| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 15 decomposed | 9 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Exposes asana_create_task tool through MCP protocol that accepts JSON schema-validated parameters (name, description, assignee, due_date, projects, tags) and translates them into Asana REST API POST requests. Uses TypeScript type definitions and runtime validation to ensure only valid Asana field types are submitted, preventing malformed API calls before they reach Asana's servers.
Unique: Implements MCP tool registration with Asana-specific schema constraints (e.g., due_on as ISO8601 string, projects as array of GIDs) rather than generic REST wrapper, enabling AI clients to understand valid parameter combinations without trial-and-error API calls
vs alternatives: Tighter validation than raw Asana API SDKs because schema is enforced at MCP protocol layer before reaching Asana, reducing failed requests and API quota waste
Implements asana_search_tasks tool that queries Asana's task search endpoint with filters across workspace, project, assignee, tag, and status fields. Translates MCP parameters into Asana's query syntax (e.g., 'assignee:gid' format) and returns paginated results with task metadata (GID, name, assignee, due date, completion status). Supports both simple text search and structured field-based filtering.
Unique: Translates natural MCP filter parameters into Asana's proprietary query syntax (e.g., 'assignee:gid' format) transparently, allowing AI clients to use simple field names without learning Asana's search grammar
vs alternatives: More discoverable than raw Asana API because MCP schema explicitly lists available filter fields, whereas Asana's REST API requires reading documentation to know which query operators are valid
Exposes asana_get_project tool that retrieves full project metadata including sections array with section GIDs and names. Sections are organizational containers within projects that group related tasks. Tool returns section structure enabling AI clients to understand project layout and determine correct section for task placement. Sections are read-only through MCP — creation/deletion not supported.
Unique: Exposes sections as part of project metadata rather than separate tool, allowing AI clients to discover section structure in single call and understand project workflow layout
vs alternatives: More efficient than separate section-listing tool because sections are included in project metadata, reducing API calls needed to understand project organization
Implements asana_update_task tool that modifies specific task fields (name, description, assignee, due_date, completed status, custom fields) through Asana's PATCH endpoint. Uses selective field update pattern — only provided fields are modified, leaving others unchanged. Validates field types before submission and returns updated task metadata. Supports both simple fields (name, description) and complex fields (custom fields, assignee).
Unique: Implements selective field updates using PATCH semantics rather than full task replacement, allowing AI agents to modify single fields without risk of overwriting other task data
vs alternatives: Safer than full task replacement because only specified fields are modified, reducing risk of accidental data loss if AI agent doesn't include all fields in update request
Exposes asana_get_workspaces tool that lists all workspaces accessible to the authenticated user. Returns workspace metadata (GID, name, is_organization) enabling AI clients to discover available workspaces and select correct workspace for subsequent operations. Workspace enumeration is required step before accessing projects or tasks since all Asana entities are scoped to workspaces.
Unique: Provides workspace enumeration as dedicated tool rather than requiring users to hardcode workspace GIDs, enabling dynamic workspace discovery for multi-workspace organizations
vs alternatives: More flexible than hardcoded workspace GIDs because AI agents can discover available workspaces at runtime and select appropriate workspace for operations
Implements asana_get_task tool that retrieves complete task metadata including standard fields (name, description, assignee, due_date, completed) and custom fields with their values. Uses Asana's task detail endpoint with field expansion to include related data (assignee details, project info, custom field definitions and values). Returns comprehensive task context enabling AI clients to understand full task state.
Unique: Includes custom field expansion in task retrieval, returning both field definitions and values in single call, rather than requiring separate custom field metadata lookups
vs alternatives: More complete than basic task retrieval because custom fields are included with values, enabling AI agents to make decisions based on custom metadata without additional API calls
Implements error handling layer that catches Asana API errors (4xx, 5xx responses) and validation errors (invalid parameters, missing required fields) and returns structured error responses through MCP protocol. Maps Asana API error codes to human-readable messages and includes error context (which field failed, why) enabling AI clients to understand failure reasons and retry appropriately. Validation happens before API calls to prevent wasted requests.
Unique: Validates parameters at MCP schema layer before submitting to Asana API, catching invalid inputs early and reducing failed API calls and quota waste
vs alternatives: More efficient than API-first validation because schema validation prevents invalid requests from reaching Asana, reducing API quota consumption and latency
Exposes asana_add_task_dependency and asana_remove_task_dependency tools that manage task blocking relationships through Asana's dependency API. Translates MCP requests into Asana's dependency endpoint calls, supporting 'blocks' and 'is_blocked_by' relationship types. Validates that both task GIDs exist before attempting relationship creation, preventing orphaned dependencies.
Unique: Wraps Asana's dependency API with explicit relationship type parameters ('blocks' vs 'is_blocked_by') in MCP schema, making directionality unambiguous for AI agents that might otherwise confuse blocking semantics
vs alternatives: Clearer than Asana's native UI for programmatic dependency creation because MCP schema forces explicit relationship direction, whereas UI can be ambiguous about which task blocks which
+7 more capabilities
Executes SQL queries against Supabase PostgreSQL instances through the Model Context Protocol, translating natural language or structured query requests into parameterized SQL statements. Uses MCP's tool-calling interface to expose database operations as callable functions with schema validation, enabling LLM agents to perform CRUD operations, joins, and aggregations with automatic connection pooling and credential management through Supabase client SDK.
Unique: Exposes Supabase PostgreSQL as MCP tools with automatic credential injection from Supabase client SDK, eliminating manual connection string management and enabling seamless LLM-to-database queries within Claude or compatible agents
vs alternatives: Tighter integration than generic SQL MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in authentication and connection pooling rather than requiring separate database credential configuration
Exposes Supabase Auth session state and user metadata through MCP tools, allowing agents to inspect current authentication context, retrieve user profiles, and trigger auth-related operations. Integrates with Supabase's JWT-based auth system to validate sessions and access user claims without re-authenticating, using the Supabase client's built-in session management.
Unique: Integrates Supabase's JWT-based auth system directly into MCP tool interface, allowing agents to inspect and act on auth state without managing separate credential stores or re-authentication flows
vs alternatives: More seamless than generic auth MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in session management and avoids redundant credential passing between agent and auth system
Invokes Supabase Edge Functions (serverless TypeScript/JavaScript functions) through MCP tools, passing parameters and receiving results with optional streaming support. Uses Supabase's edge function HTTP API to trigger functions with automatic authentication headers and response parsing, enabling agents to execute custom business logic without embedding it in the agent itself.
Asana MCP Server scores higher at 60/100 vs Supabase at 42/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Edge Functions as MCP tools with automatic authentication and response parsing, allowing agents to invoke custom serverless logic without managing HTTP clients or credential injection
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic HTTP MCP tools because it handles Supabase-specific authentication, error handling, and response formatting automatically
Subscribes to real-time changes on Supabase tables through MCP's event streaming interface, using Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY mechanism to push INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE events to agents. Maintains persistent WebSocket connections and filters events by table and row-level policies, enabling agents to react to database changes without polling.
Unique: Bridges Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY real-time system with MCP's tool interface, enabling agents to subscribe to database changes without managing WebSocket connections or event serialization
vs alternatives: More efficient than polling-based approaches because it uses Supabase's native real-time infrastructure rather than repeated database queries
Manages files in Supabase Storage buckets through MCP tools, supporting upload, download, list, and delete operations with automatic authentication and path-based access control. Uses Supabase's S3-compatible storage API with built-in support for public/private buckets and signed URLs for temporary access, enabling agents to handle file I/O without managing cloud storage credentials.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Storage's S3-compatible API as MCP tools with automatic authentication and signed URL generation, eliminating the need for agents to manage cloud storage credentials or generate temporary access tokens
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic S3 MCP tools because it leverages Supabase's built-in bucket policies and authentication rather than requiring separate AWS credentials
Performs semantic similarity searches on vector embeddings stored in Supabase PostgreSQL using pgvector extension, translating natural language queries into embedding vectors and executing cosine/L2 distance searches. Integrates with embedding providers (OpenAI, Cohere) or uses pre-computed embeddings, enabling agents to retrieve semantically similar documents or records without full-text search limitations.
Unique: Integrates pgvector directly into MCP tools with automatic embedding generation and distance calculation, enabling agents to perform semantic search without managing separate vector database infrastructure
vs alternatives: More efficient than external vector databases (Pinecone, Weaviate) for Supabase users because it colocates embeddings with relational data, reducing network latency and simplifying data synchronization
Exposes Supabase database schema information through MCP tools, allowing agents to discover table structures, column types, constraints, and relationships without manual schema documentation. Queries PostgreSQL information_schema and Supabase metadata tables to dynamically generate schema descriptions, enabling agents to construct valid queries and understand data relationships.
Unique: Queries Supabase's PostgreSQL information_schema directly through MCP tools, enabling agents to dynamically discover and adapt to database schemas without pre-configured schema definitions
vs alternatives: More flexible than static schema definitions because it reflects live database state, including recent migrations or schema changes
Enforces Supabase Row-Level Security policies within agent queries, ensuring that agents can only access rows permitted by RLS rules defined in the database. Evaluates policies based on authenticated user context (JWT claims, user ID) and applies WHERE clause filters automatically, preventing unauthorized data access at the database layer rather than application layer.
Unique: Delegates authorization enforcement to PostgreSQL RLS policies rather than implementing authorization in agent code, ensuring that data access rules are centralized and cannot be bypassed by agent logic
vs alternatives: More secure than application-level authorization because RLS is enforced at the database layer, preventing accidental data leaks even if agent code has bugs
+1 more capabilities