| 0 |
| Quality | 0 | 0 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Starting Price | $7.00e-8 per prompt token | $6.00e-7 per prompt token |
| Capabilities | 6 decomposed | 11 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Generates text using a 21B parameter Mixture-of-Experts architecture that activates only 3B parameters per token through learned routing mechanisms. This sparse activation pattern reduces computational overhead while maintaining model capacity, using heterogeneous expert specialization where different experts handle distinct semantic or linguistic domains. The routing mechanism learns to select which expert subset processes each token based on input context.
Unique: Uses heterogeneous MoE structure with modality-isolated routing, meaning different expert subsets are specialized for different input modalities or semantic categories, rather than generic expert pools. This architectural choice enables the model to maintain multimodal understanding (text + image) while keeping sparse activation efficient.
vs alternatives: Achieves lower per-token latency than dense 21B models (e.g., Llama 2 21B) while maintaining competitive quality through learned expert specialization, making it faster and cheaper than dense alternatives at similar parameter counts.
Processes both text and image inputs through a unified architecture where modality-isolated routing directs image and text tokens to specialized expert subsets. The model encodes images into token sequences (likely through a vision encoder) and routes them through experts trained specifically for visual understanding, while text tokens follow separate routing paths. This heterogeneous design allows the model to reason across modalities without forcing all experts to handle both equally.
Unique: Implements modality-isolated routing where image and text processing paths are separated at the expert level, rather than using a single unified expert pool. This allows vision-specific experts to specialize in visual reasoning while text experts handle linguistic tasks, improving efficiency and specialization compared to generic multimodal experts.
vs alternatives: Provides multimodal capabilities with sparse activation (only 3B active parameters), making it faster and cheaper than dense multimodal models like GPT-4V or Claude 3 while maintaining competitive understanding across both modalities.
Maintains conversation state across multiple turns by accepting full conversation history in API requests and using attention mechanisms to track context dependencies. The model processes the entire conversation history to generate contextually appropriate responses, with routing decisions informed by prior turns. This approach allows the model to reference earlier statements, maintain consistent character or tone, and resolve pronouns and references across turns.
Unique: Uses MoE routing informed by full conversation history, meaning expert selection for generating each response token considers the entire prior dialogue. This differs from models that treat each turn independently or use fixed context windows, enabling more contextually-aware expert specialization.
vs alternatives: Handles multi-turn conversations with sparse activation (3B active parameters), reducing per-token cost compared to dense models while maintaining conversation coherence across turns.
Generates text incrementally through token-by-token streaming, allowing clients to receive and display partial responses before generation completes. The API returns tokens as they are generated rather than waiting for full completion, enabling real-time user feedback and lower perceived latency. This is implemented through HTTP streaming (likely Server-Sent Events or chunked transfer encoding) where each token is sent as it exits the sparse MoE routing and generation pipeline.
Unique: Streams tokens from a sparse MoE model where routing decisions are made per-token, potentially allowing clients to observe which expert subsets are activated for different tokens if metadata is exposed. This provides visibility into model behavior that dense models typically hide.
vs alternatives: Provides streaming output with lower per-token latency than dense models due to sparse activation, making real-time interfaces feel more responsive while reducing backend compute costs.
Exposes the ERNIE 4.5 21B model through OpenRouter's unified API interface, allowing developers to call the model using standard HTTP requests without direct Baidu API integration. OpenRouter handles authentication, rate limiting, and request routing, providing a consistent interface across multiple model providers. Requests are formatted as JSON with standard chat completion schemas, and responses follow OpenAI-compatible formats for easy integration with existing LLM tooling.
Unique: Provides OpenAI-compatible API wrapper around Baidu's proprietary MoE model, allowing developers to use ERNIE 4.5 as a drop-in replacement in applications built for OpenAI's API format. This abstraction layer handles Baidu-specific details (routing, expert selection) transparently.
vs alternatives: Offers unified API access to Baidu's sparse MoE model through OpenRouter's multi-provider platform, enabling easy comparison and switching between Baidu, OpenAI, and Anthropic models without code changes.
Reduces inference costs by activating only 3B of 21B parameters per token, lowering computational requirements and memory bandwidth compared to dense models. The sparse activation is achieved through learned routing that selects which expert subset processes each token based on input content. This architectural choice reduces floating-point operations (FLOPs) and memory access patterns, directly translating to lower API costs and faster inference latency.
Unique: Achieves cost reduction through architectural sparsity (3B active of 21B total) rather than quantization or distillation, maintaining full model capacity while reducing per-token compute. This differs from dense models that must choose between smaller parameter counts or higher costs.
vs alternatives: Delivers lower per-token inference costs than dense 21B models (e.g., Llama 2 21B) while maintaining competitive quality, making it ideal for cost-sensitive production deployments at scale.
GLM-4.5 uses a Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architecture to dynamically route tokens through specialized expert networks based on input characteristics, enabling efficient processing of 128k-token contexts without proportional latency increases. The MoE design allows selective expert activation per token, reducing computational overhead while maintaining reasoning depth across extended conversations and multi-document analysis tasks typical of agent-based workflows.
Unique: Mixture-of-Experts routing specifically tuned for agent workloads rather than generic dense models; expert activation patterns are optimized for tool-use sequences and multi-step reasoning rather than general language tasks
vs alternatives: Outperforms dense models like GPT-4 Turbo on agent tasks within 128k context by routing computational budget to relevant experts, reducing latency and cost vs. models that process all tokens through identical layers
GLM-4.5 implements native function calling through a schema-based registry where tools are defined as JSON schemas with parameter constraints, type validation, and description metadata. The model learns to emit structured tool invocations that map directly to function signatures, enabling deterministic tool orchestration without post-processing or regex parsing. Integration with OpenRouter's API exposes this via standard function-calling parameters compatible with OpenAI's format.
Unique: Schema-based function calling is trained directly into the model weights rather than implemented as post-hoc decoding constraints, allowing the model to learn semantic relationships between tool purposes and input context during training
vs alternatives: More reliable than constraint-based function calling (e.g., Guidance, LMQL) because tool selection is learned rather than enforced, reducing parsing failures and enabling the model to reason about tool applicability
Z.ai: GLM 4.5 scores higher at 24/100 vs Baidu: ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B at 22/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
GLM-4.5 can be used for batch inference through OpenRouter's API, enabling cost-optimized processing of large numbers of requests. Batch processing typically offers reduced pricing compared to real-time API calls and is suitable for non-urgent inference tasks. The model can process batches of prompts efficiently, with results returned after processing completes. This is valuable for agents running scheduled tasks or processing large datasets.
Unique: Batch processing is offered through OpenRouter's unified API rather than a separate batch service, enabling seamless switching between real-time and batch modes with the same client code
vs alternatives: More cost-effective than real-time API for high-volume inference; simpler than managing separate batch infrastructure because OpenRouter handles queuing and result delivery
GLM-4.5 maintains coherent conversation state across turns by encoding prior messages into a compressed representation that persists within the 128k context window. The model uses attention mechanisms to selectively retrieve relevant prior context, enabling agents to reference earlier decisions, tool results, and user preferences without explicit memory management. This is particularly effective for agent workflows where state accumulation (e.g., task progress, discovered facts) must inform subsequent actions.
Unique: Implicit memory management through attention-based context selection rather than explicit memory modules; the model learns which prior turns are relevant without separate retrieval or summarization steps
vs alternatives: More efficient than explicit memory systems (e.g., LangChain's ConversationBufferMemory) because attention is computed once during inference rather than requiring separate retrieval and summarization passes
GLM-4.5 generates code across 40+ programming languages by leveraging training data that includes diverse codebases and syntax patterns. The model understands language-specific idioms, library conventions, and structural patterns (e.g., async/await in JavaScript, type hints in Python, generics in Java) without explicit language-specific modules. Generation is context-aware, respecting indentation, existing code style, and project conventions when completing or extending code snippets.
Unique: Language-agnostic code generation trained on diverse codebases rather than language-specific fine-tuning; the model generalizes syntax patterns across languages, enabling reasonable code generation even for less common languages
vs alternatives: Broader language coverage than specialized models like Codex (which emphasizes Python/JavaScript) but lower quality on niche languages compared to language-specific models; better for polyglot teams than single-language specialists
GLM-4.5 is trained on extensive technical documentation, API references, and code examples, enabling it to understand and reason about complex technical concepts, library APIs, and system architectures. The model can parse API schemas (OpenAPI, GraphQL, Protocol Buffers), understand parameter constraints and type systems, and generate code that correctly uses APIs based on documentation. This is particularly valuable for agent workflows that must interact with external systems.
Unique: Semantic understanding of API schemas and documentation is learned from training data rather than implemented as a separate schema parser; the model reasons about API semantics holistically
vs alternatives: More flexible than code-generation-only models because it understands API semantics and can reason about correctness; better than generic LLMs for technical tasks because training includes extensive API documentation
GLM-4.5 can generate responses that explicitly show reasoning steps, enabling transparency into how conclusions were reached. When prompted with chain-of-thought patterns, the model generates intermediate reasoning steps before final answers, making it suitable for applications requiring explainability or verification. This is implemented through training on reasoning-annotated data and prompt patterns that encourage step-by-step decomposition.
Unique: Chain-of-thought reasoning is trained directly into the model rather than implemented as a decoding strategy; the model learns to generate reasoning steps as part of its core training objective
vs alternatives: More natural and coherent reasoning steps than prompt-injection approaches (e.g., appending 'think step by step') because reasoning is learned as a first-class capability
GLM-4.5 supports multiple languages (Chinese, English, and others) with training that enables cross-lingual reasoning — understanding concepts expressed in one language and reasoning about them in another. The model can translate, summarize, and reason across languages without language-specific degradation. This is particularly valuable for global applications and agents that must operate in multilingual environments.
Unique: Cross-lingual reasoning is learned from multilingual training data rather than implemented as separate language-specific models; the model develops a shared representation across languages
vs alternatives: More efficient than maintaining separate models per language because a single model handles all languages; better for cross-lingual reasoning than language-specific models because the shared representation enables concept transfer
+3 more capabilities