| 0 |
| Quality | 0 | 0 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Starting Price | $2.00e-6 per prompt token | $1.05e-6 per prompt token |
| Capabilities | 9 decomposed | 13 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Generates coherent text up to 256K tokens using a hybrid State Space Model (SSM) and Transformer architecture that balances computational efficiency with long-range dependency modeling. The SSM components handle sequential processing with linear complexity, while Transformer layers provide attention-based refinement, enabling efficient processing of extended contexts without quadratic memory scaling typical of pure Transformer models.
Unique: Hybrid SSM-Transformer architecture achieves linear complexity in sequence length through State Space Models while maintaining Transformer attention for critical dependencies, reducing memory overhead from O(n²) to O(n) compared to pure Transformer implementations at 256K context
vs alternatives: More efficient than Claude 3.5 Sonnet (200K context) or GPT-4 Turbo (128K context) for long-context tasks due to linear SSM scaling, while maintaining competitive instruction-following quality
Executes multi-step instructions with improved grounding through fine-tuning on instruction-following datasets and factual consistency benchmarks. The model uses attention mechanisms to anchor outputs to provided context, reducing hallucinations when given explicit constraints, references, or factual anchors within the prompt.
Unique: Fine-tuned specifically for grounding outputs to provided context through instruction-following datasets, using attention mechanisms to anchor generation to source material rather than relying solely on general knowledge
vs alternatives: Improved grounding over base Jamba models and competitive with Claude 3.5 for instruction adherence, with better efficiency due to SSM architecture
Generates and understands text across multiple languages using a unified tokenizer and embedding space trained on multilingual corpora. The model applies the same SSM-Transformer architecture across language pairs without language-specific routing, enabling code-switching and cross-lingual reasoning within single responses.
Unique: Unified multilingual architecture without language-specific routing or switching overhead, enabling seamless code-switching and cross-lingual reasoning within single generation passes
vs alternatives: More efficient than language-specific model selection approaches used by some competitors, with comparable multilingual quality to GPT-4 but with better inference efficiency
Achieves lower inference latency and reduced computational overhead through the SSM-Transformer hybrid architecture, which replaces quadratic attention complexity with linear SSM processing for most sequence positions. This enables faster token generation and lower memory consumption during inference compared to pure Transformer models of similar capability.
Unique: Linear-complexity SSM components reduce per-token latency from O(n) to O(1) amortized cost for most sequence positions, while Transformer layers provide O(n) attention only where needed, resulting in 20-40% latency reduction vs pure Transformer models
vs alternatives: Faster inference than GPT-4 Turbo and Claude 3.5 Sonnet due to linear SSM scaling, with comparable quality and better cost-efficiency per token
Generates structured outputs (JSON, XML, code) that conform to provided schemas through constrained decoding and fine-tuning on structured generation tasks. The model uses attention mechanisms to track schema constraints during generation, ensuring outputs match specified formats without post-processing validation.
Unique: Fine-tuned for structured generation with implicit schema tracking through attention mechanisms, enabling reliable JSON/XML output without explicit schema parameters or post-processing
vs alternatives: Comparable to Claude 3.5's structured output capability but with better latency due to SSM architecture; less formal than OpenAI's JSON mode but more flexible for custom schemas
Understands and generates code across multiple programming languages using a tokenizer optimized for code syntax and a training corpus including public code repositories. The model applies the same SSM-Transformer architecture to code as natural language, enabling code completion, refactoring, and explanation without language-specific routing.
Unique: Code-optimized tokenizer and training corpus enable efficient code understanding without language-specific routing, with SSM architecture providing linear-complexity processing for long code files
vs alternatives: Comparable code quality to GitHub Copilot and Claude 3.5 for generation, with better latency for long files due to SSM architecture; less specialized than Codex but more efficient
Maintains coherent multi-turn conversations by leveraging the 256K context window to preserve full conversation history without summarization or truncation. The SSM-Transformer architecture efficiently processes extended conversation history, enabling the model to reference earlier turns and maintain consistent personality and context across hundreds of exchanges.
Unique: 256K context window enables full conversation history preservation without summarization, with SSM architecture providing linear-complexity processing of extended history
vs alternatives: Better context preservation than models with smaller context windows (GPT-4 Turbo at 128K), with more efficient processing than pure Transformer models due to SSM architecture
Performs semantic reasoning and understanding tasks through transformer attention layers that model long-range semantic dependencies, combined with SSM components for efficient sequential processing. The model applies multi-head attention to capture multiple semantic relationships simultaneously, enabling complex reasoning about meaning, intent, and logical relationships.
Unique: Hybrid SSM-Transformer architecture enables efficient semantic reasoning by using Transformer attention for semantic dependencies while SSM components handle sequential context, reducing computational overhead vs pure Transformer models
vs alternatives: Comparable semantic reasoning to GPT-4 and Claude 3.5, with better efficiency and lower latency due to SSM architecture
+1 more capabilities
GLM-5.1 executes multi-step coding tasks over extended timeframes without requiring human intervention between steps, using an internal planning mechanism that decomposes complex objectives into sub-tasks and maintains execution state across sequential operations. Unlike minute-level interaction models that require prompting after each step, this capability enables the model to autonomously navigate decision trees, handle errors, and adapt strategy based on intermediate results without context resets.
Unique: Designed specifically for minute+ autonomous execution windows rather than single-turn interactions; maintains internal execution state and decision-making across extended task horizons without requiring external orchestration or re-prompting between steps
vs alternatives: Outperforms GPT-4 and Claude for long-horizon coding tasks because it's architected for continuous autonomous operation rather than stateless request-response cycles
GLM-5.1 generates and refactors code with awareness of the full codebase structure, dependencies, and patterns, using semantic understanding of how changes in one file propagate to others. The model analyzes import graphs, function signatures, and usage patterns across files to ensure generated code maintains consistency and doesn't introduce breaking changes, rather than treating each file in isolation.
Unique: Maintains semantic awareness of codebase structure and cross-file dependencies during generation, enabling it to make coordinated changes across multiple files rather than treating each file independently
vs alternatives: Produces more consistent multi-file refactorings than Copilot or Claude because it reasons about the entire codebase context simultaneously rather than file-by-file
Z.ai: GLM 5.1 scores higher at 24/100 vs AI21: Jamba Large 1.7 at 23/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
GLM-5.1 diagnoses errors and bugs by analyzing error messages, stack traces, and code context to identify root causes and suggest fixes. The model correlates error symptoms with likely causes, explains why errors occur, and provides specific debugging steps or code fixes.
Unique: Diagnoses errors by correlating symptoms with root causes using semantic understanding of code and error patterns, providing explanations and fixes rather than just pattern matching
vs alternatives: More effective at diagnosing subtle bugs than search-based solutions because it reasons about code semantics and error causality
GLM-5.1 identifies performance bottlenecks in code and suggests optimizations with specific implementation guidance, analyzing algorithms, data structures, and resource usage to recommend improvements. The model understands performance implications of different approaches and can suggest algorithmic or architectural changes to improve efficiency.
Unique: Suggests optimizations based on algorithmic and architectural analysis rather than just code-level tweaks, understanding performance implications of different approaches
vs alternatives: Provides more meaningful performance guidance than generic LLMs because it understands algorithm complexity and can suggest structural improvements
GLM-5.1 analyzes code for security vulnerabilities including injection attacks, authentication/authorization issues, cryptographic weaknesses, and data exposure risks, providing specific remediation guidance. The model understands common vulnerability patterns and security best practices to identify risks and suggest secure implementations.
Unique: Identifies security vulnerabilities through semantic analysis of code patterns and provides remediation guidance based on security best practices, not just pattern matching against known CVEs
vs alternatives: More effective at finding context-specific security issues than SAST tools because it understands code intent and can suggest secure implementations
GLM-5.1 performs step-by-step reasoning about code behavior by internally simulating or tracing execution paths, allowing it to predict runtime behavior, identify bugs, and explain code logic without requiring actual execution. This capability uses chain-of-thought-like reasoning applied specifically to code semantics, tracking variable state, control flow, and function call sequences to reason about correctness.
Unique: Applies extended reasoning specifically to code semantics and execution paths, enabling it to predict runtime behavior and identify subtle bugs through symbolic execution simulation rather than pattern matching
vs alternatives: More effective at finding subtle logic bugs than GPT-4 because it explicitly traces execution state rather than relying on pattern recognition
GLM-5.1 maintains rich context across multiple conversation turns when working on code, remembering previous edits, design decisions, and constraints without requiring users to re-specify them. The model builds an internal model of the codebase state and user intent that persists across turns, enabling iterative refinement where each turn builds on previous work rather than starting fresh.
Unique: Maintains stateful context across turns specifically optimized for code collaboration, remembering design decisions and codebase state without explicit memory structures
vs alternatives: Provides better iterative code refinement than stateless models because it retains context about previous edits and design intent across turns
GLM-5.1 translates natural language specifications into code that preserves semantic intent, handling ambiguous or underspecified requirements by inferring reasonable implementations based on context and common patterns. The model uses semantic understanding of both natural language and code to bridge the gap between high-level intent and low-level implementation details.
Unique: Translates natural language to code with explicit semantic fidelity checking, inferring reasonable implementations for underspecified requirements rather than producing literal or incomplete code
vs alternatives: Handles ambiguous requirements better than Copilot because it uses semantic reasoning to infer intent rather than pattern matching against training data
+5 more capabilities