| 0 |
| 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Paid | Free |
| Capabilities | 16 decomposed | 9 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Enables read and write operations on Baserow table rows through MCP protocol, exposing individual row creation, retrieval, update, and deletion as discrete tool calls. Implements row-level mutations with field-value validation against the table's 20+ typed field definitions (text, number, select, date, links, etc.), returning structured row objects with metadata. Works by translating MCP tool invocations into Baserow's internal row storage layer, respecting workspace and table-level permissions defined in the hosting tier.
Unique: Exposes Baserow's typed field system (20+ field types including links, lookups, rollups, collaborators) as MCP tools with schema validation, enabling type-safe mutations from LLMs without custom API wrapper code. Integrates directly with Baserow's permission model (workspace, database, table, field-level) to enforce access control at the MCP layer rather than requiring client-side validation.
vs alternatives: Provides direct MCP integration to a fully-featured no-code database with 20+ field types and permission controls, whereas generic database MCP servers require manual schema definition and lack Baserow's visual UI for non-technical stakeholders.
Automatically validates and transforms input data against Baserow's 20+ typed field definitions (single-line text, long text, number, rating, boolean, date/time, URL, email, file, select, link-to-table, lookup, rollup, collaborator, count, duration, autonumber, UUID, password, etc.) before persisting rows. Implements field-specific coercion rules (e.g., converting ISO date strings to date fields, validating email format, enforcing select options) and returns validation errors with field-level details. Enables LLMs to understand table schema constraints and generate valid mutations without trial-and-error.
Unique: Baserow's MCP integration exposes 20+ distinct field types (including advanced types like lookups, rollups, collaborators, and autonumber) with type-specific validation rules, whereas generic database MCP servers typically support only basic types (string, number, boolean, date). This enables LLMs to understand and respect complex data models without custom wrapper logic.
vs alternatives: Provides richer type information and validation than REST API wrappers, allowing LLMs to self-correct invalid mutations before submission rather than failing after the fact.
Exposes single-select and multi-select field options as queryable enumerations through MCP, enabling LLMs to understand available choices and enforce constraints when populating select fields. Implements option enumeration by fetching the list of valid options for a select field and returning them with metadata (option ID, label, color). Validates mutations against the option list, rejecting invalid selections and returning constraint violation errors.
Unique: Baserow's MCP server exposes select field options as queryable enumerations with metadata (label, color), enabling LLMs to understand and enforce select constraints. This provides type-safe select field population without hardcoding option lists.
vs alternatives: Provides dynamic option enumeration integrated with Baserow's select field definitions, whereas hardcoded option lists require manual updates when options change.
Supports reading and writing date and date/time fields through MCP with timezone awareness, enabling LLMs to work with temporal data correctly. Implements date/time handling by accepting ISO 8601 formatted strings or date objects and converting them to Baserow's internal format, with timezone information preserved. Returns dates in ISO 8601 format with timezone metadata, enabling agents to reason about temporal relationships and schedule-based workflows.
Unique: Baserow's date/time fields support timezone-aware operations through MCP, enabling LLMs to work with temporal data correctly across distributed teams. Date and duration fields provide rich temporal semantics beyond basic string storage.
vs alternatives: Provides native timezone-aware date handling integrated with Baserow's field types, whereas generic databases require manual timezone conversion logic.
Supports reading and writing rating (1-5 star) and boolean (true/false) fields through MCP, enabling LLMs to populate simple categorical fields and understand binary states. Implements rating fields as integer values (1-5) with validation, and boolean fields as true/false values. Returns typed values in row responses, enabling agents to reason about ratings and boolean states.
Unique: Baserow's rating and boolean field types provide simple but strongly-typed categorical fields, enabling LLMs to populate them with validated values. Rating fields constrain values to 1-5, and boolean fields enforce true/false semantics.
vs alternatives: Provides type-safe rating and boolean field operations integrated with Baserow's field types, whereas generic databases require manual validation logic.
Validates and stores email, URL, and phone number fields through MCP with format-specific validation rules, enabling LLMs to populate contact fields correctly. Implements validation by checking email format (RFC 5322), URL format (valid protocol and domain), and phone number format (international or regional), rejecting invalid values with detailed error messages. Returns validated values in row responses, ensuring data quality for contact information.
Unique: Baserow's email, URL, and phone number fields include format-specific validation rules, enabling LLMs to populate contact fields with validated data. Validation errors provide specific feedback for format violations.
vs alternatives: Provides native format validation for contact fields integrated with Baserow's field types, whereas generic databases require custom validation logic for each field type.
Supports writing to password fields through MCP with secure hashing and storage, enabling LLMs to set passwords or secrets in Baserow records. Implements password storage by accepting plaintext passwords and hashing them using Baserow's secure hashing algorithm before storage, with read access restricted to prevent plaintext exposure. Returns only a masked indicator on retrieval, preventing password leakage.
Unique: Baserow's password field type provides secure hashing and write-only access, preventing plaintext password exposure. LLMs can set passwords but cannot read them, enforcing security best practices.
vs alternatives: Provides native password field security integrated with Baserow's field types, whereas generic databases require external secret management and custom hashing logic.
Supports reading and writing long text fields through MCP with optional rich-text formatting (markdown, HTML), enabling LLMs to store and retrieve formatted content. Implements long text fields as plain text or rich-text content with optional formatting metadata, returning formatted content in row responses. Enables document-like content storage within Baserow records.
Unique: Baserow's long text field type supports optional rich-text formatting, enabling LLMs to store and retrieve formatted content. This provides document-like content storage within structured records.
vs alternatives: Provides native long-text field support with optional formatting, whereas generic databases require external content storage or custom formatting logic.
+8 more capabilities
Executes SQL queries against Supabase PostgreSQL instances through the Model Context Protocol, translating natural language or structured query requests into parameterized SQL statements. Uses MCP's tool-calling interface to expose database operations as callable functions with schema validation, enabling LLM agents to perform CRUD operations, joins, and aggregations with automatic connection pooling and credential management through Supabase client SDK.
Unique: Exposes Supabase PostgreSQL as MCP tools with automatic credential injection from Supabase client SDK, eliminating manual connection string management and enabling seamless LLM-to-database queries within Claude or compatible agents
vs alternatives: Tighter integration than generic SQL MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in authentication and connection pooling rather than requiring separate database credential configuration
Exposes Supabase Auth session state and user metadata through MCP tools, allowing agents to inspect current authentication context, retrieve user profiles, and trigger auth-related operations. Integrates with Supabase's JWT-based auth system to validate sessions and access user claims without re-authenticating, using the Supabase client's built-in session management.
Unique: Integrates Supabase's JWT-based auth system directly into MCP tool interface, allowing agents to inspect and act on auth state without managing separate credential stores or re-authentication flows
vs alternatives: More seamless than generic auth MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in session management and avoids redundant credential passing between agent and auth system
Invokes Supabase Edge Functions (serverless TypeScript/JavaScript functions) through MCP tools, passing parameters and receiving results with optional streaming support. Uses Supabase's edge function HTTP API to trigger functions with automatic authentication headers and response parsing, enabling agents to execute custom business logic without embedding it in the agent itself.
Supabase scores higher at 42/100 vs Baserow at 21/100. Baserow leads on quality, while Supabase is stronger on ecosystem. Supabase also has a free tier, making it more accessible.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Edge Functions as MCP tools with automatic authentication and response parsing, allowing agents to invoke custom serverless logic without managing HTTP clients or credential injection
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic HTTP MCP tools because it handles Supabase-specific authentication, error handling, and response formatting automatically
Subscribes to real-time changes on Supabase tables through MCP's event streaming interface, using Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY mechanism to push INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE events to agents. Maintains persistent WebSocket connections and filters events by table and row-level policies, enabling agents to react to database changes without polling.
Unique: Bridges Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY real-time system with MCP's tool interface, enabling agents to subscribe to database changes without managing WebSocket connections or event serialization
vs alternatives: More efficient than polling-based approaches because it uses Supabase's native real-time infrastructure rather than repeated database queries
Manages files in Supabase Storage buckets through MCP tools, supporting upload, download, list, and delete operations with automatic authentication and path-based access control. Uses Supabase's S3-compatible storage API with built-in support for public/private buckets and signed URLs for temporary access, enabling agents to handle file I/O without managing cloud storage credentials.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Storage's S3-compatible API as MCP tools with automatic authentication and signed URL generation, eliminating the need for agents to manage cloud storage credentials or generate temporary access tokens
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic S3 MCP tools because it leverages Supabase's built-in bucket policies and authentication rather than requiring separate AWS credentials
Performs semantic similarity searches on vector embeddings stored in Supabase PostgreSQL using pgvector extension, translating natural language queries into embedding vectors and executing cosine/L2 distance searches. Integrates with embedding providers (OpenAI, Cohere) or uses pre-computed embeddings, enabling agents to retrieve semantically similar documents or records without full-text search limitations.
Unique: Integrates pgvector directly into MCP tools with automatic embedding generation and distance calculation, enabling agents to perform semantic search without managing separate vector database infrastructure
vs alternatives: More efficient than external vector databases (Pinecone, Weaviate) for Supabase users because it colocates embeddings with relational data, reducing network latency and simplifying data synchronization
Exposes Supabase database schema information through MCP tools, allowing agents to discover table structures, column types, constraints, and relationships without manual schema documentation. Queries PostgreSQL information_schema and Supabase metadata tables to dynamically generate schema descriptions, enabling agents to construct valid queries and understand data relationships.
Unique: Queries Supabase's PostgreSQL information_schema directly through MCP tools, enabling agents to dynamically discover and adapt to database schemas without pre-configured schema definitions
vs alternatives: More flexible than static schema definitions because it reflects live database state, including recent migrations or schema changes
Enforces Supabase Row-Level Security policies within agent queries, ensuring that agents can only access rows permitted by RLS rules defined in the database. Evaluates policies based on authenticated user context (JWT claims, user ID) and applies WHERE clause filters automatically, preventing unauthorized data access at the database layer rather than application layer.
Unique: Delegates authorization enforcement to PostgreSQL RLS policies rather than implementing authorization in agent code, ensuring that data access rules are centralized and cannot be bypassed by agent logic
vs alternatives: More secure than application-level authorization because RLS is enforced at the database layer, preventing accidental data leaks even if agent code has bugs
+1 more capabilities