| 1 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Starting Price | — | $10/mo |
| Capabilities | 18 decomposed | 13 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Provides real-time visual representation of neural network architectures with layer-by-layer breakdown, tensor shape tracking, and parameter counts. The extension hooks into PyTorch, TensorFlow, and JAX execution contexts to intercept model definitions and render them as interactive graphs within VS Code's webview panel, enabling developers to inspect layer connectivity, data flow, and computational graph structure without leaving the editor.
Unique: Integrates directly into VS Code's editor context with live model auto-detection across PyTorch, TensorFlow, and JAX without requiring separate visualization tools or notebook environments, using framework-specific introspection APIs to capture computational graphs at definition time
vs alternatives: Faster than Netron or TensorBoard for architecture review because visualization is embedded in the editor and updates on file save without launching external applications
Captures tensor values during training execution and displays them in a dedicated panel with histogram distributions, min/max/mean statistics, and anomaly flagging. The extension instruments training loops at the bytecode level to intercept tensor operations, storing snapshots of tensor state at configurable intervals (per batch, per epoch, or on-demand). Anomaly detection uses statistical methods (z-score, IQR) to flag NaN, Inf, or unusual value distributions that indicate training instability.
Unique: Combines bytecode-level tensor interception with statistical anomaly detection to flag training issues automatically, rather than requiring manual inspection of logs or print statements, and integrates results directly into VS Code's debug UI
vs alternatives: More immediate than TensorBoard for debugging because anomalies are flagged in real-time within the editor rather than requiring post-hoc log analysis in a separate browser window
Analyzes data pipelines to identify preprocessing steps, data transformations, and potential issues. The extension can inspect data loaders to visualize sample batches, compute dataset statistics, and detect data drift (distribution changes between training and validation sets). Supports common data formats (CSV, images, text) and frameworks (PyTorch DataLoader, TensorFlow tf.data, pandas).
Unique: Integrates data inspection and drift detection directly into VS Code's debugging workflow, allowing developers to analyze data without leaving the editor or writing separate analysis scripts
vs alternatives: More integrated than separate data analysis tools because inspection happens within the training context, and more automated than manual data inspection because drift detection is computed automatically
Provides built-in support for differentially private training using DP-SGD (Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent). The extension instruments training loops to apply noise to gradients and track privacy budget (epsilon and delta parameters) throughout training. Visualizes privacy budget consumption and provides recommendations for privacy-utility tradeoffs.
Unique: Integrates DP-SGD implementation with privacy budget tracking and visualization, allowing developers to implement differential privacy without deep expertise in privacy-preserving ML
vs alternatives: More accessible than implementing DP-SGD manually because the extension handles gradient clipping and noise addition, and more comprehensive than basic DP-SGD because privacy budget tracking and recommendations are included
Enables side-by-side comparison of multiple trained models or model architectures. The extension displays architecture differences (layer counts, parameter counts, computational complexity), performance metrics (accuracy, loss, inference time), and resource usage (memory, GPU utilization). Supports comparing models from different frameworks (PyTorch vs TensorFlow) and different training runs.
Unique: Provides unified comparison interface for models from different frameworks and training runs, with automatic metric computation and visualization
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than manual comparison because metrics are computed automatically, and more accessible than separate comparison tools because comparison happens within VS Code
Integrates an LLM-based debugging assistant that analyzes training errors, logs, and model state to suggest root causes and fixes. When training fails (NaN loss, OOM error, convergence failure), the extension captures error context and sends it to an LLM (provider unknown, likely ChatGPT or similar) which generates diagnostic suggestions. Results are displayed in a chat-like interface within VS Code.
Unique: Integrates LLM-based debugging assistance directly into VS Code, providing contextual suggestions without requiring developers to search documentation or forums
vs alternatives: More immediate than searching Stack Overflow because suggestions are generated in context, but less reliable than expert human debugging because LLM suggestions are heuristic-based
Enables debugging of training jobs running on cloud platforms (AWS SageMaker, Google Vertex AI, Azure ML) directly from VS Code. The extension connects to remote training jobs, captures logs and metrics in real-time, and allows setting breakpoints and inspecting model state on remote machines. Supports attaching to running jobs or launching new jobs with debugging enabled.
Unique: Provides unified debugging interface for multiple cloud platforms without requiring separate tools or SSH access, with real-time log streaming and remote breakpoint support
vs alternatives: More convenient than SSH debugging because debugging happens in VS Code, and more comprehensive than cloud platform dashboards because full debugging capabilities are available
Captures execution timeline during training and displays it as an interactive timeline chart showing CPU/GPU utilization, kernel execution times, and data loading delays. The extension automatically highlights bottlenecks (e.g., long data loading times, GPU idle periods) and provides recommendations for optimization. Supports zooming and filtering to focus on specific time ranges or operations.
Unique: Provides interactive timeline visualization with automatic bottleneck detection and highlighting, rather than requiring manual analysis of profiler output
vs alternatives: More intuitive than flame graphs because timeline shows temporal relationships, and more actionable than raw profiler data because bottlenecks are automatically highlighted
+10 more capabilities
Generates single-line and multi-line code suggestions in real-time as developers type, using semantic indexing of the entire codebase to retrieve relevant type definitions, function signatures, and contextual patterns. The system maintains a 1M token context window (Pro/Team tiers) that enables suggestions informed by distant code definitions and cross-file dependencies, constructed via local codebase semantic search rather than simple token-based recency. Suggestions adapt to detected coding style on Pro/Team tiers through implicit pattern learning from recent edits.
Unique: 1M token context window with codebase-wide semantic indexing enables suggestions informed by distant code definitions and cross-file patterns, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that typically use fixed context windows (4K-32K tokens) or file-local context. Claimed 250ms latency suggests optimized retrieval pipeline, though indexing mechanism and performance at scale remain undisclosed.
vs alternatives: Larger context window than GitHub Copilot (8K-32K tokens) and faster latency than unnamed competitors (250ms vs 783ms claimed), enabling suggestions on large codebases with minimal typing delay; trade-off is cloud dependency and undisclosed free tier limitations.
Provides a separate chat interface supporting multiple LLM backends (GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, GPT-4, others) for conversational code assistance. Users attach files, reference recent edits, and trigger compiler diagnostic uploads; the system generates diffs and applies code changes directly to the editor. Model selection is per-conversation, and $5/month in credits (included in Pro/Team) covers external model API costs; overage pricing is undisclosed. Hotkey-driven workflow enables rapid context switching between inline completion and chat.
Unique: Multi-model chat interface with per-conversation model selection and integrated diff application, combined with compiler diagnostic auto-upload. Unlike Copilot Chat (single model per tier) or standalone ChatGPT, Supermaven Chat unifies multiple LLM backends in a single hotkey-driven workflow with direct editor integration for change application.
Supermaven scores higher at 71/100 vs AI/ML Debugger at 34/100. AI/ML Debugger leads on ecosystem, while Supermaven is stronger on adoption and quality.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
vs alternatives: Supports multiple LLM backends (GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet) in one interface with included credits, whereas GitHub Copilot Chat is single-model per tier and requires separate ChatGPT subscription for model switching; trade-off is credit limits and unknown overage pricing.
Supermaven Chat can automatically upload compiler diagnostic messages (errors, warnings) alongside code context to provide error-aware suggestions and fixes. The mechanism is described as 'automatically uploading your code together with compiler diagnostic messages,' but specific language/compiler support and the upload trigger mechanism are undisclosed. This feature is Chat-only and not available in inline completion.
Unique: Automatic compiler diagnostic upload in Chat for error-aware suggestions, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that require manual error context or have limited diagnostic integration. Supermaven's approach reduces friction but with undisclosed language/compiler support.
vs alternatives: Automatic diagnostic upload reduces manual context-gathering compared to manual copy-paste; trade-off is undisclosed language support and unclear upload trigger mechanism.
Supermaven offers a 30-day free trial of the Pro tier ($10/month), providing full access to 1M token context window, largest model, style adaptation, and $5/month chat credits. No credit card is required to start the trial (implied), and trial conversion to paid is automatic after 30 days unless cancelled. Trial terms and auto-renewal policy are not explicitly detailed.
Unique: 30-day free trial of Pro tier with full feature access (1M context, largest model, chat credits), versus competitors (Copilot 2-month free trial, Tabnine free tier only) with different trial lengths and feature access. Supermaven's approach is generous but with undisclosed auto-renewal terms.
vs alternatives: Full Pro feature access during trial compared to limited free tier; trade-off is undisclosed auto-renewal policy and potential unexpected charges if not cancelled.
Supermaven requires internet connectivity and server-side inference; no offline mode or local inference capability is mentioned or available. All code completion requests are sent to Supermaven's backend servers for processing, and responses are returned over the network. This creates a hard dependency on network connectivity and Supermaven's service availability; if the service is down or network is unavailable, code completion is not available.
Unique: Supermaven has no offline mode or local inference capability; all processing is server-side. GitHub Copilot also requires server-side inference, but Tabnine offers local inference options for some use cases. Supermaven's lack of offline capability is a significant limitation for developers with connectivity constraints.
vs alternatives: Supermaven's server-side-only approach is comparable to GitHub Copilot; Tabnine offers local inference options, making Tabnine more suitable for offline work. Supermaven's lack of offline capability is a weakness vs. Tabnine.
Analyzes recent code edits and inferred coding patterns to adapt inline suggestions to match team conventions, naming patterns, and structural preferences. The mechanism is implicit (not explicit fine-tuning) and operates only on Pro/Team tiers, suggesting pattern learning from editor activity rather than explicit configuration. Free tier uses a single base model without personalization.
Unique: Implicit style adaptation via editor activity analysis without explicit configuration, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that require manual style guides or explicit fine-tuning. Supermaven's approach is transparent to the user but also non-configurable and undisclosed in mechanism.
vs alternatives: Requires no manual style configuration compared to tools requiring explicit style guides; trade-off is lack of transparency and inability to control or export learned styles.
Delivers code suggestions to the editor inline as the developer types, with a claimed baseline latency of 250ms from keystroke to suggestion display. The system uses a cloud inference backend and local editor plugin to minimize round-trip time. Latency claim is positioned against an unnamed competitor (783ms), but methodology is undisclosed and no independent verification is provided.
Unique: Claimed 250ms latency via optimized cloud inference pipeline and editor plugin architecture, versus competitors with higher latency (783ms unnamed baseline). Actual differentiation is undisclosed; mechanism may involve request batching, model quantization, or edge caching, but specifics are not public.
vs alternatives: Faster than unnamed competitor (250ms vs 783ms claimed); trade-off is cloud dependency and unverified latency claim with no SLA or performance guarantee.
Provides native editor extensions for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs (IntelliJ IDEA, PyCharm, WebStorm, etc.), and Neovim, enabling inline suggestion rendering, hotkey-driven chat access, and compiler diagnostic integration directly within the editor. Each plugin variant is maintained separately and integrates with the editor's native autocomplete UI, keybinding system, and file context APIs.
Unique: Native plugins for three major editor ecosystems (VS Code, JetBrains, Neovim) with integrated chat and diff application, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that support broader editor ecosystems but with less deep integration in some cases. Supermaven's approach prioritizes depth over breadth.
vs alternatives: Deep integration with VS Code and JetBrains (native autocomplete UI, hotkey system) compared to web-based tools or lighter integrations; trade-off is limited editor support (no Sublime, Vim, Emacs) and undisclosed Neovim support details.
+5 more capabilities