Asana MCP Server vs Telegram MCP Server
Side-by-side comparison to help you choose.
| Feature | Asana MCP Server | Telegram MCP Server |
|---|---|---|
| Type | MCP Server | MCP Server |
| UnfragileRank | 46/100 | 46/100 |
| Adoption | 1 | 1 |
| Quality | 0 | 0 |
| Ecosystem |
| 0 |
| 1 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 15 decomposed | 12 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Exposes asana_create_task tool through MCP protocol that accepts JSON schema-validated parameters (name, description, assignee, due_date, projects, tags) and translates them into Asana REST API POST requests. Uses TypeScript type definitions and runtime validation to ensure only valid Asana field types are submitted, preventing malformed API calls before they reach Asana's servers.
Unique: Implements MCP tool registration with Asana-specific schema constraints (e.g., due_on as ISO8601 string, projects as array of GIDs) rather than generic REST wrapper, enabling AI clients to understand valid parameter combinations without trial-and-error API calls
vs alternatives: Tighter validation than raw Asana API SDKs because schema is enforced at MCP protocol layer before reaching Asana, reducing failed requests and API quota waste
Implements asana_search_tasks tool that queries Asana's task search endpoint with filters across workspace, project, assignee, tag, and status fields. Translates MCP parameters into Asana's query syntax (e.g., 'assignee:gid' format) and returns paginated results with task metadata (GID, name, assignee, due date, completion status). Supports both simple text search and structured field-based filtering.
Unique: Translates natural MCP filter parameters into Asana's proprietary query syntax (e.g., 'assignee:gid' format) transparently, allowing AI clients to use simple field names without learning Asana's search grammar
vs alternatives: More discoverable than raw Asana API because MCP schema explicitly lists available filter fields, whereas Asana's REST API requires reading documentation to know which query operators are valid
Exposes asana_get_project tool that retrieves full project metadata including sections array with section GIDs and names. Sections are organizational containers within projects that group related tasks. Tool returns section structure enabling AI clients to understand project layout and determine correct section for task placement. Sections are read-only through MCP — creation/deletion not supported.
Unique: Exposes sections as part of project metadata rather than separate tool, allowing AI clients to discover section structure in single call and understand project workflow layout
vs alternatives: More efficient than separate section-listing tool because sections are included in project metadata, reducing API calls needed to understand project organization
Implements asana_update_task tool that modifies specific task fields (name, description, assignee, due_date, completed status, custom fields) through Asana's PATCH endpoint. Uses selective field update pattern — only provided fields are modified, leaving others unchanged. Validates field types before submission and returns updated task metadata. Supports both simple fields (name, description) and complex fields (custom fields, assignee).
Unique: Implements selective field updates using PATCH semantics rather than full task replacement, allowing AI agents to modify single fields without risk of overwriting other task data
vs alternatives: Safer than full task replacement because only specified fields are modified, reducing risk of accidental data loss if AI agent doesn't include all fields in update request
Exposes asana_get_workspaces tool that lists all workspaces accessible to the authenticated user. Returns workspace metadata (GID, name, is_organization) enabling AI clients to discover available workspaces and select correct workspace for subsequent operations. Workspace enumeration is required step before accessing projects or tasks since all Asana entities are scoped to workspaces.
Unique: Provides workspace enumeration as dedicated tool rather than requiring users to hardcode workspace GIDs, enabling dynamic workspace discovery for multi-workspace organizations
vs alternatives: More flexible than hardcoded workspace GIDs because AI agents can discover available workspaces at runtime and select appropriate workspace for operations
Implements asana_get_task tool that retrieves complete task metadata including standard fields (name, description, assignee, due_date, completed) and custom fields with their values. Uses Asana's task detail endpoint with field expansion to include related data (assignee details, project info, custom field definitions and values). Returns comprehensive task context enabling AI clients to understand full task state.
Unique: Includes custom field expansion in task retrieval, returning both field definitions and values in single call, rather than requiring separate custom field metadata lookups
vs alternatives: More complete than basic task retrieval because custom fields are included with values, enabling AI agents to make decisions based on custom metadata without additional API calls
Implements error handling layer that catches Asana API errors (4xx, 5xx responses) and validation errors (invalid parameters, missing required fields) and returns structured error responses through MCP protocol. Maps Asana API error codes to human-readable messages and includes error context (which field failed, why) enabling AI clients to understand failure reasons and retry appropriately. Validation happens before API calls to prevent wasted requests.
Unique: Validates parameters at MCP schema layer before submitting to Asana API, catching invalid inputs early and reducing failed API calls and quota waste
vs alternatives: More efficient than API-first validation because schema validation prevents invalid requests from reaching Asana, reducing API quota consumption and latency
Exposes asana_add_task_dependency and asana_remove_task_dependency tools that manage task blocking relationships through Asana's dependency API. Translates MCP requests into Asana's dependency endpoint calls, supporting 'blocks' and 'is_blocked_by' relationship types. Validates that both task GIDs exist before attempting relationship creation, preventing orphaned dependencies.
Unique: Wraps Asana's dependency API with explicit relationship type parameters ('blocks' vs 'is_blocked_by') in MCP schema, making directionality unambiguous for AI agents that might otherwise confuse blocking semantics
vs alternatives: Clearer than Asana's native UI for programmatic dependency creation because MCP schema forces explicit relationship direction, whereas UI can be ambiguous about which task blocks which
+7 more capabilities
Sends text messages, media files, and formatted content to Telegram chats and channels through the Telegram Bot API. Implements message routing logic that resolves chat identifiers (numeric IDs, usernames, or channel handles) to API endpoints, handles message formatting (Markdown/HTML), and manages delivery confirmation through API response parsing. Supports batch message operations and message editing after delivery.
Unique: Wraps Telegram Bot API message endpoints as MCP tools, enabling LLM agents to send messages through a standardized tool-calling interface rather than direct API calls. Abstracts chat identifier resolution and message formatting into a single composable capability.
vs alternatives: Simpler integration than raw Telegram Bot API for MCP-based agents because it handles authentication and endpoint routing transparently, while maintaining full API feature support.
Retrieves message history from Telegram chats and channels by querying the Telegram Bot API for recent messages, with filtering by date range, sender, or message type. Implements pagination logic to handle large message sets and parses API responses into structured message objects containing sender info, timestamps, content, and media metadata. Supports reading from both private chats and public channels.
Unique: Exposes Telegram message retrieval as MCP tools with built-in pagination and filtering, allowing LLM agents to fetch and reason over chat history without managing API pagination or response parsing themselves. Structures raw API responses into agent-friendly formats.
vs alternatives: More accessible than direct Telegram Bot API calls for agents because it abstracts pagination and response normalization; simpler than building a custom Telegram client library for basic history needs.
Asana MCP Server scores higher at 46/100 vs Telegram MCP Server at 46/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Integrates with Telegram's webhook system to receive real-time updates (messages, callbacks, edits) via HTTP POST requests. The MCP server can be configured to work with webhook-based bots (alternative to polling), receiving updates from Telegram's servers and routing them to connected LLM clients. Supports update filtering and acknowledgment.
Unique: Bridges Telegram's webhook system into MCP, enabling event-driven bot architectures. Handles webhook registration and update routing without requiring polling loops.
vs alternatives: Lower latency than polling because updates arrive immediately; more scalable than getUpdates polling because it eliminates constant API calls and reduces rate-limit pressure.
Translates Telegram Bot API errors and responses into structured MCP-compatible formats. The MCP server catches API failures (rate limits, invalid parameters, permission errors) and maps them to descriptive error objects that LLMs can reason about. Implements retry logic for transient failures and provides actionable error messages.
Unique: Implements error mapping layer that translates raw Telegram API errors into LLM-friendly error objects. Provides structured error information that LLMs can use for decision-making and recovery.
vs alternatives: More actionable than raw API errors because it provides context and recovery suggestions; more reliable than ignoring errors because it enables LLM agents to handle failures intelligently.
Registers custom bot commands (e.g., /start, /help, /custom) and routes incoming Telegram messages containing those commands to handler functions. Implements command parsing logic that extracts command names and arguments from message text, matches them against registered handlers, and invokes the appropriate handler with parsed parameters. Supports command help text generation and command discovery via /help.
Unique: Provides MCP-compatible command registration and dispatch, allowing agents to define Telegram bot commands as MCP tools rather than managing raw message parsing. Decouples command definition from message handling logic.
vs alternatives: Cleaner than raw message event handling because it abstracts command parsing and routing; more flexible than hardcoded command lists because handlers can be registered dynamically at runtime.
Fetches metadata about Telegram chats and channels including member counts, titles, descriptions, pinned messages, and permissions. Queries the Telegram Bot API for chat information and parses responses into structured objects. Supports both private chats and public channels, with different metadata availability depending on bot permissions and chat type.
Unique: Exposes Telegram chat metadata as queryable MCP tools, allowing agents to inspect chat state and permissions without direct API calls. Structures metadata into agent-friendly formats with permission flags.
vs alternatives: More convenient than raw API calls for agents because it abstracts permission checking and response normalization; enables agents to make permission-aware decisions before attempting actions.
Retrieves information about Telegram users and chat members including usernames, first/last names, profile pictures, and member status (admin, restricted, etc.). Queries the Telegram Bot API for user objects and member information, with support for looking up users by ID or username. Returns structured user profiles with permission and status flags.
Unique: Provides user and member lookup as MCP tools with structured output, enabling agents to make permission-aware and user-aware decisions. Abstracts API response parsing and permission flag interpretation.
vs alternatives: Simpler than raw API calls for agents because it returns normalized user objects with permission flags; enables agents to check user status without managing API response structure.
Edits or deletes previously sent messages in Telegram chats by message ID. Implements message lifecycle management through Telegram Bot API endpoints, supporting text content updates, media replacement, and inline keyboard modifications. Handles permission checks and error cases (e.g., message too old to edit, insufficient permissions).
Unique: Exposes message editing and deletion as MCP tools with built-in permission and time-window validation, allowing agents to manage message state without directly handling API constraints. Abstracts 48-hour edit window checks.
vs alternatives: More agent-friendly than raw API calls because it validates edit eligibility before attempting operations; enables agents to implement message lifecycle patterns without manual constraint checking.
+4 more capabilities