Supabase ranks higher at 42/100 vs Awesome Crypto MCP Servers by badkk at 19/100. Capability-level comparison backed by match graph evidence from real search data.
| Feature | Awesome Crypto MCP Servers by badkk | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Repository | MCP Server |
| UnfragileRank | 19/100 | 42/100 |
| Adoption | 0 | 0 |
| Quality |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 5 decomposed | 9 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Maintains a curated registry of Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers specifically focused on cryptocurrency and blockchain domains. The curation process involves manual evaluation and categorization of servers by functionality, enabling developers to quickly identify compatible MCP implementations for crypto-specific use cases without evaluating the entire MCP ecosystem.
Unique: Specialized curation focused exclusively on cryptocurrency MCP servers rather than generic MCP ecosystem aggregation, providing domain-specific filtering and categorization that reduces discovery friction for crypto-focused AI development
vs alternatives: More targeted than generic MCP server lists (like awesome-mcp-servers) because it pre-filters for crypto relevance and includes domain-specific categorization, reducing evaluation overhead for blockchain-focused teams
Organizes discovered MCP servers into a hierarchical taxonomy based on cryptocurrency use cases and capabilities (e.g., trading, DeFi protocols, NFT operations, blockchain data access). This taxonomy enables developers to navigate the ecosystem by functional domain rather than implementation details, mapping business requirements directly to compatible MCP server implementations.
Unique: Creates a use-case-driven taxonomy that maps cryptocurrency business problems (e.g., 'execute limit orders on Uniswap') directly to MCP server implementations, rather than organizing by technical implementation details or protocol versions
vs alternatives: More actionable than generic MCP registries because it organizes servers by business intent rather than technical metadata, enabling faster matching between developer requirements and available implementations
Provides reference implementations and integration patterns showing how to connect MCP servers to LLM agents and applications in cryptocurrency workflows. Documentation includes code examples, configuration templates, and best practices for composing multiple crypto MCP servers into coherent agent systems that can perform complex blockchain operations.
Unique: Focuses on practical integration patterns specific to cryptocurrency workflows (e.g., atomic swap execution, multi-chain portfolio balancing) rather than generic MCP integration tutorials, providing domain-specific guidance on composing crypto operations
vs alternatives: More actionable than generic MCP documentation because it includes crypto-specific patterns like handling blockchain confirmation delays, managing private keys securely in agent contexts, and coordinating operations across multiple blockchain networks
Tracks the health, maintenance status, and evolution of MCP servers in the cryptocurrency domain by monitoring repository activity, release cycles, and community engagement. This enables developers to assess server maturity and reliability before integrating into production systems, identifying which servers are actively maintained versus abandoned or deprecated.
Unique: Applies ecosystem health monitoring specifically to crypto MCP servers, tracking not just code activity but also security-relevant signals (e.g., audit status, key rotation practices) critical for blockchain integrations where operational security is paramount
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than simple GitHub star counts because it includes maintenance velocity, security update frequency, and community responsiveness—factors that matter more for production crypto systems than popularity metrics
Provides architectural guidance for composing multiple cryptocurrency MCP servers into coordinated agent systems that can execute complex multi-step operations across different blockchain networks and protocols. This includes patterns for state management, transaction coordination, and error recovery when combining servers with different capabilities and failure modes.
Unique: Addresses the unique challenges of composing crypto MCP servers including blockchain confirmation delays, atomic swap semantics, and cross-chain state consistency—problems not present in generic MCP composition scenarios
vs alternatives: More specialized than generic workflow orchestration guidance because it accounts for blockchain-specific constraints like transaction finality, MEV exposure, and the inability to roll back on-chain operations once confirmed
Executes SQL queries against Supabase PostgreSQL instances through the Model Context Protocol, translating natural language or structured query requests into parameterized SQL statements. Uses MCP's tool-calling interface to expose database operations as callable functions with schema validation, enabling LLM agents to perform CRUD operations, joins, and aggregations with automatic connection pooling and credential management through Supabase client SDK.
Unique: Exposes Supabase PostgreSQL as MCP tools with automatic credential injection from Supabase client SDK, eliminating manual connection string management and enabling seamless LLM-to-database queries within Claude or compatible agents
vs alternatives: Tighter integration than generic SQL MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in authentication and connection pooling rather than requiring separate database credential configuration
Exposes Supabase Auth session state and user metadata through MCP tools, allowing agents to inspect current authentication context, retrieve user profiles, and trigger auth-related operations. Integrates with Supabase's JWT-based auth system to validate sessions and access user claims without re-authenticating, using the Supabase client's built-in session management.
Unique: Integrates Supabase's JWT-based auth system directly into MCP tool interface, allowing agents to inspect and act on auth state without managing separate credential stores or re-authentication flows
vs alternatives: More seamless than generic auth MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in session management and avoids redundant credential passing between agent and auth system
Invokes Supabase Edge Functions (serverless TypeScript/JavaScript functions) through MCP tools, passing parameters and receiving results with optional streaming support. Uses Supabase's edge function HTTP API to trigger functions with automatic authentication headers and response parsing, enabling agents to execute custom business logic without embedding it in the agent itself.
Supabase scores higher at 42/100 vs Awesome Crypto MCP Servers by badkk at 19/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Edge Functions as MCP tools with automatic authentication and response parsing, allowing agents to invoke custom serverless logic without managing HTTP clients or credential injection
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic HTTP MCP tools because it handles Supabase-specific authentication, error handling, and response formatting automatically
Subscribes to real-time changes on Supabase tables through MCP's event streaming interface, using Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY mechanism to push INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE events to agents. Maintains persistent WebSocket connections and filters events by table and row-level policies, enabling agents to react to database changes without polling.
Unique: Bridges Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY real-time system with MCP's tool interface, enabling agents to subscribe to database changes without managing WebSocket connections or event serialization
vs alternatives: More efficient than polling-based approaches because it uses Supabase's native real-time infrastructure rather than repeated database queries
Manages files in Supabase Storage buckets through MCP tools, supporting upload, download, list, and delete operations with automatic authentication and path-based access control. Uses Supabase's S3-compatible storage API with built-in support for public/private buckets and signed URLs for temporary access, enabling agents to handle file I/O without managing cloud storage credentials.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Storage's S3-compatible API as MCP tools with automatic authentication and signed URL generation, eliminating the need for agents to manage cloud storage credentials or generate temporary access tokens
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic S3 MCP tools because it leverages Supabase's built-in bucket policies and authentication rather than requiring separate AWS credentials
Performs semantic similarity searches on vector embeddings stored in Supabase PostgreSQL using pgvector extension, translating natural language queries into embedding vectors and executing cosine/L2 distance searches. Integrates with embedding providers (OpenAI, Cohere) or uses pre-computed embeddings, enabling agents to retrieve semantically similar documents or records without full-text search limitations.
Unique: Integrates pgvector directly into MCP tools with automatic embedding generation and distance calculation, enabling agents to perform semantic search without managing separate vector database infrastructure
vs alternatives: More efficient than external vector databases (Pinecone, Weaviate) for Supabase users because it colocates embeddings with relational data, reducing network latency and simplifying data synchronization
Exposes Supabase database schema information through MCP tools, allowing agents to discover table structures, column types, constraints, and relationships without manual schema documentation. Queries PostgreSQL information_schema and Supabase metadata tables to dynamically generate schema descriptions, enabling agents to construct valid queries and understand data relationships.
Unique: Queries Supabase's PostgreSQL information_schema directly through MCP tools, enabling agents to dynamically discover and adapt to database schemas without pre-configured schema definitions
vs alternatives: More flexible than static schema definitions because it reflects live database state, including recent migrations or schema changes
Enforces Supabase Row-Level Security policies within agent queries, ensuring that agents can only access rows permitted by RLS rules defined in the database. Evaluates policies based on authenticated user context (JWT claims, user ID) and applies WHERE clause filters automatically, preventing unauthorized data access at the database layer rather than application layer.
Unique: Delegates authorization enforcement to PostgreSQL RLS policies rather than implementing authorization in agent code, ensuring that data access rules are centralized and cannot be bypassed by agent logic
vs alternatives: More secure than application-level authorization because RLS is enforced at the database layer, preventing accidental data leaks even if agent code has bugs
+1 more capabilities