| 0 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 12 decomposed | 9 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Generates a complete MCP server skeleton following the Model Context Protocol specification, including request/response handlers, resource definitions, and tool registration stubs. Uses template-based code generation to produce TypeScript/Python starter code that adheres to MCP message schemas and lifecycle requirements, reducing setup time from hours to minutes.
Unique: Provides MCP-specific scaffolding rather than generic server templates, with built-in understanding of MCP message routing, resource lifecycle, and tool invocation patterns that would otherwise require manual protocol implementation
vs alternatives: Faster than building from raw MCP spec or generic Node/Python frameworks because it pre-implements protocol message handling and resource registration patterns specific to MCP's architecture
Validates tool/resource definitions against MCP schema requirements (argument types, return types, descriptions) and registers them into the server's tool registry with automatic request routing. Uses JSON Schema validation to ensure tool definitions are MCP-compliant before runtime, preventing schema mismatches between client requests and server handlers.
Unique: Provides MCP-native schema validation that understands the protocol's tool definition structure, including argument constraints and return type specifications, rather than generic JSON Schema validation
vs alternatives: Catches schema mismatches earlier than alternatives that only validate at request time, because it validates tool definitions during server initialization rather than deferring to runtime
Provides pre-built example tool implementations demonstrating common patterns: database queries, REST API calls, file operations, data transformation, and external service integration. Each example includes error handling, logging, and input validation. Examples are fully functional and can be used as templates for building similar tools. Includes documentation explaining the pattern and how to adapt it for specific use cases.
Unique: Provides MCP-specific example implementations with error handling, logging, and input validation built-in, demonstrating best practices for tool development. Examples are fully functional and can be used as templates.
vs alternatives: More practical than documentation alone because examples are runnable code that developers can test and adapt, whereas documentation requires developers to implement patterns from scratch.
Validates MCP server implementations against the official specification, checking tool definitions, resource schemas, request/response formats, and protocol compliance. Provides linting rules for best practices (naming conventions, error handling, documentation). Generates compliance reports with detailed violations and remediation suggestions. Can be integrated into CI/CD pipelines to enforce compliance before deployment.
Unique: Provides MCP-specific compliance validation and linting, checking against the official specification and enforcing best practices. Can be integrated into CI/CD pipelines for automated compliance checking.
vs alternatives: More thorough than manual code review because automated validation catches specification violations consistently, whereas manual review is error-prone and time-consuming.
Exposes application resources (files, database records, API endpoints) as MCP resources with versioning support, allowing clients to query available resources and subscribe to updates. Implements resource listing, metadata retrieval, and change notification patterns that enable LLMs to discover and interact with dynamic data sources without hardcoded references.
Unique: Implements MCP's resource model with versioning semantics, enabling clients to track resource state changes and invalidate caches intelligently, rather than treating resources as static endpoints
vs alternatives: More efficient than polling-based discovery because it provides explicit version information and change notifications, reducing unnecessary re-fetches of unchanged resources
Implements MCP's request-response protocol with automatic message serialization, deserialization, and error handling. Routes incoming requests to appropriate handlers, captures responses or errors, and sends them back to the client with proper MCP error codes and stack traces. Handles connection lifecycle (initialization, heartbeat, graceful shutdown) automatically.
Unique: Provides MCP-specific message routing and error formatting that understands the protocol's error codes and response structure, rather than generic RPC message handling
vs alternatives: More reliable than manual message handling because it enforces MCP protocol compliance and automatically manages connection state, reducing bugs from protocol misimplementation
Registers reusable prompt templates that MCP clients can discover and invoke, with support for variable substitution and context injection. Templates are stored server-side and can be parameterized with tool outputs, resource data, or user input, enabling consistent prompt engineering across multiple LLM interactions without duplicating prompt logic in client code.
Unique: Implements MCP's prompt model as server-side templates with variable substitution, enabling centralized prompt management and dynamic context injection without requiring client-side prompt engineering
vs alternatives: More maintainable than client-side prompts because prompt logic is versioned and audited server-side, and changes propagate to all clients without redeployment
Abstracts the underlying transport layer (stdio, HTTP, WebSocket) behind a unified interface, allowing the same MCP server code to run over different protocols without modification. Handles protocol-specific serialization, connection management, and message framing automatically, enabling deployment flexibility and client compatibility.
Unique: Provides transport abstraction specifically for MCP's message format and lifecycle, rather than generic RPC transport layers, with built-in understanding of MCP initialization and resource discovery patterns
vs alternatives: More flexible than transport-specific implementations because the same server code runs unchanged over stdio, HTTP, or WebSocket, reducing deployment complexity and testing burden
+4 more capabilities
Executes SQL queries against Supabase PostgreSQL instances through the Model Context Protocol, translating natural language or structured query requests into parameterized SQL statements. Uses MCP's tool-calling interface to expose database operations as callable functions with schema validation, enabling LLM agents to perform CRUD operations, joins, and aggregations with automatic connection pooling and credential management through Supabase client SDK.
Unique: Exposes Supabase PostgreSQL as MCP tools with automatic credential injection from Supabase client SDK, eliminating manual connection string management and enabling seamless LLM-to-database queries within Claude or compatible agents
vs alternatives: Tighter integration than generic SQL MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in authentication and connection pooling rather than requiring separate database credential configuration
Exposes Supabase Auth session state and user metadata through MCP tools, allowing agents to inspect current authentication context, retrieve user profiles, and trigger auth-related operations. Integrates with Supabase's JWT-based auth system to validate sessions and access user claims without re-authenticating, using the Supabase client's built-in session management.
Unique: Integrates Supabase's JWT-based auth system directly into MCP tool interface, allowing agents to inspect and act on auth state without managing separate credential stores or re-authentication flows
vs alternatives: More seamless than generic auth MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in session management and avoids redundant credential passing between agent and auth system
Invokes Supabase Edge Functions (serverless TypeScript/JavaScript functions) through MCP tools, passing parameters and receiving results with optional streaming support. Uses Supabase's edge function HTTP API to trigger functions with automatic authentication headers and response parsing, enabling agents to execute custom business logic without embedding it in the agent itself.
Supabase scores higher at 42/100 vs Example MCP Server at 30/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Edge Functions as MCP tools with automatic authentication and response parsing, allowing agents to invoke custom serverless logic without managing HTTP clients or credential injection
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic HTTP MCP tools because it handles Supabase-specific authentication, error handling, and response formatting automatically
Subscribes to real-time changes on Supabase tables through MCP's event streaming interface, using Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY mechanism to push INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE events to agents. Maintains persistent WebSocket connections and filters events by table and row-level policies, enabling agents to react to database changes without polling.
Unique: Bridges Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY real-time system with MCP's tool interface, enabling agents to subscribe to database changes without managing WebSocket connections or event serialization
vs alternatives: More efficient than polling-based approaches because it uses Supabase's native real-time infrastructure rather than repeated database queries
Manages files in Supabase Storage buckets through MCP tools, supporting upload, download, list, and delete operations with automatic authentication and path-based access control. Uses Supabase's S3-compatible storage API with built-in support for public/private buckets and signed URLs for temporary access, enabling agents to handle file I/O without managing cloud storage credentials.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Storage's S3-compatible API as MCP tools with automatic authentication and signed URL generation, eliminating the need for agents to manage cloud storage credentials or generate temporary access tokens
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic S3 MCP tools because it leverages Supabase's built-in bucket policies and authentication rather than requiring separate AWS credentials
Performs semantic similarity searches on vector embeddings stored in Supabase PostgreSQL using pgvector extension, translating natural language queries into embedding vectors and executing cosine/L2 distance searches. Integrates with embedding providers (OpenAI, Cohere) or uses pre-computed embeddings, enabling agents to retrieve semantically similar documents or records without full-text search limitations.
Unique: Integrates pgvector directly into MCP tools with automatic embedding generation and distance calculation, enabling agents to perform semantic search without managing separate vector database infrastructure
vs alternatives: More efficient than external vector databases (Pinecone, Weaviate) for Supabase users because it colocates embeddings with relational data, reducing network latency and simplifying data synchronization
Exposes Supabase database schema information through MCP tools, allowing agents to discover table structures, column types, constraints, and relationships without manual schema documentation. Queries PostgreSQL information_schema and Supabase metadata tables to dynamically generate schema descriptions, enabling agents to construct valid queries and understand data relationships.
Unique: Queries Supabase's PostgreSQL information_schema directly through MCP tools, enabling agents to dynamically discover and adapt to database schemas without pre-configured schema definitions
vs alternatives: More flexible than static schema definitions because it reflects live database state, including recent migrations or schema changes
Enforces Supabase Row-Level Security policies within agent queries, ensuring that agents can only access rows permitted by RLS rules defined in the database. Evaluates policies based on authenticated user context (JWT claims, user ID) and applies WHERE clause filters automatically, preventing unauthorized data access at the database layer rather than application layer.
Unique: Delegates authorization enforcement to PostgreSQL RLS policies rather than implementing authorization in agent code, ensuring that data access rules are centralized and cannot be bypassed by agent logic
vs alternatives: More secure than application-level authorization because RLS is enforced at the database layer, preventing accidental data leaks even if agent code has bugs
+1 more capabilities