort requests or reopen completed results without re-running generation.
Unique: Integrates progress feedback into VS Code's status bar rather than modal dialogs, providing non-intrusive operation visibility. Allows both cancellation and result reopening from a single UI element, reducing context-switching overhead.
vs alternatives: Less intrusive than modal progress dialogs because it uses VS Code's native status bar, and more flexible than simple completion notifications because it enables cancellation and result reopening without re-running generation.
Routes all AI requests through Cursor's managed server infrastructure by default, which handles authentication, rate limiting, and model selection. If the Cursor server becomes unstable or unavailable, users can configure custom OpenAI API keys to bypass Cursor's infrastructure entirely. The extension abstracts away the routing logic, presenting a unified interface regardless of backend selection.
Unique: Implements dual-backend routing with transparent fallback, allowing users to start with Cursor's managed infrastructure and switch to custom API keys without changing extension configuration. The abstraction layer hides routing complexity from users while providing flexibility.
vs alternatives: More resilient than single-backend solutions because it offers fallback options, but less direct than using OpenAI API clients directly because Cursor server remains an intermediary even with custom keys.
+3 more capabilities
Generates single-line and multi-line code suggestions in real-time as developers type, using semantic indexing of the entire codebase to retrieve relevant type definitions, function signatures, and contextual patterns. The system maintains a 1M token context window (Pro/Team tiers) that enables suggestions informed by distant code definitions and cross-file dependencies, constructed via local codebase semantic search rather than simple token-based recency. Suggestions adapt to detected coding style on Pro/Team tiers through implicit pattern learning from recent edits.
Unique: 1M token context window with codebase-wide semantic indexing enables suggestions informed by distant code definitions and cross-file patterns, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that typically use fixed context windows (4K-32K tokens) or file-local context. Claimed 250ms latency suggests optimized retrieval pipeline, though indexing mechanism and performance at scale remain undisclosed.
vs alternatives: Larger context window than GitHub Copilot (8K-32K tokens) and faster latency than unnamed competitors (250ms vs 783ms claimed), enabling suggestions on large codebases with minimal typing delay; trade-off is cloud dependency and undisclosed free tier limitations.
Provides a separate chat interface supporting multiple LLM backends (GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, GPT-4, others) for conversational code assistance. Users attach files, reference recent edits, and trigger compiler diagnostic uploads; the system generates diffs and applies code changes directly to the editor. Model selection is per-conversation, and $5/month in credits (included in Pro/Team) covers external model API costs; overage pricing is undisclosed. Hotkey-driven workflow enables rapid context switching between inline completion and chat.
Unique: Multi-model chat interface with per-conversation model selection and integrated diff application, combined with compiler diagnostic auto-upload. Unlike Copilot Chat (single model per tier) or standalone ChatGPT, Supermaven Chat unifies multiple LLM backends in a single hotkey-driven workflow with direct editor integration for change application.
Supermaven scores higher at 71/100 vs CodeCursor (Cursor for VS Code) at 39/100. CodeCursor (Cursor for VS Code) leads on ecosystem, while Supermaven is stronger on adoption and quality.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
vs alternatives: Supports multiple LLM backends (GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet) in one interface with included credits, whereas GitHub Copilot Chat is single-model per tier and requires separate ChatGPT subscription for model switching; trade-off is credit limits and unknown overage pricing.
Supermaven Chat can automatically upload compiler diagnostic messages (errors, warnings) alongside code context to provide error-aware suggestions and fixes. The mechanism is described as 'automatically uploading your code together with compiler diagnostic messages,' but specific language/compiler support and the upload trigger mechanism are undisclosed. This feature is Chat-only and not available in inline completion.
Unique: Automatic compiler diagnostic upload in Chat for error-aware suggestions, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that require manual error context or have limited diagnostic integration. Supermaven's approach reduces friction but with undisclosed language/compiler support.
vs alternatives: Automatic diagnostic upload reduces manual context-gathering compared to manual copy-paste; trade-off is undisclosed language support and unclear upload trigger mechanism.
Supermaven offers a 30-day free trial of the Pro tier ($10/month), providing full access to 1M token context window, largest model, style adaptation, and $5/month chat credits. No credit card is required to start the trial (implied), and trial conversion to paid is automatic after 30 days unless cancelled. Trial terms and auto-renewal policy are not explicitly detailed.
Unique: 30-day free trial of Pro tier with full feature access (1M context, largest model, chat credits), versus competitors (Copilot 2-month free trial, Tabnine free tier only) with different trial lengths and feature access. Supermaven's approach is generous but with undisclosed auto-renewal terms.
vs alternatives: Full Pro feature access during trial compared to limited free tier; trade-off is undisclosed auto-renewal policy and potential unexpected charges if not cancelled.
Supermaven requires internet connectivity and server-side inference; no offline mode or local inference capability is mentioned or available. All code completion requests are sent to Supermaven's backend servers for processing, and responses are returned over the network. This creates a hard dependency on network connectivity and Supermaven's service availability; if the service is down or network is unavailable, code completion is not available.
Unique: Supermaven has no offline mode or local inference capability; all processing is server-side. GitHub Copilot also requires server-side inference, but Tabnine offers local inference options for some use cases. Supermaven's lack of offline capability is a significant limitation for developers with connectivity constraints.
vs alternatives: Supermaven's server-side-only approach is comparable to GitHub Copilot; Tabnine offers local inference options, making Tabnine more suitable for offline work. Supermaven's lack of offline capability is a weakness vs. Tabnine.
Analyzes recent code edits and inferred coding patterns to adapt inline suggestions to match team conventions, naming patterns, and structural preferences. The mechanism is implicit (not explicit fine-tuning) and operates only on Pro/Team tiers, suggesting pattern learning from editor activity rather than explicit configuration. Free tier uses a single base model without personalization.
Unique: Implicit style adaptation via editor activity analysis without explicit configuration, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that require manual style guides or explicit fine-tuning. Supermaven's approach is transparent to the user but also non-configurable and undisclosed in mechanism.
vs alternatives: Requires no manual style configuration compared to tools requiring explicit style guides; trade-off is lack of transparency and inability to control or export learned styles.
Delivers code suggestions to the editor inline as the developer types, with a claimed baseline latency of 250ms from keystroke to suggestion display. The system uses a cloud inference backend and local editor plugin to minimize round-trip time. Latency claim is positioned against an unnamed competitor (783ms), but methodology is undisclosed and no independent verification is provided.
Unique: Claimed 250ms latency via optimized cloud inference pipeline and editor plugin architecture, versus competitors with higher latency (783ms unnamed baseline). Actual differentiation is undisclosed; mechanism may involve request batching, model quantization, or edge caching, but specifics are not public.
vs alternatives: Faster than unnamed competitor (250ms vs 783ms claimed); trade-off is cloud dependency and unverified latency claim with no SLA or performance guarantee.
Provides native editor extensions for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs (IntelliJ IDEA, PyCharm, WebStorm, etc.), and Neovim, enabling inline suggestion rendering, hotkey-driven chat access, and compiler diagnostic integration directly within the editor. Each plugin variant is maintained separately and integrates with the editor's native autocomplete UI, keybinding system, and file context APIs.
Unique: Native plugins for three major editor ecosystems (VS Code, JetBrains, Neovim) with integrated chat and diff application, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that support broader editor ecosystems but with less deep integration in some cases. Supermaven's approach prioritizes depth over breadth.
vs alternatives: Deep integration with VS Code and JetBrains (native autocomplete UI, hotkey system) compared to web-based tools or lighter integrations; trade-off is limited editor support (no Sublime, Vim, Emacs) and undisclosed Neovim support details.
+5 more capabilities