| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 5 decomposed | 9 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Aggregates and maintains a manually-curated list of marketing tools organized by category and use case, using GitHub's markdown-based repository structure as the persistence and versioning layer. The artifact functions as a crowdsourced knowledge base where contributors submit, review, and validate tool entries through pull requests, enabling community-driven curation with git-based audit trails for all changes.
Unique: Uses GitHub repository structure as both the knowledge base and collaboration mechanism, enabling transparent version control, contributor attribution, and community governance through pull request workflows rather than a centralized database or web interface
vs alternatives: Provides transparent, auditable tool recommendations with full git history vs proprietary tool directories that hide curation logic and lack community contribution mechanisms
Organizes marketing tools into hierarchical categories (e.g., email marketing, social media, analytics, automation) using markdown section headers and bullet-point lists, enabling users to navigate by use case rather than tool name. The categorization structure acts as a lightweight taxonomy that groups similar tools together, allowing users to compare alternatives within a specific functional domain without requiring database queries or search algorithms.
Unique: Implements taxonomy through markdown section hierarchy rather than database schema or faceted search, making categorization transparent and editable by any contributor while remaining human-readable without specialized tooling
vs alternatives: More transparent and community-editable than proprietary tool directories, but less queryable than database-backed directories with faceted search and filtering
Enables community members to submit new tools, update existing entries, and propose category changes through GitHub pull requests, which are reviewed by repository maintainers before merging. This workflow creates a lightweight governance model where contributions are validated, discussed, and attributed through GitHub's native code review interface, with full transparency into who changed what and why via commit messages and PR discussions.
Unique: Leverages GitHub's native pull request and code review system as the entire contribution and governance mechanism, eliminating the need for custom submission forms or approval workflows while maintaining full audit trails through git history
vs alternatives: More transparent and decentralized than proprietary tool directories with hidden submission processes, but requires more technical overhead than simple web forms or email submissions
Maintains structured metadata for each tool (name, description, URL, category, pricing model) using consistent markdown formatting conventions, creating a semi-structured knowledge base that can be parsed by scripts or humans. While not a formal schema, the consistent formatting enables downstream automation (e.g., scripts to extract tool names and URLs) and makes it easier for contributors to understand what information should be included for each tool entry.
Unique: Implements lightweight metadata standardization through markdown formatting conventions rather than formal schema or database, enabling human readability while remaining parseable by scripts without requiring specialized tooling
vs alternatives: More flexible and human-editable than rigid database schemas, but less queryable and more error-prone than structured data formats like JSON or XML
Maintains complete git history of all changes to tool entries, including who added/modified each tool, when changes occurred, and what was changed, enabling users to understand the evolution of the directory and trace the provenance of recommendations. Git's commit log and blame functionality provide transparent attribution and allow users to evaluate the credibility of entries based on contributor history and community review.
Unique: Leverages git's native version control capabilities to provide transparent, immutable audit trails of all changes, enabling users to evaluate credibility and trace the evolution of recommendations without requiring custom logging or audit systems
vs alternatives: More transparent and auditable than proprietary tool directories with hidden change logs, but requires git knowledge to fully utilize and can be overwhelming for non-technical users
Executes SQL queries against Supabase PostgreSQL instances through the Model Context Protocol, translating natural language or structured query requests into parameterized SQL statements. Uses MCP's tool-calling interface to expose database operations as callable functions with schema validation, enabling LLM agents to perform CRUD operations, joins, and aggregations with automatic connection pooling and credential management through Supabase client SDK.
Unique: Exposes Supabase PostgreSQL as MCP tools with automatic credential injection from Supabase client SDK, eliminating manual connection string management and enabling seamless LLM-to-database queries within Claude or compatible agents
vs alternatives: Tighter integration than generic SQL MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in authentication and connection pooling rather than requiring separate database credential configuration
Exposes Supabase Auth session state and user metadata through MCP tools, allowing agents to inspect current authentication context, retrieve user profiles, and trigger auth-related operations. Integrates with Supabase's JWT-based auth system to validate sessions and access user claims without re-authenticating, using the Supabase client's built-in session management.
Unique: Integrates Supabase's JWT-based auth system directly into MCP tool interface, allowing agents to inspect and act on auth state without managing separate credential stores or re-authentication flows
vs alternatives: More seamless than generic auth MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in session management and avoids redundant credential passing between agent and auth system
Invokes Supabase Edge Functions (serverless TypeScript/JavaScript functions) through MCP tools, passing parameters and receiving results with optional streaming support. Uses Supabase's edge function HTTP API to trigger functions with automatic authentication headers and response parsing, enabling agents to execute custom business logic without embedding it in the agent itself.
Supabase scores higher at 42/100 vs Awesome Marketing at 22/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Edge Functions as MCP tools with automatic authentication and response parsing, allowing agents to invoke custom serverless logic without managing HTTP clients or credential injection
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic HTTP MCP tools because it handles Supabase-specific authentication, error handling, and response formatting automatically
Subscribes to real-time changes on Supabase tables through MCP's event streaming interface, using Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY mechanism to push INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE events to agents. Maintains persistent WebSocket connections and filters events by table and row-level policies, enabling agents to react to database changes without polling.
Unique: Bridges Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY real-time system with MCP's tool interface, enabling agents to subscribe to database changes without managing WebSocket connections or event serialization
vs alternatives: More efficient than polling-based approaches because it uses Supabase's native real-time infrastructure rather than repeated database queries
Manages files in Supabase Storage buckets through MCP tools, supporting upload, download, list, and delete operations with automatic authentication and path-based access control. Uses Supabase's S3-compatible storage API with built-in support for public/private buckets and signed URLs for temporary access, enabling agents to handle file I/O without managing cloud storage credentials.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Storage's S3-compatible API as MCP tools with automatic authentication and signed URL generation, eliminating the need for agents to manage cloud storage credentials or generate temporary access tokens
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic S3 MCP tools because it leverages Supabase's built-in bucket policies and authentication rather than requiring separate AWS credentials
Performs semantic similarity searches on vector embeddings stored in Supabase PostgreSQL using pgvector extension, translating natural language queries into embedding vectors and executing cosine/L2 distance searches. Integrates with embedding providers (OpenAI, Cohere) or uses pre-computed embeddings, enabling agents to retrieve semantically similar documents or records without full-text search limitations.
Unique: Integrates pgvector directly into MCP tools with automatic embedding generation and distance calculation, enabling agents to perform semantic search without managing separate vector database infrastructure
vs alternatives: More efficient than external vector databases (Pinecone, Weaviate) for Supabase users because it colocates embeddings with relational data, reducing network latency and simplifying data synchronization
Exposes Supabase database schema information through MCP tools, allowing agents to discover table structures, column types, constraints, and relationships without manual schema documentation. Queries PostgreSQL information_schema and Supabase metadata tables to dynamically generate schema descriptions, enabling agents to construct valid queries and understand data relationships.
Unique: Queries Supabase's PostgreSQL information_schema directly through MCP tools, enabling agents to dynamically discover and adapt to database schemas without pre-configured schema definitions
vs alternatives: More flexible than static schema definitions because it reflects live database state, including recent migrations or schema changes
Enforces Supabase Row-Level Security policies within agent queries, ensuring that agents can only access rows permitted by RLS rules defined in the database. Evaluates policies based on authenticated user context (JWT claims, user ID) and applies WHERE clause filters automatically, preventing unauthorized data access at the database layer rather than application layer.
Unique: Delegates authorization enforcement to PostgreSQL RLS policies rather than implementing authorization in agent code, ensuring that data access rules are centralized and cannot be bypassed by agent logic
vs alternatives: More secure than application-level authorization because RLS is enforced at the database layer, preventing accidental data leaks even if agent code has bugs
+1 more capabilities