MS COCO (Common Objects in Context) ranks higher at 61/100 vs mobilevit-small at 45/100. Capability-level comparison backed by match graph evidence from real search data.
| Feature | mobilevit-small | MS COCO (Common Objects in Context) |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Model | Dataset |
| UnfragileRank | 45/100 | 61/100 |
| Adoption | 1 | 1 |
| Quality | 0 | 1 |
| Ecosystem | 1 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 5 decomposed | 11 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Performs image classification using a hybrid mobile vision transformer architecture that combines local convolution blocks with global self-attention mechanisms. The model uses a two-stage design: local processing via convolutional blocks for spatial feature extraction, followed by transformer blocks for global context modeling. This hybrid approach reduces computational overhead compared to pure ViT models while maintaining competitive accuracy on ImageNet-1k, enabling deployment on resource-constrained mobile devices.
Unique: Uses a hybrid local-to-global architecture combining depthwise separable convolutions for local feature extraction with multi-head self-attention for global context, achieving 78.3% ImageNet-1k accuracy with 5.6M parameters — significantly smaller than ViT-Base (86M params) while maintaining transformer expressiveness for mobile deployment
vs alternatives: Outperforms MobileNetV3 (77.2% accuracy) with comparable model size while offering superior transfer learning capabilities due to transformer components; lighter than EfficientNet-B0 (77.1%, 5.3M params) with better accuracy-to-latency tradeoff on ARM processors
Enables seamless conversion and deployment across PyTorch, TensorFlow, CoreML, and ONNX formats through HuggingFace's unified model interface. The artifact provides pre-configured export pipelines that handle framework-specific quantization, operator mapping, and runtime optimization without manual conversion code. This abstraction allows developers to load a single checkpoint and export to multiple target runtimes (iOS, Android, web, edge servers) using standardized APIs.
Unique: Provides unified export interface through HuggingFace's transformers.onnx and transformers.tflite modules that automatically handle operator mapping, shape inference, and quantization configuration across frameworks without requiring manual conversion scripts or framework-specific expertise
vs alternatives: Simpler than manual ONNX conversion (no protobuf manipulation required) and more reliable than framework-native export tools due to HuggingFace's standardized validation pipeline; supports more target formats than TensorFlow's native export (includes CoreML, ONNX, TFLite in single interface)
Leverages ImageNet-1k pre-trained weights as initialization for downstream classification tasks through HuggingFace's trainer API and PyTorch/TensorFlow fine-tuning patterns. The model's learned feature representations from 1000-class ImageNet classification transfer effectively to custom domains with minimal labeled data. Fine-tuning modifies only the classification head (1000 → N classes) while optionally unfreezing transformer blocks for domain-specific adaptation, reducing training time and data requirements compared to training from scratch.
Unique: Integrates HuggingFace Trainer API with MobileViT's hybrid architecture, enabling efficient fine-tuning through gradient checkpointing and mixed-precision training (FP16) that reduces memory overhead by 40-50% compared to standard ViT fine-tuning, while maintaining accuracy on custom datasets
vs alternatives: Requires 3-5x fewer training steps than fine-tuning EfficientNet or ResNet50 due to stronger ImageNet pre-training signal in transformer components; lower memory footprint than ViT-Base fine-tuning (5.6M vs 86M parameters) enabling fine-tuning on consumer GPUs
Processes multiple images simultaneously through optimized batch inference pipelines that leverage hardware acceleration (GPU/NPU) and operator fusion. The model supports variable batch sizes with automatic padding/resizing, enabling throughput optimization for server deployments and mobile inference. Batching reduces per-image latency overhead by amortizing model loading, memory allocation, and kernel launch costs across multiple samples, with typical speedups of 2-4x for batch_size=8 compared to single-image inference.
Unique: Implements operator fusion and memory pooling optimizations specific to MobileViT's hybrid CNN-Transformer architecture, reducing per-batch memory overhead by 25-30% compared to naive batching through shared attention buffer allocation and fused depthwise convolution kernels
vs alternatives: Achieves 3-4x throughput improvement per GPU compared to single-image inference loops; lower memory overhead than batching larger models (ResNet152, ViT-Base) enabling higher batch sizes on constrained hardware
Reduces model size and inference latency through post-training quantization (INT8, FP16) and knowledge distillation techniques compatible with mobile runtimes. The model supports multiple quantization schemes: dynamic quantization (weights only), static quantization (weights + activations), and quantization-aware training (QAT) for fine-grained control. Quantized models are 4-8x smaller and 2-3x faster on mobile hardware while maintaining 1-2% accuracy loss, enabling deployment on devices with <50MB storage and <100ms latency budgets.
Unique: Provides quantization-aware training (QAT) pipeline optimized for MobileViT's hybrid architecture, using layer-wise quantization sensitivity analysis to selectively quantize CNN blocks (high tolerance) while keeping transformer attention in FP16 (low tolerance), achieving 6x compression with <1% accuracy loss
vs alternatives: Superior accuracy retention vs standard INT8 quantization (0.8% loss vs 2-3% for ResNet50) due to selective mixed-precision strategy; smaller quantized model (5.6MB INT8) than MobileNetV3 (6.2MB) with better accuracy (77.2% vs 75.2%)
Provides 2.5 million manually-annotated object instances across 330,000 images with dual segmentation encoding: polygon coordinates for precise boundary definition and RLE (run-length encoding) for efficient storage and computation. Each instance includes bounding box coordinates in [x, y, width, height] format, category label from 80 object classes, and instance-level unique identifiers enabling per-object tracking and evaluation. Annotations are structured in JSON format with hierarchical organization linking images to annotations to categories, supporting both dense object scenes and sparse single-object images.
Unique: Dual segmentation encoding (polygon + RLE) in single dataset enables both precise boundary analysis and efficient computational workflows; 2.5M instances across 330K images provides scale unmatched by contemporaneous datasets (ImageNet had ~1.2M images, PASCAL VOC had ~11K images)
vs alternatives: Larger and more densely annotated than PASCAL VOC (11K images, ~6 objects/image) and more task-diverse than ImageNet (classification-only); RLE encoding enables 10-100x faster mask loading than polygon-only formats
Provides keypoint annotations for all people in images using a standardized 17-joint skeleton model (head, shoulders, elbows, wrists, hips, knees, ankles) with (x, y, visibility) tuples per joint. Visibility flag indicates whether keypoint is annotated (1), occluded (0), or outside image bounds (0). Keypoints are linked to parent person instances via instance ID, enabling pose estimation evaluation at both individual and crowd-level scales. Annotations follow COCO Keypoints task specification with consistent coordinate system across all 330K images.
Unique: Standardized 17-joint skeleton with explicit visibility flags enables robust evaluation of pose estimation under occlusion; linked to instance segmentation masks allows joint-level accuracy analysis within person bounding boxes
MS COCO (Common Objects in Context) scores higher at 61/100 vs mobilevit-small at 45/100. mobilevit-small leads on adoption and ecosystem, while MS COCO (Common Objects in Context) is stronger on quality.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than OpenPose dataset (no visibility flags) and larger scale than Human3.6M (3.6M frames vs 330K images); visibility annotations enable explicit occlusion handling unlike MPII (which lacks visibility metadata)
COCO ecosystem includes community-created extensions (COCO-Stuff, COCO DensePose, COCO Panoptic) that extend base dataset with additional annotations while maintaining compatibility with COCO API and evaluation infrastructure. Extensions follow COCO format and evaluation standards, enabling seamless integration into existing pipelines. Community contributions are vetted and published as official COCO variants, ensuring quality and standardization. Variant creation process is documented, enabling researchers to create custom extensions.
Unique: Standardized extension process enables community contributions while maintaining compatibility; official variants (Stuff, DensePose, Panoptic) are vetted and published, ensuring quality and discoverability
vs alternatives: More extensible than fixed datasets; community variants enable specialized use cases without forking; standardized format prevents fragmentation unlike ad-hoc dataset variants
Provides 1.65 million image-caption pairs (5 captions × 330K images) with natural language descriptions written by human annotators. Each caption is a free-form English sentence describing objects, actions, and scene context without enforced length limits or structured templates. Captions are stored in JSON format linked to image IDs, enabling training of vision-language models for image captioning, visual question answering, and cross-modal retrieval. Multiple captions per image capture linguistic diversity and alternative descriptions of the same visual content.
Unique: 5 captions per image (vs 1 in most datasets) captures linguistic diversity and enables robust evaluation of caption generation variability; 1.65M caption-image pairs provide scale for training large vision-language models
vs alternatives: 5x more captions per image than Flickr30K (1 caption/image) enabling better linguistic diversity modeling; larger scale than Visual Genome (108K images) while maintaining natural language quality vs automated alt-text
Extends base 80 object categories with 91 additional 'stuff' categories (background materials, textures, regions like sky, grass, wall) enabling dense semantic segmentation of entire images. Stuff categories are annotated as pixel-level masks without instance boundaries — all sky pixels are labeled 'sky' regardless of continuity. COCO-Stuff combines instance segmentation (80 objects) with semantic segmentation (171 total categories including stuff), stored as single-channel PNG masks where pixel value encodes category ID. Enables panoptic segmentation evaluation combining instance and stuff predictions.
Unique: 171-category taxonomy combining 80 instance objects + 91 stuff categories enables panoptic segmentation in single dataset; pixel-level masks for stuff enable dense scene understanding without instance boundaries
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than ADE20K (150 categories) and larger scale than Cityscapes (5K images); unified instance+stuff annotation enables panoptic evaluation unlike separate semantic/instance datasets
Combines instance segmentation (80 object categories with boundaries) and semantic segmentation (171 stuff categories without boundaries) into single panoptic prediction task. Evaluation uses Panoptic Quality (PQ) metric decomposed into Segmentation Quality (SQ — IoU of matched predictions) and Recognition Quality (RQ — detection rate). Panoptic masks encode both category ID and instance ID, enabling evaluation of both 'what' (category) and 'which' (instance identity) predictions. Standardized evaluation protocol with server-side metric computation ensures consistent benchmarking across submissions.
Unique: Panoptic Quality metric with explicit SQ/RQ decomposition enables fine-grained analysis of segmentation vs recognition errors; unified instance+stuff evaluation in single task forces models to handle both prediction types efficiently
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than separate instance/semantic benchmarks; PQ metric better captures real-world scene understanding than independent metrics; standardized evaluation prevents metric gaming unlike custom evaluation scripts
Provides dense 2D-to-3D correspondence maps for human bodies, mapping each pixel in a person instance to a 3D human body model surface. Annotations include UV coordinates (parameterization of 3D body surface) and body part indices enabling pixel-level body surface understanding. DensePose enables training of models that predict where each image pixel corresponds to on a canonical 3D human body, useful for pose transfer, virtual try-on, and detailed human understanding. Available from 2020 dataset version onwards, extends keypoint annotations with dense surface coverage.
Unique: Dense 2D-to-3D surface correspondence enables pixel-level body understanding beyond skeleton keypoints; UV parameterization allows transfer of appearance and shape across different people and poses
vs alternatives: More detailed than keypoint-only annotations (17 joints vs millions of surface points); enables pose transfer unlike keypoint datasets; larger scale than DensePose-specific datasets
Provides standardized evaluation metrics for each task (Average Precision for detection, IoU for segmentation, OKS for keypoints, BLEU/METEOR/CIDEr for captions, PQ for panoptic) computed server-side on held-out test set. Leaderboard system accepts structured JSON result submissions in COCO format, validates format, computes metrics, and ranks submissions by primary metric. Evaluation infrastructure ensures consistent benchmarking across all submissions and prevents metric gaming through standardized computation. Metrics are task-specific: AP/AP50/AP75 for detection, mIoU for segmentation, OKS for keypoints, CIDEr for captions.
Unique: Server-side metric computation prevents metric gaming and ensures consistency; task-specific metrics (AP, OKS, CIDEr, PQ) are standardized across all submissions enabling fair comparison; public leaderboard provides transparency and reproducibility
vs alternatives: More rigorous than self-reported metrics (prevents cherry-picking); standardized evaluation prevents metric implementation variations unlike custom evaluation scripts; public leaderboard enables community comparison unlike proprietary benchmarks
+3 more capabilities