| 0 |
| Ecosystem | 1 | 1 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 19 decomposed | 12 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Sisyphus main orchestrator coordinates 11 specialized agents (Hephaestus, Oracle, Librarian, Explore, Atlas, Prometheus, Metis, Momus, Multimodal-Looker, Sisyphus-Junior) with role-specific prompts and tool permission matrices. Each agent is matched to tasks based on capability profiles and model compatibility, with dynamic prompt building that injects agent-specific context. The orchestrator implements a planning workflow that decomposes user intent into subtasks, delegates to appropriate agents, and aggregates results.
Unique: Implements a 11-agent specialized workforce with explicit role-specific tool permission matrices and dynamic agent-model matching, rather than a single generalist agent. Uses Sisyphus orchestrator pattern with planning agents that decompose tasks before worker agent execution, enabling structured multi-step workflows with role enforcement.
vs alternatives: Provides more granular task routing and role-based tool access than single-agent systems like Copilot or standard Claude Code, enabling specialized agent expertise without requiring manual agent selection by the user.
The hashline_edit tool implements line-level content hashing (LINE#ID format) that validates code before applying modifications, ensuring zero-error edits by confirming the target content matches expected state. Each editable line is tagged with a hash of its content; edits are rejected if the hash doesn't match, preventing off-by-one errors and stale edit conflicts. This pattern integrates with AST-Grep for structural code navigation and LSP for semantic awareness.
Unique: Uses cryptographic content hashing at the line level (LINE#ID format) to validate edit targets before modification, achieving 0% error modification rate. This is a novel pattern not found in standard code editors or LLM code generation tools, providing deterministic edit safety without requiring full file locking.
vs alternatives: Eliminates off-by-one edit errors that plague LLM-generated code modifications by validating content hashes before applying changes, whereas Copilot and standard Claude Code rely on line numbers alone which can drift with concurrent edits.
Implements a planning workflow where planning agents (Oracle, Librarian) decompose complex user intents into structured subtasks before delegation to worker agents. Planning agents analyze the task, identify dependencies, and create an execution plan with task ordering and resource requirements. The plan is validated before execution, ensuring feasibility. This two-phase approach (plan then execute) reduces agent errors and enables better resource allocation.
Unique: Implements a two-phase workflow (plan then execute) with dedicated planning agents (Oracle, Librarian) that decompose tasks and validate plans before worker agent execution. This reduces execution errors compared to direct task execution.
vs alternatives: Provides explicit task planning and decomposition before execution, whereas most agent frameworks execute tasks directly without planning, leading to more errors and suboptimal execution order.
Implements Ultrawork mode, a continuous execution mode where agents autonomously execute tasks without waiting for user confirmation between steps. Agents monitor task progress, handle errors, and adapt execution based on results. Ultrawork mode includes safeguards (resource limits, timeout enforcement, error thresholds) to prevent runaway execution. Session continuity ensures tasks can be resumed if interrupted.
Unique: Implements Ultrawork mode for continuous autonomous execution with integrated safeguards (resource limits, timeout enforcement, error thresholds) and session continuity for resumable execution. This enables hands-off agent workflows while preventing runaway execution.
vs alternatives: Provides continuous autonomous execution with built-in safeguards, whereas most agent frameworks require user confirmation between steps or lack execution safeguards.
Implements Deep Work mode, a focused execution mode where the Hephaestus agent (specialized in complex code generation and refactoring) works deeply on a single task with extended context and reasoning. Hephaestus has access to advanced tools (AST-Grep, LSP, code analysis) and can maintain longer reasoning chains. Deep Work mode is optimized for complex tasks requiring sustained focus, unlike Ultrawork's breadth-first approach.
Unique: Implements Deep Work mode with Hephaestus, a specialized agent for complex code generation and refactoring with access to advanced tools and extended reasoning chains. This contrasts with Ultrawork's breadth-first approach.
vs alternatives: Provides specialized deep reasoning for complex code tasks with extended context, whereas standard agent frameworks use single-pass reasoning which is insufficient for complex refactoring.
Implements non-interactive and CI modes where agents execute without user interaction, suitable for automated CI/CD pipelines and batch processing. In CI mode, agents read input from files or environment variables and write output to files or stdout. Error handling is strict; agents fail fast on errors rather than attempting recovery. CI mode integrates with standard Unix tools (pipes, redirection) for easy pipeline composition.
Unique: Implements CI mode with strict error handling and Unix tool integration (pipes, redirection, environment variables), enabling agents to be composed into standard CI/CD pipelines without custom wrapper code.
vs alternatives: Provides native CI/CD integration with Unix tool compatibility, whereas most agent frameworks require custom wrapper code to integrate with CI pipelines.
Implements a debugging workflow where the Oracle agent analyzes errors, generates debugging hypotheses, and recommends fixes. Oracle has access to error logs, stack traces, and code context. The workflow supports interactive debugging (user provides feedback) and automated debugging (Oracle generates and tests fixes). Debugging results are logged for future reference.
Unique: Implements a dedicated debugging workflow with Oracle agent that analyzes errors, generates hypotheses, and recommends or automatically applies fixes. Supports both interactive and automated debugging modes.
vs alternatives: Provides specialized debugging workflow with error analysis and fix generation, whereas most agent frameworks treat debugging as a generic task without specialized support.
Implements concurrent agent execution with task batching, enabling multiple agents to work in parallel on independent subtasks. The orchestrator analyzes task dependencies and groups independent tasks for parallel execution. Concurrency is managed via a configurable thread pool; parallelism is limited by available resources. Results are aggregated after all parallel tasks complete.
Unique: Implements automatic task batching and parallel execution with dependency analysis, enabling multiple agents to work in parallel without manual concurrency management. Thread pool is configurable for resource control.
vs alternatives: Provides automatic parallelism with dependency analysis, whereas most agent frameworks execute tasks sequentially or require manual parallelism management.
+11 more capabilities
Crawls 11+ heterogeneous platforms (Zhihu, Weibo, Bilibili, Twitter, Reddit, HackerNews, etc.) and RSS feeds using platform-specific scrapers, normalizes disparate data schemas into a unified NewsItem model, and deduplicates content across sources using fuzzy title matching and URL canonicalization. The system maintains platform-specific metadata (rank, heat value, engagement metrics) while presenting a single normalized feed, enabling cross-platform trend detection that would be invisible within individual platform silos.
Unique: Implements platform-specific crawler modules with unified NewsItem schema and fuzzy deduplication across 11+ heterogeneous sources (Chinese + international), rather than relying on single-platform APIs or generic RSS parsing. Maintains platform-specific metadata (rank × 0.6 + frequency × 0.3 + platform hot value × 0.1) for weighted hotspot scoring.
vs alternatives: Covers more platforms (especially Chinese social media) with deeper metadata extraction than generic RSS aggregators, and provides unified deduplication across sources unlike single-platform monitoring tools.
Implements a multi-stage filtering pipeline that matches news items against user-defined keywords using regex patterns, required word lists, and excluded word lists. The system applies frequency-based scoring (keyword occurrence count) combined with platform hotspot weights to rank filtered results. Configuration is stored in frequency_words.txt with support for regex patterns, AND/OR/NOT boolean operators, and per-keyword weighting. Filtering occurs at collection time (reducing storage) and again at report generation time (enabling dynamic reconfiguration without re-crawling).
Unique: Combines regex pattern matching with frequency-based scoring and platform hotspot weighting (rank × 0.6 + frequency × 0.3 + platform hot value × 0.1) in a two-stage pipeline (collection-time and report-time filtering). Supports dynamic reconfiguration without re-crawling by applying filters at report generation.
TrendRadar scores higher at 58/100 vs oh-my-openagent at 46/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
vs alternatives: More flexible than simple keyword matching (supports regex and boolean logic) and more efficient than semantic filtering (no LLM overhead), making it suitable for real-time filtering at scale.
Detects newly emerged topics by comparing current crawl results against historical data stored in the system. Topics are marked as 🆕 (new) if they appear for the first time in the current crawl or if their hotspot rank increased significantly compared to previous crawls. The system tracks topic emergence velocity (how quickly a topic rises in rankings) and flags topics with unusual acceleration. New topic detection is performed at report generation time, enabling dynamic detection without re-crawling. The system maintains a historical hotspot index for comparison.
Unique: Detects new topics by comparing current hotspot rankings against historical data, marking topics with significant rank increases as 🆕. Tracks emergence velocity to distinguish breaking news from sustained trends.
vs alternatives: More efficient than semantic similarity detection (no LLM overhead) and more accurate than simple first-appearance detection (accounts for re-emerging topics), but requires historical baseline data.
Provides a web-based UI for editing TrendRadar configuration files (config.yaml, frequency_words.txt, timeline.yaml) with real-time validation and preview. The editor supports: (1) syntax highlighting for YAML and regex, (2) validation of keyword patterns (regex compilation check), (3) preview of filtered results based on current keyword configuration, (4) drag-and-drop channel configuration, (5) schedule preview (shows next 10 execution times). Changes are validated before saving, preventing configuration errors. The editor is optional; users can edit config files directly.
Unique: Provides web-based configuration editor with real-time validation, regex preview, and schedule visualization. Enables non-technical users to configure TrendRadar without editing YAML files.
vs alternatives: More user-friendly than manual YAML editing and provides validation feedback, but adds operational complexity compared to file-based configuration.
Integrates LiteLLM to provide vendor-agnostic AI analysis and summarization of filtered news items. Users configure their preferred LLM provider (OpenAI, Anthropic, Ollama, local models, etc.) once in config.yaml, and the system automatically routes analysis requests to that provider. The AI analysis capability includes: (1) automated summarization of long articles into key points, (2) sentiment analysis (positive/negative/neutral), (3) trend prediction based on historical patterns, and (4) custom analysis prompts. Analysis results are cached to avoid redundant API calls and can be pushed directly to notification channels.
Unique: Uses LiteLLM abstraction layer to support any LLM provider (OpenAI, Anthropic, Ollama, local models) with single configuration, enabling provider switching without code changes. Caches analysis results to reduce redundant API calls and costs.
vs alternatives: More flexible than hardcoded OpenAI integration (supports any LiteLLM provider) and cheaper than dedicated sentiment analysis APIs (can use local models), but slower than rule-based sentiment analysis.
Leverages LiteLLM to translate news content from source languages (primarily Chinese) to target languages (English, etc.) on-demand. The system detects source language automatically (via langdetect or similar), caches translations to avoid re-translating identical content, and batches translation requests to reduce API calls. Translations are stored alongside original content, enabling bilingual reports and multi-language notification delivery. Translation can be triggered at collection time (all news) or report time (only filtered news).
Unique: Implements provider-agnostic translation via LiteLLM with automatic language detection, content-based caching, and batch request optimization. Stores translations alongside originals for bilingual report generation.
vs alternatives: More flexible than dedicated translation APIs (supports any LiteLLM provider) and cheaper than commercial translation services when using local models, but slower than specialized translation APIs.
Implements a notification abstraction layer supporting 9+ delivery channels (WeChat, WeWork, Feishu, Telegram, Email, ntfy, Bark, Slack, etc.). Each channel has a provider-specific formatter that converts normalized news items into channel-appropriate messages (e.g., WeChat card format, Telegram markdown, email HTML). The system batches notifications atomically—all news items for a report are sent as a single batch to each channel, ensuring consistency and reducing API calls. Message formatting respects channel constraints (character limits, attachment limits, etc.) and supports templating for customization.
Unique: Implements atomic message batching across 9+ heterogeneous channels with provider-specific formatters and constraint-aware truncation. Single configuration enables simultaneous delivery to WeChat, WeWork, Feishu, Telegram, Email, ntfy, Bark, Slack, etc. without code changes.
vs alternatives: Supports more channels (especially Chinese platforms like WeWork, Feishu) than generic notification services, and batching reduces API calls and spam compared to per-item notifications.
Exposes TrendRadar's data and analysis capabilities as an MCP server, enabling AI agents and LLM applications to query trends, perform analysis, and generate insights through natural language. The MCP server implements tools for: (1) querying filtered news by keyword/date/platform, (2) retrieving trend statistics and hotspot rankings, (3) running custom analysis on news subsets, (4) generating reports in various formats. Clients (Claude, other LLM agents) can invoke these tools via MCP protocol, enabling conversational exploration of trends without direct database access. The server maintains state across multiple requests, allowing multi-turn conversations about trends.
Unique: Implements full MCP server exposing trend data and analysis tools to LLM agents, enabling conversational queries and multi-turn analysis workflows. Maintains state across requests and supports complex tool invocations (filtering, analysis, report generation).
vs alternatives: Enables conversational access to trends (vs. API-only access) and integrates with LLM agent workflows (vs. standalone tools), but adds operational complexity compared to simple REST APIs.
+4 more capabilities