MS COCO (Common Objects in Context) ranks higher at 61/100 vs Baidu: ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B at 22/100. Capability-level comparison backed by match graph evidence from real search data.
| Feature | Baidu: ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B | MS COCO (Common Objects in Context) |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Model | Dataset |
| UnfragileRank | 22/100 | 61/100 |
| Adoption |
| 0 |
| 1 |
| Quality | 0 | 1 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Paid | Free |
| Starting Price | $1.40e-7 per prompt token | — |
| Capabilities | 7 decomposed | 11 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Processes both text and image inputs simultaneously using a 28B parameter Mixture-of-Experts architecture where only 3B parameters activate per token. Implements modality-isolated routing, meaning separate expert pathways handle text and vision features before fusion, enabling specialized processing for each modality without forcing them through identical computational paths. This heterogeneous MoE design allows the model to maintain distinct reasoning chains for language and vision while sharing a unified token-level gating mechanism.
Unique: Implements modality-isolated expert routing where text and vision pathways remain separate until fusion, rather than forcing all modalities through identical expert selection. This heterogeneous MoE structure differs from standard MoE approaches (like Mixtral) which use modality-agnostic routing, allowing ERNIE 4.5 VL to maintain specialized expert knowledge per modality while activating only 3B/28B parameters per token.
vs alternatives: More parameter-efficient than dense multimodal models (GPT-4V, Claude 3.5 Vision) while maintaining competitive understanding through specialized expert pathways; lower inference cost and latency than larger dense alternatives due to sparse activation pattern.
Answers natural language questions about image content by grounding language understanding in visual features extracted through the vision expert pathway. The model performs token-level fusion of image embeddings and text tokens, allowing it to generate answers that reference specific visual regions or objects mentioned in questions. This capability leverages the modality-isolated routing to maintain separate visual reasoning before integrating with language generation.
Unique: Uses modality-isolated expert routing to maintain separate visual reasoning pathways that feed into unified token-level fusion with language generation, enabling more precise grounding of answers in specific image regions compared to models that process vision and language through identical expert selection.
vs alternatives: More efficient than GPT-4V for VQA tasks due to sparse MoE activation (3B vs dense billions), while maintaining competitive accuracy through specialized vision expert pathways.
Analyzes documents, forms, and screenshots by simultaneously processing visual layout and text content through separate expert pathways that fuse at the token level. The model can extract structured information from documents (tables, forms, receipts) by understanding both the spatial arrangement of elements (vision pathway) and semantic meaning of text (text pathway). The heterogeneous MoE architecture allows it to specialize in document structure recognition without diluting text understanding capacity.
Unique: Combines vision expert specialization in spatial layout recognition with text expert specialization in semantic understanding through modality-isolated routing, enabling more accurate document structure preservation than models that process layout and text through identical pathways.
vs alternatives: More efficient than dedicated document AI services (AWS Textract, Google Document AI) for simple extractions due to lower latency and cost, though may require more careful prompting for complex structured output.
Generates natural language descriptions and captions for images by processing visual features through the vision expert pathway and generating coherent text through the text expert pathway with token-level fusion. The model can produce captions at varying levels of detail (short captions, detailed descriptions, technical analysis) based on prompt instructions. The sparse activation pattern (3B/28B) allows efficient batch processing of image captioning tasks.
Unique: Leverages modality-isolated expert routing to maintain specialized vision understanding for visual feature extraction while text experts focus purely on coherent caption generation, reducing parameter waste compared to dense models that process both modalities identically.
vs alternatives: More cost-effective than GPT-4V or Claude 3.5 Vision for bulk captioning due to sparse MoE activation and lower per-token cost; faster inference than dense alternatives for high-volume captioning pipelines.
Maintains multi-turn conversations where users can reference previously shared images and ask follow-up questions that build on earlier visual context. The model preserves image embeddings and visual understanding across conversation turns, allowing users to ask 'what was in that image from earlier?' or refine questions about previously analyzed images. The heterogeneous MoE routing maintains separate visual and text reasoning chains that can be reused across turns without reprocessing images.
Unique: Maintains separate visual and text expert reasoning chains across conversation turns through modality-isolated routing, allowing efficient re-reference of earlier images without full re-encoding, while preserving conversation context through unified token-level fusion.
vs alternatives: More efficient for multi-turn image analysis than models requiring full image re-encoding per turn; lower latency for follow-up questions due to sparse MoE activation pattern.
Performs reasoning tasks that require simultaneous understanding of both text and visual semantics, such as determining if an image matches a text description, identifying contradictions between image content and text claims, or reasoning about abstract relationships between visual and textual information. The modality-isolated expert routing allows the model to develop independent semantic representations in each modality before fusion, enabling more nuanced cross-modal reasoning than models that force both modalities through identical pathways.
Unique: Develops independent semantic representations in vision and text expert pathways before fusion, enabling more sophisticated cross-modal reasoning than models that process both modalities identically; modality-isolated routing allows each expert to specialize in semantic understanding within its domain.
vs alternatives: More nuanced cross-modal reasoning than dense models due to specialized expert pathways; more efficient than ensemble approaches that run separate vision and language models.
Processes multiple image-text pairs or sequential multimodal requests efficiently through sparse MoE activation, where only 3B of 28B parameters activate per token. This enables higher throughput and lower latency for batch operations compared to dense models, making it suitable for processing large volumes of images with associated queries. The sparse activation pattern reduces memory footprint and computational cost per request, allowing more concurrent requests on the same hardware.
Unique: Sparse MoE architecture with 3B/28B parameter activation enables significantly lower computational cost per request compared to dense models, allowing higher throughput and lower latency for batch multimodal processing without sacrificing model capacity.
vs alternatives: Lower per-token cost and faster inference than dense multimodal models (GPT-4V, Claude 3.5 Vision) for batch operations; more efficient than running separate vision and language models in sequence.
Provides 2.5 million manually-annotated object instances across 330,000 images with dual segmentation encoding: polygon coordinates for precise boundary definition and RLE (run-length encoding) for efficient storage and computation. Each instance includes bounding box coordinates in [x, y, width, height] format, category label from 80 object classes, and instance-level unique identifiers enabling per-object tracking and evaluation. Annotations are structured in JSON format with hierarchical organization linking images to annotations to categories, supporting both dense object scenes and sparse single-object images.
Unique: Dual segmentation encoding (polygon + RLE) in single dataset enables both precise boundary analysis and efficient computational workflows; 2.5M instances across 330K images provides scale unmatched by contemporaneous datasets (ImageNet had ~1.2M images, PASCAL VOC had ~11K images)
vs alternatives: Larger and more densely annotated than PASCAL VOC (11K images, ~6 objects/image) and more task-diverse than ImageNet (classification-only); RLE encoding enables 10-100x faster mask loading than polygon-only formats
Provides keypoint annotations for all people in images using a standardized 17-joint skeleton model (head, shoulders, elbows, wrists, hips, knees, ankles) with (x, y, visibility) tuples per joint. Visibility flag indicates whether keypoint is annotated (1), occluded (0), or outside image bounds (0). Keypoints are linked to parent person instances via instance ID, enabling pose estimation evaluation at both individual and crowd-level scales. Annotations follow COCO Keypoints task specification with consistent coordinate system across all 330K images.
Unique: Standardized 17-joint skeleton with explicit visibility flags enables robust evaluation of pose estimation under occlusion; linked to instance segmentation masks allows joint-level accuracy analysis within person bounding boxes
MS COCO (Common Objects in Context) scores higher at 61/100 vs Baidu: ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B at 22/100. MS COCO (Common Objects in Context) also has a free tier, making it more accessible.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than OpenPose dataset (no visibility flags) and larger scale than Human3.6M (3.6M frames vs 330K images); visibility annotations enable explicit occlusion handling unlike MPII (which lacks visibility metadata)
COCO ecosystem includes community-created extensions (COCO-Stuff, COCO DensePose, COCO Panoptic) that extend base dataset with additional annotations while maintaining compatibility with COCO API and evaluation infrastructure. Extensions follow COCO format and evaluation standards, enabling seamless integration into existing pipelines. Community contributions are vetted and published as official COCO variants, ensuring quality and standardization. Variant creation process is documented, enabling researchers to create custom extensions.
Unique: Standardized extension process enables community contributions while maintaining compatibility; official variants (Stuff, DensePose, Panoptic) are vetted and published, ensuring quality and discoverability
vs alternatives: More extensible than fixed datasets; community variants enable specialized use cases without forking; standardized format prevents fragmentation unlike ad-hoc dataset variants
Provides 1.65 million image-caption pairs (5 captions × 330K images) with natural language descriptions written by human annotators. Each caption is a free-form English sentence describing objects, actions, and scene context without enforced length limits or structured templates. Captions are stored in JSON format linked to image IDs, enabling training of vision-language models for image captioning, visual question answering, and cross-modal retrieval. Multiple captions per image capture linguistic diversity and alternative descriptions of the same visual content.
Unique: 5 captions per image (vs 1 in most datasets) captures linguistic diversity and enables robust evaluation of caption generation variability; 1.65M caption-image pairs provide scale for training large vision-language models
vs alternatives: 5x more captions per image than Flickr30K (1 caption/image) enabling better linguistic diversity modeling; larger scale than Visual Genome (108K images) while maintaining natural language quality vs automated alt-text
Extends base 80 object categories with 91 additional 'stuff' categories (background materials, textures, regions like sky, grass, wall) enabling dense semantic segmentation of entire images. Stuff categories are annotated as pixel-level masks without instance boundaries — all sky pixels are labeled 'sky' regardless of continuity. COCO-Stuff combines instance segmentation (80 objects) with semantic segmentation (171 total categories including stuff), stored as single-channel PNG masks where pixel value encodes category ID. Enables panoptic segmentation evaluation combining instance and stuff predictions.
Unique: 171-category taxonomy combining 80 instance objects + 91 stuff categories enables panoptic segmentation in single dataset; pixel-level masks for stuff enable dense scene understanding without instance boundaries
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than ADE20K (150 categories) and larger scale than Cityscapes (5K images); unified instance+stuff annotation enables panoptic evaluation unlike separate semantic/instance datasets
Combines instance segmentation (80 object categories with boundaries) and semantic segmentation (171 stuff categories without boundaries) into single panoptic prediction task. Evaluation uses Panoptic Quality (PQ) metric decomposed into Segmentation Quality (SQ — IoU of matched predictions) and Recognition Quality (RQ — detection rate). Panoptic masks encode both category ID and instance ID, enabling evaluation of both 'what' (category) and 'which' (instance identity) predictions. Standardized evaluation protocol with server-side metric computation ensures consistent benchmarking across submissions.
Unique: Panoptic Quality metric with explicit SQ/RQ decomposition enables fine-grained analysis of segmentation vs recognition errors; unified instance+stuff evaluation in single task forces models to handle both prediction types efficiently
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than separate instance/semantic benchmarks; PQ metric better captures real-world scene understanding than independent metrics; standardized evaluation prevents metric gaming unlike custom evaluation scripts
Provides dense 2D-to-3D correspondence maps for human bodies, mapping each pixel in a person instance to a 3D human body model surface. Annotations include UV coordinates (parameterization of 3D body surface) and body part indices enabling pixel-level body surface understanding. DensePose enables training of models that predict where each image pixel corresponds to on a canonical 3D human body, useful for pose transfer, virtual try-on, and detailed human understanding. Available from 2020 dataset version onwards, extends keypoint annotations with dense surface coverage.
Unique: Dense 2D-to-3D surface correspondence enables pixel-level body understanding beyond skeleton keypoints; UV parameterization allows transfer of appearance and shape across different people and poses
vs alternatives: More detailed than keypoint-only annotations (17 joints vs millions of surface points); enables pose transfer unlike keypoint datasets; larger scale than DensePose-specific datasets
Provides standardized evaluation metrics for each task (Average Precision for detection, IoU for segmentation, OKS for keypoints, BLEU/METEOR/CIDEr for captions, PQ for panoptic) computed server-side on held-out test set. Leaderboard system accepts structured JSON result submissions in COCO format, validates format, computes metrics, and ranks submissions by primary metric. Evaluation infrastructure ensures consistent benchmarking across all submissions and prevents metric gaming through standardized computation. Metrics are task-specific: AP/AP50/AP75 for detection, mIoU for segmentation, OKS for keypoints, CIDEr for captions.
Unique: Server-side metric computation prevents metric gaming and ensures consistency; task-specific metrics (AP, OKS, CIDEr, PQ) are standardized across all submissions enabling fair comparison; public leaderboard provides transparency and reproducibility
vs alternatives: More rigorous than self-reported metrics (prevents cherry-picking); standardized evaluation prevents metric implementation variations unlike custom evaluation scripts; public leaderboard enables community comparison unlike proprietary benchmarks
+3 more capabilities