| 0 |
| 0 |
| Quality | 0 | 0 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Starting Price | $2.80e-7 per prompt token | $1.05e-6 per prompt token |
| Capabilities | 8 decomposed | 13 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
ERNIE-4.5-300B-A47B implements a Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architecture where only 47B out of 300B total parameters are activated per token, reducing computational overhead while maintaining model capacity. The model uses a gating network to route tokens to specialized expert modules, enabling efficient inference through sparse activation patterns rather than dense forward passes through all parameters.
Unique: Uses selective 47B/300B parameter activation via MoE gating rather than dense forward passes, achieving inference efficiency comparable to 50-70B dense models while maintaining 300B-scale reasoning capacity through expert specialization
vs alternatives: More parameter-efficient than dense 300B models (GPT-4, Claude 3.5) and faster than full-activation MoE variants, but with less predictable output consistency than dense architectures due to routing variability
ERNIE-4.5-300B-A47B processes conversation history through explicit system/user/assistant message roles, maintaining coherent context across multiple exchanges without requiring manual context window management. The model implements sliding-window attention or similar context compression to handle extended dialogues while respecting token limits, enabling stateless API calls where conversation state is passed in each request.
Unique: Implements explicit role-based message routing (system/user/assistant) with implicit context compression, allowing stateless API design where conversation history is passed per-request rather than maintained server-side, reducing infrastructure complexity
vs alternatives: Simpler to integrate than stateful dialogue systems (e.g., LangChain memory backends) but requires client-side context management; more flexible than single-turn models but less sophisticated than models with explicit memory modules or retrieval-augmented generation
ERNIE-4.5-300B-A47B is trained on instruction-following datasets enabling it to interpret natural language task descriptions and adapt behavior accordingly. The model uses in-context learning to follow complex multi-step instructions, system prompts for behavioral constraints, and few-shot examples to guide output format — all without fine-tuning, leveraging the model's learned ability to parse and execute arbitrary instructions.
Unique: Combines instruction-following with MoE sparse activation, allowing task-specific expert routing — different instruction types may activate different expert subsets, enabling specialized behavior without explicit fine-tuning or model switching
vs alternatives: More flexible than task-specific models (e.g., CodeLlama for code-only) but less reliable than fine-tuned models for highly specialized domains; comparable to GPT-4 instruction-following but with lower cost due to MoE efficiency
ERNIE-4.5-300B-A47B supports text generation across multiple languages (Chinese, English, and others) through language-agnostic MoE routing where the gating network treats tokens uniformly regardless of language, allowing the model to leverage shared expert knowledge across linguistic boundaries. The model was trained on multilingual corpora, enabling code-switching and cross-lingual reasoning without language-specific model variants.
Unique: Uses language-agnostic MoE routing where experts are not language-specific but shared across all languages, enabling efficient multilingual support without separate expert pools — a design choice that trades per-language specialization for cross-lingual knowledge sharing
vs alternatives: More cost-efficient than maintaining separate language-specific models but may underperform specialized models like ChatGLM (Chinese-optimized) or Claude (English-optimized) in individual languages; better for code-switching than language-specific models
ERNIE-4.5-300B-A47B is accessed exclusively via OpenRouter or Baidu's API, supporting both streaming (token-by-token output for real-time UI) and batch (full completion returned at once) inference modes. The API abstracts away model deployment complexity, handling load balancing, rate limiting, and multi-user concurrency server-side, while clients manage request formatting and response parsing.
Unique: Provides API-only access through OpenRouter and Baidu endpoints, eliminating local deployment complexity but introducing provider dependency; streaming mode uses Server-Sent Events (SSE) for real-time token delivery, enabling responsive UI without polling
vs alternatives: Lower operational overhead than self-hosted models (Ollama, vLLM) but higher latency and ongoing costs; more cost-efficient than GPT-4 API for equivalent reasoning tasks due to MoE sparse activation, but less mature ecosystem than OpenAI/Anthropic APIs
ERNIE-4.5-300B-A47B exposes temperature, top-p (nucleus sampling), and top-k parameters allowing fine-grained control over output randomness and diversity. Lower temperatures (0.0-0.5) produce deterministic, focused outputs suitable for factual tasks; higher temperatures (0.7-1.0+) increase creativity and diversity for open-ended generation. The model implements standard softmax temperature scaling and nucleus sampling, enabling developers to tune the probability distribution over tokens without retraining.
Unique: Exposes standard sampling parameters (temperature, top-p, top-k) without proprietary extensions, enabling portable prompt engineering across models; MoE architecture may interact with sampling in subtle ways (e.g., expert routing may be affected by token probability distributions)
vs alternatives: Comparable to OpenAI/Anthropic APIs in parameter exposure; more transparent than some closed-source models but less sophisticated than models with adaptive sampling or dynamic temperature scheduling
ERNIE-4.5-300B-A47B allows clients to specify max_tokens parameter, controlling the maximum length of generated completions. This enables developers to enforce output length constraints without post-processing, useful for fitting responses into UI constraints or limiting API costs. The model respects the max_tokens limit during generation, stopping early if the limit is reached before natural completion.
Unique: Implements standard max_tokens parameter with hard cutoff behavior; no special handling for MoE expert routing or adaptive truncation — the limit applies uniformly regardless of which experts are active
vs alternatives: Standard feature across all LLM APIs; comparable to OpenAI/Anthropic but lacks sophisticated truncation strategies (e.g., Claude's 'stop_sequences' for graceful termination)
ERNIE-4.5-300B-A47B supports stop_sequences parameter allowing developers to specify custom tokens or strings that trigger generation termination. When the model generates a stop sequence, output is immediately halted and returned, enabling natural conversation boundaries (e.g., stopping at newlines for single-line outputs) or domain-specific delimiters without post-processing.
Unique: Provides standard stop_sequences parameter without advanced features like regex patterns or priority ordering; integrates with MoE routing transparently (stop sequences are checked post-generation regardless of expert activation)
vs alternatives: Comparable to OpenAI/Anthropic APIs; less sophisticated than models with grammar-based constraints (e.g., Outlines library) but simpler to implement and more widely supported
GLM-5.1 executes multi-step coding tasks over extended timeframes without requiring human intervention between steps, using an internal planning mechanism that decomposes complex objectives into sub-tasks and maintains execution state across sequential operations. Unlike minute-level interaction models that require prompting after each step, this capability enables the model to autonomously navigate decision trees, handle errors, and adapt strategy based on intermediate results without context resets.
Unique: Designed specifically for minute+ autonomous execution windows rather than single-turn interactions; maintains internal execution state and decision-making across extended task horizons without requiring external orchestration or re-prompting between steps
vs alternatives: Outperforms GPT-4 and Claude for long-horizon coding tasks because it's architected for continuous autonomous operation rather than stateless request-response cycles
GLM-5.1 generates and refactors code with awareness of the full codebase structure, dependencies, and patterns, using semantic understanding of how changes in one file propagate to others. The model analyzes import graphs, function signatures, and usage patterns across files to ensure generated code maintains consistency and doesn't introduce breaking changes, rather than treating each file in isolation.
Unique: Maintains semantic awareness of codebase structure and cross-file dependencies during generation, enabling it to make coordinated changes across multiple files rather than treating each file independently
vs alternatives: Produces more consistent multi-file refactorings than Copilot or Claude because it reasons about the entire codebase context simultaneously rather than file-by-file
Z.ai: GLM 5.1 scores higher at 24/100 vs Baidu: ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B at 23/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
GLM-5.1 diagnoses errors and bugs by analyzing error messages, stack traces, and code context to identify root causes and suggest fixes. The model correlates error symptoms with likely causes, explains why errors occur, and provides specific debugging steps or code fixes.
Unique: Diagnoses errors by correlating symptoms with root causes using semantic understanding of code and error patterns, providing explanations and fixes rather than just pattern matching
vs alternatives: More effective at diagnosing subtle bugs than search-based solutions because it reasons about code semantics and error causality
GLM-5.1 identifies performance bottlenecks in code and suggests optimizations with specific implementation guidance, analyzing algorithms, data structures, and resource usage to recommend improvements. The model understands performance implications of different approaches and can suggest algorithmic or architectural changes to improve efficiency.
Unique: Suggests optimizations based on algorithmic and architectural analysis rather than just code-level tweaks, understanding performance implications of different approaches
vs alternatives: Provides more meaningful performance guidance than generic LLMs because it understands algorithm complexity and can suggest structural improvements
GLM-5.1 analyzes code for security vulnerabilities including injection attacks, authentication/authorization issues, cryptographic weaknesses, and data exposure risks, providing specific remediation guidance. The model understands common vulnerability patterns and security best practices to identify risks and suggest secure implementations.
Unique: Identifies security vulnerabilities through semantic analysis of code patterns and provides remediation guidance based on security best practices, not just pattern matching against known CVEs
vs alternatives: More effective at finding context-specific security issues than SAST tools because it understands code intent and can suggest secure implementations
GLM-5.1 performs step-by-step reasoning about code behavior by internally simulating or tracing execution paths, allowing it to predict runtime behavior, identify bugs, and explain code logic without requiring actual execution. This capability uses chain-of-thought-like reasoning applied specifically to code semantics, tracking variable state, control flow, and function call sequences to reason about correctness.
Unique: Applies extended reasoning specifically to code semantics and execution paths, enabling it to predict runtime behavior and identify subtle bugs through symbolic execution simulation rather than pattern matching
vs alternatives: More effective at finding subtle logic bugs than GPT-4 because it explicitly traces execution state rather than relying on pattern recognition
GLM-5.1 maintains rich context across multiple conversation turns when working on code, remembering previous edits, design decisions, and constraints without requiring users to re-specify them. The model builds an internal model of the codebase state and user intent that persists across turns, enabling iterative refinement where each turn builds on previous work rather than starting fresh.
Unique: Maintains stateful context across turns specifically optimized for code collaboration, remembering design decisions and codebase state without explicit memory structures
vs alternatives: Provides better iterative code refinement than stateless models because it retains context about previous edits and design intent across turns
GLM-5.1 translates natural language specifications into code that preserves semantic intent, handling ambiguous or underspecified requirements by inferring reasonable implementations based on context and common patterns. The model uses semantic understanding of both natural language and code to bridge the gap between high-level intent and low-level implementation details.
Unique: Translates natural language to code with explicit semantic fidelity checking, inferring reasonable implementations for underspecified requirements rather than producing literal or incomplete code
vs alternatives: Handles ambiguous requirements better than Copilot because it uses semantic reasoning to infer intent rather than pattern matching against training data
+5 more capabilities