| 0 |
| 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 7 decomposed | 9 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Translates natural language questions into Axiom query language (AQL) by leveraging an LLM to parse user intent, extract filter conditions, aggregations, and time ranges, then executes the generated query against Axiom's event data backend. Uses MCP protocol to expose Axiom as a tool-callable service, allowing Claude and other LLM clients to invoke queries without users learning AQL syntax.
Unique: Exposes Axiom's event query engine as an MCP tool, allowing LLMs to autonomously translate conversational debugging questions into AQL without requiring users to learn query syntax or manually construct filters. Uses MCP's standardized tool-calling interface to bridge natural language intent to structured observability queries.
vs alternatives: More accessible than writing raw AQL or SQL for log analysis, and integrates directly into LLM chat workflows (vs. separate dashboard tools), but trades query precision and performance for ease-of-use since LLM interpretation adds latency and potential misinterpretation.
Enables querying across Axiom datasets (logs, traces, metrics) in a single natural language request by mapping dataset names and field relationships, then executing coordinated queries that correlate events across sources. The MCP server maintains awareness of available datasets and their schemas, allowing the LLM to construct queries that join or filter across multiple event streams.
Unique: Axiom's MCP server maintains schema awareness across multiple datasets and enables the LLM to construct correlated queries by mapping field relationships, rather than requiring manual JOIN syntax or separate sequential queries. This allows conversational queries like 'show me traces with errors' to automatically correlate across logs and traces.
vs alternatives: More powerful than single-dataset log viewers because it correlates across event types in one query, but requires more upfront schema documentation and is slower than pre-built dashboards since correlation happens at query-time via LLM interpretation.
Parses natural language time expressions ('last hour', 'since 3pm', 'past 7 days') and converts them to absolute Axiom query time ranges, maintaining context across multi-turn conversations so follow-up questions inherit the same time window. The MCP server tracks conversation state to avoid re-specifying time ranges in each query.
Unique: Maintains conversation-level time context so users don't repeat time specifications across multi-turn debugging sessions. Uses relative time parsing to map natural language expressions to Axiom's absolute timestamp ranges, with state tracking to apply context to follow-up queries.
vs alternatives: More conversational than dashboard UIs that require explicit date-picker selections, and faster than manually calculating and re-entering timestamps, but relies on heuristic parsing that may misinterpret ambiguous expressions like 'last week'.
Introspects Axiom dataset schemas to provide the LLM with available fields, data types, and common values, enabling intelligent suggestions when users ask vague questions (e.g., 'show me errors' → suggests filtering by 'level=error' or 'status_code>=400'). The MCP server caches schema metadata and exposes it as context to the LLM for better query generation.
Unique: Caches and exposes Axiom dataset schemas to the LLM as context, enabling intelligent field suggestions and auto-completion without requiring users to manually browse schema documentation. The MCP server acts as a schema broker, translating vague user intent into concrete field filters.
vs alternatives: More discoverable than requiring users to memorize field names or consult documentation, and faster than trial-and-error query construction, but adds latency for schema introspection and may suggest incorrect fields if domain semantics are not captured in field names.
Exposes Axiom's trace data (spans, parent-child relationships, duration metrics) to the LLM for querying and analyzing distributed traces. Enables filtering by span attributes, duration thresholds, and error status, then aggregates results to identify slow or failing spans across traces. The MCP server understands trace structure (trace_id, span_id, parent_span_id) and can correlate spans with logs.
Unique: Axiom's MCP server understands trace structure (span hierarchies, parent-child relationships) and enables the LLM to query traces by span attributes and duration thresholds, then correlate slow/failed spans with logs. This allows conversational trace debugging without requiring users to navigate trace UIs.
vs alternatives: More accessible than learning Jaeger or Zipkin UIs, and faster than manually clicking through trace waterfalls, but lacks visual span waterfall diagrams and is limited to Axiom's trace schema and indexing capabilities.
Implements the Model Context Protocol (MCP) server specification, exposing Axiom query capabilities as callable tools that LLM clients (Claude, etc.) can invoke with structured arguments. Uses MCP's resource and tool definitions to declare available queries, their parameters, and return types, enabling the LLM to autonomously decide when to query Axiom and how to interpret results.
Unique: Implements the MCP server specification to expose Axiom as a first-class tool in LLM applications, using MCP's standardized resource and tool definitions to enable autonomous tool invocation. This allows LLMs to query Axiom without custom integrations or API wrappers.
vs alternatives: More standardized and interoperable than custom REST API wrappers, and enables autonomous LLM tool use without manual function calling, but adds protocol overhead and requires MCP-compatible LLM clients (currently limited to Claude and a few others).
Maintains conversation state across multiple turns, preserving query context (selected datasets, time ranges, filters) so follow-up questions can reference previous results without re-specifying parameters. The MCP server tracks conversation history and allows the LLM to refer back to earlier queries (e.g., 'show me more details about the error from the last query').
Unique: Preserves query context (datasets, time ranges, filters) across multi-turn conversations, allowing follow-up questions to inherit context without re-specification. The MCP server tracks conversation state and enables the LLM to reference previous results.
vs alternatives: More natural than stateless query interfaces where each question requires full context re-specification, but loses state on connection reset and requires LLM context window to track conversation history.
Executes SQL queries against Supabase PostgreSQL instances through the Model Context Protocol, translating natural language or structured query requests into parameterized SQL statements. Uses MCP's tool-calling interface to expose database operations as callable functions with schema validation, enabling LLM agents to perform CRUD operations, joins, and aggregations with automatic connection pooling and credential management through Supabase client SDK.
Unique: Exposes Supabase PostgreSQL as MCP tools with automatic credential injection from Supabase client SDK, eliminating manual connection string management and enabling seamless LLM-to-database queries within Claude or compatible agents
vs alternatives: Tighter integration than generic SQL MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in authentication and connection pooling rather than requiring separate database credential configuration
Exposes Supabase Auth session state and user metadata through MCP tools, allowing agents to inspect current authentication context, retrieve user profiles, and trigger auth-related operations. Integrates with Supabase's JWT-based auth system to validate sessions and access user claims without re-authenticating, using the Supabase client's built-in session management.
Unique: Integrates Supabase's JWT-based auth system directly into MCP tool interface, allowing agents to inspect and act on auth state without managing separate credential stores or re-authentication flows
vs alternatives: More seamless than generic auth MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in session management and avoids redundant credential passing between agent and auth system
Invokes Supabase Edge Functions (serverless TypeScript/JavaScript functions) through MCP tools, passing parameters and receiving results with optional streaming support. Uses Supabase's edge function HTTP API to trigger functions with automatic authentication headers and response parsing, enabling agents to execute custom business logic without embedding it in the agent itself.
Supabase scores higher at 42/100 vs Axiom at 21/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Edge Functions as MCP tools with automatic authentication and response parsing, allowing agents to invoke custom serverless logic without managing HTTP clients or credential injection
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic HTTP MCP tools because it handles Supabase-specific authentication, error handling, and response formatting automatically
Subscribes to real-time changes on Supabase tables through MCP's event streaming interface, using Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY mechanism to push INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE events to agents. Maintains persistent WebSocket connections and filters events by table and row-level policies, enabling agents to react to database changes without polling.
Unique: Bridges Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY real-time system with MCP's tool interface, enabling agents to subscribe to database changes without managing WebSocket connections or event serialization
vs alternatives: More efficient than polling-based approaches because it uses Supabase's native real-time infrastructure rather than repeated database queries
Manages files in Supabase Storage buckets through MCP tools, supporting upload, download, list, and delete operations with automatic authentication and path-based access control. Uses Supabase's S3-compatible storage API with built-in support for public/private buckets and signed URLs for temporary access, enabling agents to handle file I/O without managing cloud storage credentials.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Storage's S3-compatible API as MCP tools with automatic authentication and signed URL generation, eliminating the need for agents to manage cloud storage credentials or generate temporary access tokens
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic S3 MCP tools because it leverages Supabase's built-in bucket policies and authentication rather than requiring separate AWS credentials
Performs semantic similarity searches on vector embeddings stored in Supabase PostgreSQL using pgvector extension, translating natural language queries into embedding vectors and executing cosine/L2 distance searches. Integrates with embedding providers (OpenAI, Cohere) or uses pre-computed embeddings, enabling agents to retrieve semantically similar documents or records without full-text search limitations.
Unique: Integrates pgvector directly into MCP tools with automatic embedding generation and distance calculation, enabling agents to perform semantic search without managing separate vector database infrastructure
vs alternatives: More efficient than external vector databases (Pinecone, Weaviate) for Supabase users because it colocates embeddings with relational data, reducing network latency and simplifying data synchronization
Exposes Supabase database schema information through MCP tools, allowing agents to discover table structures, column types, constraints, and relationships without manual schema documentation. Queries PostgreSQL information_schema and Supabase metadata tables to dynamically generate schema descriptions, enabling agents to construct valid queries and understand data relationships.
Unique: Queries Supabase's PostgreSQL information_schema directly through MCP tools, enabling agents to dynamically discover and adapt to database schemas without pre-configured schema definitions
vs alternatives: More flexible than static schema definitions because it reflects live database state, including recent migrations or schema changes
Enforces Supabase Row-Level Security policies within agent queries, ensuring that agents can only access rows permitted by RLS rules defined in the database. Evaluates policies based on authenticated user context (JWT claims, user ID) and applies WHERE clause filters automatically, preventing unauthorized data access at the database layer rather than application layer.
Unique: Delegates authorization enforcement to PostgreSQL RLS policies rather than implementing authorization in agent code, ensuring that data access rules are centralized and cannot be bypassed by agent logic
vs alternatives: More secure than application-level authorization because RLS is enforced at the database layer, preventing accidental data leaks even if agent code has bugs
+1 more capabilities