bRAG-langchain vs strapi-plugin-embeddings
Side-by-side comparison to help you choose.
| Feature | bRAG-langchain | strapi-plugin-embeddings |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Model | Repository |
| UnfragileRank | 36/100 | 32/100 |
| Adoption | 0 | 0 |
| Quality | 0 | 0 |
| Ecosystem | 1 | 1 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 13 decomposed | 9 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Constructs a complete Retrieval-Augmented Generation pipeline using LangChain Expression Language (LCEL) that separates indexing (one-time document embedding and vector store population) from query execution (per-request retrieval and LLM synthesis). The rag_chain in full_basic_rag.ipynb assembles retriever, prompt templates, and LLM into a single composable expression, enabling declarative pipeline definition without imperative control flow.
Unique: Uses LangChain Expression Language (LCEL) to declaratively compose indexing and query phases into a single reusable chain expression, eliminating boilerplate control flow and enabling runtime chain introspection and modification
vs alternatives: Simpler than building RAG from scratch with raw vector store APIs, and more transparent than black-box RAG frameworks because LCEL makes each pipeline step explicit and swappable
Generates multiple semantically-diverse query variants from a single user question using an LLM, then retrieves documents against all variants in parallel, unions the results, and deduplicates to improve recall. Implemented in Notebook 2 via LLM prompt templates that instruct the model to generate alternative phrasings, followed by concurrent retriever calls and result aggregation.
Unique: Leverages LLM-in-the-loop query expansion with parallel retrieval and union-based deduplication, avoiding hand-crafted query expansion rules and adapting dynamically to domain-specific terminology
vs alternatives: More effective than single-query retrieval for sparse corpora, and more flexible than static query expansion templates because the LLM adapts variants to the specific query context
Manages LLM prompts using LangChain PromptTemplate, enabling parameterized prompt construction with context injection, variable substitution, and format specification. Notebooks demonstrate prompts for retrieval evaluation, query generation, answer synthesis, and re-ranking, with explicit separation of system instructions, context, and user input.
Unique: Uses LangChain PromptTemplate for parameterized prompt construction with explicit variable injection, enabling prompt reuse and experimentation without string concatenation
vs alternatives: More maintainable than string concatenation, and more flexible than hard-coded prompts because templates are reusable and variables are explicit
Provides five structured Jupyter notebooks (Notebooks 1-5) that progressively introduce RAG techniques from basic setup to advanced retrieval and self-correction. Each notebook builds on the previous, introducing new techniques (multi-query, routing, advanced indexing, re-ranking) with executable code, explanations, and reference links. The progression enables learners to understand RAG incrementally rather than all-at-once.
Unique: Provides a structured 5-notebook curriculum that progressively introduces RAG techniques with executable code and explanations, enabling self-paced learning from basic to advanced patterns
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than blog posts or tutorials because it covers the full RAG spectrum, and more practical than academic papers because code is executable and runnable
Provides a self-contained, production-ready RAG chatbot implementation in full_basic_rag.ipynb that can be adapted to custom documents, LLMs, and vector stores. The boilerplate includes document loading, embedding, vector store setup, retrieval chain assembly, and inference loop, enabling developers to fork and customize without building from scratch.
Unique: Provides a complete, self-contained RAG chatbot in a single notebook that can be forked and customized without external dependencies or infrastructure setup
vs alternatives: Faster to deploy than building RAG from scratch, and more customizable than SaaS RAG platforms because code is fully visible and modifiable
Routes incoming queries to different retrieval or processing paths based on semantic classification or logical rules using LangChain's RunnableBranch construct. Notebook 3 demonstrates routing via LLM classification (e.g., 'is this a factual question or a reasoning task?') and conditional branching to specialized chains (e.g., HyDE for hypothetical document expansion, RAG-Fusion for multi-perspective retrieval).
Unique: Uses LangChain's RunnableBranch to declaratively define conditional routing logic without imperative control flow, enabling runtime inspection and modification of routing conditions
vs alternatives: More maintainable than hard-coded if-else routing, and more transparent than learned routing models because conditions are explicit and auditable
Implements sophisticated indexing strategies (Notebook 4) including MultiVectorRetriever for storing summaries/questions alongside full documents, InMemoryByteStore for metadata caching, and Parent Document Retriever for retrieving larger context chunks while querying against smaller summaries. These patterns decouple the retrieval unit (summary) from the context unit (full document), improving both precision and context quality.
Unique: Decouples retrieval granularity (summaries) from context granularity (full documents) using MultiVectorRetriever and parent-child mappings, enabling precise relevance matching without losing contextual information
vs alternatives: More effective than chunk-based retrieval for long documents because it retrieves at the document level while scoring at the summary level, reducing context fragmentation
Applies learned re-ranking to retrieval results using cross-encoder models (e.g., Cohere Rerank API) that score document-query pairs jointly, improving ranking quality beyond embedding-based similarity. Notebook 5 integrates CohereRerank and demonstrates Corrective RAG (CRAG) with LangGraph, which evaluates retrieval quality and iteratively refines queries or retrieves additional documents if confidence is low.
Unique: Combines cross-encoder re-ranking with Corrective RAG (CRAG) using LangGraph state machines, enabling iterative retrieval refinement with explicit quality validation rather than single-pass retrieval
vs alternatives: More effective than embedding-only ranking for complex queries, and more robust than static retrieval because CRAG detects and corrects failures automatically
+5 more capabilities
Automatically generates vector embeddings for Strapi content entries using configurable AI providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, or local models). Hooks into Strapi's lifecycle events to trigger embedding generation on content creation/update, storing dense vectors in PostgreSQL via pgvector extension. Supports batch processing and selective field embedding based on content type configuration.
Unique: Strapi-native plugin that integrates embeddings directly into content lifecycle hooks rather than requiring external ETL pipelines; supports multiple embedding providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, local) with unified configuration interface and pgvector as first-class storage backend
vs alternatives: Tighter Strapi integration than generic embedding services, eliminating the need for separate indexing pipelines while maintaining provider flexibility
Executes semantic similarity search against embedded content using vector distance calculations (cosine, L2) in PostgreSQL pgvector. Accepts natural language queries, converts them to embeddings via the same provider used for content, and returns ranked results based on vector similarity. Supports filtering by content type, status, and custom metadata before similarity ranking.
Unique: Integrates semantic search directly into Strapi's query API rather than requiring separate search infrastructure; uses pgvector's native distance operators (cosine, L2) with optional IVFFlat indexing for performance, supporting both simple and filtered queries
vs alternatives: Eliminates external search service dependencies (Elasticsearch, Algolia) for Strapi users, reducing operational complexity and cost while keeping search logic co-located with content
Provides a unified interface for embedding generation across multiple AI providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, local models via Ollama/Hugging Face). Abstracts provider-specific API signatures, authentication, rate limiting, and response formats into a single configuration-driven system. Allows switching providers without code changes by updating environment variables or Strapi admin panel settings.
bRAG-langchain scores higher at 36/100 vs strapi-plugin-embeddings at 32/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Unique: Implements provider abstraction layer with unified error handling, retry logic, and configuration management; supports both cloud (OpenAI, Anthropic) and self-hosted (Ollama, HF Inference) models through a single interface
vs alternatives: More flexible than single-provider solutions (like Pinecone's OpenAI-only approach) while simpler than generic LLM frameworks (LangChain) by focusing specifically on embedding provider switching
Stores and indexes embeddings directly in PostgreSQL using the pgvector extension, leveraging native vector data types and similarity operators (cosine, L2, inner product). Automatically creates IVFFlat or HNSW indices for efficient approximate nearest neighbor search at scale. Integrates with Strapi's database layer to persist embeddings alongside content metadata in a single transactional store.
Unique: Uses PostgreSQL pgvector as primary vector store rather than external vector DB, enabling transactional consistency and SQL-native querying; supports both IVFFlat (faster, approximate) and HNSW (slower, more accurate) indices with automatic index management
vs alternatives: Eliminates operational complexity of managing separate vector databases (Pinecone, Weaviate) for Strapi users while maintaining ACID guarantees that external vector DBs cannot provide
Allows fine-grained configuration of which fields from each Strapi content type should be embedded, supporting text concatenation, field weighting, and selective embedding. Configuration is stored in Strapi's plugin settings and applied during content lifecycle hooks. Supports nested field selection (e.g., embedding both title and author.name from related entries) and dynamic field filtering based on content status or visibility.
Unique: Provides Strapi-native configuration UI for field mapping rather than requiring code changes; supports content-type-specific strategies and nested field selection through a declarative configuration model
vs alternatives: More flexible than generic embedding tools that treat all content uniformly, allowing Strapi users to optimize embedding quality and cost per content type
Provides bulk operations to re-embed existing content entries in batches, useful for model upgrades, provider migrations, or fixing corrupted embeddings. Implements chunked processing to avoid memory exhaustion and includes progress tracking, error recovery, and dry-run mode. Can be triggered via Strapi admin UI or API endpoint with configurable batch size and concurrency.
Unique: Implements chunked batch processing with progress tracking and error recovery specifically for Strapi content; supports dry-run mode and selective reindexing by content type or status
vs alternatives: Purpose-built for Strapi bulk operations rather than generic batch tools, with awareness of content types, statuses, and Strapi's data model
Integrates with Strapi's content lifecycle events (create, update, publish, unpublish) to automatically trigger embedding generation or deletion. Hooks are registered at plugin initialization and execute synchronously or asynchronously based on configuration. Supports conditional hooks (e.g., only embed published content) and custom pre/post-processing logic.
Unique: Leverages Strapi's native lifecycle event system to trigger embeddings without external webhooks or polling; supports both synchronous and asynchronous execution with conditional logic
vs alternatives: Tighter integration than webhook-based approaches, eliminating external infrastructure and latency while maintaining Strapi's transactional guarantees
Stores and tracks metadata about each embedding including generation timestamp, embedding model version, provider used, and content hash. Enables detection of stale embeddings when content changes or models are upgraded. Metadata is queryable for auditing, debugging, and analytics purposes.
Unique: Automatically tracks embedding provenance (model, provider, timestamp) alongside vectors, enabling version-aware search and stale embedding detection without manual configuration
vs alternatives: Provides built-in audit trail for embeddings, whereas most vector databases treat embeddings as opaque and unversioned
+1 more capabilities