| 0 |
| 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Capabilities | 8 decomposed | 5 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Searches across 1M+ hours of indexed podcast, interview, and talk audio content using dual search modes: text-based keyword matching for exact phrase discovery and semantic search for conceptual relevance. Returns segment-level results with speaker identification, precise timestamps (HH:MM:SS format), and relevance scoring (0-1 float). Implements pagination via offset/limit parameters (max 200 results per query) and supports sorting by relevance, publication date, or episode title. Results include direct URLs with timestamp anchors enabling one-click navigation to specific moments in audio.
Unique: Combines speaker identification with dual search modes (text + semantic) across 275,000+ pre-transcribed podcasts, returning segment-level results with precise timestamps and direct playback URLs. Unlike generic audio search, it indexes speaker identity and enables conceptual discovery across a curated corpus of 1M+ hours.
vs alternatives: Faster and more accurate than manual podcast searching or generic web search because it operates on pre-transcribed, indexed audio with speaker metadata rather than requiring real-time transcription or relying on episode descriptions alone.
Lists recently published podcast episodes with configurable lookback window (1-365 days, default 7 days) and optional filtering by specific podcast IDs. Returns structured episode metadata including title, podcast name, publication date (YYYY-MM-DD), duration in seconds, and direct episode URLs. Supports pagination via limit parameter (1-100 episodes per request). Designed as a lightweight alternative to full search for discovering fresh content within a time window.
Unique: Provides lightweight, time-windowed episode listing with optional podcast filtering, enabling efficient discovery of recent content without full-text search overhead. Optimized for agents that need to stay current with specific podcast feeds rather than search across the entire corpus.
vs alternatives: More efficient than running broad searches for recent content because it directly indexes publication dates and returns only new episodes, avoiding the computational cost of semantic or text matching across the full 1M+ hour corpus.
Retrieves complete episode content including full transcript, metadata (title, podcast, publication date, duration), and speaker information for a specified episode ID. Enables downstream processing of full episode context rather than segment-level search results. Implementation details are partially documented; full transcript retrieval mechanism and context window handling are not fully specified in available documentation.
Unique: Provides direct access to full episode transcripts with speaker identification and metadata, enabling AI models to process complete episode context rather than isolated search segments. Integrates with Audioscrape's 99.2% transcription accuracy and speaker identification pipeline.
vs alternatives: More efficient than downloading raw audio and running local transcription because it returns pre-transcribed, speaker-identified content with timestamps, saving compute time and enabling immediate downstream processing.
Exposes Audioscrape's audio search and retrieval capabilities as standardized MCP (Model Context Protocol) tools, enabling Claude, other LLM-based assistants, and AI agents to call audio search functions natively without custom API integration code. Implements OAuth 2.0 authentication with dynamic client registration following MCP spec 6/18. All tools are read-only (no mutation capabilities). Server endpoint is mcp.audioscrape.com, supporting remote MCP connections from any MCP-compatible client.
Unique: Provides standardized MCP tool bindings for audio search, enabling AI assistants to call Audioscrape functions as native tools without custom API integration. Uses OAuth 2.0 dynamic client registration for secure, user-specific authentication within MCP framework.
vs alternatives: Simpler than building custom API clients because it leverages MCP's standardized tool protocol, allowing Claude and other MCP-compatible assistants to call audio search functions with zero custom integration code. Enables natural language queries to be translated directly to structured audio searches.
Implements tiered subscription plans (Free, Basic, Pro, Enterprise) with explicit monthly quotas for searches, API calls, and transcription minutes. Free plan: 10 searches/month, 50 transcription minutes/month. Basic plan: 50 searches/month, 50 API calls/month, 1000 transcription minutes/month. Pro plan: unlimited searches, 1000 API calls/month, 5000 transcription minutes/month. Enterprise: unlimited access. Rate limiting is enforced server-side at the MCP endpoint; quota consumption is tracked per API key and reset monthly.
Unique: Implements multi-dimensional quota system (searches, API calls, transcription minutes) across four subscription tiers, with monthly reset cycles. Quota enforcement is server-side at the MCP endpoint, preventing quota-aware clients from needing local tracking.
vs alternatives: More transparent than usage-based pricing because quotas are fixed and predictable per plan, enabling builders to estimate costs upfront. Simpler than per-request metering because quota resets monthly rather than requiring real-time billing calculations.
Enables users to upload private audio files (meetings, calls, proprietary recordings) for indexing and search within their own Audioscrape account. Uploaded audio is transcribed, speaker-identified, and indexed using the same pipeline as public podcasts, making it searchable via the standard search_audio_content tool. Private uploads are isolated to the uploading user's account and not visible to other users. Transcription of private audio consumes the user's monthly transcription minute quota.
Unique: Extends Audioscrape's indexing pipeline to user-uploaded private audio, enabling unified search across public podcasts and proprietary content. Private uploads are isolated per user and consume the user's transcription quota, creating a hybrid public/private search experience.
vs alternatives: More integrated than managing separate transcription and search systems because private uploads use the same indexing and search infrastructure as public podcasts, enabling single-query search across both sources without custom integration.
Supports filtering search results by podcast IDs, publication date range (date_from/date_to in YYYY-MM-DD format), and recency (last_week, last_month, last_year enum). Sorting options include relevance (default), publication date, and episode title, with ascending or descending order. Filters are applied server-side during search execution, reducing result set before returning to client. Pagination via offset/limit enables iterating through filtered results.
Unique: Provides server-side filtering and sorting across multiple dimensions (podcast, date, recency, relevance), reducing client-side processing and enabling efficient result refinement without fetching full result sets.
vs alternatives: More efficient than client-side filtering because filters are applied at the server during query execution, reducing data transfer and processing latency compared to fetching all results and filtering locally.
Optional include_context parameter in search_audio_content enables retrieval of surrounding audio segments adjacent to matched results, providing narrative context around search hits. When enabled, results include not just the matched segment but also preceding and following segments from the same episode, enabling AI models to understand broader context without requiring full episode retrieval. Context window size is not documented.
Unique: Enables optional retrieval of surrounding segments adjacent to search matches, providing narrative context without requiring full episode transcripts. Reduces latency compared to full episode retrieval while providing more context than isolated segment matches.
vs alternatives: More efficient than full episode retrieval because it returns only relevant segments plus immediate context, reducing data transfer and processing overhead while still providing sufficient context for AI reasoning.
ChatGPT utilizes a transformer-based architecture to generate responses based on the context of the conversation. It employs attention mechanisms to weigh the importance of different parts of the input text, allowing it to maintain context over multiple turns of dialogue. This enables it to provide coherent and contextually relevant responses that evolve as the conversation progresses.
Unique: ChatGPT's use of fine-tuning on conversational datasets allows it to better understand nuances in dialogue compared to other models that may not be specifically trained for conversation.
vs alternatives: More contextually aware than many rule-based chatbots, as it leverages deep learning for understanding and generating human-like dialogue.
ChatGPT employs a multi-layered neural network that analyzes user input to identify intent dynamically. It uses embeddings to represent user queries and matches them against a vast array of learned intents, enabling it to adapt responses based on the user's needs in real-time. This capability allows for more personalized and relevant interactions.
Unique: The model's ability to leverage contextual embeddings for intent recognition sets it apart from simpler keyword-based systems, allowing for a more nuanced understanding of user queries.
vs alternatives: More effective than traditional keyword matching systems, as it understands context and intent rather than relying solely on predefined keywords.
ChatGPT manages multi-turn dialogues by maintaining a conversation history that informs its responses. It uses a sliding window approach to keep track of recent exchanges, ensuring that the context remains relevant and coherent. This allows it to handle complex interactions where user queries may refer back to previous statements.
ChatGPT scores higher at 43/100 vs Audioscrape at 23/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Unique: The implementation of a dynamic context management system allows ChatGPT to effectively manage and reference prior interactions, unlike simpler models that may reset context after each response.
vs alternatives: Superior to basic chatbots that lack memory, as it can recall and reference previous messages to maintain a coherent conversation.
ChatGPT can summarize lengthy texts by analyzing the content and extracting key points while maintaining the original context. It utilizes attention mechanisms to focus on the most relevant parts of the text, allowing it to generate concise summaries that capture essential information without losing meaning.
Unique: ChatGPT's summarization capability is enhanced by its ability to maintain context through attention mechanisms, which allows it to produce more coherent and relevant summaries compared to simpler models.
vs alternatives: More effective than traditional summarization tools that rely on extractive methods, as it can generate summaries that are both concise and contextually accurate.
ChatGPT can modify its tone and style based on user preferences or contextual cues. It analyzes the input text to determine the desired tone and adjusts its responses accordingly, whether the user prefers formal, casual, or technical language. This capability enhances user engagement by tailoring interactions to individual preferences.
Unique: The ability to adapt tone and style dynamically based on user input distinguishes ChatGPT from static response systems that lack this level of personalization.
vs alternatives: More responsive than traditional chatbots that provide fixed responses, as it can tailor its language style to match user preferences.